Friendly Reminder

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I&feature=youtu.be
ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/antitrust-laws
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

without net neutrality you wouldnt be able to post shit like this you cuck, that or you would have pay ((them)) even more money.

...

...

the jews are lose with their lies!

tell me, what do I have to gain by being anti-net neutrality. I know you're a shill, but it will be interesting to hear.

>soros also drinks water
>come on goy! your enemy drinks water! be antiwater!
nice try, you two-faced jew. show your fucking flag.

Reminder that all your dead relatives (((coincidentally))) all drank water, stop giving money to big water.

>WE NEED NET NEUTRALITY FOR A NEUTRAL CENSORSHIP-FREE INTERNET
>*bans dailystormer*
>*bans conservative websites*
>*demonetize anti-liberal youtube videos*
>*shuts down conservative youtube channels*
>*bans conservative accounts from using twitter and facebook*
>*artificially promotes liberal news sites as real news*
>*artificially hides conservative news sites as fake news*
>*blocks Russian IP from using twitter*
>BY THE WAY FELLOW REDDITO... I MEAN 4CHANNERS WE NEED TO DEFEND NET NEUTRALITY OR ELSE THEY WILL BAN 4CHINZ NOW

This.

How does ending nn help stop this?

>WE NEED NET NEUTRALITY FOR A NEUTRAL CENSORSHIP-FREE INTERNET
>*bans dailystormer*
>*bans conservative websites*
>*demonetize anti-liberal youtube videos*
>*shuts down conservative youtube channels*
>*bans conservative accounts from using twitter and facebook*
>*artificially promotes liberal news sites as real news*
>*artificially hides conservative news sites as fake news*
>*blocks Russian IP from using twitter*
>BY THE WAY FELLOW REDDITO... I MEAN 4CHANNERS WE NEED TO DEFEND NET NEUTRALITY OR ELSE THEY WILL BAN 4CHINZ NOW

ITT: Corporate shills trying to convince Sup Forums to give up 1st Amendment because "Free speech benefits Soros-leftists-whoever you don't like!"

You mean going back to pre-2015 Sup Forums? Yes please

THAT

We existed before, we shall exist after. Sup Forums will continue.

>teams have been autobalanced

>without net neutrality you wouldnt be able to post shit like this you cuck
yeah I'm so glad Sup Forums was created in 2015 after Net Neutrality was created

>sites managing their own content
>ISPs just providing bandwidth deciding for the whole internet
Nice try shill

If they’re for it, them I’m categorically against it.

Repealing Net Neutrality laws is the best way to ensure a Democrat victory in both the 2018 and 2020 elections.

Not only that, Trump isn't smart enough to truly understand the situation. And he's handed the whole thing over to a sleazy, deceitful pajeet, who is nothing more than a shill and a snake in the grass for the big ISPs.

Trump's actions will eventually lead to the end of Sup Forums, the very thing that helped get him elected in the first place.

How does this make you feel?

Doesn't matter, I'm not letting Verizon or AT&T fuck with my network.

>yeah I'm so glad Sup Forums was created in 2015 after Net Neutrality was created

Kek

>Leftist donates to cause leftists support

Gadzooks!

Its intentions are to make money, not for the good of mankind.

Clearly, there is a problem with Net Neutrality that none of us can see.

It's far worse than worrying about Verizon selling package deals for websites.

Literally, SOROS is shilling hard for Net Neutrality. Yet, people who regularly criticize Soros don't fucking care that he's pushing hard for Net Neutrality.

What's wrong with you people? You'll regret this later after the government completely controls your internet.

kek'd and checked.

but soros and his commie lackeys are A-OK

good on him

Next phase of shilling: report that Soros contributed to Trump.

Staggering that anyone would be either so irrational or so fucking stupid they'd give up their own freedom just because freedom also benefits people they don't like.

Except net neutrality is irrelevant to all of those because it only restricts the ISP, not private companies like the host of Daily Stormer, Facebook, google, and twitter. Are you that stupid?

Nothing, except niggers and SJWs who live in their mom's basement, crying on our boards.

>all these buttmad redditors
These newfags must never been around pre-2015.

Net neutrality keeps consumers POURING into their sites. The less customers, the more customer service. Are you really this bad at economics, reddit?

WTF I'm anti-net neutrality now

I TOLD YOU FAGGOTS THIS FAGGOT BASICALLY RUNS REDDIT@!

Yea im coming around. I was for it but the fact they Reddit censorships T_D and facebook/youtube have deleted or de-monetized certain profile/channels smells of hypocrisy. fuck em

Their brains have a mental block when exposed to concepts like supply and demand.

They can't conceptualize such an abstract concept.

well of course, soros loves Sup Forums

it's a great place for bantz and some loose redpills, sure, but most of this shit nowadays is either ironic or unironic shilling bait slide threads.

Sup Forums is useful to soros.

>mfw the final redpill is to never come back to Sup Forums and just live well

>net neutrality """created""" in 2015

Net Neutrality protects my consumer rights. None of you anti-NN shills can give me a good reason why I should be against it.

Another retard that thinks net neutrality didn't exist prior to 2015.

>massive companies pushing for law change
>this means i'm going to be saving money!!!!

This is your brain on libertarianism

You win, sir

But Shirley, big businesses always have my best interests at heart.

i won't have to subsidize your goddamn netflix/youtube pipe anymore.

>implying killing net nuetrality would unfuck any of those things you listed
Nigga are you retarded

hey youtube is nice

>i won't have to subsidize
???

>also implying you even pay any taxes you welfare leech

B-b-but a JEW likes NN,therefore we MUST be against it! We are (((true))) /polacks are we not!? We need to stand together against das Juden!

/ourguy/

>A Jew

More like all Jews. (((Zuckerberg))), (((Larry Page))), (((Sergey Brin))), (((Sheryl Sandberg))), (((Elliot Schrage))) and I could go on. These are the deep pockets behind pro-net neutrality lobbying and shilling. Every single talking point you hear in favor of net neutrality comes from these and other kikes, who are financing all of it. Net neutrality is propped up entirely by Jewish shekels.

It's fine if you support NN. Just don't pretend for one second that you're not siding with the kikes on this issue. You are, unequivocally.

yeah and if you're anti-NN then you're siding with the Comcast kikes as well as a corrupt poo in the loo.

The point of that shill post was just to try to smear NN by associating NN with reddit.

Sometimes Sup Forums is so fucking stupid that if reddit came out as strongly 2A I think Sup Forums would scream for everyone to melt down their guns.

Soros is offically /ourguy/ now.

Here is Weev explaining why you're full of shit.

youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I&feature=youtu.be

>first thing he brings up is Facebook terms of service, as if that has anything at all to do with NN
This guy is a straight up retard.

>donates $200M to net neutrality groups
> on Sup Forums this (((donation))) takes the form of hudreds of paid shills, sjws, kikes and police spamming the board making sure it stays (((neutral)))

>Missing the point this hard

Wew. 2 cents deposited!

so you're telling me if we don't repeal net neutrality democrats will be guaranteed to lose 2018 and 2020

>no you consumers don't have rights stop thinking you do
Fuck off ISP shill

i was a #CRUZMISSILE tho

This will stir up the shills

>>no you racist consumers don't have rights stop thinking you do
this isnt neutrality its ((neutrality))

Anti-trust laws already do that.

Net Neutrality =/= net neutrality

"Net Neutrality" protects Democrats from doing their job and reporting anti-trust breaches to the FCC. Instead the FCC has full control.

Real net neutrality means no fast lanes and everyone pays the same price. Bandwidth must be treated like water. That means it paves the way for ISPs to charge bandwidth the same way as electric bill.

Neither have anything to do with free speech.
Neither will make the internet or infrastructure better.
Neither will raise or lower prices because they are already arbitrarily set by private companies.

None of the companies that actually make money support net neutrality. Democratic Socialists support Net Neutrality because it's one step closer to communism.

Do you know what an ISP is? Because they don't have control over the dailystormer losing their site host.

Just more retards I guess.

>meme flag
>1 post
fuck off comcast shill
If NN is repealed, what is going to stop my ISP from throttling my connection on loli doujin sites or some other site they don't personally approve of?

>Bandwidth must be treated like water. That means it paves the way for ISPs to charge bandwidth the same way as electric bill.
>Democratic Socialists support Net Neutrality because it's one step closer to communism.
The fuck?

>None of the companies that actually make money support net neutrality
>Greedy kikes at (((Comcast))) don’t support something that keeps them from unleashing their corporate fuckery on the world
Color me shocked

>If NN is repealed, what is going to stop my ISP from throttling my connection on loli doujin sites or some other site they don't personally approve of?
Nothing. It can be like how twitter likes to ban certain voices they find problematic from their site. The feelings of the executives and shareholders will be what matter.

Most of the anti-net neutrality people, aside from shills, believe that there will be a larger market once net neutrality is removed. They don't seem to understand the large undertaking creating a new ISP entails. You have to lay new fiber, get government approval and construction and this will take years to just establish a small ISP in a small area.

There is a reason most ISPs before NN already had monopolies in certain areas, because like power and water the infrastructure for them is already in in place. Starting an ISP is FAR different than starting a social media site or opening a coffee shop, and a lot of people don't seem to understand that.

Anti-trust laws already do that. Unless you're doing something illegal.

>t. poor dumb indoctrinated commie

>pre-2015
NN started in 04

>We existed before
Sup Forums was started in 04, same as NN

>2015 after Net Neutrality
NN started in 04

>Anti-trust laws already do that.
which specific statutes?
>They don't seem to understand the large undertaking creating a new ISP entails
Yeah, everyone seems to just be screaming "get a new ISP bro" at me but that's not really feasible

>Doesn’t refute argument
>”C-commie”
Hello Comcast

>There is a reason most ISPs before NN already had monopolies in certain areas

Because the elected leaders of the area failed their job by enabling it.

(((NN))) is just socialist handwaving so elected leaders don't have to do their job and can blame the government. It's not real net neutrality.

>which specific statues
ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/antitrust-laws

Go read up on the laws of the country you live in for once you dumb indoctrinated democrat nigger.

>not an argument

The only good commie is a dead commie. Make like one.

>Starting an ISP is FAR different than starting a social media site or opening a coffee shop, and a lot of people don't seem to understand that
But this is America! If you don't like Verizon and Comcast, you're free to start a new national ISP to compete with them!

Of course, you won't get the $250B tax break they did, money from the taxpayers they then used to "pay" for their infrastructure buildout.

But that *you* can't compete with their corporate lobbyists is no reason to hobble their ability to innovate in how they fuck over America!

dumb nigger this site exists because of NN

>Yeah, everyone seems to just be screaming "get a new ISP bro" at me but that's not really feasible
Even if they were going to set up new ISPs you are going to be waiting years to have the options available anyway, that is if someone even starts one in your area. Otherwise you are just stuck with whatever your options are now.

Again for a new ISP you need to set up the infrastructure and lay the new fiber along with everything that goes a long with that. It can take years to just set that up in a small area.

Also relying entirely on the free market for things like ISPs, who shouldn't be anything more than the gateway to the internet, but then being against monopolies, shows you do believe there should be some government regulations on the free market and you don't believe in a truly free market. There is a middle ground, it's not all or nothing.

No it doesn't.

Dude, you’re a shill. Fuck off and die you basket of niggers

All you're doing is projecting hypotheticals and excusing the fact that YOU do not want to put effort into the issues and want SOMEONE ELSE to do it.

Which is exactly why every single Democrat run city or state is a cesspool of illegal activity, because they want govment to do all the work for them.

Now we have a president that's making the government do what little powers they already have, like throw out illegals, and Democrats are throwing a fucking tantrum about it.

Dumb fucking socialists can all die. No worth in this life or the next.

>communism intensifies

wtf i hate net neutrality now

Don't see anything in here that protects my consumer rights like you say it does.

Pretty much, it's like what innovations are ISPs even going to bring? Slightly faster speed?

Just because people believe ISPs should continue to be treated as public utilities (like power or water), because they use established infrastructure such a fiber that uses public land, does not make them socialists.

I'm sure you believe power and water should be in the free market and anti-trust laws should be abolished to remove these restrictions on business and let the invisible hand of the free market do everything. Some government regulation on the free market is good. Against it's not all or nothing, that just some 5th grade ideology.

SHILL SHILL SHILL SHILL SHILL SHILL SHILL

This.

>*moves to another ISP*
how dumb are you?

This boards hate speech is not net neutral...

Thats what they'll argue next

>But that *you* can't compete with their corporate lobbyists is no reason to hobble their ability to innovate in how they fuck over America!

Only Verizon and Comcast have lobbyists. Not Google, Netflix, Reddit, Hulu, Spotify, Facebook or any other tech giant, apparently.

Weev Shitstomped the entire pro-NN argument single handedly. There is zero reason to support it.

>Not Google, Netflix, Reddit, Hulu, Spotify, Facebook or any other tech giant
Since the discussion was about the (specious) claim was that it was easy to start a competitive ISP - and none of the the companies you list are national ISPs (even unlimited bankroll tech gorilla Google won't enter that market) - you're either sorely lacking in reading comprehension, logical integrity, or both.

When is this shit being decided already so net neutrality can be kill and soros and all the soyboys and nigger bulls cry?

just the sheer volume of shilling is a dead giveaway. if obama and soros are for it, how could it possibly be good.

I'm starting to realize Soros is one of the good guys. No wonder the Russian communist government hates him.

Or maybe the desert peoples' "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" thinking is infantile.

It's hard to believe even the shills, of which there are ever-increasing number, seriously believe the only "argument" they need to make is "someone you don't like is in favor of it."

soy king in for a rude heart attack