What did Russia do to deserve the false accusations of meddling in U.S elections?

What did Russia do to deserve the false accusations of meddling in U.S elections?

Other urls found in this thread:

dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf
axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_77906.shtml
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Exist.

Meddled in the U.S. elections.

Fuck you, we actually did hack your elections.

They stood up to the Rothschilds.

not be jewish enough

That's not what Putin told Trump though

Trump and Putin are cronies, they work together. In fact Trump was the one who commissioned the hack in the first place.

A bunch of Russians posted cartoon frogs on this website called "Sup Forums" and that subliminally brainwashed Americans into voting for Trump.

Trump was destined to win anyways. He didn't need to hack the results. The media bashing of Russia is very negative and unnecessary imo.

Puti completely BTFO the cabal during the olympic deal
Also cucked Obama in Syria for 6 years
Exiled Soros and Rothschild banks
Etc,etc

It really kicked off when they violated the Wolfititz doctrine by parking their fleet off Syria in 2013 and stopped The Empire from destroying it and eradicating it as a cultural entity with their Isis creation.

Russia defied the empire. This cannot be tolerated.

The whole election thing is complete bullshit of course.

Sweet digits of truth.

They didn't shill for Hill.

Russia happened to be the optimal scapegoat for progressivists to shift the blame to (after being whipped in 2016 elections). This way they can avoid the embarrassing and unpleasant process of solving internal/domestic issues yet still retain some credibility.

I know this behavior quite well because that's what our government always does to avoid the embarrassing and unpleasant process of solving internal/domestic issues. Well, except they shift the blame the other way round.

Kikes are mad because Putin sabotaged Israel's plans for Syria

They were eye raping us.

Did Russia hack Russian elections?

>What did Russia do to deserve the false accusations of meddling in U.S elections?

Russia did this:

and this

and also this

and the greater israel syria stuff

You're a gullible Slavic retard.

The West is the actual source of Russian and Slavic problems.

The West has meddled into Slavic affairs and lands since Charlemagne.

The West literally disemboweled Russia in the 90s through (((oligarchs))), (((technocrats))) and (((venture capital investors))).

Yeltsin's re-election was election fraud.

Seriously, there you have the singular proof why Bolshevism and Communism could succeed among stupid Slavs, whom Marx literally despised.

and fucking with rothschild

drop out comunism

and also dugin calling aout rothschilds

...

Putin is worst goy.

Because they had 7 ex soviet KGB/FSB sleeper cell spies who were caught in the early 2,000's in positions of federal law enforcement and close to government officials.

Also, Russia was getting closer to Europe and supplying them with gas and oil. The Arab Alliance didn't like this because they had plans to run a pipeline through Syria and Iraq into southern Europe, and Russia was attempting to create competition in the market by laying down the pipeline first through the Ukraine, but the Ukraine are Arab puppets who like the idea that Hitler was allied to them and continued to honor that pact.

...

keked hard

Russian election as of late simply prevent candidates undesirable for establishment from participating.
No need to hack. XDD

>whom Marx literally despised
Trotsky had a pragmatic view and treated every nation as cattle, without expressing any disdain as it is an irrelevant feeling to him.

Lenin on the other hand had personal quarrels with the Tsar (his brother got executed by the regime), and he had this pattern of a butt-blasted minority - something alike to Estonians etc. There was something personal about him.

Thanks!

Do you honestly believe that the same establishment which saved Russia from the brink of collapse and Balkanisation is acting against the interest of Russians?

And that you, a stupid NEET Russian English speaking mongrel knows better what is good for Russia and Russians?

After centuries of German and Bolshevik autocracy? Really?

You would immediately emigrate to the West if someone offered you several thousand euros/dollars pay.

That's how much of a Russian patriot and nationalist you are.

Are Amerimutts too retarded to understand that Russia uses RT and Sputnik News to influence public opinion. Specifically in regard to matters such as foreign policy, oil & gas and immigration. Go look up the report by Intelligence Community Assesment assesing the influences on American politics.

Trotsky hated Slavs. One of his early workings was propaganda and smear campaign against Serbs and in favour of Albanians.

The Albanians are a globalist project. The name itself is a project. No one called them that way, not the region itself before London congress of 1912.


The Comintern has since 1912 the plan to remove Kosovo from Serbs and give it to Albania. Even Tito, Kardelj and Stalin post-WW2 were discussing the need, neccessity and date to do so.


Why is that so, eludes me. But it is a historical fact. The rabbit hole is deep.
One of the worst moments for me was finding out that Ante Pavelić was British MI6 agent since 1920s, and that Ustashe had many Jews among the high ranks.

>The West is the actual source of Russian and Slavic problems.
No, it's not.
Unless you actually think that being more successful = being a source of problems.

Do you realize basically nobody here watches RT? It would not surprise me if most people had no idea what it was.

Syria. They fucked up the gas pipe plan to sell to europe. It was worth a fortune.

Why havent we had heaps of threads on fusion stuff? They paid journalists ffs.

They won WWII.

What he said about Russian government preventing opposition from running in elections is objectively true regardless of whether you think it's a good thing.

plz no more radiation

Sharing one's opinion through news outlets =/= hacking the votes in an election

Dare to be woke on the JQ

And how do you stay "successful" and "global leader" geopolitically-wise if not by destabilising destroying any rival in the infancy?
The demise of Ottomans and the protection+control of Holy Land was a certainty in 1850s and then the French and Brits, Piedmont attacked Russia.

In 1878, the West again met to save the Ottomans and prevent Balkans from being liberated.

In 1912 they rolled back de-islamization in London congress and played everyone against Bulgaria, which previously had German monarch installed, just like Romania and Greece,

I have read more Russian books and books on Russian history than you have.
Exploiting Divide et Impera has been a staple of Western policy against Slavs.

The Poles had a saying "pit a Russian against a Russian", which was true for the entirety of Lithuanian-Muscovy wars.

>Do you honestly believe that the same establishment which saved Russia from the brink of collapse and Balkanisation is acting against the interest of Russians?
Yes.

>And that you, a stupid NEET Russian English speaking mongrel knows better what is good for Russia and Russians?
It's a stupid question because current establishment also knows what's better for Russia in general — they just don't do it because it's worse for them personally.

The Democratic party and Hillary Clinton colluded with Russia. Clinton's election was supposed to be a shoo-in, but it didn't happen. Coupled with the fact that the Republicans had Senate majority and the executive office, the Democratic party developed the extremely shoddy contingency of blaming the new guy with no history in politics of colluding with Russia. They knew an investigation would be developed, and they knew none of it would make sense, but they hoped for a 4 year window until the next election. During that time frame, they will and already have used the media to their advantage to attempt to persuade the masses that they did nothing wrong.
Just general political stuff.

If anyone watched the hearing from the NSA director, he said "Russia" is always interfering. It's mostly just noise, and unintelligible.

Ukraine. Specifically the (democratic and legal) annexation of Crimea.

Tell me one potential replacement for Putin and United Russia.

Navalny is a meme-tier retard meeting with western ambassadors, spouting demagogue nonsense and shilling in worst Russophobe publishings.


If Slavs had any brains in them, they would pull of Italy or Germany long time ago. There was a bigger differnce between Baltic, High and Low Germans than there was among South, among Western and especially among East Slavs (basically derivatives of historical Russians), yet the retards remained divided.

>And how do you stay "successful" and "global leader" geopolitically-wise if not by destabilising destroying any rival in the infancy?
You seem to believe geopolitics is a zero summ game.

Oh, really? Quite an opinion you have of yourself, despite not knowing not even the slightest amount of data, let alone access to classified and internal information.


Yeah, yeah, they are in it for approval ratins. Putin also stole billions of dollars, which he will take with him to his grave. He also has a huge luxurious castle because he has plenty of time and opportunity to dick around and live lavishly.

A developed and united Russia would be self-sufficient and stop being a raw resource and white slave source for the West.
A unified and homogenous Russian state all the way to Rawa Ruska or Przemysl (historic Red Russia/Ruthenia/Ros) would be an incredibly formidable adversary.

The multipolar world is not a favourable outcome for globalist elite. They lose the monopoly on interventionism and pursuit of interest.

>Oh, really? Quite an opinion you have of yourself, despite not knowing not even the slightest amount of data, let alone access to classified and internal information.
Kek. By the same logic democrats/progressivists in US SURE knewbetter what's goodfor US.

Obviously it's easier for Putin to buck against the West, instead of bending over and selling Russia over to the IMF.

Is geopolitics a zero sum game?
Yes or no?

The only one's claiming hack is the Hillary camp. The narrative is that Russia meddled in the election, which they DID.

/Thread

Hey, underage faggot. Can you bring up an unironic example of this geo-politics you keep harping on about? 2 INDEPENDENT sides coming to an agreement over some IMPORTANT, hmmm let's say in the entire period after WW2
You've got 50 years+ for your "geo-politicks" examples, go!

They don't. They are indoctrinated, arrogant dimwits.

So are Russian westernophiles from the 90s,and so are Russian autochauvinists and liberals. Russian (((liberals))) are self-explanatory.

I honestly can't comprehend Russians who are against Putin and his reign. They had 13 million more deaths than normal, and 9 million less births than normal in the 90s due to (((transition))) and (((democratisation)))

You can't add or subtract global influence and power projection.
Geopolitics is global power and influence competition.
Which earns you perks such as regime change, ignoring of international law, puppets, spheres of influence and "humanitarian" "interventions".
US allies can literally bomb UNESCO sites, attack UN protected sites, commit ethnic cleansing and launch coups, and get away with it, because they toe US interests.

Russia was completely powerless from 1990 to 2010. Colour revolutions, Third World and Yugoslavia interventions....

Do you think you're everyone? When have I said they're using Sup Forums to influence public opinion? Nobody gives a shit about Sup Forums politically. Half of you are NEETS and other half are social shutouts, then there's that small minority of high-functioning autismos on Sup Forums. That being said RT & Sputnik gets millions of views because of their coverage of the things "MSM won't cover". They essentially had a monopoly on the coverage of refugees in Europe. They covered everything as negatively as possible. They did so to antagonize Europeans and change Public opinion on foreign policy. That being said, they do all kinds of things. If you don't believe your own intelligence agencies, then just bugger off. You're literally a brainlet if you take the word of some autist on Sup Forums over the intelligence agencies in the U.S.

They influenced politics by telling the truth, the facts and exposing the reality to people who were sheltered from it

>shut it down

You as a Swede should be familiar with that

I don't believe our intelligence agencies have made a believable case for whatever it is exactly is being claimed to have happen. In fact I would like to see their funding reduced if they're going to be so incompetent.

As for RT, the fact is most people here don't watch it and don't know what it is. Something like Infowars or Sup Forums would have a decidedly wider reach in the US.

Truth or not, they intent is malicious. They aren't interested in what's best for Sweden, the U.S or any other European country. Why do you think they are in Syria? Because Putin is good guy humanitarian? No because they want those oil contracts and free advertisment of their weapons arsenal to attract buyers.

Maybe other news networks should have covered negatives of refuree crisis too then?

picrelated is who supports pro-american "liberalism" worldwide
underage jobless faggots

Again, even if say the networks did cover the refugee crisis in an unbiased manner, this doesn't change what Russia is doing outside of it's own borders.

jews know they can blame russia for anything since russia don't have anything the jew want

RT America and Sputnik News has a huge influence on the American population.

Low effort post, fuck off.

That being said, I will go get you some quotes from their report.

>people dont watch RT
theres been fuck knows how many congressional hearings spearheaded by lobbied politiwhores about RT's YOUTUBE videos, so you can pretend people don't watch it but that's not gonna fly
literally the only major news network that livestreams "refugee" crossings and documentaries about amerilard magdump police

So does every American news network, BBC and lots of others. Are they problem too?

[citation needed]

I've known about RT since its launch, as it was convenient to what you might call the truth movement or whatever (at first the guests they had on might as well have all come out of the International Forecaster). Sputnik News I hadn't even heard of until very recently.

They bought ads to shitpost against the turd sandwich. Daddy may or may not have been aware of this.

That's literally the worst case scenario.

Bolshevism

I though everyone here understands and takes for granted the fact that governments serve the interest of the state. No, whether they serve the interest of the people, Volk, depends on the ideology.

Of course the Russians are serving their interests when fighting in Syria. They want Sunni extremists dead, lest they get to Russia eventually.
They also want to break the axis that is USA-West-GCC

elaborate why then fucker

#PizzaGate

shill

Sure. My point though is that you're going to have a hard time finding anybody actually watching RT in their home or at a hotel, and that's if RT is even offered. At an individual level it is not common.

The much more significant impact is as source material for other outlets, or Drudge linking to a particular story or whatever. That RT simply says things the US Jews won't is not some kind of brainwashing attempt. It's just bog standard counterintelligence bantz, making the US Jews have to work a little harder at pedaling their fake news.

"Russian Propaganda Efforts. Russia’s state-run
propaganda machine—comprised of its domestic
media apparatus, outlets targeting global
audiences such as RT and Sputnik, and a network
of quasi-government trolls—contributed to the
influence campaign by serving as a platform for
Kremlin messaging to Russian and international
audiences. State-owned Russian media made
increasingly favorable comments about Presidentelect
Trump as the 2016 US general and primary
election campaigns progressed while consistently
offering negative coverage of Secretary Clinton."

RT is a leading media voice opposing
"Western intervention in the Syrian conflict
and blaming the West for waging
"information wars" against the Syrian
Government (RT, 10 October-9 November). "

"RT runs anti-fracking programming,
highlighting environmental issues and the
impacts on public health. This is likely
reflective of the Russian Government's
concern about the impact of fracking and
US natural gas production on the global
energy market and the potential challenges
to Gazprom's profitability (5 October)."

Now before you say muh hillary. We all know she was HAWKISH on Russia when it came to foreign policy. Putin hates her and so does the Russian media. You can go watch their state-tv and they praise Trump all the time. Also there is a social media footprint of RT's coverage. Are you really saying pic related is no influence?

Read page 13,14 & 18.
dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

the hard time people are gonna have watching RT "NOW", is because your freedom-loving country banned it LMAO
but you can go on about the "reasons" for a bit more, the fact that this came after the yearly UN summit where US yearly defends the freedom of nazis to free speech then bans a news network right after, is the cherry on this cake

Of course national TV in their respective countries are going to push their agenda, the point being is that Russia Agenda is not benefitial to your agenda in anyway. In fact, they actually carpet-bombed Syria. You can search up why the U.S uses laser guided bombs instead of carpet bombs. Because carpet bombs just destroying everything. This increases the amount of refugees from Syria to Europe too.

Where

They shutdown anyone who says something unfavorable of Russia or Putin. They are the CNN of Russia dude. Check out pic-related below.

No, I'm just saying that RT is acting like any other state media agency, whether its coming out of the US or the UK or Iran. That it has managed to score a bit of an online audience means that they're doing a good job (or, I would argue, that western media is doing a really shit job by comparison).

You've got to be some kind of paranoid schizophrenic to construe what RT does as BIG RUSSIAN MEDDLING IN THE ELECTION.

You're post is literally just garbage, you didn't motivate why it was the Jews, how they did it or who these jews were. So fuck off.

they carpet bombed syria because they had a civil war to win you cucked "swedeshit" are you some iraqi migrant or something?
natocucks openly supply jihadis then go on about russia increasing the refugee flow, are you fucked in the head?
and btw they won that war

They made this mistake of dealing dirtily with Hillary Clinton. Demos project.

>the point being is that Russia Agenda is not benefitial to your agenda in anyway
Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't. It's like like the US government is run by saints and heros who never lie and always act in the best interests of the US.

But Aleppo had less civilian deaths than Mosul and Raqqa. A bigger city with more combatants and civilians.

It is meddling by all means. If Russia is seeking to sway the votes to a certain way, what do you call this? This is precesily the kind of foreign-intervention the U.S engages in when they use media and fake news to change public opinion.

Ofcourse Russian agenda is not benefitial but neither is mainstream "western" agenda.

axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_77906.shtml

I call it a Great Power doing what Great Powers always do. I call suddenly freaking out about one particular instance of one particular Great Power having some loosely-specified effect because Hillary lost the election a disproportionate reaction.

Fourth Post Best Post

They didn't carpet bomb because they had a war to win . They carpet bomb to intentionally destroy. If I was an actual Iraqi immigrant, do you honestly believe i'd be reading reports from government agencies lol? NATO has barely had any involvment in Syria.

Well your idiocy certainly has me stumped.
you need to work on your shitposting

Also NATO didn't arm jihadis. It was the U.S with it's massive depos of humvees, weapons and all that other shit they left from the Iraq war.

Based.