Shills have got me. I'm a brainlet. (((they))) have confused me

Shills have got me. I'm a brainlet. (((they))) have confused me.

Is net neutrality good or bad for Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

(((they))) want it.

Think about that real hard for a minute. The answer will come to you.

No, (((they))) is Comcast Verizon and Warner. And look what (((they))) want.

No. If we give the FCC the right to regulate the internet like a public utility in a very short amount of time all your favorite filthy degenerate pornsites(like Sup Forums) will have their "internet license" revoked because they don't serve the public interest.

Sup Forums is and have been fine up until now without net neutrality, use your common logic instead of listening to shills.

it is irrelevant, if the jews wanted to kill Sup Forums they could do it either way

Net neutrality is simply a subsidy scheme for (((Google))) and (((Netflix))).

youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I

When you hear retards complaining about how jewgle and jewflix want NN, realize that Time Warner/Comcast wants to get rid of it. It's two groups fighting for their own interests, but Sup Forums is retarded enough to side with the corrupt and shitty ISPs just because jewgle and jewflix support it.
>But much lobbyists
Don't be a fuckwit. Lobbyists are on both ends. Why are so many congressmen not reacting to the outcry against removing NN? Because they are lobbied by ISPs. I hope NN gets removed and Sup Forums gets shut down for the retardation I have been seeing about this.

You mean "with net neutrality". Why is there so much confusion surrounding this topic? It's really not that difficult to understand.

Bad cause it lets the big corporate boys do what they want, which is higher profits and more market share.

Look here fuckboi, does repealing NN and allowing ISPs to charge more not help different corporations? Pick your horse in this race wisely.

no idea, I have to stay the course against the establishment.
Could'nt that shit go either way

This.

FUCKING KIKES ARE AGAINST NN

>Is net neutrality good or bad for Sup Forums?

Without net neutrality providers can slow down traffic to Sup Forums to a crawl. Is this good or bad, what do you think?

>up until now without net neutrality
But we always had net neutrality you retard.

Net neutrality is good for Sup Forums, because without it, the ISPs are going to block/seriously throttle your access to it.

ANYONE WHO IS AGAINST NET NEUTRALITY IS A SHILL FOR THE (((TELECOM CEOS))) AND BIG GOVERNMENT.

This. Does anyone here trust the fucking Time Warner Cable/Comcast monopoly? They bought out my local company, raised prices, and slashed a shit ton of channels. This is the corporation you should be concerned with. Jewgle may be protecting it's interests, but in this case it aligns with ours.

Weev is against nn so I'm really unsure about it all.

All I know is that the internet works fine now, so changing it must be a Jewish cash grab. It all works now, what could possibly improve?

The only question is services like Netflix sucking up an inordinate amount of bandwidth. But again, it all works, so what the fuck is the difference?

But.. But...((they)) told me it'll lead to "innovation"

>help different corporations and fuck the customers
Get it now, amerimongrel sharty fat fuck moron?

Its a question of freedom. ISPs are abused as all shit by google and other big sites because of NN giving no chance for other competitors to get even.

Good for Sup Forums and my clop sites. Couldn't care less about common pleb shit everyone visits.

That could be solved by just allowing ISPs to raise prices by a fixed amount for corporations over a certain size using a specified amount of bandwidth, so it doesn't block out the little guys.

Every meme flag is an American until proven otherwise. Your argument is the same as mine but you think corporations are on only one side. ISPs are not your friend retard. They can start charging the consumer more for certain services if this shit goes through. They can also throttle data to certain sites that are not friendly to ISPs. Why the fuck do you think Sup Forums would be safe from that? There are lobbyists on both sides of this, one corporation will benefit from keeping NN, another will benefit from removing it.

Net Neutrality is good. The only reason it is opposed by anyone on here is because they're either so far up Trump's ass that they would probably vote themselves to be disemboweled and raped publicly if he ordered it, or because they're being a typical Sup Forums contrarian and absolutely MUST justify any action deemed "anti-liberal".

There is no logical reason to support destroying NN unless you are a massive jew or a trump cuck.

No. Local contracts are NOT affected by NN. This has literally nothing to do with NN. It's so cities don't have 5 different lines running underground everywhere.

>Allowing ISPs to limit data to certain sites that are deemed unfriendly to the ISP means Sup Forums is safe
This what Sup Forums actually believes