NET NEUTRALITY MEANS COMMUNISM

NET NEUTRALITY MEANS COMMUNISM

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0ilMx7k7mso
youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I
archive.is/bxoHF
archive.is/jyJYn
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

You're a dumb one, aren't you?

>corporations will control the internet
>communism
How?

>obama
kekeroni, it was placed in 96 under Clinton

Net neutrality means that the government controls the internet, nigger.

>internet treated as a utility like television
>television is literally censored and rated by the government
>some how internet will not be censored and rated by the government

Explain this, anti-anti-net neutrality people.

Millions of nerds dont care about television

I wish canada and Israel would get nuked

youtube.com/watch?v=0ilMx7k7mso

this 2.0

YOU UTTER MORON
THE FCC IS REGULATING ISP BEHAVIOR NOT INTERNET CONTENT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

YOU UTTER MORON
THE FCC IS REGULATING ISP BEHAVIOR NOT INTERNET CONTENT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>gov controls
More like stops corps from jewing us

Fine, i can't do anything aboot it, eh

Enjoy your bundles Americans.

Your inaction guarantees a smaller view of the planet..

Net neutrality just treats ISPs as utilities like power and water. ISPs are just gateways to the internet, currently they are not allowed to censor anything or throttle sites that don't pay them enough, they have to treat all packets from sites the same.

Without net neutrality they can censor, block or throttle what they like for any reason. It's also much harder to start up an ISP since you have a lot of infrastructure to set up like laying the fiber that other ISPs already have in place. That's why before NN these ISPs already had monopolies in certain areas because competition wasn't really a thing.

If I recall in Britain, don't they force you to buy their BBC shit? Even if you don't want it?

The government also controls the military. Is the military communism?

It does NOT stop corporations from jawing you, it protects the establishment and strengthens monopolies by preventing businesses from making business decisions. It’s garbage, it’s exactly what OP meme says, a solution looking for a problem. There has never in the history of the internet been a problem that net neutrality would have fixed.

Robot shills confirmed.

The military is now comparable to the internet

Unironically, yes

Repealing Net Neutrality would be a Great Idea, if America had Functioning, "Real Capitalism". But America has Predatory Capitalism, in which Large Conglomerates consolidate power, buy legislators, write the rules, divide up turf in order to maximize profits.
Competition isn't going to increase. Prices aren't going to drop. Because these cable companies literally stay out of each other's way so that they can control the prices.
When Interests Converge there is no need for a Formal Conspiracy, all it takes is a wink and a nod, these companies are already behaving like a functioning Monopoly.

o

Unironically true, a company needs to be able to charge another one using the most of their cables like a big hungry nigger.
Every house in panama has fiber optic internet because they did away with net neutrality and an arms race broke out between the telecomm companies there for business.

It is a socialistic program

Fuck off kike.
youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I

>lets fix monopolies by getting govt to make them all offer the same service
>it won't be shitty service because bandwidth is unlimited weeeeee
How about lets fix monopolies by breaking them up the way trump is doing.
Bandwidth is not infinite no matter what laws you make saying it is.

what changed for the better since 2015? ill wait for you to come up with an answer

In the US only government is obligated to not infringe free speech. So long as they technically regulate the internet, ISP's cannot infringe free speech.

If NN ends, then that government protection ends and companies can do anything you want. Your freedom online will be regulated by jewish billionaires. It will destroy us.

On the other hand what is the argument to end NN? I have yet to read anything that wasn't boomer rhetoric that demonstrates total ignorance on the subject.

read this story you stupid NIGGERS
>image.jpg

NN has been around since 96

BANDWIDTH IS NOT INFINITE NO MATTER WHAT LAWS YOU PASS THAT SAY IT IS.

im not sure i even get what your anti-argument is?

>It does NOT stop corporations from jawing you
It does, it's classified as a public utility the same way power and water are, and pricing is regulated by a commission. They can't gouge you like say the producers of epipen who had a real monopoly. The reason for this classification is because of the infrastructure that needs to be set up around the city and to each property or business, much like water and electric.

The good thing about this obviously is the ISPs cannot push their personal beliefs on the consumer (much like twitter and facebook are doing now) by censoring or blocking things.

problem>reaction>solution

You're right. Modern NN means declaring ISPs public utilities requiring them to treat all data equal tho. All data is not equal. NN has existed forever BECAUSE of the free market. It doesnt need govt enforcement

If browsing sites that haven't paid the ISPs enough money becomes more tedious, then I'm against abolishing net neutrality.

Your microdick will be the first to complain since you have no bitcoins to pay for HQ comped tranny porn or to pay royalties. Fucking Nazi Lobster.

archive.is/bxoHF
the topic is a FALSE FLAG and CITATION NEEDED

John Oliver, on HBO, a channel ONLY accessible via cable contracts, who posts their content on YouTube (which is also going for an a la carte TV model), was the one that originally pushed the public in the direction of Net Neutrality. Really think about that for a minute.

A company, who profits from cable companies, was pushing the public to go for Net Neutrality.........

No one said it was. However a company should only sell lines they have enough service to support which they currently are not doing. They oversell lines and refuse to upgrade infrastructure unless the government pays them to. You're basically complaining that the government wants you to get the full loaf of bread when you buy a loaf instead of a slice and the option to buy each addition slice at 4.99. Loafs of bread the government fucking baked. I seriously hope you're getting paid to shill because if you don't you may in fact be the dumbest mother fucker alive.

The corporations are fascist organizations in coordination with three-letter agencies that don't give a shit about the people.

Net Neutrality is also heavily supported by George Soros, a pile of garbage.

what a fucking loser

Fuck off shill, you have posted on every thread pertaining to NN with the same copied shit. Have an actual argument other than some autists youtube video.

NN literally makes internet slower for everyone. It's impossible for everyone to get max bandwidth 24/7 simultaneously

>mfw anti-NN fags don't realize Ajit is pro-censorship
Better grab your torrents while you can. BitTorrent will be the first to fall to make up for the failure in 2008.

Is this going to be the 1st time government gets it right or is it another false promise to us in favor of their cronies?

Google and Netflix make billions of dollars on bandwidth provided by ISPs and pay nothing for infrastructure.

IMHO, the ISP can do whatever they want with their internet connections. Doesn't mean people are going to pay for it.

It's actually the other way around. Google and friends ARENT beholden to the first amendment as it is.

Go fuck yourself nigger, stop posting in six gorillion threads about this stupid kike war.

wtf
how about sue for false advertising??
NIGGER GODAMNIT SEE THE SHILLS ARE OUTITS ALL A FALSE FLAG
The FCC’s 2015 Open Internet Order established the legal framework to enforce what’s known as “net neutrality,” a term that refers to a core principle of the internet: that ISPs treat all data delivered to customers equally. That means Comcast (or any other ISP) can’t slow down Netflix in an attempt to get you to use their own streaming service instead, for example.
To have the authority to impose net neutrality protections on ISPs, the FCC reclassified broadband providers as “common carriers” under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934. The FCC’s new plan would revert ISPs to their previous classification and eliminate the federal net neutrality protections that came with Title II.
As you might have guessed, the FCC’s proposal is popular with companies like Comcast and AT&T but overwhelmingly opposed by advocates for free speech online, technology startups that rely on the internet, and opponents of censorship. These ideals, together with net neutrality, are what have been historically known as internet freedom or “open internet” values. Now that Republicans in the FCC are pushing to eliminate net neutrality regulations, however, they’ve begun to use the same
> language to describe what they want to do.

Really, and thats why they all support it right? Thats why it has an awesome name like patriot act or no child left behind. Seems familiar, where have i seen this game before?

Removing net neutrality would be ok if USA had a free internet market. They dont and in many places you cant change internet operator unless you actually move to another town thus a unelected corporation can control your use of your internet and thus to a larger extent nowdays your speech.

And yet some are to dumb to understand this.

>Da jewz

Not every fucking issue ever conceived is about da jewz. NN is about Comcast trying to fuck everyone including a handful of jews.

isps cannot censor you right NOW. if they do they are false advertisign and denying service which you paid for

NONE OF YOU FAGGOTS MAKE ONE POINT

THIS WHOLE BULLSHIT THING, THE SJW'S AND EVERYTHING ELSE..... ALL OF IT
ARE ALL
FOR THIS VERY GODAMN TOPIC OP

>all traffic is the same and everyone should pay the same for the internet and equal access to high speed internet

No it doesn't. It just means that your ISP can't restrict access to certain sites. That's literally all it is. Anti-NN means you want your ISP to restrict your access to certain sites. The only people in favor of it are 1) ISPs, 2) the jews who run the ISPs, 3) the retard congressman in your district who answers to the ISP Jew, and 4) the retard who voted for him, i.e. (((you))).

POISONING THE WELL GOOD JOB SHILL
GO GET YOUR SHEKELS AT THE DOOR

LIKE EVERYONE IS SO STUPID THEY DONT EVEN KNOW WHAT THE INTERNET IS. OR GETTIGN AN ISP

YOUR RELYING ON MORONS THINKING ITS A TELEVISION AND THEYRE CHANNELS SHOULD COME IN CLEAR WITH NO INTERUPTIONS OR BUFFERING

>John Oliver was the one that originally pushed the public in the direction of Net Neutrality
You must be at least 18 years of age to post on Sup Forums.

We were talking about net neutrality well before the John Oliver was around. That's why if you look at a lot of those "This is what the Internet will look like without net neutrality" images they contain logos of shit like Napster and AIM which no one uses anymore. I remember seeing those images on video game forums and Digg circa 2005.

Go fuck yourself nigger, stop posting in six gorillion threads about this stupid kike war.

You're a communist faggot if you really believe government can regulate the needs of a constantly in flux technology industry better than free market

They don't have to upgrade infrastructure right now because there's no competition AND the govt won't pay them to as they shouldn't because its not the govts role

Under full NN only huge corps will be able to afford to facilitate the demand, i.e. upgrading infrastructure
Fuck youre dumb

for that very reason of censorship

archive.is/bxoHF
answer this shit then homo

>one post by this ID

And the people in favor of it are A) Google B) Facebook C) Netflix. They don't want to pony up the cash required to build the infrastructure their servers depend on, especially when YouTube and Netflix are direct competition with cable TV.

You want to watch netflix on OUR cable connection instead of TV? Fine, then you are paying for the infrastructure we need to build in order to support that extra bandwidth.

at this point i can't even tell.
are you guys being serious about this NN or are you just shitposting?
i am aware that a lot of (niggers and (americans)) can't afford it but do you really think that this is a smart move?

no one can even answer this simple question, eh?

no that makes every person with an internt connection paying for whatever they deem to be the same as

but the bandwidth consumed is the SAME AS and people who use high speeds of bandwidth, should just fucking pay for more. if the amoutn of bandwidth is a problem thats not even our concern

Also in a lot of areas, even before NN, there was a monopoly and they could charge you whatever for their shitty service. People need to understand that getting into the ISP business is difficult, extremely expensive and setting one up even in a small area can take years because of the fiber you need to lay along with government approval and construction.

The only thing that would change for a lot of rural people who complain about shitty internet is that shitty internet will be more expensive and subject to the censorship whims of the ISP executives and shareholders.

Not quote 2005 but this shit has been going on for a decade dipshit.

archive.is/jyJYn

I like what Google and Netflix offer.

The ISPs are butthurt because Netflix, Youtube, and Facebook mean that their customers are actually using the bandwidth they are already paying for and they don't actually have available to sell, and NN means they can't throttle people in order to avoid upgrading THEIR infrastructure.

>All data is not equal.

Elaborate. I'm pretty sure 50GB is 50GB whether it's 50GB of porn, netflix, or Sup Forums archives.

>may also be illegal under US law
>2007
>before Obama's NN laws

Damn, really made me think.

this is how related to the op?
it is a false flag according again to my link
archive.is/bxoHF
>the same language to describe what they want to do.
about what YOur talking about

Comcast is pro NN...

>They don't want to pony up the cash required to build the infrastructure their servers depend on
They pay for their own infrastructure. Are you saying they should pay for the ISPs infrastructure? That's what your mom pays for when she pays the internet bill every month. Do you think that if Google pays for it, your mom won't have to pay for internet anymore?

Yes. They do that in Denmark too. And it costs 3 times a Netflix membership - not that I want either, both are garbage.

I pay ton of cash to shitpost on Sup Forums, so I have to shitpost on a daily basis to compensate for my loss.

hallmark of a shill, no argument kisses ass

PUBLIC ROADS MEANS COMMUNISM
PLUMBING MEANS COMMUNISM
SOCIAL SECURITY MEANS COMMUNISM
NATIONAL PARKS MEANS COMMUNISM
PUBLIC TELEVISION MEANS COMMUNISM
FREE ACCESS TO RADIO BROADCASTS MEANS COMMUNISM

SPREAD THE WORD MAGAPEDES

THE INTERNET, RIGHT NOW, IS A COMMUNIST STATE THAT MUST BE BROUGHT DOWN

KILL THE INTERNET, GOY- I MEAN BROS

>"hate" sites will be banned
>have to pay extra on top of monthly caps to download
>servers will be put into a tier that you need to pay extra for to connect to
>streaming competition will die and only big services like netflix will survive because they can pay ISP's to be put into their fast lane tier
>prices for everything will go up because companies have to pay for digital downloads to be fast
>small websites will cease to exist since it will actively incentivize those that can pay for their users to access
>this will kill online services, competition and freedom of speech

How will it continue to exist with all the shit that various content providers and the government have been doing? It is the FCC that regulates content, not the FTC. We are already on that road. Getting rid of NN and allowing the FTC to regulate ISPs as businesses rather than utilities could theoretically eliminate some of their monopoly power and give us increased access to alternatives in a competitive market, but really the change isn't really going to affect the direction things are heading either way. Price discrimination will be based on bandwidth, you are already getting censored.

The entirety of Sup Forums is really chimping out over this subject, divided as hell too.

God you shills are going all out aren't you

>ooh whatever companies tell me to do
shill
inb5 shillk you cant call out shills
no that was a shill tactic brought up around 2006-7 they started trying to yell at everybody to do to gatekeep information

this is a big gatekeeping operation fuck these guys they have no point call them out

They all stem from the same issues that kept creeping up because of ISPs. I'm not going to gather all of the links because people are too lazy or too stupid to learn from the past.

How stupid do you have to be to trust them? Comcast vehemently opposed it and lobbies against it regularly. They know 99% of the nation supports net neutrality so they're trying to grab some stupid support, nothing more.

Electricity is communism too. Anti-trust is also communism, it's the government meddling in the free market.

Look, I hate the cable/ISP companies, too. But fucking forgive me for not just accepting at face value these ultra altruistic selling points of NN. Sorry for trying to critically examine the claims.

I pay 40 dollars for internet
40 dollars for TV license because I have internet (Don't even have a TV).

That's 80 dollars a month.

I'm not going to pay for Crunchyroll.

So does everyone else.
No, because people use the internet differently. Netflix and YouTube streaming on a high level bottlenecks at certain chock points. The ISP level networks are not designed to push out 1 Gb internet to every user, all day every day. They probably have a 1 GB cap for 50+ homes on 100 Mbps connections. If one or two people reach their cap, it slows down everyone else.

Net Neutrality looks great on paper, because on paper we all have 100 Mb connections. But in infrastructure, all those connections only go into Network Equipment that can handle so much data. Which goes into the next piece, and the next piece, etc etc.

If ISP's can throttle Netflix and Youtube, they can install their own streaming services closer to the source and provide better service.

It doesn't make sense to computer newbs and neets, but it makes a lot of sense if you work with infrastructure. It costs a lot of money to keep making the pipes bigger to support Netflix, when Netflix doesn't pay for any of it.

Think about it this way. Netflix and Comcast are basically providing cable TV. But Comcast is the only company that actually paid to dig and place the cable lines. Netflix just piggy backs off of it with no consequence.

What's "ultra altruistic" about giving customers the service they pay for?

Net Neutrality is not fucking communism. How did this meme even get started?

The internet is inherently Communist.

Data is inherently Communist because it can be copied and shared whereas an IRL product like a car cannot.

That is a good thing. Why would you support Jews controlling what books you can read or hiding everything behind a paywall?

You go to try and buy some underground book related to Fascism or whatever, no one on Amazon or Google sells it so you find a .PDF copy online on an illegal site. Then I can share it with anyone. That's a good thing. The internet SHOULD be Communist in nature. It means complete freedom. Only a shill would be against this.

Bear in mind, I believe the INTERNET should be Communist in nature not the REAL WORLD.

I've seen shills trybto gaslight this shit it's amazing. People are so caught up in "my side" shit they can't allow to admit that Trump and Pajeet Poo-in-Loo are in the wrong here.

Its a shame government is the direct result of living in a civilized non-niggerfied western society, then.

No, they don't pay for the cable line going into your house. Once Google connects to AT&T, they are done. After that, it's the ISP's managing the infrastructure to your house.

In the case of a phone line, AT&T provides the service, and they dig the physical lines. If you are running a business, and using their phone lines to such a degree that it slows down other customers, it would cause a similar problem.

If they can't support the bandwidth for Netflix and Youtube they should not be selling it. You can't punish the customer because you're greedy and selling something you don't actually have in the hopes too many people won't be using it simultaneously.

im talking about NOW you little godamn piece of shit
you're distracting smoke screening from this being a false flag
you took a side, and trying to get people to go along with your side, BLINDLY without explaining or letting anyone know what the fuck it is.
which is exactlyu what yuo want, that will BE the intenret after this shit is through, with you claiming people wanted this, and also claiming that people want whatever else you bitch about too

thats all im worried about and you seem to not care one bit and keep bringing up your shill fucking godamn topic
>paying for bandwidth speed is censorship
fuck you lying about how ISPS or internet even works to push your agenda
I already explained that to this other parrot freind of yoursits not our concern

>business running everyday operations
>neet constantly playing visual online while downloading hentai
>Equal

Equality is bullshit.