Big Tech Companies Hate Him

/ourguy/ Weev clarifying "Net Neutrality".
Easy to see "Net Neutrality" isn't about the free and open internet because Zucc, Google, Twitter, and Reddit are all shilling hard for it.
"Net Neutrality" is about crippling the development of the internet so the (((monopolizers of internet content))) can pay a little less for bandwidth.

He puts his position in a nutshell at 9:18
youtu.be/B03eByZia5I?t=9m18s

Other urls found in this thread:

google.com/search?q=somali to english&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS729US729&oq=somali to&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l5.4707j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
freepress.net/blog/2017/04/25/net-neutrality-violations-brief-history
youtube.com/watch?v=dxSGPyS_Un8
youtube.com/watch?v=GodPzCu_r2o
cnet.com/news/fcc-formally-rules-comcasts-throttling-of-bittorrent-was-illegal/
dailywire.com/news/18613/7-reasons-net-neutrality-idiotic-aaron-bandler
youtube.com/watch?v=s1IzN9tst28
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Weev is absolutely correct here. Always thought he was a sperg, but gonna subscribe now and see what happens.

I think weev is a no good fbi informant who got out from prison by whatever means. But I think he is exactly right here. Reminder: Netflix is 22billion in debt, more than likely 50 billion invested and this would be the nail in a coffin for kill cable experiment.

he's an edgy cunt, fuck him

and fuck that paedophile anglin

Styx put out almost the same video today. Great minds think alike.

>"Net Neutrality" is about crippling the development of the internet so the (((monopolizers of internet content))) can pay a little less for bandwidth.
This is true, although weev is a massive faggot.

They claim all bits are created equal, and that they shouldnt pay reasonable fees for transit. However went those bits start transversing their network, if they dont agree with them, they wont even give you the opportunity to pay reasonable fees to transmit your data, they'll just ban you and block all your bits.

LETS DO IT PEDES WE ARE WINNING WE CAN DO THIS LETS KILL (((NET NEUTRALITY))) THE SPAWN OF COMMOBAMA

Nice.
Though I feel "Net Neutrality" should always be in quotes because it's the opposite.

>styx
>great

the dude is literally a lolberg

SAVE NET NEWPS

My fix with quotes to question the honesty of the term 'Net Neutrality".

My thread talking about this got deleted. Wonder (((why))).

((ShuItDownGoy))

i'm against NN but weev is a subversive kike

Speaking of shutting it down and the internet,
My thread about secret messages about Israel hidden in Google translate what shoah'd yesterday.

I thought Israel messages of world domination were political

Try it!
google.com/search?q=somali to english&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS729US729&oq=somali to&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l5.4707j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Bump this and copy pasta in all shill threads.

cocaine bump

"countless people from all ethnic groups who live in honor of the people of Israel."
-Google

It's fine to get rid of but we need to end the things in place that allow ISPs to do that while we don't have alternatives and the regulations in place will take years for any potential competitor to get around. It's not that I want the government involved in the regulation even if NN is just them telling ISPs to not regulate content. It's just that the potential to removing it without fixing the problems that it was attempting to mitigate have a work around. If we hadn't paid so much taxpayer money to these ISPs I wouldn't even care but we essentially created their entire industry by not only financing their physical infrastructure but creating all of the content that became the reason people even procured their services in the first place.

this subversive faggot will support whatever he thinks will cause the most chaos and harm to american society. he wants everyone to feel as angry as him so he can channel that collective rage against the people he blames for his own butthurt.

you'd have to be a breitbart reading simpleton to watch this video for anything other than a laugh. (he is funny, i'll give him that)

T_D gtfo. If you want an accurate meme it should be boomers and retards that are against Net Neutrality and people who understand tech that either want it in place or are in favor of keeping it until we can create a way to foster actual competition for ISPs. You know all those piddly faggot meme ISPs you mention go over the taxpayer-funded backbone owned by the Big 3? They're just the illusion of competition.

There's very few people who know the tech and are in favor of repealing NN and the ones who are are in favor of doing so if we can get rid of the red tape preventing real ISP competition.

Attacking the messenger instead of the message.
Not an argument.

I TRUST THE ISPs

>I TRUST THE GOVt

Not your current one, no.

Mindless Trump drones won't give a shit just like they ignore his extremely close ties to Israel and kikes in general.

>I trust Zucc, Jewgle, @Jack, and Spez
-You

S O Y B O Y

Why is this by far the most common attack on NN?

I do not give a shit who is for it. Neither of the big companies for or against it are likeable. I don't give a shit, and I will always care about what benefits people.

Does having an environment that allows ISPs to choke you sound like fun? Not to me, so that's the side I pick.

>allows ISPs to choke you
Fake problems created by the people choking the internet.

Also, big government regulations faggotry that will kill any competition among ISPs.

>Irish flag
>not acting like a jew
Select one

WEEV is Jewish.

I'm sorry, who? Your ISP is the one that can put a hard cap on your data and connection speed, or even what they want you to access.

>kill any competition among ISPs
fucking lmao
do you even know a single thing about your own country?

>when the murican IQ is less than his racial quotient

Holy fuck Sup Forums is retarded. I want everyone but Sup Forums to shut the fuck up with their misguided brainlet shilling when it comes to net neutrality.
You dumb fucks are gonna be the death of us all.

why does he twitch and pace so much?

>Does having an environment that allows ISPs to choke you sound like fun
depends on a lot
i mean we got incredibly good lte networks now which was insanely challenging in the usa thanks to the exorbitant fees and throttling that was allowed to be done

Your fascist memeflag totally made me believe you're on my side, arguing for my benefit, and Weev is a jew. I now hate Weev.

'Yuh ISP can do this or that'
Have any ISPs done this?
I'm asking for the second time. Are you going to give an actual real problem that has happened that this is going to save the consumer from? Didn't think so.

The Liberals FOR this literally have Zucc'd, Nuke'd and Shoah'd people. They are monopolies choking the internet.

Obama gave a fucking choke point of the internet to the U.N. The motherfuckers who want to tax us trillions and decide who can have kids because we've angered the weather gods.

freepress.net/blog/2017/04/25/net-neutrality-violations-brief-history

>Your ISP is the one that can put a hard cap on your data and connection speed
why is this unreasonable to you

Because it is literal greed that costs them fucking nothing otherwise?

Oh, I'm sorry, you obviously like spending money pointlessly.

I don't click links
HAS ANY ISP DONE WHAT THIS RULE IS SUPPOSED TO PREVENT THEM FROM DOING?

do we hate net neutrality now?

Yes.

Comcast,
AT&T
Verizon

Those would be the biggest Amerimutt ones.

Whatever their kike-loving overlord wants, that's what they want.

>bandwidth and infrastructure is free
>(((Potato intellectuals)))

They've been thriving so far. Why exactly do you want to pay them more money?

yes several isp's already throttled P2P torrents, video streaming, ect. only thing that stopped them was further codification/enforcement of NN.

Pic related shows when, also is quick rundown.

pro NN is pro keeping internet the way it is.

>realized that they can't protect Net neutrality no matter what they do
>"I-IT WAS A BAD THING ALL ALONG GUYS, WE DON'T ACTUALLY NEED IT"
God you people are pathetic.

Lol, you spelt neutrality wrong on this one.

this is correct. great explanation of why “muh net (((neutrality)))” is retarded

Fuck off shill

Where and to who? How many people?

I don't have Verizon
But Comcast and AT&T have never, ever impinged on my use of the internet.
Though they have issues they have never crossed a line. They even allow piracy.

On the other hand Zucc, Jewgle, @Jack, and Spez heavily censor me and what I'm allowed to see. AND they sell my data. AND they are internet constipation.

Also, The last nigger in chief and the Democrats want to take the censorship and the ministry of truth further into government hands with 'Russia Bot' "fake news" bullshit.

Hey let's also not forget Obama pissed in the well of the internet with mass surveillance.

I've been enjoying his recent videos, there was a good one where he cooked dates wrapped in Parma ham while talking about how to build Fascism in America

tl;dr - Sites like Sup Forums that give a lot of value for not much bandwidth will gain a competitive advantage.

NN is like saying the Soviet breadlines are better because each loaf of bread is treated equally by the government - preventing private bakeries from "gouging" you.

But with net neutrality literally anyone can startup a website with their own computer and be given the same treatment as anyone else.

Whats the issue?

I want more speed for less money. This can’t happen when Netflix us distributing the cost of HD streams on my Sup Forums browsing habbits. Quit drinking so much and being a nigger.

>AT&T: From 2007–2009, AT&T forced Apple to block Skype and other competing VOIP phone services on the iPhone. The wireless provider wanted to prevent iPhone users from using any application that would allow them to make calls on such “over-the-top” voice services. The Google Voice app received similar treatment from carriers like AT&T when it came on the scene in 2009.

>AT&T, SPRINT and VERIZON: From 2011–2013, AT&T, Sprint and Verizon blocked Google Wallet, a mobile-payment system that competed with a similar service called Isis, which all three companies had a stake in developing.

>VERIZON: In 2012, the FCC caught Verizon Wireless blocking people from using tethering applications on their phones. Verizon had asked Google to remove 11 free tethering applications from the Android marketplace. These applications allowed users to circumvent Verizon’s $20 tethering fee and turn their smartphones into Wi-Fi hot spots. By blocking those applications, Verizon violated a Net Neutrality pledge it made to the FCC as a condition of the 2008 airwaves auction.

>AT&T: In 2012, AT&T announced that it would disable the FaceTime video-calling app on its customers’ iPhones unless they subscribed to a more expensive text-and-voice plan. AT&T had one goal in mind: separating customers from more of their money by blocking alternatives to AT&T’s own products.

>VERIZON: During oral arguments in Verizon v. FCC in 2013, judges asked whether the phone giant would favor some preferred services, content or sites over others if the court overruled the agency’s existing open internet rules. Verizon counsel Helgi Walker had this to say: “I’m authorized to state from my client today that but for these rules we would be exploring those types of arrangements.” Walker’s admission might have gone unnoticed had she not repeated it on at least five separate occasions during arguments.

>Always thought he was a sperg
>Implying Spergs aren't always worth subscribing to.
Honestly, nowadays the best internet content is produced by people on the spectrum
>Sup Forums
>Richard Spencer
>The Right Stuff
>Terry A. - Crushes of CIA Niggers Under the Wheels of his SUV - Davis
>Weev
>Reviewbrah
>Barron Trump
>Donald Trump (?)

What's the deal with these dating sites? Do they actually work? I've always thought they're meme, but they seem to have an audience. Does this guy actually get messages from women wanting to get spanked?

Holy fuck, how much broadband do you really think that takes up?

Jesus you 56%ers really are dumb as shit. You are in for a rude awakening if you think this will bring you better speeds. I had a shitty 1.8 megabit connection and I didn't even notice a major drop during peak hours. On 140 megabit now and I never notice any significant loss.

This post is how I know you’re a shill. Copypasta your shit. I see your flag in multiple threads. Kys. I hope the 2 cents are worth it.

He new podcast is fantastic.

youtube.com/watch?v=dxSGPyS_Un8
youtube.com/watch?v=GodPzCu_r2o

weev is a manlet.

I can't take people seriously if they're under 5'2

>HD video doesn’t take up a lot of data
What are some things that take up more? Are you pretending to be retarded?

> what is a joke

All this shilling makes me think Weev is actually correct here

It fucking is. It is also exactly the right length a podcast should have.
Richard Spencer and the guys at Alt Right should shorten their podcast to an hour. They spend way too much time shitposting and making insider jokes imo.

Or you know, you could refute those examples given? Just a thought.

You either have a connection that can handle that speed or you don't. What's the problem? I never had a connection for years that could handle that either way. Now I do and there's barely a dent in it.

>I can't take people seriously if they're under 5'2
Brainlet Status:
Confirmed [X]
Not Confirmed [ ]

These are mostly anti-Trust or agreement breaking offenses.
Google, Apple and others do this shit to customers all the time.

Where are the mass throttling and gauging for data offenses?
You know, the fake problem every "Net Neutrality" shill is screaming about that I've asked for a thousand times?

I agree. Fash The Nation is too long, but at least it's filled with content. The Daily Shoah is going down in quality and each episode is 2 1/2 hours. Sven and Mike should probably cut their length in half and do more show prep.

I want cheaper and faster. What part of that don’t you understand retard? With Jewflix clogging up my shit, I’m paying more for a service I don’t use. I want more options and freedoms. A fucking potato kike is so retarded and only good for shilling for his jew anglo masters.

I can access this site and so can anyone else in the world, so what "advantage" would we gain from new regulations?

The internet is fine as it is you're a fucking shill is whats happening here, its taboo to fuck with the internet right now if this taboo is blown out because morons like you are easily led they will start doing other shit to it a decade from now, its how they always do it.

Colossal faggot you are.

I'm sorry. But I can't help it.

I can't take these people seriously. they should be in a zoo.

I have manager at work who's small .... I can't bring myself to take onboard what he's saying. Once he got so frustrated with me that he locked himself in the toilet and cried.

Regardless of anything, he is definitely a huge sperg.

You're not going to get cheaper and faster you nigger, unless you are on a primitive 200kbs download. In that case no amount of removal of NN will help you.

>changing goalposts

As for throttling:
cnet.com/news/fcc-formally-rules-comcasts-throttling-of-bittorrent-was-illegal/

Why should my ISP fees subsidize software pirates and porn addicts?

you want cheaper and faster? kepe NN then.

because all you are going to get without NN is more expensive internet. All the shills are out in full force, the amount of money they can make from this is insane so they've gone all out with paying politicians.

All you people claim "follow the money" call everyone else shills. LOOK AT THE FUCKING CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS AND BLATANT BRIBERY TO THE PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT REPEALING NN. ITS SO OBVIOUS.

...

>subsidize
They are offering a service, people are paying for it. How shocking.

Lanklets will hang on the Day of the Stool

Sup Forums is a bunch of 12-year-olds jerking off over each others desktops at this point

>Day of the Stool
They will hang on a national Indian holiday?

...

4k streaming. i dont really want it. netflixtards can pay for the necessary infrastructure upgrade

true manipulators set up the board so either outcome benefits them.

NN is just another example.

bump

DRUGS
R
U
G
S

dailywire.com/news/18613/7-reasons-net-neutrality-idiotic-aaron-bandler

Somebody archive this

His take is pretty important for dudes like me because I know fuck all about the internet and the bill. I trust his judgement on this issue for sure

LeL great job OP

>Moving goalposts
No that's what you did with that bullshit I didn't ask for. Now we got a throttling and it exposes you bullshit.

There was none of this regulation big tech wants before 2015 and the internet was fine.
They will handle throttling and gauging case by case.
>Just like they did with 2008 case you fucking cited.
This regulation is full of make problems that MAINTAINS the current monopolies NOT makes them fair to customers.
>People only believe this "Net Neutrality" bullshit when they believe you shill assumptions.
youtube.com/watch?v=s1IzN9tst28

>subsidize everyone else
>cheaper
Hello commie

From the article:
>As Ben Shapiro wrote in 2014
Absolutely disregarded.
The only good thing about the Shapiro are Khazarian Milkers, and Ben doesn't have those

but they are still a profitable company. they could pay off the debt longerm if they started putting all profits towards it.

>I will always care about the people
Then let them choose user. Companies rise and fall all the time at the hands of consumers but governments are a little harder to get rid of. Just look at how hard it is for the left to remove drumphy.
Also stop shilling.

yeah
this is a great example of jewish warfare with both sides flexing bureaucratic and media power while the real solution of gassing them all is never presented as an option

>Yes goy disregard arguments because of the source

no, my co-defendant testified against me and received no prison time at all after pleading guilty and testifying

i didn't get out by "whatever means" -- i had an insanely well publicized appeal because i didn't commit a fucking crime in the first place, kike