So much for States' Rights

So much for States' Rights

Trump sold us out

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/IVYtw
forbes.com/sites/haroldfurchtgottroth/2017/01/22/president-trump-designates-ajit-pai-as-chairman-of-fcc/#b8238761577a
usnews.com/news/technology/articles/2017-10-02/us-senate-confirms-fcc-chairman-to-new-five-year-term
twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/532608358508167168
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Not trump, this was a plan put in place back during the obama days.

Trump's FCC is the one who ordered this, not Obama's

Trump could put the breaks on this at any time.

I don't give a fuck if normies can't access Fakebook, Twatter, or any shit like that. Hopefully those Instagram/Twitch thots and YouTube faggots have to find real jobs now.

Ajit Pai has been pushing this since he was appointed by Obama during Obama's second term. He has been voting against Net Neutrality formally since 2015.

Say goodbye to the dank meme dreams soyim. The train has no breaks.

Fuck this currynigger shill.

He's a Republican. Obama had his hands tied with nominating him because the Republican Senate wouldn't confirm anybody else.

everybody i hate is shilling against this shit. why should i care again?

NET NEUTRALITY is MARXISM

>breaks
And you faggots wonder why they laugh at our education.

a billionaire republigoy sold out? ALERT THE DO SOMETHINGS

It will give more power to CNN and MSNBC to shut out Fox News, Breitbart, InfoWars, Sup Forums, Drudge Report, etc

>everybody i hate is shilling against this shit. why should i care again?
Fallacy of association.
They are all breathing too. maybe you should stop.

...

>Google is paying "muh logical fallacy" autismos to shill for them

Why will nobody talk about the cold facts? What do you all even oppose / like about the bill? All i see are shills vs shills here
>How and what lead to its current implementation
>Why do Comcast and other maniacal megacorps seem to despise it more than anyone else?
>What grounds are there to trump tweet regarding it?

>"muh logical fallacy"
Not an argument, telecom shill.

Telecommunications is a federal issue. States rights have no application here.

Net Neutrality creates "even playing field". Name a time when government created "even playing field" and didn't fuck it all up

Full retard shill. How the f is net neutrality a bad thing? When did letting jews fuck you for a few more shekels become good? Gtfo

Nah, they will be fine. Those companies have the money to pay off the ISPs, but any business that is not an established internet giant will be fucked. Have a small-medium business, or even a big business that is not an internet giant? Then be prepared for your website to load in 5 minutes. This will severely affect business sales, and will hurt the economy. This effects everybody, even people that don't use the internet, because presumably they have a job at one of those companies.

states rights? lmao this has nothing to do with that.
>removing regulation infringes on the rights of the states
go ahead and pass net neutrality in your state then loser if you love monopolies so much.

>net neutrality is good because it says neutral in its name
>affordable care act is affordable two haha

Cant look beyond few$$$
Keep arguing for gov regulation of internet.

despite having a flowery name what do you think net neutrality did?

it didnt even exist until 2015

Good.

Jesus christ u right wing retards are the biggest fucking DINDUS on the planet

u can never own up to your own bullshit

>patriot act
-This is good because we're patriots...
>affordable care act
-That must mean it's afordable...
>net neutrality
-Hmm neutrality is good!

:D

>go ahead and pass net neutrality in your state then loser if you love monopolies so much.
Are you illiterate? The OP literally says the FCC is stopping states from doing that

What if its cheaper?
What if one isp sticks with its current internet plans?

Its not going to stop ipfs or the zeronet anyway
What are they gonna do ban torrenting/connecting to home ips?

I wonder if MESH networking will take off.
You can tunnel IPv4 over IPv6 over IPv4

conservashits have absolutely 0 principles. i've seen it all my life

states rights was a larp

I was under the (possibly false) impression that people would have to pay for access to certain websites similar to cable packages. That would drastically hurt people who make money off of the views they receive from being degenerates.

It didn't exist as a LAW until 2015, but was essentially in practice since the beginning of the internet as a general rule.

...

Somebody make a genuine, logical argument for why getting rid of net neutrality is a good thing. I'm interested to see what arguments are made

people don't support it because it has neutrality in the name, they support it because they are it means websites like Sup Forums can be accessed without potentially having to pay additional access fees or lose access altogether because hiroshimoot can't afford the bills without slathering ads all over the place

>incumbent
Get a dictionary obamafag

no one's buying your stupid 'neutrality in the name' meme shill

Yeah he's the incumbent. Trump made him the FCC Chairman u fucking right wing DINDU

ISP's are a monopoly with extremely high barriers to entry

not to mention the fact that they're eating each other to the point where only Comcast and Verizon will be available, everyone else will be some DSL bullshit, and most people have removed land lines from their homes

This is actually a good move by Trump. He knows young people only care about the internet and video games and he's actively getting them to be involved with politics using net neutrality as a lightning rod. He'll announce he won't repeal it since people are passionate about it to show he's a reasonable guy.

they don't have any.
I saw someone yesterday say it will lead to the adoption of new technologies. I spat my drink all over my monitor.

>What if one isp sticks with its current internet plans?
This is what I think will happen over time. There will be such a backlash (Why the fuck do I have to suddenly pay more for porn/Youtube/Sup Forums/etc?!) that people will freak out and some ISP will just decide it's more profitable to offer the "old" internet at a potentially higher price because that's what people want. If demand is high enough, there will be a supply.

George Soros is the largest financial contributor to Net Neutrality
Mods keep deleting my thread related to this.
archive.is/IVYtw

Hah. Trump doesn't have a say in this and won't say shit anyway. He'll keep his head low and let whatever happens happen because literally the only alternative is to tell Republicans and the ISPs to fuck off.

whatever.
he was a commissioner before that appointed by ya boy

Who shorted Netflix here?

>people don't support it because it has neutrality in the name
No, that's exactly why the average normie supports it.

>without potentially having to pay additional access fees or lose access altogether
Beyond Netflix because of it's enormous bandwidth usage, name one other example of this happening. Because outside of that, nothing like this has ever happened before the government decided to stick their fingers in the internet, it didn't happen during the extremely brief period the FCC's regs were in place, and as such it probably wont happen once original normalcy is restored and they're repealed.

he wasn't the FCC chairman.

Tom Wheeler was

Ajit pai is /yourpoo/

own it cuck

NN is really a fight between ISPs and bandwidth devouring streaming companies. We've only had NN for two fucking years and suddenly the internet will end without it.

How can you regulate the internet at the state level that sounds retarded and nightmarish.

so you literally want to pay shlomo more for exactly the same service you already receive? you're willing to do that?

When was the last time you heard of a new ISP forming that wasn't DSL? Google Fibre? Yeah, Google, that small upstart was able to find the funding to provide services to a select few municipalities. Bodes well for future competition eh?

yeah, because their shariablue shilling efforts will be seriously undermined or the budget for them will have to increase. soros doesn't want to have to pay more money to spam leftypol and Sup Forums

Can’t they not? Isn’t this a congressional issue since it stems from economics and business across state lines? It’ll get tied up inncoirts for years and should die in the SC as government forcing states to do something that is against the constitution.

>so you literally want to pay shlomo more for exactly the same service you already receive? you're willing to do that?
This was never happening until the government enforced NN and then added new taxes to the internet.

The doomsday scenario you claim will come about as a lack of regulation is coming about with and because of the regulation.

ajit pai wouldn't have been on anyone's radar if he didn't already serve as a commissioner
>Thanks Obama!

Why does Sup Forums need mods? There's no way to get a politically neutral moderator who won't act on bias.

...

>muh shareblue

You stupid fucks i own a small business, am I jew because I don't want my website fucked to death you stupidnniggers.

>OBAMA MADE TRUMP APPOINT THIS POO
you're retarded or a shill

I havent heard any good arguments from your camp. Plz coprorate shill tell me why net neut is a bad thing?

>OBAMA MADE TRUMP APPOINT THIS POO
you're retarded or a shill or both

See
It's 2 years old, and censorship has already quadrupled.

TRUMP DINDU NUFFIN!!

President Trump Designates Ajit Pai As Chairman Of FCC
forbes.com/sites/haroldfurchtgottroth/2017/01/22/president-trump-designates-ajit-pai-as-chairman-of-fcc/#b8238761577a

>b-but the Democrats!

>Pai won confirmation by 52-41 over objections from Democrats, who criticized him for moving to deregulate U.S. telecommunications rules.

usnews.com/news/technology/articles/2017-10-02/us-senate-confirms-fcc-chairman-to-new-five-year-term

u filthy right wing degenerates are the biggest dindus on the planet

even u know it to be true

Ajit Pai is the poo in my loo.

What does this mean? There is nothing wrong with the internet now? why vote for anything

>going against net neutrality
>posting on fucking Sup Forums, the website that is going to be banned first (not Netflix and not YouTube because of a backlash it will create)
heh

The way they implement is actually irrelevant. The ISPs will give higher bandwidth to internet giants like facebook, twitter, etc. in detriment to other businesses. Either by people paying them, or the internet giants paying them. In both cases, non internet giants will get fucked. Because a) you don't have the money to pay the ISPs off, or b) you will never get your business in a package, since your not important enough.

Let's say you start a successful business, put up a website, and people like what your company is offering, and come to your website in high numbers. The ISPs will begin to throttle your website speed in order to give priority to titty streamers on twitch, customers will dissatisfied, and you will lose your one chance to make it big.
This will severely damage the economy.

Another problem is that it's not good enough to pay off you ISP, because you need to pay off all ISPs that exist, otherwise all the users connected to an ISP that you didn't pay off, will have slow access to your website.

There wasn't anything wrong with it 2 years ago either.

Obama implemented it and Soros financially supports it.

you know the different between accessing the internet and using a platform on the internet, right?

>Trump sold us out

lolno. This is literally what you retards voted for.

There has never been an internet without NN. That it's some new Obama policy is FAKE NEWS, he simply formalized what had always existed.

Whats bad about the new/obama net neut?

Not even joking or shit talking, Trump wouldn't be able to grasp what the fuck NN is, how ISP's work or even what the FCC is. If he even understood 1% of what the fuck is going down he'd against it since it'll kill right wing movements online. Alas he's too fucking retarded.

Yes I'm sure that's why Google so fervently backs it.

exactly this

because they wanted to fuck the people in the ass
they were like, screw this shit, why should we have to give people the bandwidth they pay for in their monthly bill? we need to tax these companies that are causing everyone to hit their monthly caps because we can't be fucked laying new infrastructure

the government stepped in at the last minute to protect consumers from these gluttonous corporations. Daily reminder the coaxial cable laid in the United States is there because a monopoly was in place (AT&T) and that's the only feasible business model to allow for new infrastructure to be laid.

HE'S A REPUBLICAN PUT IN PLACE BY A REPUBLICAN SENATE YOU FUCKING RETARD

What's bad about Jews as a whole?
archive.is/IVYtw

Good. Glad I voted for him. Go back to Re.ddit faggot

If I count pronounce your name I don't give a fuck about your AMERICAN political views. Sorry not sorry. Fuck off panjeet. Integrate or rope.

Can anyone post actual source to this new secondary claim?

Pretty sure its bullshit because FCC can't possibly enforce that and it won't hold up in court.

Nope.

twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/532608358508167168
>Net neutrality is the Fairness Doctrine.

Yep, and it was pushed by Joe Lieberman. His tribals own all 3 of America's telecom networks.

answer the question plz. i think u corporate shills know you wont win on liberal reddit so youve come to Sup Forums

Republicans are such failures in life, they can't even stand by their own policies, and they have to dindu everything they do

remember this guy?

>Trump sold us out

Fucking Sage. Hillary Shill.


Trump is only taking the goverment out of our internets, thus making the internet great again. Shadily, brethren.

His name isn't even hard to pronounce compared to most of them.

Are you trying to say that Trump didnt drain the swamp?

the government had to step in and block these corporations from going down a path that would fuck over customers and startups in favor of big companies

soros is worried about the costs of funding his e-army and getting his message out there, it's common sense that he would be against it because he funds grass roots internet campaigns

When the internet is finally broken,I can’t wait till shitty websites like this disappear. This is probably one of the better outcomes of killing net neutrality. No more Sup Forums, good riddence.

>The way they implement is actually irrelevant
I'm not even arguing your point, but you can't say the way they implement it isn't relevant and then proceed to write three paragraphs about the dangers of how you foresee them implementing it.

>implying anyone will stay with an ISP that throttles connections
>an ancap in favour of government regulation

Still waiting for someone to tell us why forfeiting net neutrality is a 'good' thing. That is all that matters. How would losing net neutrality benefit "we, the people". Let's hear it. If there's no benefit, then there's no reason to 'fix' what's not broken.

>t. liberal moron who has no idea that America is a constitutional republic, not a democracy

You poor dumb gassed commies.

While I care nothing for identity politics and would rather see bipartisan politics dismantled, I'm not going to sit here and let morons gaslight other morons.

The amount of autistic hyperbole on both sides of this argument is astounding.

The free ride is over nigger. Pay for your Netflix.