>lolbertardians will defend this
Lolbertardians will defend this
You don't have a right to the internet
>retards are opposing NN because they think it has to do with free internet and not with internet providers being forced to provide the bandwidth they agreed to when they sold you a fucking contract
>battlefront 2 is awesome
Pay your bandwidth, kike.
Too bad the free market doesn't work when entrance costs are astronomical.
>battlefront 2
>awesome
I hate this man more with each passing day.
Spectrum's going to charge me $1000 just to look up the weather on Google. Thanks so much, Sup Forums. All of you blow your brains out.
I may be libertarian, but not even I can defend Battlefront II.
Wow, that's a whole new level of arrogance, now they will assume for me which game is great, so they want to directly take money from game companies.
>battlefront 2 is awesome
Gotta love when politicians try to pander to young people
Thank you America for ruining internet. Soon they will do this shit everywhere. Though the bill will unlikely pass
NN is digital egalitarianism. Not all packets are data are made the same, or have the same worth.
Only way lolitards can defend this is if the internet wasn't first developed with a black budget that wasn't taxpayer funded one way or the other.
>rights
games like battlefront don't even use up much of the resources, it's the netflix faggots and twitch stream watchers who are the problem
America (the US military) created the internet with American tax-dollars. It's a fucking utility..
Not only is this kike greedy, but he has shit taste in vidya.
Please explain how America "created" a GLOBAL network
>video games and streaming services use a entire (((gigabit))) of bandwidth to use.
I can run hulu, netflix, a playstation, xbox, wow, and download the entirety of spongebob at 5mbps download and still only use 100mbps dl and 25mbps ul.
That should come up to about 10 cents per hour.
>let's charge them 100 U.S.D. per hour for that package
>defending socialism once
Capitalism would have stopped this if they stopped trying to sell their liberal dream that every house deserves to have internet access.
It was a combination of the US military and french coders creating a net of communication
You're already paying the internet company's margins, though. The difference in repealing NN is that the depressives that spend all day watching Netflix and playing online video games will pay for what they use, and likewise for those of us who have a life besides occasionally shitposting.
It won't. Enough people on both sides are against it.
The U.S.A. tasked multiple U.S. and European engineers to create a line of communication that could pass information as fast as possible.
While the idea behind the internet or web was originally I believe the idea of some English gentlemen. It was the U.S.A. who actually made a world wide web and implemented the theory to a widespread use.
It's gonna cost you $20 just to download battlefront dumbass
Correct answer. End of thread
>STAH WAH ITH AWETHUM GAM
Maybe you shouldn't rely on the internet so much. That's the real redpill, and why Sup Forums will continue to oppose net jewtrality.
ok, you got us there
BUT WHAT IF COMPANIES DO SONETHIBG AGAINST THEIR OWN SELF INTERESTS. SAVE US GOVERMET
Nice double triple mr potato head
>t. corporate aplogist
> battlefront 2 is awesome
Ask me how I know he's a shill
Good. Ajit Pai is a Verizon dicksuckingmachine
shilling for big corporations is part of the libertarian dream
wtf is the name of that guy?
I've tried to find the name of that autistic meme and i've found nothing
>isps can have monopolies in the land of the "free"
How the fuck did this happen?
Couldn't they just raise the price of internet usage right now? What's stopping them?
Are they going through with all of this in order to make it confusing as to how they're raising the price?
There's such a low level of dialog with net neutrality, I have no idea what the issue really is because everyone is just spouting buzzwords and one liners instead of having any decent arguments.
the freedom of blocking competitors
en.wikipedia.org
Who gave it away patent and royalties free so anyone could make use of it.
US jews obviously see it differently
Reminder that the only reason to get rid of net neutrality is so that your ISP can punish you for using their service that you pay for.
i have a right to use products i buy as i see fit
I think ISPs just don't want to get regulations pushed on them that may or may not limit their marketing choices in the future
such a thing is always bad
on top of that, the net neutrality bill didn't just enforce NN, it also included stuff for an "open internet" that had to do with price controls such as forcing you to make cheap contracts, which ISPs absolutely hate. They want to negotiate every contract on their own without regulators dictating them a maximum price or telling them to make more contracts to allow for an "open internet" etc.
no, because now they have to provide equal access to everyone
They want to open up a bidding war on access, so if one website (such as facebook) wants faster speeds, they can bid more than another website (such as Sup Forums). It basically means all websites will be motivated to start milking their visitors as hard as possible, so they can bid the highest. Instead of paying a small service fee to set up a website, you will also have to establish a large revenue stream in order to bid for higher and higher speeds
You're paying for a service that the provider has attached terms and conditions to.
JUST PAY says the rich Jew whose parents payed for his car and car insurace till he was 25
What more can be said?
the terms and conditions are i get to use what i pay for as i see fit
So IT IS OUR FUCKING RIGHT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Max stirner, retard extraordinaire
typical libertarian
You don't have the right to anything. Unless you believe you do. Meaning objective rights don't exist. 'Rights' are just norms imposed or allowed by people that control all the guns. That's the only reason you have rights. Not because they objectively exist.
That's Sterner. A German egoist. Your public schooling failed you.
Thanks for the explanations, annons. It's just so difficult keeping up with things while obvious propaganda campaigns are underway.
This is an exception.
t. Lolbertardian
P.S. I'm not kidding.
Thank you, fellow burgers
yeah most of the time only the most aggressive propaganda reaches out to the people
if you'd like to read more about it, here's an article that explains the dispute pretty well:
economist.com
Corporations only care about Mr. Goldstein's stock price. We already get jewed by the phone companies internet will be next
Internet has become the greatest source of knowledge and entertaiment in history of humanity, and it is totally worthless without the people that creates content for it, ISP's want and and will control everything we say or do in this new internet, how is it posible that you cannot see how dangerous is this?.
/thread
>and it is totally worthless without the people that creates content for it
You gonna go out and lay fiber and cable?
so the content of the bill is... hat precisely?
people, including businesses already pay for packages depending on content
Exactly this is the problem. Smaller less popular sites and including controversial sites which Sup Forums is becoming in the eyes of normies, would be fucked by this. It opens a new avenue for censorship and hivemining.
NN does not mean people get internnet without paying for it. Stop conflating those.
>hehe I hate bfr2 im so edgy and original xD
Fuck off. The politically incorrect opinion is to like the game for what it is, it's brilliant minus the pay to win shit
they prob slippery slope it because you're entitled to some utilities like running water
are the social media companies gonna compensate me for all the nigger murderers running around like chmps in the rap vids they push/
no?
oh, then this is one step closer to us killing each and every media employee
It was built around the microtransactions, you cannot separate one from the other
How is that brilliant?
>country doesn't care to guarantee its citizens basic public services paid for by taxes
>not wanting to pay a couple of bucks in taxes so poor people can pursue their happiness with proper tools
>this level of MUH SHEKELS
literally 3rd world
>It was built around the microtransactions
i dunno, it looks like your typical $69 game to me and then they couldn't resist and hooked the pay2win into it
This NN happening is Metal Gear tier. ISPs want to create context with the internet.
No, that's why the internet has to become an utility just like water and electricity, subsidised by the goverment and payed by the companies who utilizes the most quantity of bandwidth plus the consumer, NN has to stay.
They have admitted to it to the extent that, when they said they were going to remove them, the next day it turned out they planned to just re-implement them later
That guy is a fucking idiot. If I pay for gas and put it in my fucking tank and I want to drive fast on a fucking road it doesnt matter what fucking road I choose to drive fast on.
the problem here is that companies are colluding to set prices in the form of legal barriers to market entrants, both in terms of monopoly and making per megabyte the only legal standard of service. even the fucking philippines has unlimited packages
>has to become an utility just like water and electricity
Electricity here is private. You pay the power company for service.
You people honestly believe you should just be handed shit for a set price don't you?
lmfao, are you for real?
It's battlefield with an even more half-assed campaign.
It's shit. Go play any other shooter, it's the same damn thing. The old school N64 star wars shooters are better.
I wonder what happens when we start playing a new game where some people start having accidents.
>because the game's awesome
>lolbertardian likes consumerist trash
Imagine my shock. I wonder if we could get Jeffery Tucker to pen a loving, sensual defense of microtransactions.
The rules in a game of hockey dont objectively exist, but they work in context to the game. Human rights are a meme which serve a purpose, like the rules in a sport. We agree upon them for our mutual benefit. So, is having internet classified as a human right beneficial? I dont think a free market is necessarily good in every scenario, just like a hammer isnt a useful tool for every job. But in the case of NN honestly I am not sure if regulations on ISPs are good or not..
You don't have a right to property either. You just think you do.
says the faggot with the meme flag. fuck off
Good goys in this thread who use Sup Forums actually support ruining the internet lol
i agree with you
it's the typical $69 box sale, battlefield super vietnam, call of duty special ghost, whatever
the point is, there's no real difference from other games you buy and already own the stuff in the game without additional payments
And you also pay for water, and gas, and the internet too, i'm not saying what the prices should be, for all i cared it could be 400$ - 800$ a month, doesn't matter as long as the internet is free for one to see in it's entirety.
>pay your bandwith with this new package. 500gb a month, with social media included, add youtube for 5.99.
Fuck you kikes, even if we have to use the liberals to put the ISPs back in their place and shatter their dream of creating cable 2.0 its worth it.
then make it a right
the internet is one of the greatest inventions of digital age, why ruin it?
is it so hard to accept a bit of government regulation for a good reason?
Theyre taxing data, and going to control what data is viewed.
Al Gore invented the internet and global warming.
This
Fucking retards making go from moderate capitalist to full blown National Socialist. T.bh fuck the free market
It's the final solution to shutting down Shia's flag project
fippy bippy
nah people might actually start to complain to their representatives that there is a problem
make it a cheap $299 and keep the goyim pay by the month
All you faggots whining about nn honestly sound like niggers chimping for your free gibs, can anyone here even name something they do other than use it to shitpost, watch porn and order drugs? It's actually degenerate as fuck and hopefully the neets who can't afford the fast lanes have to connect with reality for once
The internet was always destined to become a government run utility like any other, it has to be at this point unless ypu want jewgle to rule the world in 10-15 years
>if you buy a car you need to pay additional moneys for open his doors
the absolute state of burgerland
Boy, I wonder why that is, surely it's not because red tape right?
I'd love to set up and sell high level pay per play wifi access in my neighborhood but the FCC are a bunch of faggots.
yeah you don't own the car faggot its leased
you still payed the full price but you "rent" it and of course unlocking or locking for extended periods will not be free
if you don't like it go live in venezuela
Ummm no more like
>if you buy a car you need to pay taxes to use the road
Not like an italian would understand a thing about economics in the first place
So everything we pay for now comes incomplete
>internet with limited access buy a specal packet for more
>Videogames with limited content, buy dlc for more
>toys without batteries and gadgets, buy for more experience
What's next?
>buy a car, tires not include, buy special access for more
>by tv , remote control not included
>take wife to the hospital because she is about to deliver a baby, pay extra if you want the baby with arms and legs
Greed and capitalism is a pain in the ass.
Or uh, just paying for public roads like we all do.