PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP
whitehouse.gov
donaldjtrump.com
>b-but Trump hasnt done anything!
pastebin.com
pastebin.com
PREV APPEARANCES/LINKS
pastebin.com
DAILY SCHEDULE (WH Press Corps) publicpool.kinja.com
TrumpTV Weekly Updates: pastebin.com
NEWTRUMP NIGHTLY NEWS pastebin.com
NEW APPEARANCES
>Pres Trump pardons Drumstick w/Barron&Tiffany 11/21/17
youtu.be
>Introducing Wishbone & Drumstick, official TotUS 11/20/17
youtu.be
>Pres Trump meets w/Cabinet, declares noko terror state 11/20/17
youtu.be
>FLotUS Melania receives WH Christmas Tree 11/20/17
youtu.be
>SoS T-Rex meets w/Colombia FM 11/20/17
youtu.be
>SoS T-Rex meets w/Qatari FM 11/20/17
youtu.be
>Qatari FM presser 11/20/17
youtu.be
>UN Amb Haley speech on Sudan 11/20/17
youtu.be
>WH Thanksgiving Press Brief (Sarah, SoS T-Rex) 11/20/17
youtu.be
>TrumpTV Weekly Update #17 (Lara) 11/17/17
youtu.be
>WH Video: Pres Trump congratulates NCAA champs 11/17/17
youtu.be
>Pres Trump welcomes NCAA champ teams to WH 11/17/17
youtu.be
>WH Press Brief (Sarah, Chair Econ Adv Hassett) 11/17/17
youtu.be
>SecDef C.H.A.O.S. Mattis @Peterson AFB 11/17/17
youtu.be
>AG Sessions @Federalist Society Lawyers Conv 11/17/17
youtu.be
>SoS T-Rex @Ministerial in Africa 11/17/17
youtu.be
>SoS T-Rex family pic with AU leaders 11/17/17
youtu.be
>UN Amb Haley @UNSC against Russia 11/17/17
youtu.be
>StateDep Press Brief (Heather) 11/17/17
youtu.be
OP pastebin: pastebin.com
prev
/ptg/ PRESIDENT TRUMP GENERAL - BUILDING AGAIN EDITION
Other urls found in this thread:
fclj.org
realclearpolicy.com
en.wikipedia.org
netequalizernews.com
twitter.com
MAGA
So if Alabama decides to reinstitute slavery, it would be okay as long as they had a plurality of votes? It wouldn’t be a violation of the 13th Amendment?
hey /ptg/fags
your drumpfy is a pedo
HAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHA
>primaries were two years ago
Code Pink supports NN, why don't you?
Damn, Lavar Ball is one dumb nigger
Fuck it, I'm doing it.
...
powerful
Best argument I've heard in 6 fucking threads.
Still on the fence though.
Ok.
It needs to die.
wow, this really makes me think.
...
AMERICAN MINDS ARE DESTINED TO BE GREAT!
>150388624
wtf i'm /withher/ now
t. 40% of all usage
Trump is getting his son's suit jackets cut oversized like he does.
Looks weird on anyone but Trump desu
NOOOO
HOW ELSE WILL I JEW ON YOU?!
> watching any TV period
NO DONT DO IT
>huge multinational corporation
>defending Net Neutrality
Leftists are going to start attacking NN now, right? Corporations are evil.
How was the turkey pardoning today, /ptg/?
Worth watching?
>we oppose our gibs being taken away
Honestly no, and I'll watch most Trump-related shit.
You're asking if states rights supersedes the constitutional amendments? Do you have to votes to amend the constitution user :^)
Too late. He's mine.
Yes
Is net neutrality finally gone? We can go back to a time before 2012 when everything was the same as now?
Corporations are the moral conscience of America
Oh you'll get pulled over here too, but there's a lot of empty ass highway and cops can't patrol every inch of it every minute of the day
>*Tsundere noises*
Fun, light, without incident or habbening. Cute. Should be in the OP by morning.
Now its because they support it. Before it was because dismantling it was one step closer to breaking up the cartelization of ISPs
>Google loosing shit because they might have to pay more for hogging the bandwidth.
>ISPs loosing their shit because they might be open to antitrust laws again
Net Neutrality must support their business model somehow.
I don't understand it, however.
Saltmine status: OPEN
WTF mother nature is a racist now?
So to recap (updated from last thread):
>FCC good for licensing, bad for content regulating
>FTC taking over, good for monopoly-breaking
>FTC in charge of splitting content providers from service providers
>DoJ anti-trust head already in place and blocking mergers of this nature
>ISPs want to charge content providers more for using most bandwidth
>Content providers want ISPs to eat the costs
>It will end up on your bill if you use the services, but not if you don't (with NN repealed)
>Removing NN, along with monopoly-breaking, makes it easier for new ISPs to form
>NN gives more power to censor-happy leftists (Google, Netflix, etc.)
>Biggest hurdle to ISP competition is local regulations and red-tape. FIX IT LOCALLY!
>If no company will provide locally, form a town/municipal co-op
>If no money to form co-op check for/apply for grants (public or private)
Recommended reading:
fclj.org
realclearpolicy.com
Still need real rundown
All I know is that a few jews will make some shekels
Shit like this make me highly suspect that "net neutrality" is neutral in name only.
>"Donald Trump is just like my dad. He never pays attention to me."
This Cuomo/Ball interview is fucking hilarious
Regarding net neutrality..
What you're told happening:
>Support NN or your favorite websites will be destroyed.
>Internet providers have created a monopoly through the use of government regulations pushing everyone else out. So the way to fix this problem is more regulations.
>Capitalism is evil.
>Corporations are evil unless they're on our side.
What is actually happening:
>net neutrality gives the FCC more power. Power that can be controlled through regulatory capture. facebook, google, and amazon all have picks lined up for who should head the new FCC internet neutrality police chief.
>The FTC can regulate just as well on the basis of competition. The only advantage to regulating the Internet under FCC is for policing CONTENT.
>FTC has a mandate to not to tamper with the content unlike FCC (LOOK AT WHAT IT HAS DONE TELEVISION AND RADIO)
it doesnt even matter. Trump wont back off this no matter how much they piss an moan.
Forgot image
Structurally, the U.S constitution is supreme. Slavery is forbidden by the U.S constitution, and therefore will never be allowed by both federal, state, local, and territorial government.
This was the same for prohibition, the Eighteenth amendment applied to every U.S state, even those who did not ratify.
d-dont do it, we'll get in trouble posting old PBS awoos
>ISPs footing the bill means packets are free
Wew.
All this time and I STILL don't know what the fuck net neutrality is supposed to be. So much disinformation floating around about it.
This is what every celeb hopes when they bash Trump, they just aren't honest about it.
>must support their business model somehow.
It's how they get away with streaming all their content at no extra cost.
But does every Amendment matter or just the ones that liberals care about? That’s the real question conservative Americans need to ask themselves.
Obviously the 1st and 2nd Amendments are ignorable.
A good rule of thumb I follow is that anything that is innocuously named typically has the opposite effect
Eddieposting will be our dankest meme
It's nothing but just hype
Remember last year or two years ago with the UN doing the same shit?
Same story
>open a restaurant
>what do you mean I have to pay for the food!?
thanks for the quick rundown
Demonte Jones villain when?
no shit. NN allows companies like netflix to get away with absorbing ludicrous amounts of bandwidth while paying minimal for it.
Netflix basically circumvented the issue with cable, which is the need to pay for airtime. They have an on demand streaming platform that ISPs have to support.
I've been doing my best to gather points from various anons throughout the threads and posting it as pasta all afternoon. See and then draw your own conclusions.
niggers are truly infuriatingly stupid.
There’s a lady who works as my office intern,
And soon she’ll be going to Heaven.
When she gets here she’ll know, if the office is closed,
We’re alone, so she’ll take off her panties.
Ooh, Ooh, and soon she’ll be going to Heaven.
There’s a bust on the desk, ‘cause I want to be sure,
Because she said that she would tell my family.
So I’ll smash in her head, and I’ll cover it up,
With a lie that she fell when she fainted.
So the old system before Obama. There was no problem with that system, so this is good.
Good or bad.
My tooth ith gone, /ptg/!
Nah, FCC just started the public comment period and the vote is in December.
nice summary user
These are great.
RIP. :(
Just like how inner city charter schools are always named Academy of Scientific Excellence and Scholarship but not one student can read or do maths.
Exactly! Thank you, user.
>everyone starting tweets with [adjective] [proper noun] now
Cute
Also
>(((SiriusXM)))
What did you do???
this dropped just in time to sink that awful plagiarized mexican movie
This is also the reason why gook moot is shitting his pants. He'll have to pay for all the bandwidth Sup Forums takes up now instead of getting by the same way as netflix. On the other hand, Sup Forums was around 6 years before net neutrality was a thing.
OK now do one to "I Think We're Alone Now!"
>All this time and I STILL don't know what the fuck net neutrality is supposed to be. So much disinformation floating around about it.
The left is shilling the hell out of keeping it. That mostly tells you what you need to know.
Ultimately, it's about more government control over the Internet.
God I would love for this to be a thing one day
So more freedom?
Why does Trump want to end the internet? I kind of like the internet...
...
The underlying problem is that artificially low speed limits that are rarely enforced fosters a cultural acceptance of speeding.
Speed limits that are realistic but strictly enforced are one of the few things I will admit Europe is right about.
The basic gestalt is that “Net Nuetrality” is corporatism cloaked in liberalism. Large companies like Netflix who take up large amounts of bandwidth don’t want to be charged for it (and neither do their customers).
The leftist are being sold the idea of “free internet” (like everything else with them) because internet is a “human right”. It’s just more socialism.
Jesus, you don’t even read it do you?
> Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S. ___ (2014), is a landmark decision in United States corporate law by the United States Supreme Court allowing closely held for-profit corporations to be exempt from a regulation its owners religiously object to, if there is a less restrictive means of furthering the law's interest, according to the provisions of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).
Here is the ruling
> As applied to closely held for-profit corporations, the Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations imposing the contraceptive mandate violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). HHS's contraceptive mandate substantially burdens the exercise of religion under the RFRA. The Court assumes that guaranteeing cost-free access to the four challenged contraceptive methods is a compelling governmental interest, but the Government has failed to show that the mandate is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest.
This decision only applies to regulations and those who have a least restrictive path to be applied. It also leans on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act [1] which, as we have been through before, was ruled as ***not applying to states*** in our previous interaction.
Admit it! It doesn’t aplly to states. Be a man and admit being wrong, stop being a Jew.
[1] en.wikipedia.org
> Massachusetts just violated the first amendment
I believe you, as a Massachusetts resident and company owner, could mount a case and take it all the way to the Supreme Court and likely win. The state is still not breaking federal law and specially not the ones you mention.
I don’t doubt for a second that a complainant would win the case but that makes it a matter of a state resident taking the state legislature to court for violating their constitutional rights, not a state breaking federal law and getting away with it. ADMIT IT
>The only advantage to regulating the Internet under FCC is for policing CONTENT
You 1-post-by-this-ID guy got this inverted. NN is about prevention of policing content netequalizernews.com
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
>tfw s-senpai doesn't notice you
Stop drinking soda.
if you have a Netflix subscription, it might cost you slightly more each month to watch.
NN rules and Title 2 actually pased because Reddit and Google convinced people that "Netflix rates would go up without it" because AT&T was threatening to charge Netflix for the amount of traffic that they use.
Its understandable why he would be worried about it. However, and I say this with a heavy heart. If it requires taking a blow and possibly sinking this ship, its worth it to take out the likes of Google, Amazon, Netflix, Youtube etc etc.
Hopefully we can pull through though. I love you guys.
>taking control away from something that might censor to give it to an industry that has proven it will censor
Makes sense.
The interwebs turned me into a lolicon
So in ok with it going away.
You're really going for the fatigue run, let me propose a counter point, is a state allowed to repeal it's own rights should the majority agree upon it at a state level? The answer is yes, however should a person who disagrees with that state majority bring this fact to an appellate court or supreme court, the constitutional amendment stands above state laws and that's the issue. I know what you're arguing and that's for the enforcement of laws but if you think loopholes such as sanctuary cities which by definition is illegal to immigration law is legal at a state level, requires the repeal of the state law and the enforcement of the federal and presidential powers. Anything else?
Yes and the 1st Amendment ensures religious freedom. Sorry, but it seems as though non-Americans can literally not understand what my point is.
NO!
> He'll have to pay for all the bandwidth Sup Forums takes up now instead of getting by the same way as netflix
Sup Forums already pays for all the bandwidth user, do you think it’s hosted for free?
Why do you think the “real gookmoot hours” hit every day? He turns off the expensive servers to save shekels
>"ooga booga drumpf literally looks like an orange lmao"
>what the fuck is this nigger shit, i bet 12yo like this
>DRRRRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUMPF dont ingnore me pleaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaase :'(
What movie did it plagiarize?
>if you have a Netflix subscription, it might cost you slightly more each month to watch
I only watch Bojack, so...
Eh?
>
NN rules and Title 2 actually pased because Reddit and Google convinced people that "Netflix rates would go up without it" because AT&T was threatening to charge Netflix for the amount of traffic that they use.
Oh, those fags?
Also I keep passing 30 Captchas
> actually shilling for Anti-net neutrality and corporate monopolies
Does no one remember SOPA and PIPA?