Net Neutrality

What the fuck do you have against it? The only argument I saw in favor of it is "You dont want the greedy jew (((government))) to regulate your internet" but that totally ignores that the other options are greedy jew (((companies))) doing so. Government is restricted by at least having to pretend they do something for its people while the companies dont have any.

Also "Reddit is in favor of Net Neutrality" isnt an argument against it either. Even a blind chicken finds some corn from time to time.

So I ask again: Why is getting rid of NN a good idea?

Other urls found in this thread:

mega.nz/#!N2RgmZga!4cuhfCP2moPm2EWdb3d70Vek98FXkIcKZ7d_Srpp0ts
mega.nz/#!ZngDlS5Z!xd0ICBjIZlc8C_heOzNgRov8NDMM6DC93b7jOc0_BWI
youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Communications_Inc._v._FCC_(2014)
m.youtube.com/watch?t=9s&v=le2R2Ps58p
m.youtube.com/watch?v=le2R2Ps58pQ
youtu.be/1B0u6nvcTsI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

NN is a good idea if you don't like this kind of stuff to circulate

mega.nz/#!N2RgmZga!4cuhfCP2moPm2EWdb3d70Vek98FXkIcKZ7d_Srpp0ts

mega.nz/#!ZngDlS5Z!xd0ICBjIZlc8C_heOzNgRov8NDMM6DC93b7jOc0_BWI

second link no worko

Dont be a newfag and fall for the fact that multiple paid groups are obviously pushing an agenda on Sup Forums

so instead of the jew government it will be the jew corporations regulating it
in what world is this any better?
>oh you want to visit "insert site here". better pay those shekels for access
the internet works fine the way it is now. why change it?

https:// 0 bin .net/?6c8935913c5af569#mQdax5cgOhIEU2w2mr6VCva+XITz5VGxeW9Huk6sbck=

Then take this

Putting shitty websites like social media and youtube and netflix behind paywalls will kill them, no one will pony up money monthly for Faceberg access, for example. Finally, 2 full generations of Americans will learn to go outside and mingle... Welcome to the golden age of the internet

>normies who can't walk on the street without their phones and facebook on won't pay 10$ a month to access it

lol. lol. LOL

Are these documents real?

Because no net neutrality means less burgers browsing this place and the internet in general.

And yes that is an argument against net neutrality.

Yes.

Uh, no net neutrality will affect you too, last time I checked Texas was a part of the United States

aint clicking that shit

figured as much, but i thought maybe i can get some info. there is always the chance i am misinformed. however yeah, the anti NN stuff seems rather jewy

what about putting websites with critical information outside the (((approved))) spectrum of things? imagine having to pay extra everytime you want to see a source outside the MSM. It is basically censorship you have to pay extra to avoid which most people wont bother with resulting in them being able to be completly duped by (((them))) since they will never see any oppinion, view or information out of what (((they))) want. killing youtube and other side isnt worth that

Nigga we created net neutrality. You are welcomed by the way.

people are already duped by one side or the other and most of them aren't smart enough to search for the truth. so does it really matter?

yes, because it gets rid of the chance to undupe themselves with the right information and become a critically thinking member of society once again

Pic related is good enough for me to know that something's not right with the whole NN thing

As an engineer who is working and developing for world wide telecommunications I can say that NN should be dropped because now 90% of internet (science-knowledge-research-progress network, my ass) is filled with porn movies and youtube cat videos. This is is counterprogressive.

checked
And that may be explained with how people would be forced to pay to access facebook, and when faced with a fee would stop using it or switch to a new free service that would inevitably pop up.

>what is reverse psychology
i dont know, seems fishy, yes. but how would he profit from NN? how would getting rid of it hurt him?
i mean ISPs may start charging extra which can lower his traffic on FB, but that really is pretty much it.
maybe he isnt as high up in the comman chain as people like to think and is just a jew trying to jew people with his website which doesnt work as well when less people come to his website.
however there is the stuff with the CIA creating FB allegedly beforehand which zuckerberg just took over then which if true would say he may be higher in the command chain, but i dont now. a jewy jew liking it isnt really an argument against it even though i admit it makes it worth looking into.

It's only libertarian retards and literal shills defending the kikes' schemes to get rid of NN. Almost all people with at least two working braincells realize NN is necessary if you don't want your internet to end up like Cable TV jewry.

FUCK OFF SHILLS
FOR DECADES BEFORE 2015 NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE INTERNET
NN IS A GOVERNMENT POWER GRAB
ALL THESE PRO NN PEOPLE ARE NETFLIX AND FACEBERG PAID SHILLS

FOR DECADES BEFORE 2015 NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE INTERNET
NN IS A GOVERNMENT POWER GRAB
ALL THESE PRO NN PEOPLE ARE NETFLIX AND FACEBERG PAID SHILLS

FOR DECADES BEFORE 2015 NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE INTERNET
NN IS A GOVERNMENT POWER GRAB
ALL THESE PRO NN PEOPLE ARE NETFLIX AND FACEBERG PAID SHILLS

FOR DECADES BEFORE 2015 NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE INTERNET
NN IS A GOVERNMENT POWER GRAB
ALL THESE PRO NN PEOPLE ARE NETFLIX AND FACEBERG PAID SHILLS

FOR DECADES BEFORE 2015 NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE INTERNET
NN IS A GOVERNMENT POWER GRAB
ALL THESE PRO NN PEOPLE ARE NETFLIX AND FACEBERG PAID SHILLS

FOR DECADES BEFORE 2015 NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE INTERNET
NN IS A GOVERNMENT POWER GRAB
ALL THESE PRO NN PEOPLE ARE NETFLIX AND FACEBERG PAID SHILLS

FOR DECADES BEFORE 2015 NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE INTERNET
NN IS A GOVERNMENT POWER GRAB
ALL THESE PRO NN PEOPLE ARE NETFLIX AND FACEBERG PAID SHILLS

FOR DECADES BEFORE 2015 NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE INTERNET
NN IS A GOVERNMENT POWER GRAB
ALL THESE PRO NN PEOPLE ARE NETFLIX AND FACEBERG PAID SHILLS

FOR DECADES BEFORE 2015 NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE INTERNET
NN IS A GOVERNMENT POWER GRAB
ALL THESE PRO NN PEOPLE ARE NETFLIX AND FACEBERG PAID SHILLS

FOR DECADES BEFORE 2015 NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE INTERNET
NN IS A GOVERNMENT POWER GRAB
ALL THESE PRO NN PEOPLE ARE NETFLIX AND FACEBERG PAID SHILLS

FOR DECADES BEFORE 2015 NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE INTERNET
NN IS A GOVERNMENT POWER GRAB
ALL THESE PRO NN PEOPLE ARE NETFLIX AND FACEBERG PAID SHILLS

FOR DECADES BEFORE 2015 NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE INTERNET
NN IS A GOVERNMENT POWER GRAB
ALL THESE PRO NN PEOPLE ARE NETFLIX AND FACEBERG PAID SHILLS

FOR DECADES BEFORE 2015 NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE INTERNET
NN IS A GOVERNMENT POWER GRAB
ALL THESE PRO NN PEOPLE ARE NETFLIX AND FACEBERG PAID SHILLS

Fuck off shareblue.

All the commie tears in the world won't stop this.

NN is dead.

Why is the left so scared?

>The only argument I saw in favor of it is "You dont want the greedy jew (((government))) to regulate your internet"
The argument is that the government has no right to tell companies what they are and arent allowed to do. If an ISP wants to charge a website a fee its the ISPs right to do so. fuck you, leftist faggot, id throw you out of the helicopter myself you stupid fucking niggerkin goblin cocksucking ass communist orc soyboy.

>NN IS A GOVERNMENT POWER GRAB
mate, NN is what we have now. the law wants to get rid off it enabling companies to make people pay for access to certain websites, slow down the internet speed to those or outright block them. it is more a power grab by the companies

so i take it you have no actual reason to support it then since you didnt state one?

"What is wrong with net neutrality, goys? Why do you want a free market on the most important way to share info? Want to access leaked files? Sorry, not enough bandwidth for that hehehe"

It's basically the choice between having government jews regulate your internet or company jews regulate your internet.
This whole situation and the countless shill threads on Sup Forums and leddit right now are literally jews jewing eachother.

>German flag
>we

fuck off Ahmed

thats a theory i can dig.

>censorship is ok if its subject to the free market
>still didnt realize that unhinged communism and capitalism are 2 signs of the same coin

that link isnt working either just dumps me to a "submit some shit to be 0binned" page

>thinks that ISPs owe him anything.
You fucking dumbass, then create your own connection to the internet if you don't like the way it is. Nobody owes you shit. Kill yourself.

Works for me, weird.

are you telling me your internet isnt neutral right now? do you browse a different internet than all the others here? do you come from the future where NN is gotten rid off?
complaining about the word "we" in this case is utterly retarded mate.

the internet lines in germany were build with taxmoney, additionally i pay monthly fee for access to the internet. so yeah, i do believe the ISPs owe me retard

The argument against it is from morons who are conflating everything including the price of rice in china with internet access. NN prevents internet toll roads and shitposting about everything under the sun to distract from the fact. Yea it fucks over big corporations a little but there is no better option or outcome. Pick your battles

>do you come from the future where NN is gotten rid off?

No I come from a past where there was nothing wrong for decades you ignorant muslim retard

US NN has not a fucking thing to do with you downloading ISIS beheading videos in Germanistan

why do you care faggot?

do i need javascript enabled or something? i might just be retarded (spoiler alert: im pretty retarded)

Accessing US servers will be affected and close to everything is on US servers.

yeah, I do the same mistake all the time.

Le 56% has spoken

>Comcast has deposited $0.50 into your account.

i care because it can result in a domino effect resulting in my country getting rid of it too.
>there was nothing wrong for decades
thats why i dont want shit to change. how dense are you?

>it was "build" with taxmoney, therefore i have a right to it
t. lower class citizen

First of all, It's the companies who the state gets its money from the most, what you pay are peanuts, so no, you don't have a right to anything other than your life.
Secondly, they don't owe you anything, they're in an agreement with you, they don't owe you anything, with owe meaning giving you shit for free.

Context, nigger.

Is there any way we can see what happens and then later on if the shit gets steaked we mass mail the goberment to add net neutrality "for the people"?
I'm sure we can do something like that moving the normie masses

>How would ending NN hurt Zuckthecuck?

That's how. Normies are stupid. They can't even click twice to find their subscriptions on Youtube (a real problem when they did the first interface switch years ago).

>Like cable TV Jewry
You mean dead?

what's wrong with allowing ISPs to charge more for the same service? you must a poorfag and/or a communist----> this is my argument btw

>last time I checked Texas was a part of the United States

who gets the company money from retard? the people, by using lines paid for by the people so the controll should remain at the people.

>Secondly, they don't owe you anything, they're in an agreement with you
and the agreement is i give them money and they give me unhinged access to internet. these fuckers cant even keep the promise of the bandwith they give others, then they should at least not try to also restrict us from visiting the websites we want

well, its not easy to get them to change a law. its easier i guess trying to make them not change something. when you hang the right people everything is possible though

How the fuck are we better without NN. This shit is easier to silence when you can just bribe the ISP monopoly that owns your viewport to the world.

Hell when they are bribing the government at least its filled with fuckups who let shit slip constantly.

youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I

here you go faggots the truth

True but there are paid groups on both sides of this.

because we neither stream or have social media. Online videogames are degenerate

>Soros funds it
>Obama made it
>FCC runs it

You know when you get danger signals in real life to tell you to just fucking run as hard as you can?

because government intervention in the market should be restricted at every turn

Of course he's for NN. Facebook stands to loose a lot of money if the current status quo is upset. So what, though. Sup Forums and Zucc happen to be on the same side against the likes of Time Warner and Comcast

They can change the agreement once it expires, retard. Someone should dox people like you, really. I'd butcher you fags myself.

It's not though. These things have been circulated for years.
NN is a good thing.

>German shilling for US policy

why do you even care, muhammad? its an american issue

>Also "Reddit is in favor of Net Neutrality" isnt an argument against it either.
80% of the discourse on this board is
>look at this picture of [leftist] who supports net neutrality don't you hate it now
nobody here actually has any opinions, they just wait for a leftist to say something so they can disagree

>being this butthurt about someone not wanting to get the internet censored
wew im done talking to you since you only spout bullshit either way

i dont think he is just some random jew outside the system though.

This guy has a point. Starts hitting the actual content around 6:30 or 7:00. When he talks about 'peering.'

will mein rule34 be affected

So?
Fuck back off to reddit with your extra wise observations

>no description
I'm full on dolphin porn, thanks

why do you think I'm butthurt? Because I want to throw authoritarian twats like yourself out of helicopters? "Ur mad lmao" is not an argument, faggot.

The government is more dangerous and destructive than companies.

CIA contact and employee list.
Mossad employee list

...

It's not that we're expressly against net neutrality. It's that we're going to be under somebody's boot heel either way, so please excuse us for not springing into action and loudly proclaiming our support for one side of the shit sandwich over the other.

yeah, it totally isnt possible that as soon as the US has done it the EU or germany will be like "look how well it works in the USA. its time we follow up and modernize our laws to fit the age of the internet" or some similar bullshit. also i only asked for reason to be against NN since i didnt see any so far but the adventages of NN are obvious. so again, if you have any good arguments against NN other than "muh free market" or the stuff in the OP i will be glad to hear them

The fact that you Shareblue faggots are so for it is reason enough to get rid of it.

Until the Trump administration removes ISP anticompetition laws, I support net neutrality.
Right now, thanks to those laws, I have two ISP options: Cable One and CenturyLink (not including the resellers).
I'd rather not be forced into paying for access to 4chink at normal speeds, when it's been proven that ISPs like to fuck over their customers.
That's why NN was passed in 2015, amongst other things. Unless they were classified as Title II, they could get away with speed inhibition and selective blocking thanks to this lawsuit: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Communications_Inc._v._FCC_(2014)
Now I'm gonna go copypaste this into the other hundred NN threads that are in gross violation of the sticky.

m.youtube.com/watch?t=9s&v=le2R2Ps58p

This 5 minute video sums it up better than I can.

>what's wrong with allowing ISPs to charge more for the same service?
Trumptards are literal cucks.

wow.

Video not found

(Y0U) must go back

Just think remember before 2015 all these SJW sites were far less censored till NN happens, now they censor everything that they don’t agree with, because NN gives them the power to do that.

*this

m.youtube.com/watch?v=le2R2Ps58pQ

how does it do that? afaik NN says ISPs are not allowed to handle traffic differently or different websites. that no websites are to be restricted for commercial or personal reasons of the ISPs. these could be lowering the bandwith making websites load for eternety, making people pay for certain website access or block them completly.
so i take it there is another part to that law then i dont know about as the previous mentioned doesnt give them special rights to censor their own websites, which is that?

ISPs should be able to do (almost) whatever they want with their infrastructure. Treating different types of content differently is not necessarily a bad thing as long as it's not used for censorship. Facebook and friends are against any type of content discrimination because it goes against their interests.

I am for Net Neutrality but how come every time someone talks about a pro NN argument they have to bring up Reddit?

It seems pretty obvious to me that this site, it's use, and access to it, actually depend on NN. I find it sickening to think that ISP's could charge for access to sites like this that generate very small revenue, but could end up making ISP's more money than the site owners just because we want to have free speech forums.

But you all are forgetting a very key point. The 1st amendment in the US says that the GOVERNMENT cannot restrict speech. While the internet is a government regulated thing they have to respect Free Speech. If ISP's have total regulation control then they will censor right wing speech immediately. It's already known what side they are usually on. They are only sucking up to the right at the moment because they want NN but this will turn on a dime. As soon as the left has control, censoring us will be the bargaining chip they use to keep NN banned.

You must read into nth order consequences, the demographic changes are inevitable without a civil war. We will lose the next election or the one after it and we may never see a majority again. That's a very real possibility unless we remove refugees and illegals now. Losing free speech protections on an ISP level would be devastating for us under democrat majority. Sites like this and religionofpeace would be banned for sure.

Boomers don't know what they are talking about. the internet now makes up the majority of all human interaction. We cannot lose free speech on it. I can;t believe it would even be considered to let anyone but the government regulate it when we've seen the extreme prejudice Jews show us on private networks.

want to visit Sup Forums? Just purchase our premium + package for an additional 9.99 a month! Sign up now and receive two lootboxes for free, giving you two randomized websites of our choosing for you to visit... for free!

>pic related
>file name VERY related

Because Reddit is in favor of it.

It would be like China. You try to navigate to Sup Forums and "Server timed out, page not found."

Do you really think ISP's are going to be able to keep NN banned under a left majority without using their anti free speech capabilities against their political opponents? Banning NN will be a disaster for the right and white people.

What is the argument for banning it? What could this possibly do to help us?

thats an interesting concept that could backfire though. but no risk no fun

>What the fuck do you have against it?
Its backed by soros and the rise in pro-net neutrality shilling on Sup Forums is likley being paid for by that 16 billion he put into the open society foundation

>Losing free speech protections on an ISP level would be devastating for us under democrat majority.
Or it would force people to meet in real life. Meat space is an option, user. An incredibly hard to track and regulate option, if one is smart about it.

>NN is what we have now.
We have had it for a couple years only

calling it 'net neutrality' is a psy-op. look at what they're actually voting on and ignore the shills

>shilled by reddit and paid shills
>m-muh corporate cuck
corporations like comcast support net neutrality. fuck off with your reddit shit

This. Fuck netflix and google.

People wont. Our movement is growing for the first time in decades and we have technology and free speech to blame. Even so, most of our conversations are tied to other internet activities.

Our movement, podcasts, videos, forums. It will all be gone. Our ideas erased from digital records or blocked and in a world where Jews control almost all print media.

We'd be done for because all the other digital comforts would remain. Political discussions alone would not make people go out, and we would not even be able to organize like minded events. We'd be stuck in the middle of groups of leftists that would try to ruin us for our opinions.

Banning NN will be the death of the far right if we don't act sooner than later. Everything else is already against us.

Only lolbertarians and ancaps could possibly be against Net Neutrality, because they are so ideologically biased that they fail to understand that occasional government regulation is necessary to ensure competition, which in turn helps capitalism grow.
Being against NN is like saying you want to rescind the US antitrust law. How the fuck could either of these help the market is beyond reason, as the market would turn so competitively stagnant that in time the whole economy would be ruined.
Lolbertarians and ancaps on Sup Forums just scream "MUH FREE MARKET" while refusing to see the bigger picture. Needless to say that the Trump administration going against NN means cattering to destructive corporate interests. The digital economy will take a huge blow from this in the long term.

net neutrality (NN) is not any commoners concern.

netflix et al. cannot charge its customers any more than they do now, because otherwise it will lead to less subscribers, less revenue, less profits.

so this is a fight between ISPs and content providers about the share of content providers' profits, and i am not a moron fighting anybody's fight for free.

all NN supporters go fuck themselves.

Net neutrality is not good. It will cause innovation to grind to a halt, and it won't do any favors to our economy.
Go read a book nigger and quit listening to shills.
I'm signing up for nognet next month
youtu.be/1B0u6nvcTsI
Also sage

>netflix et al. cannot charge its customers any more than they do now, because otherwise it will lead to less subscribers, less revenue, less profits.
thats only the case if you think there is actually competition between those when i believe at the end of the day they are just from the same group of people in the end. they could just sit together, discuss a businessmodel and have it pretty much the same at every ISP out there with only very slight variations to make it seem like its a free market

This, I hate commies but I agree here. This is bad for all of us common folk.

It's potentially very bad for free speech for the left too. ISP's are sucking up to republicans right now, what if they turn and ban your side's political arguments?

The simple fact is, obviously we should have freedom of speech apply online in some degree even if companies have strict rules for using their chat services. ISP's should never be allowed to block a site for what it says or who owns it.

The reason I fear NN being banned is I know I would use it against commies and don't even lie, you'd use it against me. It's dangerous. Period. It's the equivalent of putting a nuclear social weapon out there, but whoever gets it first wins.

My God, the only reason republicans are probably supporting this is because they think it's within their grasp. But what a dangerous game to play if they lose.

The phrase was coined in 2003, and the law was established in 2010 after Comcast deliberately throttled torrent data. It's only been around recently because its only been needed recently.