Stop wasting your time trying to sift through the pro-net neutrality shills. All you need to know:
Reddit likes NN
Obama likes NN
George Soros likes NN
(((Jews))) like NN
You simply don't need to know any more than that to know to be against net neutrality
What about the Jews who own ISPs that want to get rid of it?
>defining yourself based on what other people don't like
>letting your enemies define the way you think
Who the fuck is paying you to spam this image? I've seen it in EVERY single NN thread for the past two days. This can't be just me.
>jews tell you it's good to breathe oxygen
>GUYS STOP BREATHING THE JEWS LIKE IT SO WE SHOULDN'T
Soros likes NN because he has billions invested in Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, and Apple.
this is the epitome of sheeple mentality.
learn to think for yourself. you may find legitimate reasons to be against NN.
This, I refuse to believe someone on Sup Forums is naturally making and sharing this kind of shitty t_d memes. It must be ISPs shills.
>literally last five thousand years of human history
>hurr durr its dumb and I'm so smart
>I'll do what the Jews tell me to do and think
I'm against the government regulating anything. Net neutrality takes away what makes the internet great, and ruins it. The internet is currently open and free. If we give it to the government they will only put restrictions on it.
It's fine the way it is. You can't improve it by putting rules around it.
>liberalls like living
>HA, I'LL KILL MYSELF, THAT'LL SHOW THOSE REDDIT USERS, TRIGGERED MUCH?
literally you right now, this fucking pack mentality us vs them shit has to go.
shariablue(ge-orgy sore-us)
So here we are, 224 years later, at a pivotal fork in the road, poised to preserve those very same
virtues of a democratic society – free speech, freedom of religion, a free press, freedom of assembly and
a functioning free market.
As we look around the world we see foreign governments blocking access to websites including
social media -- in sum, curtailing free speech. There are countries where it is routine for governments,
not the consumer, to determine the type of websites and content that can be accessed by its citizens. I am
proud to be able to say that we are not among them.
Absent the rules we adopt today, however, any Internet Service Provider (ISP) has the liberty to
do just that. They would be free to block, throttle, favor or discriminate against traffic or extract tolls
from any user for any reason or for no reason at all.
This is more than a theoretical exercise. Providers here in the United States have, in fact, blocked
applications on mobile devices, which not only hampers free expression but also restricts competition and
innovation by allowing companies, not the consumer, to pick winners and losers.
---------
Exactly what Google, Facebook, Twitter, Youtube has been doing since Net Neutrality, the Common Core of internet was adopted.
Ok so think this. Why don't you watch TV any more? Cos its a leftist circle jerk and nothing interesting is ever on. The Jews run the TV media, and if nn goes, then they will have the Internet as well. Redit wants non because they know its a threat to its existence. Reddit won't have the shekles to stay afloat and bam, there it goes. Same goes goes for this place or any other right wing leaning website. While Obama was a cunt he did this part right, making sure the corporates don't exploit the shit out of the net and make it another tasteless lefty shit hole.
This fellow channers, we MUST be against Net "Neutrality" for the good of the nation.
Honestly id rather have Tumblr invade Sup Forums than all these anti NN shills.
>x likes y and I hate x, therefore I must oppose y
Can we stop playing identity politics already? If this is your argument, you're no better than the SJWs.
...
You're a complete fucking idiot.
There will be further censorship once NN is repealed. Sites like Sup Forums will be declared "extremist" and will get banned
And nothing will change on Twitter because it's a private company you imbecilic moron.
>I don't believe this and this argument would never work on me, but if I say it you might do what I want and support NN
I'm Irish fuck off kike
If I don't like what my isp is doing in terms of my service I can find a new provider.
If we turn over the internet to the government they will ruin it.
Let's look at their long list of management in our lives: healthcare, Amtrak, wars since ww2. I could keep going. Regulating the internet will not be good.
"We are here to ensure that there is only one Internet where all applications, new products, ideas
and points of view, have an equal chance of being seen and heard. We are here because we want to
enable those with deep pockets, as well as those with empty pockets, the same opportunities to succeed."
Only someone from Cuckland would think that sounds good.
Net Neutrality protects consumer rights. Didn't Trump say he would protect the common man?
>I can find a new provider.
Actually no you can't because in most areas ISPs have a local monopoly because they control and own the land lines
You're a fucking shill and an idiot.
If you like how the internet is now where it's basically free and NEUTRAL you support nn. Sage the shill and divide threads.
Lol where do you live? I have one internet provider, just one option. Many places in the us are the same.
Trump said a lot of things
Weird how Sup Forums existed for over a decade without net neutrality. It's almost like the hysteria is over nothing
Turn off your service then.
Live without internet for a bit.
>Oh no, that sounds hard.
Jesus fucking Christ do you kikes not realize this is going to be the straw that breaks the normies backs, your endless fucking greed, there isn't a fucking country left to expel you to, we're just going to fucking kill you.
its from the net neutrality document you ape
--------------
How do FCC rules protect the Open Internet?
The FCC's Open Internet rules protect and maintain open, uninhibited access to lawful online content. The rules specifically prohibit:
Blocking: Broadband providers may not block access to lawful content, applications, services or non-harmful devices.
Throttling: Broadband providers may not deliberately target some lawful internet traffic to be delivered to users more slowly than other traffic.
Paid prioritization: Broadband providers may not favor some internet traffic in exchange for consideration of any kind. Internet service providers are also banned from prioritizing content and services of their affiliates.
------------
Why can twitter and apebook ban people from communicating, with current Net Neutrality rules, when they haven't even broken a law?
If he uses that sort of logic to support his position, it just might.
My real argument is that we can't trust large ISPs not to fuck us all over with the power we're about to hand them. In a true free market they would have a strong incentive to make their customers happy -- otherwise we'd go to a competitor. But they have that taken care of already. Most places they've done deals with the municipalities to keep the competition out. So all they have to do to keep us is provide better service than >tfw no internets.
I live in Illinois and I have the choice between comcast, wide open west, and att. Even in bufu Florida where I vacation there are two internet providers. That's not to mention the other providers like att, Verizon, sprint, and T-Mobile that are literally everywhere.
Please tell lies elsewhere, friends.
watch the stefan molyneux video on it
It's about the same as having a choice between a big dick in your ass or a huge dick in your ass.
>Lawful
Hmmm
You are retarded. Even if you're trolling, you're still retarded.
Yup. They've been at it for a while. At least one state attorney general is looking into paid anti-NN shilling by ISPs on social networking sites, forums, etc. NY, I think.
A huge part of their shit has been "REDDIT LIKES IT, LIBERALS LIKE IT, ITS THEREFORE BAD".
When even fucking Israel is questioning the influx of CIA faggotry.
Twitter and Facebook are not ISPs. They're internet forums, which are allowed to remove people from their own sites at will, for any reason.
To use shitty analogies:
Facebook is like a pub. You can go in and chat with people, but they can kick you out if they don't like you.
Comcast is like the roads you drive on to get to the pub. You have a right to use them to go anywhere so long as you pay the agreed upon tolls, taxes and fees, and don't break the law.
They just desperatly trying to stay relevant.
Stay mad shill. You can abandon this thread and start a new one.
Facts and reality are not your friend :^)
There already have been sites censored under net neutrality. So should probably try a new argument.
No they desperately want to be the ones to put these laws in place becuase the first side that does wins the propaganda war for fucking ever.
False opposition. If Soros calls on his good pals the Rothschilds he can easily make up the lost profit if he needs to. It's whats possible when your privately held reserve bank receives trillion dollar "bail outs" (i.e. debt payments).
You are the shill, fuckwit. Every massive Jew corporation, globalists, George fucking Soros is pushing for NN. Why do you think that is? Are you so dumb you think they suddenly care about your interests? NN is nothing but expansion of federal power over the internet; we are much better off without it.
>shariablue
>not sharejew
gtfo with your alt-kike meme names
Yes, and he is. You just aren’t smart enough to see NN for what it is.
What lawful sites have been censored by American ISPs?
to be fair its jews jewing each other. it doesnt really matter. they are already shutting down free speech on campuses and on the internet.
POLICE ENFORCED DIVERSITY! enjoy
You forgot
>(((Facebook)))
>(((Google)))
>(((Amazon)))
And some faggots are legit surprised at how so many NN shills all appeared at once
No, he isn't. If NN is repealed my internet costs will go up but the quality of service will be the same or possibly worse. How does this protect my consumer interests?
BECAUSE IT HURTS EVERYONE YOU STUPID FUCK
>Jews control the internet companies
>Repeals NN
> Jews control internet companies and what sites you go on
Good job /pol
If you can easily make it up why give a shit about anything in the first place?
>I'm going to peel the fucking skin off a shills face like in those fucked up Mexican cartel videos and make sure they know we're going to start coming after traitors.
go on kill net neutrality
Kill Sup Forums, kill trumps chances. I don't give a shit anymore. I'm done trying to convince imbeciles not to shove their head in a microwave
Find a new provider. I was tired of getting screwed by att so I switched to sprint. Almost every area in the United States is served by comcast, att, and a local provider.
By that logic then either side could be the Jewish side.
Keep dreaming amerifat
>Weird how Sup Forums existed for over a decade without net neutrality
>over a decade without net neutrality
Sup Forums has been around since 94? cuz NN started in 04
You forgot one. Hillary is pro NN.
There's no others in my area user
>inb4 dude just pack up and move somewhere else lmao
Fuck off Comcast shill. If net neutrality dies, Sup Forums dies. Simple as that.
can nobody see what's happening here
they are using reverse psychology to get you to support what they want you to support
its like telling a kid he cant have cigarettes then the kid goes out and tries a cigarette
Sup Forums poses a threat to jewish plans
>Sup Forums has been around since 94?
Sup Forums BBS will live again!
WHOEVER MAKES THE FUCKING NN LAWS WINS THE PROPAGANDA WAR FOREVER, THIS IS WHY BOTH SIDES ARE HAVE BEEN TRYING TO BE THE FIRST TO DO IT.
YOU STUPID
FUCKING
GODDAMN
RETARDS
>not wanting to ruin things for everyone
where do you think you are?
>Find a new provider
lol?
The solution to no choices isn't to hand over control to the government. Why do they have a monopoly in the first place hmm?
>WE NEED NET NEUTRALITY FOR A NEUTRAL CENSORSHIP-FREE INTERNET
>*bans dailystormer*
>*bans conservative websites*
>*demonetize anti-liberal youtube videos*
>*shuts down conservative youtube channels*
>*bans conservative accounts from using twitter and facebook*
>*artificially promotes liberal news sites as real news*
>*artificially hides conservative news sites as fake news*
>*blocks Russian IP from using twitter*
>BY THE WAY FELLOW REDDITO... I MEAN 4CHANNERS WE NEED TO DEFEND NET NEUTRALITY OR ELSE THEY WILL BAN 4CHINZ NOW
thats because they will loose market value in the long run on their investments while comcast will continue shitting money
comcast already has permission to band your internet for entering to piratebay and downloading a torrent you know the shit they will do if you give more power
Facebook's terms of service do not have anything to do with NN. It's weird that people keep bringing that up in regards to this topic. Almost like they're shills trying to distract people.
You are a liar. Net neutrality makes the internet what it is right now, which is great. Take away neutrality and the internet will turn into cable TV v2.
>not even 2 minutes had passed since the original post and this has already become a copy pasta
yeah comcast will give you 100% permission to roleplay as a nazi if you pay them 50 dollars per hour
yes isps will be free to do just that if this gets repealed
good point
I never liked HBO or any of those pay channels because YOU HAD TO FUCKING PAY FOR THEM
Net neutrality does not do anything about content inside websites, what sites Google lists in what order, or what sites are in the DNS. Please educate yourself before posting bullshit.
How can anyone be dumb enough to fall for this shit? Obvious bot right here.
>I'm against the government regulating anything
So, you're against the government setting clean standards for your drinking water? You're against the government maintaining the public roads?
>Reddit drinks water
>Obama drinks water
>soros drinks water
>Jews drink water
You don't have to know anything else to be against water.
and in here you will have no option but to pay for them
and it will also force Sup Forums to be more adbased
so if you seeing start soyproduct placements on your taiwanese weaving image board thank pajeet
Net neutrality is the status quo, which Soros is supportive of.
Both sides are Jewish, Soros just has more money behind him. The "democratic" internet platforms (Jewish companies) support him fully even though their businesses would be able to make more profit without regulation.
Ending net neutrality would at least give more power to the free market and offer cheaper internet alternatives that can provide the same speeds to popular sites, and market forces will keep prices relatively low for better service as well.
I don't see any reason why you shouldn't oppose net neutrality.
Let's like cuckcast and spooktrum have the power instead
...
Killing net neutrality KILLS Sup Forums ARE YOU SMOKING CRACK!? You've got to be a shill. No one can be this fucking dumb
That’s good to know that NN has nothing to do with censoring groups or sites like Sup Forums like the pro NN have been arguing.
Dude, you drink fresh tap?
Not that hard in non-kiked countries, mate. Supporting net neutrality is supporting (((government))) regulation and kikery.
Then ISPs have the right to block twitter or facebook for being communists and deliver their own service. their platform, their rules.
The consumer has the right to use their internet in any lawful manner they choose. It is a utility, just like electricity.
REE, FUCKING REE, I FUCKING HATE YOU FAGGOTS FOR NOT REALIZING WHAT'S GOING ON DESPITE SCREAMING REDPILL ENDLESSLY
It has nothing to do with *censoring* sites. It does raise the possibility of ISPs making you pay more to access some sites.
The fear is that it will become like cable TV. They don't censor HBO or porn channels. They just charge you extra for them.
I fucking knew this shit was coming, the internet prices were getting so low and the speed is so quick now the kikes need a new way to make money
>this thread
>(((the internet right now))) is ((("neutral")))
thanks for helping me decide, now you all can shut the fuck up, net neutrality is now declared illegal as per my decree as the sole proprietor of the earth and the universe that the earth supports on its back
It is a government beachhead that needs to slaughtered and put on pikes. It will be harder to stop censorship while they hide behind the myth of a functional prior government involvement.
google likes nn