Pro Net Neutrality Supporters include: Hillary Clinton, Anita Sarkesian, Cucks, Soy-milk, BLACKED.com, Bill Maher, Bill Nye, Neil Degrass Tyson, Stephen Colbert, George Soros, Comet Pizza, REDDIT, Rick and Morty, Transgender People
Based Anti Net Neutrality /ourguys/ are: President Donald Trump, Bill Hicks, George Carlin, Adolf Hitler, anime mommy gfs, pepe the frog, Jews fear the Samurai guy, Big Man Tyrone, the ghosts of confederate generals, Alex Jones
This literally took me 3 seconds to write while I had one finger up my ass you fucking imbecile.
Jackson Robinson
>Daily reminder that Hillary uses toilet paper, therefore don't use toiled paper.
John Lewis
That's a false equivalence. You're debating skills are sub-standared, cuck. Go back to school kid
Jason Flores
...
Jordan Gutierrez
Since you are into logical fallacies then why can't you argue about the pro/cons of NN ? Instead you associate people from political groups with pro/con NN positions in an attempt to validate some position. And since you don't provide any arguments but instead attack me, how does that affect the pro/con NN position of anyone ? - It doesn't. Like your initial post. You bring up points which have nothing to do with NN.
Matthew Gonzalez
If you are against network neutrality, you dont understand how the internet operates. Your ISP is supposed to be providing you access to the internet, not access to the parts that dont compete with their business or the parts theyre ok with you seeing.
But yeah sure, give control of the internet over to the 5 media conglomerates that own literally every other piece of mainstream media in america. Good choice. You will enjoy it when everytime you try to visit a non-approved site it redirects you back to cnn.com or huffingtonpost.com
Your ISP wants to kill network neutrality so they can charge content providers to deliver their content to you, and you to pay extra to receive it. Content providers who have already paid their ISP, and you who have ostensibly already paid your ISP.
If you got a delivery from amazon and your mailman demanded you pay him 20 dollars or hes not handing you the package, AFTER amazon has paid them to deliver it and AFTER you have paid amazon to have it sent, you'd be pissed. Its extortion. Its the same thing here. If you dont understand that, you arent smart enough to be having this conversation.
Nathan Cooper
Pretty much this.
Aiden Wright
...
Jose Sanders
>Net Neutrality repealed >Sup Forums dies because politically incorrect pedophiles >Reddit stays alive because normalfag central Yeah man NN must be bad because reddit likes it. Doing the opposite of people you dislike is the most correct thing to do. Excuse me while I go rape women and shoot children, because reddit thinks that is bad.
Nicholas Jackson
Do your fucking job mods
Carson Russell
meme flaggot retard
appeal to authority more
Joshua Wright
>getting the normies out of Sup Forums >bad go away shill
Kevin Rogers
NN is internet communism fuck the Obamadeble Nig man
Brandon Reed
What's the issue m8? Anons can discuss things you don't like.
Anthony Hernandez
tribal regard
no better than a nigger
Zachary Hill
so are public roads and access to plumbing
mentally celibate retard
Alexander Reed
Roads should be for huwhites only
Xavier Harris
I'm sick of hearing this net neutrality shit. I think I get the point all ready mate.
Isaiah Hall
Ignoring the points you don't like. That's what I'd call substandard. Perhaps you should look for another job.
Andrew Scott
Basicaly this. Anti NN cuck can't refute anything, they are LARPing ancap retards, that think complete anarchy of the megacorporations is a good thing per se.
Jack Gray
Net neutrality is cancer and if the tech companies and NGOs need to dump millions into shilling and astroturfing then its obviously not good based off its own merits
Matthew Walker
>i am too much of a brainlet to think for myself
Nolan Lewis
yeah I'm with george soros, reddit and Anita Sarkesian in this one. You have to be fucking retarded to sell your ass to big corporations. This board doesn't really surprises me anymore
Easton Wilson
>tech companies and NGOs Same attempt as op to create associations which have nothing to do with pro/con NN. You either have not read the thread or are not capable of comprehending what was said.
Jason Richardson
FUCK net neutrality.
A nigger will NEVER have sex with my girlfriend
Sebastian Rodriguez
DEATH TO SHIT MEMES
Aiden Bailey
You will literally be letting big companies make you pay more for what you already have
Brayden Williams
Hi friends,
I am from India and I am inquiring for job as Comcast shill. I am be wondering who I can contact for this position as I have very good and excellent qualifications.
I am looking to be making 200 rupees per hour which is very good money. I will be excellent Comcast shill and always on time on my VPN.
I saw this same argument in another thread. Shareblue needs some more bait
Austin Fisher
Wrong Net neutrality basically it boils down to government control over the internet and government censorship of things it deems unacceptable thought. ISP's don't have any incentive to censor free speech, but the government sure does.
Dylan Gomez
cancer, they are. hold up, i'll say it in reddit for them so they understand >redditfags should literally, unironically kill themselves >Redditors, it's thanksgiving. Time to do society a favor and murder suicide your entire families for raising such retarded pieces of shit.
Jonathan Diaz
>the government and big corporations don't have ties user you got jewed.
Kevin Bennett
This NN is nothing more than government deciding what we can and cannot see
Caleb Evans
>not being able to analyze a situation and decide your support for yourself >not having the mental capacity to make a decision and having to look at who supports what to make your decision must be white
Cameron White
This is a retarded misrepresentation of what is going on.
The ISPs essentially want the few content providers that use a disproportionate amount of bandwidth to pay to for the extra bandwidth they use so that the ISPs can upgrade their systems so that the ISPs can deliver that content FASTER.
There are two ways that ISPs have done this. Comcast for instance made Netflix pay them an amount to install hardware on comcast's systems to make Netflix faster. Google on the other hand allows corporations such as Netflix to install their own software on Google's infrastructure to make it faster.
In both cases, the content providers are paying to make their content arrive faster. However, you'll notice that this is only happening with a few content providers that use a dissproportionate amount of bandwith.
There had been no actual incidences of ISPs censoring political opinions or competitors. Although, you could make the argument that Netflix is a competitor to Comcast which they were slowing down. This seems like a separate legal battle - perhaps an anti-trust litigation.
The big problem that is happening in parallel to net neutrality is the massive amount of regulations imposed b y the government that have enabled monopolies and oligopolies to be formed in the ISP business. That shit needs to be fixed.
Jason Wood
dude that image is the opposite of what would happen...
Brody Reyes
>ISP's don't have any incentive to censor free speech Not providing any sources.
you don't understand how the internet operates what does NN do to bust up those 5 media conglomerates George Soros owns major shares in these ISPs and is funding OD on the backside to push NN through on your useful idiots via the shills. why might that be? kys. end your family bloodline. do it for the greater good, ends justify the means and all that
Brody Adams
>ad hominem S H I LL H I L L A R Y
Benjamin Evans
NN is internt communism The commy Obama government wanted to sieze the means of internet production
Julian Adams
thank you zionist now get out. this board really is full of organizations trying to subvert our culture.
Adrian Green
>everything my enemies support i must oppose Literally fuck off. Everyone is at threat by this especially Sup Forums. I have no intention of getting charged 40$ to browse Sup Forums every month.
Aiden Fisher
>ISPs don't have any incentive to censor free speech Then why do they want more control over the internet? Fuck off.
Colton Hughes
>Reminder that germany is officially a Meme flag Creativity is not your strong-suite, still using the same kind of attack. Since you are so unconvincing, I conclude you are pro-NN and are trying to sabotage your own shilling.
Evan Bennett
not true. you might pay more so you can watch your 4k cuck porn and hd netflix all day long, but I bet my price goes down because I'm no longer required to subsidize you faggots. the the bill. you obviously haven't, you get your info from 30 second blurbs on the infallible news and opinion pieces pedaled as investigative reporting.
Brody Myers
It's amusing to me when bootlickers from countries whose government censors their internet come in here and are in favor of the government regulating our internet to make it "more free"
No where will you see them complain about the government or tech companies like Google, Amazon, or Facebook censoring content.
This is super important:
The content you see can be controlled by 3 sources:
The government The ISPs Information filters/Tech Companies - Amazon, Faceberg, Jewgle
Net Neutrality only stops one of these 3 from controlling the content you can see. There is a reason why the tech companies are for NN - they want to be the people that decide what you see.
If we want to make legislation limiting what can be censored - it must prevent all 3 groups from censoring what you see, not just 1 of the 3.
Ryan Ramirez
>civic nationalists and pedophiles are the saviors of western civilization This is what kekistan fags actually believe
Colton Adams
Net neutrality just means government regulation and therefore censorship. Competition both lowers prices for consumers and makes censorship basically impossible
Jeremiah Allen
Daily reminder that you should fuck off back to algeria
Jaxon Price
It's legal for corporations to censor free speech on their platforms. It's illegal does the government to do so. In this case. I'm more worried about the corporations.
Parker Brown
>It's amusing to me when bootlickers from countries whose government censors their internet come in here and are in favor of the government regulating our internet to make it "more free" In my opinion the decision in the US may affect Germany and other countries. Germany especially since it often follows US lead.
>No where will you see them complain about the government or tech companies like Google, Amazon, or Facebook censoring content. These are service providers not ISPs.
>reason why the tech companies are for NN - they want to be the people that decide what you see NN prevents blocking for example of torrents, encryption or specific protocols, websites, ... . What you say is wrong.
>If we want to make legislation limiting what can be censored >it must prevent all 3 groups from censoring what you see, not just 1 of the 3 An all or nothing approach is unrealistic if each single instance is rather complex on it's own. So you would like to have even more regulation, but not NN because it's reach is not far enough ? Nice attempt to blur the NN issues with other things.