Well Sup Forums has been lost

In the last 48 hours ive seen Sup Forums turn from the typical Sup Forums board to a FCC Shill Infested Board. "BUT HURR DURR WE GOTTA GO AGAINST DA JOOS!"
>Thinking a poo in the loo is based
>Thinking the other two reddit pleb tier people supporting NN are based
>Only being anti NN to be a fucking edgelord or contrarian
>Thinking "HA WE'LL GET RID OF ALL THE NIGGERS, KEKS, AND EVERYONE ELSE BECAUSE THEY CANT PAY FOR IT" even though they can just use welfare money or government grants.
This board needs to be cleansed again, if that means bringing in Tumblr to repeat the Independence Raids so we can stop these shills then so be it.

where the fuck is /mlpol/ when you need them.

Well, you could just always leave

>tiered internet packages
NN does nothing to prevent this
>censorship!
NN does nothing to prevent this, in fact it makes censoring the internet easier.

NN is supported by soros.

there's other levels, retard

you shills are basically fighting each other, jej

>2017
>Not being a MAGAPEDE

So because Soros was a Nazi we can't be Nazis? What the fuck.

Literally all the globalists, mega corps, elites and Jews are all in support of NN. Do you think they suddenly have your best interests at heart?

stop being poor

Go back to PedoGAF you fucking nigger.

>implying the people who want NN aren't that either

The jew bots are going all out.

They have endless money to hammer us with anti net neutrality bs. We give the jews hundreds of millions its a wonder I was thinking today that any americans even own any companies anymore.

>soros
There are so many of these threads its just impossible to actually discuss this, any explanation will get immediately burried by the next dozen threads. Sup Forums knows not to trust soros, pointing out he backs it is the most efficient way to counter the pro NN spam.

...

>WE NEED NET NEUTRALITY FOR A NEUTRAL CENSORSHIP-FREE INTERNET
>*bans dailystormer*
>*bans conservative websites*
>*demonetize anti-liberal youtube videos*
>*shuts down conservative youtube channels*
>*bans conservative accounts from using twitter and facebook*
>*artificially promotes liberal news sites as real news*
>*artificially hides conservative news sites as fake news*
>*blocks Russian IP from using twitter*
>BY THE WAY FELLOW REDDITO... I MEAN 4CHANNERS WE NEED TO DEFEND NET NEUTRALITY OR ELSE THEY WILL BAN 4CHINZ NOW

...

>"hurr durr the internet is already bad so let's just make it worse"

...

...

...

...

As a common carrier ISPs would need certification and vetting. Net neutrality prevents small ISPs from springing up. With out net neutrality all you need to start an ISP is to buy some bandwidth and then you have a connection to unfiltered uncensored internet. Net neutrality however makes ISPs common carriers which means if the government tells them to censor something, they have to censor it.
>muh first amendment
Sure, that might work. But you know how it would happen? IT would get censored and then taken to court and months would pass before a ruling would be given to result in it potentially becoming uncensored. Thats if whatever is being censored is powerful enough to dispute it to start with.

>implying i dont want American off this website

>not being against the Jews

Nice try kike

...

...

This is completely far fetched, but could we put together our own ISP? I bet somebody on this site knows where to start.

(((lawful Internet Content)))

If getting rid of NN creates more competition against the big ISP why the fuck are they getting rid of it

Of course, and in the coming decades it will get even easier to do this. Two years ago before net neutrality hit people were already talking about how soon everyone will be their own ISP, but net neutrality but a stop to all that.

It's not hard, a lot of places have their own local ISPs.
What is hard is getting the land for your own towers. If you're for Net Neutrality you're a retard, the real problem is antitrust laws not being enforced to any meaningful degree by corrupt judges.

...

Shut up shill faggot. We know you're getting paid for this.

...

...

The why would the big ISP's fight to get rid of NN if it make people do what you are saying they would/want to do.

Because they're morons driven by greed and not Jews who plan for the longterm damage.

I wish i was a fucking paid shill but im fucking not, this whole fucking board is collapsing and leaving it's true values because of a government agency. We survived the CIA but can't survive a shit agency who has tried censoring everything in the last decade. Goddamn i thought Sup Forums would go out in a blaze of glory.

Something has to be done. Sup Forums is being overrun by shills on both sides

Thanks for the reply

Currently the big ISPs are the only ones that own infrastructure. Small ISPs dont build their own infrastructure they just rent bandwidth from the large ISPs who are also the infrastructure owners. The large ISPs will not lose money, and actually stand to gain since if there are more small ISPs around the market looks (and actually is) more competitive for a consumer, lowering the threat of the large ISPs getting broken up by the government, but since they also own the infrastructure they really are not losing any money in the long run.

It makes them a smaller target and they still get paid at the end of the day. Smaller ISPs can be more competitive due to lower overhead.

>implying that letting comcast sabotage there own service by throttling users and therefor pushing consumers to ditch garbage internet providers for alternatives isnt a good thing
What really should happen is smaller providers should start advertising that they are compliant with net neutrality, make it a selling point.

Shills on BOTH sides?!

Shit man I didn't ask for a sound and logical reply
Thanks though

>complains about NN threads on Sup Forums
>starts a NN thread on Sup Forums
Die in a fire OP.
Only thing you got right was that this board HAS gone to shit.

BUT WITHOUT NET NEWTRALTY U'LL PAY $5 MORE PER MONTH FOR NAPSTER!!!!!

a completely decentralized internet built on a network of phones and any other devices with an open connection, could be the first working model of communism, it was always meant for mindless cogs anyway

Google is trying and they are having extreme difficulty doing it. They are losing a lot of money.
You can build wireless one btut your ping will be 300 minimum.

This tbqh

>soros was a nazi
No he wasn't. GTFO.