Want to take on the Net Neutrality shill?

The Net Neutrality shills will slide this.

Find everything you can on who is lobbying for it. Who wants the government to control the last place free speech truly exists. Soros is no friend of freedom, he's a nation wrecker. Find articles and archive them. Those that can make the information easily digestible and sharable, should.

washingtonexaminer.com/soros-ford-foundation-shovel-196-million-to-net-neutrality-groups-staff-to-white-house/article/2560702

I'm at work and phoneposting so I'm limited on how in depth I can go right now. If one of you can put a better thread together that'd be great.

Bottom line is, since net neutrality passed, we've seen more censorship on the internet than all the time before put together.

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/EW5lL
responsiblewealth.org/
youtu.be/NLX7SFdQmyI
thehill.com/special-reports/net-neutrality-september-16-2014/217862-use-antitrust-laws-not-regulations-to
youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I
youtube.com/watch?v=le2R2Ps58pQ
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/16/black-lives-matter-cashes-100-million-liberal-foun/
infowars.com/soros-google-funding-net-neutrality-groups-to-control-internet-censor-infowars-com/
apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Enormous if exact

...

...

...

...

...

Where necessity exists innovation is wrought. They may shut down the internet but we will create a new network next time fully uncontrollable by any human or group

The internet is not ideal as it exists because the physical network must be maintained. A new network must be created

this is a shill say hello

archive.is/EW5lL

Drudge said that he knows his time is up. The new internet rules they're pushing will all but kill his format. He didn't specifically name NN though.

Broken clocks are right twice a day. A full repeal of all net neutrality protections will not protect the consumer in any way,shape or form. Please feel free to demonstrate a practical means for this to be the case.

Protect the consumer from what exactly? The conglomeration of the largest companies in the world and their government lackies are the biggest threat to consumer protection. Try going on any major platform and speaking a controversial opinion or fact. It will likely be censored.

Look at all the new low effort non topic threads being made. They started shilling NN here hoping to gain support, now they just want to gum up the board with bullshit.

NN has nothing to do with content censorship. If anything Soros could bribe ISPs to selectively curate content in his favor.

Also, ISPs have spent more than Soros has lobbying AGAINST NN.

God these memes are so bad, who pays you to make these?

Captcha: Pharmacy Zion

I'm tired of trying to argue with people about this

I can't believe so many people can be so retarded at the same time

At one point Verizon and AT&T had blocked Sup Forums from their users, this was before Net Neutrality laws.

I'll be laughing when Comcast charges you an extra $50 dollars a month to go on Sup Forums

And you can do nothing because they hold a fucking monopoly.

That's such a lame argument.

>No no goy! We need Net Neutrality so we can censor you when we feel like it! Here take this money from (((Soros))). We're on your side!

erect if correct

You fucking idiots just because one of our enemies funds something does NOT mean that it isn't beneficial for us. There will be no Sup Forums without NN you fucking idiots

BUMP
how hasnt someone "dealt" with soros?

HOW...HOW

CNN is sisters with a HUGE ISP. HUGE.

Terry hates NN. He knows that passing NN will give the CIA niggers power over his internet.

Maybe Soros was the good guy all along

responsiblewealth.org/

...

Ah yes... If we don't let the biggest corporations in the world lobby out government for more control, we'll lose it all. Everything you know and love will be gone.

That isn't going to happen. This is all about sites that use lots of streaming video getting squeezed. This is about YouTube and Netflix. Sites like Sup Forums cost Verizon and Comcast nearly nothing in terms of bandwidth to serve to their customers. The average 4channer uses 100+ times more bandwidth on stupid video shit like YouTube and Netflix than they do downloading low quality jpegs and text on Sup Forums.

Tell me how it won't be possible if NN is repealed.

13" if descriptive of my erect penis

>Obama leaf
>tweeting soros

youtu.be/NLX7SFdQmyI

Now why would he come out against this? hmmm wonder.

>Try going on any major platform and speaking a controversial opinion or fact. It will likely be censored.
That doesn't have anything to do with Net Neutrality. It's not your ISP that is censoring your comments, it's the business that owns the website.

You 'people' actually have no idea what you're talking about, do you?

the shills are fucking everywhere tonight, this started on cripplechan of all place, it started to occur yesterday. they are shilling the NN (or sliding something else?) very hard.

the govt created the internet and the republigoy party hates soldiers

Fuck off shill

lol trump is gunna crash the dollar

>We need Net Neutrality so we can censor you when we feel like it!
Now explain how having neutrality means they can censor you.
Go on, I'll wait until the thread 404's.

And those businesses can get a little taste of what it's like to be censored by having their sites throttled.
Let the fuckers burn

In this case he’s right

Sites like Sup Forums are the equivalent of the televangelist channels on cable/satellite TV. Cable companies love those channels because they get them for free (or next to nothing) to fill out their channel lineup. Sup Forums costs nearly nothing compared to the streaming video titans fighting for (((net neutrality))). No, this has nothing to do with Sup Forums. YouTube/Netflix/Hulu are the ESPN/HBO/NFL equivalent that cost ISPs big money to provide to their customers. This BS about "net neutrality" is just a fight between Jews (ISP Jews and the Jews who serve the Google/Facebook/Netflix content over the ISPs' pipes)

What bullshit, he's clearly shilling against it.
>what is reverse psychology

thehill.com/special-reports/net-neutrality-september-16-2014/217862-use-antitrust-laws-not-regulations-to

youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I

where did all these pro-NN shills come from suddenly? must be those $200 million sorosbux going to good use.

...

This pic doe. They are astrotufin hard on Reddit.

About a decade ago when this was first being talked about, the majority of Sup Forums at the time was for it.
Explain why you are not.

They tried it 3 years ago too. They were coming from PedoGAF then.

It's obvious this NN shilling isn't organic. It's obvious you shills are trying not to stand out, but you do. It's hilarious. I watched you guys go from a persuasive and concerned tone to calling everyone who disagrees with you a shill, in a matter of hours yesterday.

about a decade ago the majority of Sup Forums was 12 years old. i'm against it because my brain finished development.

Because it's been 10 years and things change, especially once KingNigger got his hands on it.
This is obamacare for the internet. How are those premiums working out for?

They're all #NeverTrumpers every single thread. It immediately makes it obvious.

ITT: ISPs shills
pls just kill net neutrality and end this place

Fellow shill here. Can confirm am using Trojan virus from Russia. Vote NO on neutral networks bill. Spasibo!

>Europe
You don't get a say, unfortunately.

Because these sites that where once about the people making content, are now censoring the opinions of people they think are 'problematic' and 'toxic'
youtube.com/watch?v=le2R2Ps58pQ

This level of truth could get you killed. 2015 NN bill is a SV kickback and payment for work to be done.

Silly Canadian cuck. It went down because of 9/11 and the dollar is going back up. Besides thats a lot of big words from some one who cant even own a gun.

>Soros
I was lurking a NN shill thread in Sup Forums yesterday where someone decided to argue against the shills. In his post he called out Soros for potentially being behind these raids. His post got tons of replies, most of which were posts defending Soros.

Explain why you are against it without calling everyone a shill then.
>This is obamacare for the internet.
NN gives free internet to poorfags?
It fines you money if you don't have an internet connection?
Explain.

net neutrality was in place from the beginning you tard. the fcc got its way early on. under obama it was removed and the media just acts like it had forgot just like the dns identification task being handed over to the UN. we have had both for about 3 years (2 and a half ish) and the media has been recycling shit

i guess to many were just paying attention to the election cycle from 2015 to the end of 2016. a lot of the news has been recycled from 2015. 3 ucla players getting caught shop lifting in china yea its old news... really old news

>Pirate
But pirating cites will be the first to go.

Because Sup Forums is filled with newfags that arrived after GG and the 2016 election.

It's still possible with NN, hence being a dumb argument. See stormfront.

Are you seriously this fucking stupid? Without NN they won't have to lobby and shill because said oligarchs will literally control all of the information that you can access. Are you fucking stupid? Seriously? Are you fucking mentally retarded?

I want all of the streaming video sites to be destroyed by the ISPs. Sites like Sup Forums will be unaffected, as the average user downloads very little data from such sites. Streaming video chews up gigabytes per session, Sup Forums uses megabytes of data per session.

the leaves will rule supreme

plot twist: the day of the rake was for the filthy mutts all along

>defending Soros

Are you getting mad that all you can do is throw a fit like a disgusting baby? It's happening whether you like it or not, so I suggest you get your little tantrum under control.

So how does handing ISPs and large corporations more power to censor wrongthink make this any better?
Rephrased, how will giving them more power prevent them from continuing to censor wrongthink?

Net Neutrality protects my consumer rights. Why the FUCK should I be opposed to it? You shills are ridiculous.

SOROS SUPPORTS IT SO IT'S BAD REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Because they can afford to maintain a monopoly with the same overhead as a starting business website, without NN their premiums will get jacked to fuck and bankrupt them, then ISPs will go bankrupt when their customers turn out.

They get so buttblasted. I had one guy say he wanted to fuck my mother's corpse. She's not even dead.

>This is obamacare for the internet.
Literally a Ted Cruz propaganda statement. Fuck right off.

I've explained it multiple times. I even posted parts of the text and tried to get people to read the bill with me last night.

This, plus they want to block torrenting.

He might be the fallguy

If consumers want to spend their data on video streaming sites, then why shouldn't they?
What's wrong with the free market?
ISP's allocate data use to the users, and it's the users who should then decided what their data is used on.

Now just imagine if Soros didn't push it. Sup Forums would be all for NN and the repeal would have more chance to fail. Isn't that funny?

washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/16/black-lives-matter-cashes-100-million-liberal-foun/

Think that's interesting? Check out NPR's Sponsors (some of which get cited as sources for news stories).

It's about protecting YouTube and Netflix. Fuck those companies.

>how will giving them more power prevent them from continuing to censor wrongthink?
It won't.
But if Kikebook, Jewgle, and all the other (((big sites))) wanna censor wrong-think, I have no problem with them feeling the sting as well in the form of throttling.
They wanna burn us, we'll just burn the whole fucking thing down

I think I understand you now. You want them to start charging more/discriminating in hopes they absolutely rape the bigger, untouchable media filled shitholes so they go bankrupt, correct?
I'll read it, thanks.

wtf?
Soros is for net neutrality? Im against it now.
Is this 5D chess?

>plebbit unironically being in support of online only video games and worrying about it only because someone could shut off their access to it

Thanks for trying to improve the actual discussions, did the shills bite?

I like not having to pay an extra fee for online games, an extra fee for news, an extra fee for porn, and so on. So Net Neutrality is good for consumers like me. Didn't Trump promise to protect the common man?

>When you donate to opposition and get free shills willing to harm themselves
What do you want? Google or Comcast? Because one of them will win

And thus favor comcast and the other tech giants who want to make up on lost profits. You're playing yourself

Can someone tell me why you don't trust billionaire individuals who have no interest in your daily lives but do trust multi-billion-dollar faceless corporations that literally profit from exploiting you as a consumer in every legal way possible, as well as some legally grey and even flat out illegal ways so long as they don't get caught?

Alex is truth
infowars.com/soros-google-funding-net-neutrality-groups-to-control-internet-censor-infowars-com/

I'm starting to think you guys might have won me over. It would be playing the jews against each other, forcing them to compete and fucking them out of money. They will be far more effected than me or you will be.

Censored at the individual platform level right now. This is already terrible. Why allow the possibility to further censor at the service provider level as well?

>Your consumer rights
Jesus, the only way to actually get these faggot soy enriched millennials to actually do something is the threaten their Netflix and video games. You're pathetic man. Your culture is being eroded from within and your final straw is this?

Oh shut the fuck up cunt. IF your NN repeal happens the entire corporations will fall to their fucking knees. Do you know how many I.T. professionals are running the wire to your DEMARCs, Network Racks, installing the firewalls, working directly near your most valuable assets? The very assets that control your corporations daily operations? Do you know how many of us there are? Do you have ANY fucking clue what we will do when you try and CENSOR our fucking internet?

A USB drive is a very small utiity. A USB drive can carry many payloads. A SINGLE FUCKING USB DRIVE CAN BRING DOWN ISPS AND IF NET NEUTRALITY IS REPEALED THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT WILL HAPPEN.

You think the Sony hacks we're significant? HBO? Paypal, CNN, Fox DDoSes we're significant? Imagine when every furious I.T. professional that browses Sup Forums can't browse Sup Forums anymore. Imagine it.

You will watch internet rage turn into real rage and bring your fucking companies to the ground BEGGING to put NN back in place.

Watch it motherfuckers. Watch it happen.

Title II means that broadband service providers get to charge “edge” providers, such as Google and Netflix, a positive price for terminating their bits to broadband users. Title II does not mean edge providers are exempt from paying a fee for transmission of their content. By statutory definition under Title II, a “telecommunications service” is a service sold for a fee. Moreover, these edge providers impose a direct cost on the network and, as such, the Fifth Amendment demands that BSPs be compensated appropriately. As such, Title II prohibits the FCC from imposing a “below cost”, “confiscatory” rate of zero.
Second, Title II means that BSPs must file tariffs with the FCC. The FCC has recognized that in a competitive marketplace, tariffs drive providers to charge similar prices, thus undercutting the very point of having companies compete on price. By contrast, according to the theory that held sway in Obama’s FCC, the case for using Title II to secure an Open Internet, all BSPs are gatekeepers and terminating monopolies. In other words, the commission doesn’t trust the market to ensure that rates are “just and reasonable.” Taking that argument at face value, this means that the FCC cannot eliminate tariffs in a non-competitive market by the plain terms of the Communications Act.

Third, Title II specifically permits BSPs to engage in reasonable discrimination, provided that customers are not “similarly situated.” As such, Title II expressly prohibits the FCC from imposing a rule that would mandate blanket non-discrimination.
Unfortunately Title II proved inconvenient for the Obama administration. Its solution? To ignore the “vast majority of rules adopted under Title II,” selectively picking and choosing whatever provisions of Title II it found convenient to achieve a results-driven outcome.
apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-15-24A1.pdf

>reeeeee stop caring about things you care about
>start caring about the things ***I*** care about instead
Fuck off.

waaaaa
Trump gets his second term and you don't even get scraps.

If the platforms wanna throttle us, we'll make it so they get throttled.
It's that simple. They shoulda left our fucking video games alone