Stalin or Hitler?
>strawpoll.me
you voted stalin ofcourse lol
it's 2 voters 50/50 now :p
>pick between two atheists
no
>turned his country into a superpower
VS
>burned through his countries resources, devastated a continent, and shot himself in his bunker
Saint Stalin
>strawpoll.me
Obviously hitler but stalin iz not bad since he practiced some nazbol ideas
>turned his country into a superpower
True, but he made his people hungry too.
...
Collectivization is a failure, but no one is perfect.
Memes aside, I'm not really a fan of Stalin, but in absolute terms he was a great leader. Unlike Hitler whose only influence in the end was negative, and who lost.
Fact: Stalin caught smallpox from sucking the farts out of other mens assholes daily
...
>his people
?????
Stalin didnt share ancestors with rus
>picking stalin
top kek
You're making me choose between dog shit and horse shit, but to achieve things with an ethnostate sounds more feasible than to try to create "a new man".
My vote goes for Hitler, because his methods were more simple.
>Siitoin
The 4 faggy cunts that voted Stalin are literal /leftypol/ mongrels who can't stop coming here despite how much they complain about Sup Forums and talking about how great their dead community is.
Stalin
Stalin turned Russia from a peasant shithole into one of the 2 biggest superpowers in the world.
Hitler fucked over Germany, and ruined white nationalism forever.
>turned his country into a superpower
lend/lease, hunger and picrelated instead of hard work with a longterm plan
i can do the same
Hitler was a good leader
>hitler is winning
wtf is wrong with you guys?
Death is a preferable option to communism
...
Well it was an easy choice
>Started the space and technological age, went to war with the world and nearly won
vs
>Stunted the Russian population genociding subhuman slavs and getting owned by Nazis so hard they would never recover