>MUH NETFLIX NEUTRALITY

>Started by Obama
>Backed by Soros
>Endorsed by Justin Fucking Trudeau
>Spread across the internet by brave redditeers
>Completely fucking ignores the problem of breaking up monopolies/oligopolies that are way too big (Faceberg, Jewtube, Normieflix etc) in favor of more retarded corrupt governmental regulation

NET NEUTRALITY IS NOT /OurGuy/

NEW HIGH TECH ISP INFRASTRUCTURE SHOULD BE PUT ON TRUMPS MAGA AGENDA ASAP

NET NEUTRALITY GETTING REPEALED IS JUST 1 SMALL ASS NECESSARY STEP BACKWARDS BEFORE GOING FORWARDS

STOP FOLLOWING REDSHITTERS LIKE A SHEEP

REDSHIT IS ALWAYS WRONG

POL IS ALWAYS RIGHT

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ruhFmBrl4GM
youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I
m.youtube.com/watch?v=ih94coOlnqo
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/11/comcast-asks-the-fcc-to-prohibit-states-from-enforcing-net-neutrality/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

Pretty much on point

Can't believe how many Americans are falling for this meme

>b-but the terrorists will kill us all unless we implement patriot act

fear mongerers

>Completely fucking ignores the problem of breaking up monopolies/oligopolies that are way too big (Faceberg, Jewtube, Normieflix etc) in favor of more retarded corrupt governmental regulation
You want to talk about malign monopolistic companies that need to be broken up, look no further than Time Warner and Comcast: the kikes responsible for all this anti-NN shilling on pol.

Sage and ignore anti-NN shill threads

So what's wrong with the system currently in place? Why should we all of a sudden decide that ISPs, the undisputed kings of fucking over their customers, NOT fuck us over this time once we give them the opportunity?

Assume*, not decide

something very interesting about this rock. it's hard rock like features.

> look no further than Time Warner and Comcast: the kikes responsible for all this anti-NN shilling on pol.

you mean companies that are 100x smaller than google?

Doxed OP and this is him

This. ISPs are the absolute fucking worst

youtube.com/watch?v=ruhFmBrl4GM

we all getting payed! wait i'm losing money.

youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I

relevant

Don't you shill get the holiday off?

>Time Warner and Comcast are responsible for anti-NN shilling on Sup Forums
How does your mind function?

fuck off back to the_donald fucking faggot telecom shill

We have many many ISP's in Sweden, specifically because we're not regulating the internet with things like "net neutrality"

Those against net neutrality vs. the uninformed. It's that simple.

On one side, you have professors, economists, electrical engineers, and network engineers who have consistently and thoroughly made the case as to why NN will lead to a slower, more expensive, less competitive, and less free internet. On the other side, you have reddit, twitter, kikebook, basically every mainstream groupthink (((social media platform))), conspiracy theorists, armchair economists, and soyboys shilling up and down for something they neither understand nor have the capacity to understand, because muh scary infographic... or something.

I'm honestly baffled that anyone on Sup Forums would support net neutrality. Doesn't the fact that all these major jewish-owned mega corporations support net neutrality make you just a LITTLE bit suspicious of it? Tell me, when has a bunch of corporate jews working together ever resulted in something GOOD for the consumer?

Are you pretending that getting rid of NN is going to hurt Google and not help them?

>Are you pretending that getting rid of NN is going to hurt Google and not help them?

The ones that would be helped the most would be the consumers.

Imagine if shitty ISP's begin throttling, and google steps in and becomes an ISP who won't throttle anything

suddenly 1 ISP turned into 2. Competition is good for the end-consumer.

Ah but here's the rub.
NN doesn't do anything to effect those ISP monopolies.So then what exactly is the point?
How is the fact that ISPs are a monopoly a legitimate argument in support of legislation that doesn't actually change the rules that allow ISPs to be monopolies?

Unironically kill yourself

NN was a meme, said it under Obungo, I'll say it again. Read the fucking legislation you twat.

>Allowing ISPS to own and control the internet
>Free

You need to look up the word free.

>Doesn't the fact that all these major jewish-owned mega corporations support net neutrality

Without NN the Jewish owned corporations gain more power. You just want to give mega-corporations more power.

>The ones that would be helped the most would be the consumers.

How is being forced to pay more for a shittier version of the internet helps to the consumer?

>Imagine if shitty ISP's begin throttling, and google steps in and becomes an ISP who won't throttle anything

Right now the FCC are supposed to fine ISPS who throttle the internet. Without NN you give ISPs the right to throttle your internet for no reason.

>nearly every major technology company supports NN, including every major ISP.
>"trust me goy, net neutrality is bad for us jews!"

You pretending that giving major corporations control over something is a good thing. I don't need google or AT&T to tell me what I can look to at and how.

>small ISPs compete with one another
>google steps in and becomes an ISP
>sets local rates to a point that small ISPs can't match
>throttles youtube and search engine response to http get requests originating from competitor to slow access without overtly throttling bandwidth
>wtf my internets is slow
>drives competition from the market
>google now the only ISP
thank god you have socialism Sweden; with this level of retardation you'd starve in a capitalist society

You’re forgetting that they throttle us already anyways with caps and shit, whats the difference? Without NN We might actually get more choices.

>being this much of a corporate dick licker

Being this much of a government bootlicker.

>whats the difference?
The fact that they aren't supposed to and if enough people got together they could take an ISP to court.

>Without NN We might actually get more choices.

Most major ISPS now don't compete with each other. Why would they start. Why would you take a huge risk on a "What If."

>google and comcast aren't both giant corporations seeking to use government regulation in order to maximize their market shares and profits
you're both fucking idiots

I hope that netneutrality is repealed and this society can cease being obsessed by this fucking bullshit

Kill the web
End internet culture

Nigger, do you even know what net neutrality is? It's just more regulations. Regulations are just another means of market control/bulllying. That's why the most regulated industries are also the most monopolized. That's why the ISPs are getting involved in NN, so that they can write the regulations.

Seriously how new are you? You know that the world doesn't work like your 4th grade civics textbook, right? (((Big government))) is not looking out for you, dumb goy.

>Implying BUILD NEW HIGH TECH ISP INFRASTRUCTURE doesn't mean USE GOVERNMENT TO SUBSIDIZE ALLOWING FOR MORE COMPETITION

I was for NN 10 years ago when Internet was still a series of tubes and I'm for it still.

Granted that it is mostly US issue because lack of free market in American telecom sector but I don't want anyone get any funny ideas that it is ok for infrastructure to be anything but 100% impartial.

>eriously how new are you? You know that the world doesn't work like your 4th grade civics textbook, right?

I guess that makes you a 1st grader. Since have to be fucking retarded to think that ISPs are trying to get rid of NN so they can regulate themselves. Also regulation aren't always bad. Regulation are one of the thing that stop restaurants for serving rancid food.

>Nukes are wxaggerated cold war fear propaganda
m.youtube.com/watch?v=ih94coOlnqo

Wtf I love weev now!

More choices? You'd have to use each ISPs preferred (read; those who pay the most) browser, video service, search engine, social media etc.

Do you think just any small ISPs can afford to lay the basic infrastructure, and provide cheaper services of equal quality? Don't kid yourself.

> Distrusting the Jews who favor the current model of net neutrality

> Toooootally trusting the poo-in-loos who want to get rid of it

Enjoy losing Sup Forums and being forced to use Facebook

You fucking niggers. At the first glimpse of freedom you tuck your dicks between your legs and worship the nigger president.

You think Sup Forums will end as a result of this? Idiots, the opposite will happen. You goddamn proto cucks. In a free market oriented, unshackled internet the cuck media will die by the hand of the consumer himself. Sites immune to indoctrination, where freedom of expression is paramount (like Sup Forums is when shills are asleep) will take over. That's what they're so afraid of. Freedom of expression in social media annihilated the Hillary campaign, and now they're in a hurry to shut it down before 2020. The government isn't your fucking friend. STOP FUCKING OPPOSING THIS. STOP PLAYING INTO DEMKEK HANDS, YOU TREASONOUS QUITTERS. And in case you still feel like being a cuck, I suggest you migrate to the EU. Merkel and her cronies will be more than eager to protect this internet bolshevism at any cost.

Free market, love it or fucking leave it.

>ignores the problem of breaking up monopolies/oligopolies that are way too big
It's almost as if that should be the current focus rather than turning over all the power to the same companies that love to fist fuck us on a daily basis.

yeah, let's create the most powerful propaganda tool of human history!
very redpilled fellow magapedes, many memes!

on a serious note though, it is pathetic how easily receptive Sup Forums and Sup Forums as a whole is being to this SO BLATANTLY OBVIOUS SHILLING.
Kill yourselves brainlets.

>(((Big government))) is not looking out for you
yeah let's instead hand over our civil rights to (((Big business))) they are much better at controlling us with propaganda!

>>Started by Obama
>>Backed by Soros
>>Endorsed by Justin Fucking Trudeau
>>Spread across the internet by brave redditeers

This is EVERYTHING you need to know about (((net neutrality))). ANYTHING Obama supports should be opposed.....

With EXTREME prejudice.

NN started under Bush fyi

Kill yourself, fucking sycophant.

The funny thing about these puppets favoring the FCC's plan to eradicate Net Neutrality, is their desperate, short sighted observation of Jewish executives.

They assume that since Jews own the company, they control the company.

They don't.

Facebook, Google, Netflix .. these companies are owned by Jews, sure. But they're *run* by Indians. Take a walk through any of these companies and you'll be overwhelmed by the sheer volume of H1B's with designated shitting cubicles and wiping hands.

These hyper religious, lazy, non American control freak purists, want to abolish every offensive thing. If they can't abolish the 1st amendment, they'll just write code to throttle it so it never loads.

This is the loss of anonymity. This is the destruction of Sup Forums. This is shepherding the world onto Facebook and killing non-approved groups.

This is the end of InfoWars.

You'd have to be a fool to support the FCC's plan

ISPs are not trying to get rid of NN, what are you talking about. Comcast SUPPORTS net neutrality, you dumb nigger.

The purpose of Comcast shilling for internet regulations is not to regulate themselves, but to regulate the market. By controlling the rules of market, they can effectively write the rules in such a way that their own company benefits and their competitors suffer. Sorry to shatter your rose-tinted view of the world, but regulations are not there to protect the consumer.

>comcast just wants what's best of us guise, listen to them!

None of that is an argument shithead

>How is being forced to pay more for a shittier version of the internet helps to the consumer?
>Forced
Oh, I didn't realize companies require you to swear a fucking blood oath when you sign up for internet now.

If you don't like your ISP, find another one. This isn't the 1990s where everyone and there mom has access to one ISP and only one ISP. Even if you only have one cable/DSL provider in your area - the FCC's records confirm most of the country has access to at least 2-3 mobile providers and at least 1-2 satellite providers. Nobody's forcing you to do shit.

sure thing shlomo
thats why trump is still engaging and supporting all of the wars that niggerbongo started

> the free market doesn't work guys
go back to plebbit

Paid shills actually DO work when you're shilling to a bunch of retards.

There is nothing wrong with the status quo of the internet. Fuck off Ajit shills

>net neutrality
>make it equal for everyone
>communism
>make it equal for everyone


hmmm

>listen to them, please. I'm begging you!
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/11/comcast-asks-the-fcc-to-prohibit-states-from-enforcing-net-neutrality/

It works for businesses, yeah.

Are you also against meat packing regulations just because they're regulations? We should all be able to determine for ourselves if our meat is safe to consume; the people who can't will die off along with the businesses, right? I think this might actually be the most autistic board on Sup Forums now.

ahh yes, the classic unregulated free market jew

Yes there is web_2.0 is shit

Yes you retard, that's how it works.
You're acting as if regulation is the only reason meat packing plants aren't poisoning their products.

In reality """regulation""" is rarely ever enforced or audited. The safety will be exactly the same whether or not Schlomo Kikestein and his billion dollar lobbying firm set up a thousand job killing regulations.

>find another one
*inhales*
AHHHAHAHAHAAAHHHAAAAHAHAJAHHHHASJHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAGAHAHAJAHAHHA

>monopolies/oligopolies that are way too big (Faceberg,
You have nobody to blame but yourself for using social media
>Jewtube,
adblock
>Normieflix
pirating

Meanwhile every god damn city in the country has at best 2 reliable ISPs both of which treat their customers like ass and bleed them for every cent they can, because who are they going to go to? The other guy? They treat their customers like ass and will just bleed them for every cent they can.

>You're acting as if regulation is the only reason meat packing plants aren't poisoning their products.

Take a remedial history course then come back. If you still don't understand why your 'point' is beyond retarded, take a remedial English course as well.

>On one hand there is the elite
>On another there are the common people
Good case, user. I hate having free internet now.

>sycophant

You don't know what the word means, do you?

if putting literal poison in the meat would save 5ct per slab of meat, and they could get away with doing it, you can bet your sweet naive ass that they would do it. they would slather that meat in the aids ridden blood of african children if it saved a buck.
that's the reason we need regulations.
are you seriously that indoctrinated by your corporate overlords?

>regulation is never enforced
Are you retarded, my work just had to throw out a ton of product because dept of ag deemed it unsafe

Stole the image, thanks.

>we allways must do/think the opposite of reddit

nice 'argument'

>history
>would save
You dipshit's realize that processed meat is a recognized carcinogen, right?

Companies literally already fucking do this to make meat last longer on the shelves.

Trumpfags lol

>find another one
>60% of the country has either one or 2 (comcast and verizon) isp providers

>who have consistently and thoroughly made the case
*have consistently and thoroughly been paid off to make the case
also appeal to authority and no actual argument beyond "reddit says it so it must be bad".
i hope you are getting paid for this shit.

...

your point being?
letting them off the hook for more stuff, since we already let them turn our food into literal cancer?
you are arguing for MORE regulations here, not less, retard.

>>make it equal for everyone

it was allways been equal for everyone

this meme was not meant to be serious, the old dude is supposed to say something stupid only a baby boomer would say. 1/10, see me after class.

Do you think they'll magically just start improving services? Why would that change now

>your point being?
My point was the argument was needlessly weak.

I wasn't disagreeing with them. I'm not allowed to call fuckers out for arguing for my position badly?

There you go doing what your ilk does best, move the goalposts when backed into a corner.

Ironically, you just gave more reason to support regulations of food. What do you think of having to label on meat the risks associated with consuming it a la tobacco and alcohol? It's just information.

(((Net neutrality))) is a scam. It didn't exist until 2015 and the internet was fine before that.

> implying the shills sleep

All the anti NN people talk about free markets, but what’s free about anninfrastructure monopoly you can’t sue for denying you access to information?

What’s the “worst” part about the NN regulations and how have they attacked free speech any more than Comcast and TWC deciding only good guy websites can connect, or only good guy VPNs can travel through their infra?

I get the knee jerk ancal stance but it just seems like you’re denying a free market and also denying consumer protections for what is quickly becoming the most important distributed system

Obviously the government hasn’t fucked it up yet but corporations can fuck it up as well. Idk make an argument using the NN legislation, it seems like only shills and rural and suburban retards think antiNN is secretly based because contrarianism, or stormfags who think it’s already not “neutral”

I don’t think NN is the solution, I think new infra is the solution, but it seems like it is inevitable for any kind of infra to be relatively concentrated by the successful maintainers so idk

See

One post at a time.

Meanwhile, for 10 megabytes/sec I pay a _month_ - 6,84 USD
torrents in all fields

That's a map of current ISP providers available, from data provided by the ISP. Most of the populated areas of the country have access to at least 5 lower speed broadband providers, at least 2-3 higher speed broadband providers, and at least 3-4 mobile providers. To say nothing of DSL or satellite.

The whole "50% of US residents only have access to one ISP" line is complete bullshit.

>It didn't exist until 2015 and the internet was fine before that.
It actually existed before that, they just changed the section of the legal code it was enforced under.

Also the ISP market has been “free” nd you’re going to tell me with a straight face Comcast and TWC are looking after your interests? I feel like only children who don’t pay for cable or have never moved into their own place think this way.

> yes goyim, roll back NN
> MAGA :DDD also now you can’t sue us :DDD

04 under Bush actually

Not one post itt has been able to explain why NN is bad aside from "muh jews"

>it was allways been equal for everyone

but wasn't it more equal for some?

That's all they need to do really. Just say reddit likes it and suddenly this board hates it out of meme reflex.
this board would probably cut their own dicks off en masse if they thought it might make reddit mad.

>Question everything
>Muh just do the opposite of what those guys we hate do without thinking
Burger logic 404.
Bipartism truly is cancer, you need to think every issue by yourself, not back X or Y political party you voted for, these parties are supposed to represent your ideas, not the other way around. You are reaching Goodwin point with the first post, replace Hitler with Reddit/king nigger/king leaf/king jew/[insert random person Pol hates] and you're doing the exact same thing every cancerous faggot has been doing for a century. I don't identify with any party on all their subjects, and it's the only right thing for a patrician man to do, everyone thinks by himself and in no way any political group relying on lowest common denominators could match your ideology 100% unless you're a brain-dead monkey without any ideology or self awareness. I agree with greens about the necessity of energy transition but not on gay marriage, I agree with FN on the necessity to deport Arabs but not with their economic protectionist policies, etc, etc. So again, it's not because trump is right about the wall and Soros is a turbo kike that has fucked my country with (((progressive ideas))) that their stances on this subject, which has nothing to do with the previous questions, should dictate my own stance. Trump and his poo dog are being the Jews here, you may not agree with this, but at least think by yourself and reach that conclusion on your own, not by swallowing cum down your throat like an obedient partisan goy.

>It actually existed before that, they just changed the section of the legal code it was enforced under.

And that's the section that's gonna be removed

>REDSHIT IS ALWAYS WRONG
reddit spacing

Oh those poor ISP's, yeah we should definitely give them more ways to fuck us over.

Literally fuck yourself for being this retarded.

wtf I support Net fascism now!

I fucking hate this bullshit board. You amerilards deserve the corporate cock that's coming for your collective behinds. You're all fucking retarded.

>NEW HIGH TECH ISP INFRASTRUCTURE SHOULD BE PUT ON TRUMPS MAGA AGENDA ASAP

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH *inhales* HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

YOU DUMB
FUCKING
RETARD