You dumb faggots who don't support net neutrality realize that Sup Forums can easily be shut down by (((corporations)))...

you dumb faggots who don't support net neutrality realize that Sup Forums can easily be shut down by (((corporations))) if this vote passes, right? how long do you thiink it will take for sjws to start pressuring comcast, verizon,etc, to throttle access to Sup Forums in the name of 'stopping fascists/nazis/russians'?? are you really this goyish?

Other urls found in this thread:

washingtonexaminer.com/soros-ford-foundation-shovel-196-million-to-net-neutrality-groups-staff-to-white-house/article/2560702
obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/node/323681
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>porn image in op
shift-click

Newfag detected. Also sage goes in all options.

They cant censor us even if they try.
NOTHING is beyond our reach
Jk that's just a meme we don't reach into CP

Fuck off you larping fag. Sup Forums was forged in the ancient fires of pre-NN internet. It will survive well into the future.

Inb4 newfags ask who this is

>you now have to pay companies to post anonymously
it was fun while it lasted

>you dumb faggots who don't support net neutrality realize that Sup Forums can easily be shut down by (((corporations))) if this vote passes, right
>implying this isn't the case already
hello faggot let me introduce you to my friend the daily stormer.
stop posting.

Meshchan is gonna be amazing!

sage

wow. a pedophilic picture of a man with gyno

That wont stop your ISP from doing packet inspection to block your mesh website.

>makes out with him
his name was tory smith

That girl doesn't look like she's 18...

>Sup Forums will be shut down
Good

It's just one big Jewish cesspool now with CIA posts everywhere

>1 post by this ID

dial up BBS?

fucking hell I forgot how hot zunechan was
thanks op

under net neutrality, Sup Forums can be shut down by the FCC

fuck you commie nigger

>Throttle access
Because Sup Forums just streams terraflops of 8k video right?

Motherfucking AOL would not have made a dime 'throttling' Sup Forums.

@Jack, Zucc, Spez, and Jewgle, (the fucking Jew thought police who have monopolized all internet content in order to sell your personal data while you watch it) SUPPORT THIS REGULATION
>WTF DOES THAT TELL YOU?

You can keep your plan and doctor nigger, spymaster Obama wants to.

Fucking morons!

Seeing how literally everybody save a few Jew shills on this site are against the bill, I doubt it will pass. Congressmen fear not being re-elected like the end of the world.

PROTIP: there was never a pre-NN internet in the US.

If you want to know what non-NN internet works like, go visit China or Russia.

Okg he talks like us
THis is totals not a shill guys

That girl doesn't look prepubescent either, you mega-dorks

who cares about cuckchan

this is a kike using soft porn to derail any topic of substance. It's a common trick - don't fall for it. Any thread with a half naked woman on Sup Forums is most likely a shill. They use man's strongest instinct (sex) to get your mind off redpill topics and on to jerking off. Don't fall for the kikery.

who is this? I'm not a newfag
>I've been here since june

Retards who listen to Reddit on John Oliver are against it. People who actually know what they're talking about it support the FCC repealing these pointless regulations.

sauce

...

this and day of the rake

Good..if Sup Forums shuts down we'll just re-create Sup Forums offline.

Wait, don't tell the SJWs that the utilities control the communities,

>Sup Forums can easily be shut down
no Americans means Sup Forums is dead?
A FUCKING LEAF

Post more zune Chan.

Enjoy paying $200 just to come here. Enjoy paying an extra $50 just to look something up on Google or what have you. The entire internet is going to cost thousands to use. Your freedoms are being stripped before your eyes and the le based Trump meme has blinded you.

user, fuck this thread, but announcing sage - pronounced sah geh- is a bannable offense. and for fuck sake is you sage something, and then also post an image you are bumping the thread. you fucking retards need to read the FAQ and stop shitting up the culture.

nigga this whole net nutrality rule was introduced in 2015. if what you say is true "there is no pre NN internet" then WHAT THE FUCK DO WE HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT?
keep your fucking story straight, asshat

washingtonexaminer.com/soros-ford-foundation-shovel-196-million-to-net-neutrality-groups-staff-to-white-house/article/2560702
Sure thing shill.

>fear mongering this much
maybe it'll finally get your newfaggy ass gone.

>you dumb faggots who don't support net neutrality realize that Sup Forums can easily be shut down by (((corporations))) if this vote passes, right? how long do you thiink it will take for sjws to start pressuring comcast, verizon,etc, to throttle access to Sup Forums in the name of 'stopping fascists/nazis/russians'?? are you really this goyish?
Is this why your dumb faggot ass doesnt realize that Sup Forums was up and running for years before Obama's communist NWO net nuetrality in 2015? You fucking moron commie. Go lick Obama's commie leftist blue balls and leave the brains to us.

>options

this is how i know you're a shill

NNN??
since june.

...

Yes, govt controlled internet isn't neutral, so you are advocating for govt controlled internet via NN regulations?

For the sake of argument, IF it were banned by ISPs, would you change your position?

Since when does net neutrality have to do with access to a site? Do your research leaf to see what it prevents. Throttling on some websites who don't pay an extortion fee. Nothing else. You are a puppet of the Jewish.

Somebody post the other one of these about net neutrality. I saw it in a big macro and I can't find it now.

>net nutrality rule was introduced in 2015
retard spotted

You don't understand the history (probably wilfully, since it's all been posted in detail numerous times in NN threads).

Since the start of the internet the FCC always enforced the net neutrality principal (i.e. regulated it as a common carrier). The FCC stopped ISPs every time they tried to violate the equal-treatment principal. But because internet over fibre and cable was never officially designated as "common carrier" (since cable TV wasn't, unlike dial-up and DSL which inherited that status from telephone), it looked like the ISPs might win against the FCC in courts and end NN. So Obama simply formalized what had always existed.

THIS IS LITERALLY TRUE, although that won't stop the new-neutrality-is-two-years-old fake news from being repeated endlessly on Sup Forumsthe_donald/

>the gov will control the internet under nn
retard spotted, it's a regulation to stop corps from throttling shit, not censorship by the gov

Fuck off retard
Why would right-wingers want to regulate something

yes, you are
obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/node/323681

Wew it sure is reddit in here.

You are fucking moron. A regulation is literally the govt control of a market, in this case the ISP market. Please off yourself immediately.

yes goyim, ignore the previous lawsuits by big corps that were shut down by the fcc, schlomo has your best interests at heart

Soros loves NN
#ImWithHim

>obama
it was passed under bush in 2004

>the gov regulating fair practice is bad and censorship
i bet you wish the fda was gone too

>REDDIT HATES THIS ALONG WITH LITERALLY EVERYBODY ELSE SO YOU'RE FROM REDDIT
>REDDIT REDDIT REDDIT REDDIT REDDIT REDDIT SOROS SOROS SOROS SOROS SOROS SOYBOY SOYBOY SOYBOY SOYBOY SJW SJW SJW SJW SJW SJW SJW
The only argument you Anti-NNfags have. Fuck off.

the internet killed civil society

soros loves food, you should stop eating

>not realizing that the entirety of Sup Forums was pro NN in 2014 during the last debate because he wasn't here then

You are the only newfag

You realize if it becomes FCC regulated the (((government))) would shut Sup Forums down under indecency laws right?

Also
>implying shutting down the internet would be a bad thing

Because net neutrality saved the daily stormer, right?

>is painfully misinformed, thinks that NN was actually introduced in 2015
>leave the brains to us
ironic

Formalizing something and creating something are two different things

ya fucking dip

Some of us grew up

then why haven't they done so? nn has been in place for over a decade

The government has no business regulating private business. Let them charge me $500 per post here. I'll go to an ISP that won't. Do you not understand that businesses lower prices in order to compete with each other? No ISP in their right mind would actually do this. Customers would jump ship to an ISP that doesn't. Nothing's going to change.

...BTW I hope you idiots get your way. It'll be such a disaster for free-speech and free-competition that it'll prevent any other country from foolishly going down the same road.

>>the gov regulating fair practice is bad and censorship
it's bad for consumers, yes. the regulation are setting up monopolies by nameing ISPs as utilities. You know utilities aren't subject to anti-trust laws right? That's what allows the power and water companies to have monopolies in the thier area. But here's the best part, NN stop short of having ISP be subject to a utility commission in order to raise rates. You are arguing for making ISPs bigger monopolies than the already are with govt protection, but without consumer protection of utility commission.

There is nothing in net neutrality that prevents this from happening even now. This entire talking point is the mark of either an idiot or a shill.

>implying isps don't have a monopoly already
>implying you can start competition since they passed laws against it
yeah and comcast is gonna build that fiber network with the 2bil they received, any day now i'm sure.

Without Net neutrality you will be required to give Comcast your first born to work as a sex slave.

The ISP do have huge market share, but NN will make the monopoly govt protected. They won't be able to be broken up at all.
>can't start competition against ISPs because regulations
>i know, we need more regulations.
wew lad

So what is it that Google, Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, and others are doing to "right wing" sites RIGHT NOW?
Please explain how when leftist sites shut down "hate" sites by removing their domain, hosting, or whatever else, how that's any different than an ISP fucking with Googles packets?
you lefty faggots reap what you sow.

lol
>bitches about less regulation
>on Sup Forums
>on pol

you're the dumb faggot who doesn't support the suppression of people until they have had enough and snap. The more restrictions the more people will have enough (especially when it pertains to the internet).

>forbidden network throttling is bad
uhhhhhhhh?

why cant the fcc shut them down again if it really does get out of hand
repealing this doesnt mean they cant pass a different one?

You know we do.

>The internet was fine before NN
Here's what you retards aren't getting:
There was no pre-NN. Reclassification as Title II and official NN regs are new, but principles they are based on of non-discriminatory traffic manipulation is how the internet operated prior to NN.

The push to reclassify and establish official NN rules only came about when companies started to operate AGAINST the status quo by manipulating traffic for business reasons.

15 years ago it wasn't dominated by streaming. ISPs didn't have much reason to start filtering until internet access became widespread, and streaming started to become so popular that there was a business interest in pivoting away from non-discriminatory traffic forwarding.

ISPs in court have testified they intend to establish "fast lanes" for premium packages like TV Cable. Here are examples of pre-NN where companies tried to manipulate traffic and were sued:

Madison River Communications blocked VOIP services. The FCC put a stop to it. (2005)
Comcast denied access to p2p services without notifying customers. (2005)
AT&T blocked Skype and other VOIPs because they didn't like the competition for their cellphone services. (2007)
MetroPCS tried to block all streaming except YouTube. They actually sued the FCC over this. (2011)
AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon blocked access to tethering apps on the Android marketplace, with Google's help. (2011)
AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon blocked access to Google Wallet because it competed with their payment apps. (2011)
Verizon demanded Google block tethering apps on android because it let owners avoid their $20 tethering fee. This was despite guaranteeing they wouldn't do that as part of a winning bid on an airwaves auction. They were fined $1.25million over this. (2012)
AT&T tried to block access to FaceTime unless customers paid more money. (2012)
Verizon stated that the only thing stopping them from favoring some content providers over other providers were the net neutrality rules in place. (2013)

That's really all you got isn't it. And it isn't even true if you read the regulations. The language states that any website deemed to have hosted illegal content, can be shut down/throttled by the ISP.

>we here at comcast have your best interests at heart, repeal net neutrality today!

>the fcc should spend all it's time fighting networks instead of just passing a law to end it

>any website deemed to have hosted illegal content, can be shut down/throttled by the ISP.
rip Sup Forums, soon there will be laws in place against certain websites like foxnews and infowars

Daily reminder that killing Net Neutrality is the best way to ensure a Democrat victory in the 2018 and 2020 elections

Also, Trump is killing the very thing that helped him get elected.

>WE NEED NET NEUTRALITY FOR A NEUTRAL CENSORSHIP-FREE INTERNET
>*bans dailystormer*
>*bans conservative websites*
>*demonetize anti-liberal youtube videos*
>*shuts down conservative youtube channels*
>*bans conservative accounts from using twitter and facebook*
>*artificially promotes liberal news sites as real news*
>*artificially hides conservative news sites as fake news*
>*blocks Russian IP from using twitter*
>BY THE WAY FELLOW REDDITO... I MEAN 4CHANNERS WE NEED TO DEFEND NET NEUTRALITY OR ELSE THEY WILL BAN 4CHINZ NOW

And this throttling/shutdown access to can supposedly be applied retroactively. There is nothingin the regulations to stop it.

>>*bans dailystormer*
>>*bans conservative websites*
>>*demonetize anti-liberal youtube videos*
>>*shuts down conservative youtube channels*
>>*bans conservative accounts from using twitter and facebook*
>>*artificially promotes liberal news sites as real news*
>>*artificially hides conservative news sites as fake news*
>>*blocks Russian IP from using twitter*

And that will still happen because ISPs are private companies. In fact this type of behavior will increase once the ISPs are granted additional power by the removal of NN

And that's why you're a laughable idiot.

that's exactly what will happen when you allow corporations to run things, enjoy cnn controlling all the news websites

Fuck off with these blatant scare tactics. That never happened before NN and won’t happen after it goes away.

>That never happened before NN
that's because NN has been in place since 04

No, fuck you shill. Trump isn't even smart enough to understand this situation. And he's handed the whole thing over to a filthy fucking pajeet whose nothing more than a shill for the big telecoms

>you dumb faggots who don't support net neutrality realize that Sup Forums can easily be shut down by (((corporations))) if this vote passes, right?
>he doesnt realize that corporations shutdown SF and DS
>A Fucking Leaf

None of this is happening at the ISP level, only on hosted services. Youtube has a ToS they can set. DNS hosts have ToS they can set. ISPs cannot, under NN rules, block or throttle traffic to sites based on content. You are essentially fighting to allow them to do so.

Why shouldn't they be allowed to do so?

images don't bump, this is a common myth

see? still page 3

because they don't have competition due to lobbying against startups

They should but it's not like making the isps able to do so will generate any actual benefit for the economy. Doesn't seem like the economic growth from the ending it will be worth it for the average american.

>tfw pointless government regulations are going to be repealed, and there's nothing John Oliver, George Soros, Reddit, Google, or Facebook can do about it