Why does (((George Soros))) so passionate about net neutrality

I don't think net neutrality is necessarily a bad thing, I'd just like to know why (((George Soros)))) is so passionate about keeping the current policies in place. What is his angle? We can safely discard his statements about believing in "freedom" and "openness" (he supports people being thrown in prison for questioning the "Holocaust", so we know he doesn't believe in freedom). What is he after?

Other urls found in this thread:

duckduckgo.com/?q=circumscied&t=ffsb&ia=web
youtube.com/watch?v=jgIPI79rQ9Q
duckduckgo.com/?q=canadians fat&t=ffsb&ia=web
gizmodo
unvis.it/gizmodo.com/5466492/verizon-has-blocked-access-to-Sup
dailystormer.hk/weev-on-net-neutrality/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Net nu-trality is basically Obamacare for the Internet--keeping it affordable to niggers so that the (((propaganda))) stream continues to flow

money. whether it's crytpo related is anyone's guess. i just always assume this guy is playing both sides.

Because (((they))) want control over NN
Ask yourself was there ever a need for NN?
If it really got as bad as the rebbit info graphics suggests why cant we just pass it then?
The reason they are freaking out now is because they know nothing will happen other than netflix and torrents getting throttled
NN is a solution in search of a problem typical marxist tactic

because he feels bad about selling out his fellow jews as a kid and wants to redeem himself and I will continue to sage all NN threads into the gas chamber

>Why do laws have misleading titles
>Why is the government power grabbing where it isn't needed
Net neutrality isn't

I can believe his root cause is money, but so many other liberals are now rallying to keep the net "free". No one with a brain believes they actually want freedom on the internet.

This ought to tell people all they need to know.

He's trying to jump start Nationalism, by putting mass amount immigrants into countries, the natives get all pissed and work together to get rid of the outliers. That's why large amounts of identitarian groups have appeared, AdF actually got into the Bundestag, V4 countries cracking down on Arab and black immigrants, not letting any in and Sebastian Kürz's elected as leader in Austria, forming a coalition with FPÖ, which are both right-wing governments and the FPÖ being a far-right group, literally founded by an ex-SS member.

None of this wouldn't of happened with George Soros, if anyone wants a step towards Nationalism, this is the way. You need a goal, an enemy to unite against.

It's fun to see how some purported right wing dudes go full libtard mode about Israel and whine about some fucking sand niggers and their human rights

this
2018 is the year he dies. No net communism, the billions he spent on fake rape allegations backfire, q larp psyops backfires by introducing more normies here who get redpilled. He's as good as dead

Because it's control, hurrdurr.

Funny how it wasnt an issue until the government wanted to meddle in a private negotiation so that netflix could stream leftist propaganda.

Check em

...

I would look at some of the foundations he funds. >Open Society
>No Nations No Borders
>Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa

All of these focus on eliminating the local population. Enabling and improving the lives of niggers. Destroying countries sovereignty.
I want to believe but it looks like once a kike always a kike.

BECAUSE IT GOES BOTH WAYS. IT HELPS BOTH SIDES. THUS NEUTRAL YOU DUMB FUCKING KEKS.

YOU FUCKING RETARDS TRYING TO REPEAL ARE GOING TO REGRET IT WHEN MOMMY CAN'T BUY THE Sup Forums PACKAGE AND YOU WILL BE STUCK ON LEDDIT FOREVER.

EVERYONE DEFENDING THE REPEAL NEED A BULLET IN THE HEAD FOR BETRAYING FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

its a push for one world government. Problem ...reaction...solution. Problem is islamic and nationalist terrorist groups. etc.

...

Will this only affect americans or the entire world?

jokes on you I had digits

Soros is not a bad guy.

He's just trying to make the current world work instead of burying his head in the sand and pretending that this is 1950.

If Soros is for it then it must serve white genocide.

OK, you think he's a "good guy", what's his angle? It isn't "freedom" since he supports jailing people for saying the wrong things about the "Holocaust" and race.

He's anti-authoritarian since he fled communism and experienced nazism.
And I think looking at the world today, places like Turkey and Russia, China as the biggest economy, he has a point.

it's called reversed psychology and you failed, circumcied shlong slurper

this banner on the right when you search mutilated penis, kek:
duckduckgo.com/?q=circumscied&t=ffsb&ia=web

>anti-authoritarian who supports authoritarian speech codes

Sure, that makes sense.

if he's anti-authoritarian why does he support sociopaths in favour of big government cronyism like Hillary Clinton ?

youtube.com/watch?v=jgIPI79rQ9Q
It's you, right?

Freedom of speech is BS. I'd silence anyone disagreeing with me if I could.

go on, unless you're just a shallow edgelord

Oh geeze guys soros is apparently backing it. I better double back on years of protests and be all for its privatization! We cant let soros get the nuclear codes.

You're misunderstanding something or live in the wrong country to get the real danger.

It's not better than sticking our head out and pretending that this is 1960 with his fake ass civil-rights movements. What a joke of an evil sith lord

>magyar cigány trying to discuss American cronyism

top lel

Australia, no one here will ever take you guys seriously, since all you guys ever do is shitpost. If youre trying to shill best use a different proxy.

If you say so Muhammad

are you some kind of barefoot Romanian hiding under the guise of a meme flag or are you just some desperate toothless garbage whoring himself out on here for attention, or just to kick into random people online? Your posting history so far rates you into either of these groups, possibly all of them.

Is he, dare I say it, /ourkike/?

George Soros is playing 5D chess with us, he and his (((friends))) know a large amount of people are awoke to his evil pressence. (((They))) have decided to play us by letting Soros be pro NN.
Don't be fooled he isn't the only high level player in the game. We should not just side against NN when Soros does the opposite.
NN has changed our society, without most of us would be bluepilled brainlets.

If someone else started sniffing around his tracks he'd be in trouble.

Obv doing the same thing the big brand ISPs are doing, which is red herringing the peasants

Look at UK.. 15 years jail for viewing "extremist" content. That will happen here when gov regulates internet.

>what is reverse psychology.

wtf I love soros and flooding the west with "refugess" now.

Nah, he underestimates us, and you like many overestimate him. Trust me

This user get's it, we'd be lucky if our corporate protectors are even lenient enough to let us browse four chins for the platinum package internet anyway if at all since some will most certainly jump on the 'oppressive' bandwagon and block Sup Forums as a statement against 'hate speech'. Also they could even slow down or out right ban certain browsers from functioning on their ISP's so only Jewoogle and Bing, no Firefox or Brave for the naughty goy though.

>kekistan strawman doesn't make any good counter argument and resorts to posting macro images.

>implying you euro fags don't already live in a anti free speech zone.

Nice sources you got there faggot.
The point is that even if we all lose our ability to talk with each other online, we are all red pilled to the point that we know what to do without this place. Shutting down right wing or even center of the isle websites will only make the movement more organic.

>'oppressive'
Meant to say 'progressive' but you get the point.

leafblower.jpg
You're ridiculed on par with designated street shitters here. Just give up.

I swear to god everyone on this site is retarded. The current state of the internet is NET NEUTRALITY. Everyone is free to browse the web at their leisure without being throttled by their ISP for visiting "unapproved" websites. Arguing against Net Neutrality is literally asking to have your online freedoms removed.

it is way harder to control speech on the net when you have to corrupt many different firms instead of just one single government regulatory board.

Why do you type like you’re a test spinner from r/politics?

>Being this pathetic of a shill

(OP)
I swear to god everyone on this site is retarded. The current state of the internet is NET NEUTRALITY. Everyone is free to browse the web at their leisure without being throttled by their ISP for visiting "unapproved" websites. Arguing against Net Neutrality is literally asking to have your online freedoms removed.
THIS.^

Also
>What is reverse psychology

Google and netflix hog all the traffic. They should pay for all that

well, you're correct insofar that 95% threads are coming from israels or their breathen elswhere, and yoes you've just diagnosed what's it all about - webs just got out of hand from the perspective of chosenites

Says the meme flag lmao

Sorry mutt no one can stop Canada we speak English better than you retards and know enough about American politics to embarrass you fat idiots over and over again

Sad!

Just sage and move on. Ignore the (((NN))) slide threads.

Net neutrality is net communism. The big 3 hog all the trafic and the rest have to pay the price and never get to properly compete. MAKE NO MISTAKE, NET NEUTRALITY IS NET JUDAISM
god bless trump

that's rich, canadians fat:
duckduckgo.com/?q=canadians fat&t=ffsb&ia=web
slurp your corn syroup, bitch, it's good for ya

There's always a raid happening on Sup Forums. Newfags are just now becoming aware of it.

kek, nuthing happens in this one after my intervention:

He probably believes that with enough money the internet can be a great tool for subversion, how he came to this conclusion is beyond me.

Sup Forums was blocked before and it will happen again if net neutrality is gone. You idiots against net neutrality are literally fighting to get this board blocked from the internet. Good job dumbasses. I will laugh SO FUCKING HARD once Sup Forums is blocked because of your pure ignorance.

Sources:

>gizmodo com/5466492/verizon-has-blocked-access-to-Sup Forums-but-what-are-they-gonna-do-about-it
>unvis.it/gizmodo.com/5466492/verizon-has-blocked-access-to-Sup Forums-but-what-are-they-gonna-do-about-it

He supports having people thrown into prison for saying politically incorrect things. That is what authoritarians do. They always say it's to "protect" the people. I personally agree that people do need to be protected from certain things (I am an authoritarian, so is he). We just disagree on what those things are.

George Soros wants these sites shut down. Why is he opposed to a policy that supposedly will shut them down?

I don't know Scoob. I also wonder why legislation that's only been in place a couple of years is suddenly the only thing between us and oblivion.

remember that you;'ve been cucked by eternal Pole

I'm just asking questions here, friends. I don't really know a lot about net neutrality (embarrassingly, I only know what I've heard from Jon Stewart Liebowitz and John Oliver). I want to know why George Soros is in favor of net neutrality, and what his angle is in all of it.

Net neutrality protects (((facebook))), (((google))) and (((twitter))) and no one else

classifying Internet Service Providers under Title II classification would make them liable for unlawful material and that a legislative or executive branch could use this to prevent free speech on the internet under the guise of Cyber Bullying and or Hate speech laws.

True redpill is Soros is a time traveller and actually your friend, see digits.

That's what I'm starting to lean toward. It's about protecting a handful of big boys who toe the "correct" (neoliberal/globalist/Soros) line on political issues.

this

/thread

Oh, my jew dick slurping enemy, just by soros doing it we know it's wrong - nothing else to add.

the sad reality is the corporate parasites want free reign to keep shilling emojii ads and porn, both things that the internet was never intended for.

Yes, he is a bad guy.

minimal wage soros shills are so obvious

Drumpf wants the internet to be a roiling storm of anti-swamp subversive thought. Why would he ever want to restrict that? He wouldn't. Net neutrality is an attempt at such restriction. Sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar.

careful with sarcasm, lowlife can pick it up as real

I've been trying to piece this together but it's all such a confusing clusterfuck.
At the moment I feel this way: abolish net neutrality. Far more likely than the meme internet packages is companies paying ISPs to push their traffic so they BOTH make money. Netflix gets more expensive and google is a bit less profitable; porn sites get more expensive and lots of free porn sites die and ads on the remaining become more valuable, but otherwise things stay the same.
If censorship arises we fight that as a singular issue rather than an enormous tome of a law. It can be one sentence long:
>No censorship of lawful material.

What does George Soros want? He doesn't believe in "freedom" (no one except a handful of libertarian weirdos truly do believe in "free speech", but that's another topic). He is on the records as favoring outright censorship of "hate". What's his angle here?

whatever you say Zhao.

>Canada ranked most admired country in the world. Flooded with third worlders wanting your hard-earned prosperity.

Do you think that once you've been replaced, the legions of third worlders are going to look at you with favor? Once the well runs dry you'll all die of thirst together.

We need a wall between Canada and the US so that when Canada devolves into Snow Mexico we can keep the violent gangs of marauding somalis, chinese, arabs, etc. the fuck out.

choke on that kike dick, imbecile
do it

Why don't you change my mind instead? I admired I don't really know what's going on and you are just pushing me further away from your position.

Weev and Andrew Anglin are both saying the people who are pushing to save "net neutrality" are the same exact people who tried to shut down the Daily Stormer. That really activates the old almonds.

weev on net neutrality:
dailystormer.hk/weev-on-net-neutrality/

>KyFE+0RA
seriously kys
no soy suupplement wil save you, you're garbage, there is nothing else to say

The overwhelming majority of content comes from Leftists. Service providers and other groups already blackball any legitimate Right wing resistance. So I'd rather most people censored due to this. In fact some groups shouldn't even be allowed on segments of the internet, like Blacks and social media. It keeps them indigent, lazy, and allowed to speak their baboon thoughts.

I've met lots of real Canadians. Sadly most of them seem to be over 40 years old now. I unironically haven't met a white Canadian in years now. Everyone's Asian or Indian/Pakistani. All fairly-well educated, all fairly wealthy - but are they Canadian? Do they have allegiance to Canada? Or are they there to suck off the teet of prosperity and nothing more? Do they have allegiance to western values? Do they even know what the fuck western values are?

Does the Chinaman know what freedom of speech is? Why would he - his home country never developed such a thing. Does a Pakistani know what temperence and tolerance are? Why would he - his home country is barely held together by threads.

Oh but they all learned how to type in 0s and 1s on a computer, so we should let as many come in as they want. Who are we to say no?

Canada will die. It's only a matter of time. I wouldn't have expected it to happen as quickly as it has, though. The same country that nearly saw Quebec split away in the past is now blindly saying that importing people with no allegiance whatsoever won't result in disaster. When I look at old white Canadians, I can almost sense a sort of grizzled badassery, outdoorsy basedness, despite Canada never having actually having the balls to rebel and throw off the British yoke. I guess they, and their ancestors, always were faggot bitches after all.

>In fact some groups shouldn't even be allowed on segments of the internet,
Oh man, that would be a dream come true. Faceberg and twatter becoming too expensive for them to afford, I'm getting giddy just thinking about it

You aren’t seeing white Canadians because according to you if they aren’t 1/224th German like you they are poos and Asians

Ironic coming from a nation famous for being mongrel mutts

Oh well, sad you can’t see properly or eat properly or walk properly etc just a ruined form of life

here's a thread hat died because soros soyboys are understafffed and undreduccated (I guess there's so much yoou can muy wtith 18bn):

>replying to yourself

Uh oh back to Red*it with you faggot!

if it keeps euroshitters like you in the gulags I would too

I was being sarcasm.

Whatever Soros like you better check because there are big chances it's bad.
Not necessarily evil or bad on it own, like when Soros funded right wing groups, but in the end Soros just do whatever is serving him. The fucking lizard is a tractor, he even sold Jews to Nazis.

It may be a trap

Ask yourself this, if ISPs are going to start charging more money for tiered packages, whats stopping them from just charging that same amount of money right now? Without making it a tiered package, just as the basic rate?
They can't charge preferentially right now, but they absolutely could just raise their fees by the same amount. And why wouldnt they? And yet they havent, hmmmm.