Pai Is Our Gai

So I realize some people may have trouble coming to terms with this, but Ajit Pai will be ending Net Neutrality next month, come hell or high water. I originally was devastated by this news but then I thought about something:
>Ajit Pai is a Republican, appointed by Trump
>Trump is anti-NN because it unfairly benefits liberals and their propaganda outlets
>Sometime when Trump got inaugurated, he must have met with Pai about how to get the FCC to legally rid the internet of liberal platforms
>Repealing NN was the best way
>Pai has enough influence to sway ISP's away from censoring conservative outlets and instead focus on liberal ones

Pai has been /ourgai/ from the start, and anyone who disagrees with his agenda is not thinking of the benefits. We will have efficiently won the culture war, because with no liberal propaganda, normies can no longer be indoctrinated, and with conservative outlets being the only ones not throttled, they will begin to open their eyes to what's really transpiring in the world. We're at the precipise of victory, just let Pai do what Pai does, and we will finally win the culture war for good.

Other urls found in this thread:

unv.is/theverge.com/2017/5/4/15539934/spacex-satellite-internet-launch-2019
youtube.com/watch?v=JNruoBxvk2A
youtube.com/watch?time_continue=111&v=GEx_d0SjvS0
gizmodo.com/5466492/verizon-has-blocked-access-to-Sup
cnet.com/news/at-t-said-to-block-Sup
gizmodo
unvis.it/gizmodo.com/5466492/verizon-has-blocked-access-to-Sup
netequalizernews.com/2011/02/08/what-is-deep-packet-inspection-and-why-the-controversy/
washingtonexaminer.com/soros-ford-foundation-shovel-196-million-to-net-neutrality-groups-staff-to-white-house/article/2560702
strawpoll.me/14454142/r
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>trump did it so it's a good thing!
>libtards XD

>net neutrality is a bad thing

Seriously, who gives a fuck. It's not like it's going to affect any of us anyway. The leftists and rabbits are Larping like crazy, this is what happens when you have a zero problems in your life's. Shut the fuck up already

Increased amount of traffic because of streaming services requires building physical infrastructure - which is expensive. - What do ?
(1) Oversell the available bandwidth. (2) Use Anti-NN to prioritize services which pay money and throttle non-paying services. - Manufacture scarcity (3) ... (4) Profit
Positive sideeffect: kill encryption.

Pai is just a poo-in-loo lawyer figure. He has the same dodgy bullshit double-speak every lawyer does. A useful idiot.

Current Net Neutrality, however, is bullshit socialism and needs removed. That's all that matters.

As far as companies and their oligopolies, federal government needs to stop giving them subsidies and break them up.

Corporate socialism is killing free market.

This!

Reminder that all the people who want to get rid of NN are kikes and ISP shills feeding on "libtarads" niggers

>Current Net Neutrality, however, is bullshit socialism and needs removed

enjoy having Sup Forums put on a blacklist by Verizon because its too costly to include in their "social media plan", you dirty kike

I wish I could craft bait this good

ATT already blocks me from posting to Sup Forums so...what do you mean exactly?

don't tread on me.

The property owner has the right to step on people who voluntarily lie down.
It is very important to allow this freedom.

reddit is losing their shit over this. its like post election all over again. easy to troll

It's fun to troll over this, but this is one of those issues that could change trolling as we know it.

the left will be happy once they realice corps are in "their" side
all major isps support lgtq for example
they have censored Sup Forums in the past

in months/years pol (if it still exist) is going to be the one with regret

I'm with Pai. Isp's haven't given me a reason to piss me off yet, but Google, Facebook and Twitter or the biggest backers of NN have.

I don't really care either way. I'm at da max ya

...

wait ... what?
explain
is NN already kill?
how you post here?

Within a year Sup Forums will deny ever liking Ajit
Screencap this

>Threads saying this guy is a faggot and net neutrality is good get DELETED
>Thread saying this guy is good and ending net neutrality is good get left

what the FUCK did the mods mean by this?

>giving the feds more power to fight imaginary problems is a good thing

prepare your anus netflix

mods are reddit, meme flag

what kind of connection is this?

Uh, what ISP has censored Sup Forums in the past? Legit curious. ISP around my parts is pretty much uncapped everything for $40. I didn't post or browse Sup Forums for about a ten year gap so ultimately I'm not going to miss it that much. Just go back to playing Chess during downtime at work I guess.

This anti-net neutrality push looks concentrated..but it makes sense if you understand the BIG picture. I was wondering why a bunch of "Should we ban porn?!?" threads were popping up days prior to this.
All the comments were akin to "Yes, I'd give up my rights due to my lack of self control."
Well now things are starting to make sense.

unv.is/theverge.com/2017/5/4/15539934/spacex-satellite-internet-launch-2019

EVERYONE, WATCH THIS AND ASK QUESTIONS. [YouTube] AMERICA TAKES THE MARK OF THE BEAST AFTER BEING WARNED JULY 2017! (embed)

They'll tempt you with the blazing fast "5g" bandwidths in these ISP packages, cell towers are going to be built all over the country due to the 400GHz bands, but thier end goal is clear. DONT BE A FOOL.

If removing NN is supposed to increase competition and choice, why the fuck are the existing Oligopoly of ISPs supporting it?

They'll just solidify their regional monopolies.

>government crests monopolies on internet cabal service
>now we need the government to make it fair

Yes that’ll work

5g = slaughterbots right? I'm not clicking that link or typing all that shit in YouTube.

>why the fuck are the existing Oligopoly of ISPs supporting it?
Because they want to charge facebook google and netflix more money

You think this is about muh free speech. Start saving those neetbux for your future internet service.

youtube.com/watch?v=JNruoBxvk2A

youtube.com/watch?time_continue=111&v=GEx_d0SjvS0

of course corporations will not like socialist policies, doesn't mean socialist policies are the best solution

Why were all the net neutrality threads purged?

...

thanks doc

Most discussions seem to be regarding money and who pays what. What is often overlooked is that throttling and blocking infrastructure can be used to block strong encryption. Meaning this is also a privacy issue. ISPs are interested in mining traffic/packets and sell their insight. However stronger encryption restricts these abilities. So with no NN they are able to block strong encrypted traffic (which they can't inspect deeply) and allow only weak encryption (which they are able to read).

Because of this:

gizmodo.com/5466492/verizon-has-blocked-access-to-Sup Forums-but-what-are-they-gonna-do-about-it
cnet.com/news/at-t-said-to-block-Sup Forums-pranksters-fight-back/

Here's the archive

>gizmodo com/5466492/verizon-has-blocked-access-to-Sup Forums-but-what-are-they-gonna-do-about-it
unvis.it/gizmodo.com/5466492/verizon-has-blocked-access-to-Sup Forums-but-what-are-they-gonna-do-about-it

And why they are anti-NN ?
Russians try to infiltrate our internet freedom. Case and point.

Kremlin is working hard

this.

I would love that, Sup Forumstards deserve being the first ones purged from the internet.

Kill yourself

Libtards enjoy drinking H2O and breathing O2 as well.
Are you going to stop those as well? Retarded.

I'm not on some The Rapture level shit, but I'm still not getting this if I can't hook it up to a USB to put all kinds of mirrors/shields on it... So never.

Who cares if a bunch of NEET virgins like you get affected? Get fucked you piece of shit. Net neutrality is socialism. A company doing important work to society shouldn't have equal access to a virgin sitting down in his mum's basement watching internet porn.

>Net neutrality is socialism
netequalizernews.com/2011/02/08/what-is-deep-packet-inspection-and-why-the-controversy/

>I want the liberal media to dictate what websites I can or can't visit

stop sucking that soros dick

The plan you've outlined is absurd.
Any tool that can currently be used against liberals will eventually be used by the left against conservatives.

Strawman argument.
Privatisation is not for everything just like government is not either.
No such thing as a one part fits all.

Thx, companies I don't and would never use. Well I take that back, I have AT&T home phone (Used to be South Bell Graham) since 1951.

>too costly
>an imageboard
>a fucking imageboard

You honestly understand nothing, big streaming sites like youtube and Netflix will suffer and rightly so, they pay hardly anything in taxation anyway. Sup Forums will be fine just like leddit and the other sites you no doubt visit.

This is really weird I've been posting for the last 3 hours, I posted a Net Neutrality thread and got banned,

posted in a net neutrality thread and got banned again , then all the net neutrality threads were removed except 2 that both speak positively of Pai and chocked full of weird reddit memey posts supporting him

I guess they banned all the pro net neutrality people and deleted their threads.

Your IP is blocked on Sup Forums's end, not ATT's.

Holy fuck you are dumb. Enjoy getting fucked by the corporate jews.

When NN dies the kikes will no longer be able to force the ISPs to peddle smut. Trump is trying to end the plague of cuck and nigger porn, this is why the Jews are flipping out.

Nope netequalizernews.com/2011/02/08/what-is-deep-packet-inspection-and-why-the-controversy/

...

YOU FUCKING RETARDED BRAINLET THIS IS AN RESTRICTION OF THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH! YOU THINK THIS IS GONNA HELP???
WE ARE LIVING IN THE INFORMATION AGE MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE GETTING WOKE AND YOU THINK ENDING NET NEUTRALITY IS GONNA HELP???
OPEN UP YOUR FUCKING EYES!

Gayyy

I don't think Trump understands net neutrality

>providers are all liberal as shit
>they will have full control to do as they please with Internet service
>pai isn't serving liberal interests

what the fuck

Yes the perfect way to make him more likable is it make him look like he's a zombie from Dawn of The Dead.

...

Lets see what Soros has to say

"Soros, Ford Foundation shovel $196 million to 'net neutrality' groups, staff to White House"

washingtonexaminer.com/soros-ford-foundation-shovel-196-million-to-net-neutrality-groups-staff-to-white-house/article/2560702

Please, check the poll. It's important. strawpoll.me/14454142/r

The reddit meltdown is gonna be glorious

spotted the jew.

net neutrality is a tough call. on the one hand, it is bad that internet providers can pick and choose who gets faster service, because in most places, there is no real competition, if you don't like your provider you are shit out of luck. On the other hand, the liberals and democrats are behind "net neutrality" because they want to use it to censor internet content. seems like we are fucked either way. So, knowing that anything democrats want, has to in some way have the end result of increasing third world immigration and making everyone gay, I guess I would have to side with the republicans, even though I am pretty sure they are trying to screw me also.

>implying reddit will be blocked and not Sup Forums
God I wish Sup Forums wasn't full of shills and idiots who think this administration can never do wrong.

The pajeet worked for an ISP for christ's sake.

Even better once Sup Forums goes to shit and we migrate. Just like AT&T did in the past.
You ignorant faggots.

How are they using net neutrality to censor internet content? I've seen this arguement a lot, and no one has ever provided an explanation or a source. ISPs will be able to block internet content without NN

Anyone who doesn't support Net Neutrality is a SHILL.

fucking this.
If Liberals get back in the office (they will eventually) this shit is never going away and Sup Forums is definitely getting the axe

I really haven't ever had a good explanation either. I am just basing it on the logic: The Obama administration wanted it therefore it must have the end result of stopping dissent against multiculturalism and LBGTQ or else, Obama would not have been for it

Things are heading towards war, the libshits are going to be culled before they can fuck the country up again

since the internet providers would be "common carriers", under net neutrality then perhaps the government and (((powers that be))) would be able to stifle dissent and encourage conformity of opinion through broadcast regulations like they used to do with the television networks. maybe it would have the ultimate effect of condensing all content to four or five networks that could be more easily controlled. I don;t know, but if Obama wanted it, 95% it is bad.

Wow, the pai in loo shills are out in force today

I've been noticing this as well. Let me put it this way: the isp monopoly I work for is hype af for net neutrality to end.

Saw this too. I even got banned for posting a thread about net neutrality that was neutral. I'm not sure what's happening here.

been noticing this too

It depends on whether the government believes the internet is defined by the first amendment, or if they assume it is a subsidized and governmental instrument similar to administration offices.
If it's the latter, anything that isn't considered as a role model for society will be hit hard.

Who could be behind this?

Probably the sticky on "stop fucking making 100 threads about the same topic"

No these positive threads toward pajeet were created after the purge.

After the discussions were deleted people naturally made new threads and then they were all deleted

MONOPOLIES NEED TO BE REGULATED! MONOPOLIES WITH EXTREME EXCLUSIVE POWER ARE NOT FREE MARKET AND ARE WORSE EVEN THAN BIG GOVERNMENT!

Net neutrality is good and this guy is a faggot

So we go to someone else who offers what we want at a cheaper price to undercut Verizon.

This is also known as Free Market, which any entry-level Economics class would have told you.

Nice try tho, Shillary.

Trump is Anti-NN then so am I

yeah try competing with comcast or verizon, they are monopolies and are actually trying to get local isps banned you're fooling yourself

I see! You make a good point, user. Pai's our goy. Make sure to tell your rea and get them on board!

hes just too busy keeping us safe and I think he just delegated this ussue to this Aji motherfucker. In order to be fair we need to acknowledge our flaws. killing Net neutraliyi is wrong

All I know is that in 2013/14 I used to be able to find plenty of dissenting, varied, and random shit browsing the internet. I went to prison for two years and got out in 2017. without severely focusing my efforts, I can barely find non-shill shit or echo chamber liberalism on plenty of platforms. If I search in the other direction it's pure conspiracy level/racist garbage. No in between.

Now this may be merely the change of climate in the population of the US during that time, but one of the primary reasons I came back to Sup Forums after 10+ years a few weeks ago was in an attempt to see stuff without filter either way. The absolute state of the internet is depressing desu

Regardless, it this causes a mass emmigration from Sup Forums or allows less polarization I'm for it either way.

If not I'm pretty much done with internet completely.

Made a neutral thread about NN earlier and it was deleted. Sup Forums is literally just a circle jerk of soyboys

I did too and got banned.

I kind of want to see net neutrality ended. It's easier to fight against it when we have the major corporations that will be affected by it actually affected by it.

We can read it in some archive?

>Having to move states to even have a chance at getting a new isp

Obama sold our internet to the fucking EU in 2016. That has nothing to do with NN I promise you. You had NN before prison, it just was not called that because it wasn't threatened until 2015.

This. There was actual ability to call shit about before net neutrality. Everything is behind this faux safety when in actuality EVERYTHING these companies is more pervasive and intrusive since NN introduction.

Following destruction of NN needs to be anti trust suits against Google etc.