Can we get a serious net nuetrality thread going ffs?

There are 36 net neutrality threads up right now. Every one of them is infested with corporate shills and reddit raiders. Can we have at least one serious Sup Forums related NN thread? Corporate shills and reddittards not welcome.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Communications_Inc._v._FCC_(2014)
opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/qa-fight-save-net-neutrality
reason.com/archives/2014/11/12/net-neutrality-is-a-lousy-idea
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>can we have an honest discussion without Soros NN shills?

Doubtful

>Can we have at least one serious Sup Forums related NN thread?

Sure, net neutrality is Internet Fascism and it should be done away with as quickly and efficiently as possible.

Fuck off, we support Trumps decisions here.

A blind trump loaylist.
Just as bad as a blind Obama loyalist

STOP being LOYAL to politician U stupid cucks

Trump is not a politician, he's our leader and this is a trump board literally fuck off.

imagine if she actually won the election. she's a total milf, and her policies aren't half bad either.

I'd be glad to pay more if it means that commies, niggers and other bums can't afford internet access any longer.

That would literally make the internet great again.

Also
>willingly giving government any control over anything
>ever

Yes. ISP are bad but NN is also bad. NN isn't automatically good just because we don't like the isp.

Fuck off to R*ddit

> slurp slurp

Sorry take that dick out of your mouth before you speak next time.

Trump has cucks to Israel & to the FUCKING SAUDIS, you know the cunts who ATTACKED the US on 9/11

Or did you already forget about that you amerimutt

please tell me this is not only real, but there is an uncensored version

He fixed saudi arabia already, they're literally the good guys now.

Commies in America are spoiled kids with Trust Funds who have never worked a day in their lives or even met a black person.

I would be so fucking happy if the Internet had a pay wall and the filthy shitskins were kept out.

>There are 36 net neutrality threads up right now. Every one of them is infested with corporate shills and reddit raiders.
because that's who's making the net neutrality threads in the first place... we're being brigaded hard...

>He fixed saudi arabia already
Nope. The purge was planned before he even ran for elections.

...

>There are 36 net neutrality threads up right now

fucking redditers are triggered by my nigger-jokes, it's like they hate nigger-jokes.

> slurp slurp slurp *sucking intensifies

ROFL Whatever fool.

>Nope. The purge was planned before he even ran for elections.
wow you said a thing and that makes it true? you have zero evidence of that.

How about a nude Palin thread?

Unfortunately it's fake.

fuck off shareblue

Are you retarded, what do you think 350 billion in weapons mean?? The are the good guys you loser

Ask yourself why foreign posters care so much about NN in the US.

These are shills.

t. cuck

Until the Trump administration removes ISP anticompetition laws, I support net neutrality.
Right now, thanks to those laws, I have two ISP options: Cable One and CenturyLink (not including the resellers).
I'd rather not be forced into paying for access to 4chink at normal speeds, when it's been proven that ISPs like to fuck over their customers.
That's why NN was passed in 2015, amongst other things. Unless they were classified as Title II, they could get away with speed inhibition and selective blocking thanks to this lawsuit: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Communications_Inc._v._FCC_(2014)
Now I'm gonna go copypaste this into the other hundred NN threads that are in gross violation of the sticky.

who else here is contacting their senators about this shit? :^)

She'd be a shill for the establishment. A women like that gains power by lying on her back.

Go back to plebbit you literal cock sucking faggot. Who the fuck do you think you are?
>he's our leader
I like the guy but you sound like such a fucking cuck, made me cringe at kekistani levels.

Net neutrality is backed by soros

Tanks for the template, fellow burgerbro. Contacting John McCain and Jeff Fla-- I'm fucked aren't i?

yeah bro theyre gonna throttle your 100mb of data usage a day on Sup Forums, which isnt time sensitive data in the first place, as opposed to millions of gamertards DLing a new uncompressed league of legions patch every single day which is 18gb and then streaming 4k netflix all day on the tv in their background to keep them hypnotized

why fucking live

>doesnt want Tyrone messaging his gf (implying he has one) constantly to get her to cheat
>cuck
pick one
no problem user, and dont think like that
thats a losing mentality

Would Lisa Ann have become such a big name in porn if it weren't for Sarah Palin?

source on that my man? i wanna be able to say that too without looking dumb
also any george soros pills?

>reddit copypaste
>"I have heard arguments on both sides of the issue"

Fucking lol. The only pro-Net Neutrality argument you've paid any attention to is the Reddit strawman "because it means we can charge one thousand dollars per website mwahahahahaha *twirls mustache*"

I didn't know this was a YLYL thread. Shouldn't this be in Sup Forums?

It was an example, you dunce. And that doesn't stop them from censoring content by blocking the sites like Sup Forums, daily stormer, et. al.
You could say "but muh VPN", but all they have to do is monitor packets for an encrypted portion, and block that. Boom, no more VPN access to the sites either.

holy shit trumpcucks are fucking pathetic. was your dad a raging faggot too?

yeah but i had to word it for normies and make it sound as good as possible dude
and im shit at talking to people

That is a good post. Notice how no one responds to it? Really activates my almonds...

>but all they have to do is monitor packets for an encrypted portion, and block that.
So they're going to block cloudflare traffic for one specific website?

I’ll vote for her anytime! Is that real? Can someone send the original, I want to jerk off to it...

Open society foundation is a soros front, it happens to also be where he recently transfered 16 billion dollars if you remember people talking about that a while back. It heavily campaigns for net neutrality. You can just google open society foundation net neutrality to find all sorts of stuff.

Note open society foundation used to be called open society institute, you might see that thing in earlier results.

Likley the rise of pro net neutrality shills on Sup Forums may even be a result of soros 16 billion. Literally paid soros shills.

opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/qa-fight-save-net-neutrality

They don't have to block all cloudflare traffic.

>It was an example, you dunce. And that doesn't stop them from censoring content by blocking the sites like Sup Forums, daily stormer, et. al.
yeah, an example. an example that's been posted by the same people across tens of threads for the past several days. you people suck at brigading.

throttling Sup Forums doesn't even make sense. it's as if you guys don't actually know what "throttling" means.

Then how are they going to ban Sup Forums?

So is net neutrality about being anonymous in the internet or about getting your download speeds cut?

>That is a good post. Notice how no one responds to it? Really activates my almonds...
I actually saved that image. it's a great argument. didn't think to reply though

Give me one good reason I should side with Soros, Reddit, and Tech companies on this issue?

I personally think the internet was better pre net neutrality

you're disgusting kys

This is so idiotic that there are people who think that the ISPs are more likely to censor than the "content creators" like google.
Here is a fact for you, giving powers to people who are already censoring you, like google, is not a good thing. Just because ISPs "could" censor you doesn't mean they will, unlike what is already proven with Google and the others.

Bill Cassidy and the Sundance Film Festival

>You could say "but muh VPN", but all they have to do is monitor packets for an encrypted portion, and block that. Boom, no more VPN access to the sites either.
lol look at this moron using psuedoscience to push his point. you don't even make sense you fucking brainlet. why don't you learn to use a computer before you run your mouth.

"monitor packets for an encrypted portion"

if you're using a VPN ALL of you packets are encrypted. what the fuck are you talking about!

Throttling =/= blocking. Read what the lawsuit entails.
It questioned three points (selective blocking, connection throttling, and transparency), and two were no longer banned (selective blocking and throttling) unless internet providers were reclassified with Title II. Then Obama passed NN in 2015 retitling them as such, making the suit a moot point. Now that it's being repealed, providers can once again throttle OR block completely.

>Sup Forums is actually stupid enough to think net neutrality is a bad thing

I shouldn't be surprised, but I am anyway. This is just incredible. You must be some of the most amazingly dense people on the fucking planet. I get a lot of you have a hard time distinguishing between the good and the bad decisions that Fearless Leader makes, but if you think scrapping net neutrality is a good thing in the slightest please do everyone a favour and neck yourself.

>Just because ISPs "could" censor you doesn't mean they will, unlike what is already proven with Google and the others.
that's a great point. Google and Twitter and Facebook are ACTIVELY pushing a censorship campaign as we speak and these net neutrality brainlets are insisting that we must protect ourselves from the ISPs theoretically censoring us.

Democracy means standing behind your leader and supporting him even when he has to make tough or unpopular decisions.

I’m not a fair weather fan willing to tuck tail just because I personally disagree with this.

Your subversion tactics aren’t working here.

>Then Obama passed NN in 2015 retitling them as such
see you people keep posting this shit. Obama did not PASS anything. there was NO LAW passed. the FCC used their "authority" to reclassify the Internet as a utility under Title 2 of the 1934 Communications Act. get your shit correct please.

>Now that it's being repealed, providers can once again throttle OR block completely.
yeah, sure. but as said previously, Google and Facebook and others are ACTIVELY censoring people on their platforms, yet your argument is that the ISPs MIGHT censor us. and you can bring up newspaper articles from like a decade ago to cite as evidence. that's it.

>voting
>disgusting

"Support Net Neutrality!"
>t. the companies that are already destroying free speech on their services i.e. YouTube, Twitter, Facebook

Case in point. You're a spastic. Kill yourself.

I just mean everyone Pro-NN isn't going to respond to it, for "some reason".

it has nothing to do with being anonymous on the internet i assume

supposedly companies are allowed to demand infrastructure built specifically for their service, which is extremely fucking expensive, and of course only super telecomm companies can actually tank this cost, so it's just super anti competition shit as usual

it's being super shilled on reddit so you can tell for a fact something is up. people are seriously posting "U WONT BE ABLE TO PLAY VIDEO GAMES ANYMORE' on reddit which is so ridiculous its unreal


net neutrality also didnt exist until 2015 apparently

i dont know the topic for sure but the hysterical bullshit is so aggravating because it's just intentionally deceitful & sounds like jew telecomm companies are just encouraging monopolizing legislation while painting it as if people want ancap internet where you have to pay per bit or something retarded like that

...

We care because even though you may be retards I don't want the liberal jews at Comcast taking way your liberty to see inconvenient truths.

Prioritizing traffic over the ammount that is sent is not what is at stake. If companies want to openly impose bandwidth limits, they can.
Prioritizing over the kind of traffic is what is at stake.

...

Why didn’t we need net neutrality up until 2015?

>I just mean everyone Pro-NN isn't going to respond to it, for "some reason".
because it's a logical argument. it's like when these people insist that net neutrality has been around for decades, and I point out that net neutrality is the reclassification of the Internet as a utility under Title 2 of the Communications Act of 1934, which occurred in 2015... and then nobody replies to me.

thank you my dude
dont ever talk to me or my senator again
>being faithful is being spastic
nah you kys
beat me to it

Mummy Palin yes, post more fake goodness..

reason.com/archives/2014/11/12/net-neutrality-is-a-lousy-idea

ISPs and social media corporations are very different things user.

>Prioritizing traffic over the ammount that is sent is not what is at stake. If companies want to openly impose bandwidth limits, they can.
>Prioritizing over the kind of traffic is what is at stake.
but there's literally a handful of sources that indicate this has actually happened. you people are flooding the board with this shit because of some fantasy that you insist will occur that hasn't even occured yet. meanwhile YouTube is blocking conservatives and Twitter closes people's accounts for political speech...

>ISPs and social media corporations are very different things user.
so? my point is you people are freaking out about ISPs throttling and censoring people, but there is very little evidence of this actually occuring. meanwhile Google et. al. are actually engaging in real censorship (and of course Google had a lot to do with the 2015 reclassification in the first place) and you want us to focus on the imaginary problem instead.

Nobody had the balls to try something for the longest time so it wasn't an issue. Then Verizon did and the gubment responded with the NN rule. Its a new rule to counter new faggotry

>Why didn't we need net neutrality up until 2015?

What the fuck are you talking about? Of course we needed it prior to 2015. Several companies (AT&T, Comcast, Verizon) were throttling access speeds to competitor's programs and websites.

Please get a clue. Do you actually even understand what is happening?

Does this affect people who can use the internet without worry about other people doing whatever?

What prevents us from carrying on as usual?

That is literally the exact fucking opposite of what democracy means.

>why didn't we need laws before the technology and limited competition permitted anti-consumerist practices in a given industry?

Hey you delusional trump faggot you didn't need to use the word literally it had no meaning. How can one literally fuck off? Makes sense you love trump with a retarded sentence structure.

It literally is or it's just the opposite? Faggots using that word incorrectly I swear I hope trump rapes you.

ANY PERSON WHO SAYS FREE INTERNET HAS BEEN PROTECTED BY THE FTC IS A SHILL REPEATING LIES. THE FTC HAS NO CONTROL OVER TELECOM.

ANYONE WHO IS AGAINST NET NEUTRALITY IS A SHILL FOR THE (((TELECOM CEOS))) AND BIG GOVERNMENT.

I took on a thread months ago by my lonesome pushing fake facts, and Sup Forums took the bait. It's my fault, sorry.

it's not a good post, it's quite literally "muh slippery slope" and does nothing to discuss the real concerns about monopolies and content access.

1) ISP cannot see what you are doing, only what address your at (99.99% of traffic is encrypted these days).
2) Because of (1) they cant throttle a specific type of data, only specific websites.
3) 40$ per year VPN solves all your problems.
4) ISP will realize its bad business to throttle because it doesn't work

Also: If the ISPs are gonna be monopolies, they need to be regulated. If they are deregulated, then they must be trust busted.

yes i do understand, next to nothing
this boogeyman you keep talking about was just a few small cases of bullshit and its being blown way out of proportion just because of what "could" happen

What's wrong with my post? Are you a commie nigger?

He wants you to masturbate dumbass

To literally fuck off means to initiate self pleasuring activities

Goddamn how dense are you

Hurry up and start furiously masturbating already, there's no time to waste

>aussie
>doubting trump
>zero witty banter, just infantile insults
youre a disgrace to that flag

I thought we were internet fascists!

>ANY PERSON WHO SAYS FREE INTERNET HAS BEEN PROTECTED BY THE FTC IS A SHILL REPEATING LIES. THE FTC HAS NO CONTROL OVER TELECOM.
you do realize that the whole point of this net neutrality thing was making the Internet a part of "telecom"? they didn't have any jurisdiction over the Internet before 2015. that's why they granted themselves the authority (gotta love America)

>filled with corposhills and plebbitors
Well no wonder considering either side will call you one or the other depending on which position you take.

Personally Im just glad I'm not an amerimutt.

lol look at the silly shill

ANY PERSON WHO SAYS FREE INTERNET HAS BEEN PROTECTED BY THE FTC IS A SHILL REPEATING LIES. THE FTC HAS NO CONTROL OVER TELECOM.

ANYONE WHO IS AGAINST NET NEUTRALITY IS A SHILL FOR THE (((TELECOM CEOS))) AND BIG GOVERNMENT.

no it is a good post and your point is the same thing. "Muh monopolies may, in the future, do something bad!" Funny you can't see it though. Plus, NN doesn't even do anything to stop monopolies or help small businesses compete with the big ISPs.

>what "could" happen

You're acting like this is some random hypothetical rather than something that was already the modus operandi of several large ISPs prior to the NN legislation. Why? What possible reason do you have to act so fucking dense? Not only "could" it happen it has and will continue to happen again almost as soon as the proposed changes have been made. You are wilfully dense.

Yes. Pay attention. FTC was the one controlling telecom before, because it wasn't called telecom. It then got reclassified as telecom and got passed over to the FCC. Now, the FCC is repealing net neutrality, because it doesn't have the FTC and its anti-trust laws hanging over it.

ANY PERSON WHO SAYS FREE INTERNET HAS BEEN PROTECTED BY THE FTC IS A SHILL REPEATING LIES. THE FTC HAS NO CONTROL OVER TELECOM.

ANYONE WHO IS AGAINST NET NEUTRALITY IS A SHILL FOR THE (((TELECOM CEOS))) AND BIG GOVERNMENT.