Daily reminder that

Daily reminder that

Pro Net Neutrality Supporters include: Hillary Clinton, Anita Sarkesian, Cucks, Soy-milk, BLACKED.com, Bill Maher, Bill Nye, Neil Degrass Tyson, Stephen Colbert, George Soros, Comet Pizza, REDDIT, Rick and Morty, Transgender People

Based Anti Net Neutrality /ourguys/ are: President Donald Trump, Bill Hicks, George Carlin, Adolf Hitler, anime mommy gfs, pepe the frog, Jews fear the Samurai guy, Big Man Tyrone, the ghosts of confederate generals, Alex Jones

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Xl0b2LGf9jM
tomsguide.com/us/Verizon-Wireless-Sup
extremetech.com/computing/186576-verizon-caught-throttling-netflix-traffic-even-after-its-pays-for-more-bandwidth
eff.org/wp/packet-forgery-isps-report-comcast-affair
netequalizernews.com/2011/02/08/what-is-deep-packet-inspection-and-why-the-controversy/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

All that effort down the tubes.

This literally took me 3 seconds to write while I had one finger up my ass you fucking imbecile.

>Daily reminder that
Hillary uses toilet paper, therefore don't use toiled paper.

That's a false equivalence. You're debating skills are sub-standared, cuck. Go back to school kid

...

Since you are into logical fallacies then why can't you argue about the pro/cons of NN ? Instead you associate people from political groups with pro/con NN positions in an attempt to validate some position. And since you don't provide any arguments but instead attack me, how does that affect the pro/con NN position of anyone ? - It doesn't. Like your initial post. You bring up points which have nothing to do with NN.

If you are against network neutrality, you dont understand how the internet operates. Your ISP is supposed to be providing you access to the internet, not access to the parts that dont compete with their business or the parts theyre ok with you seeing.

But yeah sure, give control of the internet over to the 5 media conglomerates that own literally every other piece of mainstream media in america. Good choice. You will enjoy it when everytime you try to visit a non-approved site it redirects you back to cnn.com or huffingtonpost.com

Your ISP wants to kill network neutrality so they can charge content providers to deliver their content to you, and you to pay extra to receive it. Content providers who have already paid their ISP, and you who have ostensibly already paid your ISP.

If you got a delivery from amazon and your mailman demanded you pay him 20 dollars or hes not handing you the package, AFTER amazon has paid them to deliver it and AFTER you have paid amazon to have it sent, you'd be pissed. Its extortion. Its the same thing here. If you dont understand that, you arent smart enough to be having this conversation.

Pretty much this.

...

>Net Neutrality repealed
>Sup Forums dies because politically incorrect pedophiles
>Reddit stays alive because normalfag central
Yeah man NN must be bad because reddit likes it.
Doing the opposite of people you dislike is the most correct thing to do. Excuse me while I go rape women and shoot children, because reddit thinks that is bad.

Do your fucking job mods

meme flaggot retard

appeal to authority more

>getting the normies out of Sup Forums
>bad
go away shill

NN is internet communism fuck the Obamadeble Nig man

What's the issue m8? Anons can discuss things you don't like.

tribal regard

no better than a nigger

so are public roads and access to plumbing

mentally celibate retard

Roads should be for huwhites only

I'm sick of hearing this net neutrality shit. I think I get the point all ready mate.

Ignoring the points you don't like. That's what I'd call substandard. Perhaps you should look for another job.

Basicaly this. Anti NN cuck can't refute anything, they are LARPing ancap retards, that think complete anarchy of the megacorporations is a good thing per se.

Net neutrality is cancer and if the tech companies and NGOs need to dump millions into shilling and astroturfing then its obviously not good based off its own merits

>i am too much of a brainlet to think for myself

yeah I'm with george soros, reddit and Anita Sarkesian in this one.
You have to be fucking retarded to sell your ass to big corporations. This board doesn't really surprises me anymore

>tech companies and NGOs
Same attempt as op to create associations which have nothing to do with pro/con NN. You either have not read the thread or are not capable of comprehending what was said.

FUCK net neutrality.

A nigger will NEVER have sex with my girlfriend

DEATH TO SHIT MEMES

You will literally be letting big companies make you pay more for what you already have

Hi friends,

I am from India and I am inquiring for job as Comcast shill. I am be wondering who I can contact for this position as I have very good and excellent qualifications.

I am looking to be making 200 rupees per hour which is very good money. I will be excellent Comcast shill and always on time on my VPN.

p.s. I promise to take my poo in loo this time

youtube.com/watch?v=Xl0b2LGf9jM

Can I see a sample of your meme portfolio?

I saw this same argument in another thread. Shareblue needs some more bait

Wrong
Net neutrality basically it boils down to government control over the internet and government censorship of things it deems unacceptable thought. ISP's don't have any incentive to censor free speech, but the government sure does.

cancer, they are.
hold up, i'll say it in reddit for them so they understand
>redditfags should literally, unironically kill themselves
>Redditors, it's thanksgiving. Time to do society a favor and murder suicide your entire families for raising such retarded pieces of shit.

>the government and big corporations don't have ties
user you got jewed.

This
NN is nothing more than government deciding what we can and cannot see

>not being able to analyze a situation and decide your support for yourself
>not having the mental capacity to make a decision and having to look at who supports what to make your decision
must be white

This is a retarded misrepresentation of what is going on.

The ISPs essentially want the few content providers that use a disproportionate amount of bandwidth to pay to for the extra bandwidth they use so that the ISPs can upgrade their systems so that the ISPs can deliver that content FASTER.

There are two ways that ISPs have done this. Comcast for instance made Netflix pay them an amount to install hardware on comcast's systems to make Netflix faster. Google on the other hand allows corporations such as Netflix to install their own software on Google's infrastructure to make it faster.

In both cases, the content providers are paying to make their content arrive faster. However, you'll notice that this is only happening with a few content providers that use a dissproportionate amount of bandwith.

There had been no actual incidences of ISPs censoring political opinions or competitors. Although, you could make the argument that Netflix is a competitor to Comcast which they were slowing down. This seems like a separate legal battle - perhaps an anti-trust litigation.

The big problem that is happening in parallel to net neutrality is the massive amount of regulations imposed b y the government that have enabled monopolies and oligopolies to be formed in the ISP business. That shit needs to be fixed.

dude that image is the opposite of what would happen...

>ISP's don't have any incentive to censor free speech
Not providing any sources.

tomsguide.com/us/Verizon-Wireless-Sup Forums-Blocked,news-5757.html

Reminder that germany is officially a Meme flag

you don't understand how the internet operates
what does NN do to bust up those 5 media conglomerates
George Soros owns major shares in these ISPs and is funding OD on the backside to push NN through on your useful idiots via the shills. why might that be?
kys. end your family bloodline. do it for the greater good, ends justify the means and all that

>ad hominem
S H I LL
H
I
L
L
A
R
Y

NN is internt communism
The commy Obama government wanted to sieze the means of internet production

thank you zionist now get out.
this board really is full of organizations trying to subvert our culture.

>everything my enemies support i must oppose
Literally fuck off. Everyone is at threat by this especially Sup Forums. I have no intention of getting charged 40$ to browse Sup Forums every month.

>ISPs don't have any incentive to censor free speech
Then why do they want more control over the internet? Fuck off.

>Reminder that germany is officially a Meme flag
Creativity is not your strong-suite, still using the same kind of attack. Since you are so unconvincing, I conclude you are pro-NN and are trying to sabotage your own shilling.

not true. you might pay more so you can watch your 4k cuck porn and hd netflix all day long, but I bet my price goes down because I'm no longer required to subsidize you faggots.
the the bill. you obviously haven't, you get your info from 30 second blurbs on the infallible news and opinion pieces pedaled as investigative reporting.

It's amusing to me when bootlickers from countries whose government censors their internet come in here and are in favor of the government regulating our internet to make it "more free"

No where will you see them complain about the government or tech companies like Google, Amazon, or Facebook censoring content.

This is super important:

The content you see can be controlled by 3 sources:

The government
The ISPs
Information filters/Tech Companies - Amazon, Faceberg, Jewgle

Net Neutrality only stops one of these 3 from controlling the content you can see. There is a reason why the tech companies are for NN - they want to be the people that decide what you see.

If we want to make legislation limiting what can be censored - it must prevent all 3 groups from censoring what you see, not just 1 of the 3.

>civic nationalists and pedophiles are the saviors of western civilization
This is what kekistan fags actually believe

Net neutrality just means government regulation and therefore censorship. Competition both lowers prices for consumers and makes censorship basically impossible

Daily reminder that you should fuck off back to algeria

It's legal for corporations to censor free speech on their platforms. It's illegal does the government to do so. In this case. I'm more worried about the corporations.

>It's amusing to me when bootlickers from countries whose government censors their internet come in here and are in favor of the government regulating our internet to make it "more free"
In my opinion the decision in the US may affect Germany and other countries. Germany especially since it often follows US lead.

>No where will you see them complain about the government or tech companies like Google, Amazon, or Facebook censoring content.
These are service providers not ISPs.

>reason why the tech companies are for NN - they want to be the people that decide what you see
NN prevents blocking for example of torrents, encryption or specific protocols, websites, ... . What you say is wrong.

>If we want to make legislation limiting what can be censored
>it must prevent all 3 groups from censoring what you see, not just 1 of the 3
An all or nothing approach is unrealistic if each single instance is rather complex on it's own.
So you would like to have even more regulation, but not NN because it's reach is not far enough ?
Nice attempt to blur the NN issues with other things.

Verizon caught throttling Netflix traffic even after its pays for more bandwidth
extremetech.com/computing/186576-verizon-caught-throttling-netflix-traffic-even-after-its-pays-for-more-bandwidth

Comcast interfering with protocols such as bittorrent
eff.org/wp/packet-forgery-isps-report-comcast-affair

What Is Deep Packet Inspection and Why the Controversy?
netequalizernews.com/2011/02/08/what-is-deep-packet-inspection-and-why-the-controversy/