The Jews benefit from centralizing everything, banks, internet, media, etc... this is how they manage to consolidate power.
Today it seems as though they are trying to fuck with the internet by turning it into a larger scale r*eddit type dystopia. Decentralizing the internet as much as possible and creating a distributed system seems to be the best way forward to save freedom of speech and information.
Agreed, it's all gotta go distributed, from the network layer to the web application layer (distributed Youtube, FB, 4ch, reddit alternatives) -- but I gotta wonder about the effects of the additional EMF radiation. And it's still not going to solve the problem of shills. I can't think of a solution for that, which still preserves anonymity.
Aiden White
Internet is already decentralized you retarded nigger Or do you think google is "installed" in only one computer?
Carson Allen
I said distributed, learn how to read you dumb wop.
Kevin Collins
Wifi usb nodes. You just need to solve compression
Chase Jones
yes a distributed wifi based network, but what about other continents?, we would need to crowdfound a satellite because internet over shortwave is gonna have very pour bitrate.
Logan Edwards
How would wifi help? I'm talking about redesigning the internet using cryptography and shit.
Lincoln Price
There's some distributed hash table library that I thought Steemit was built on, but I can't recall it.
slib? dlib?
probably neither of those, but some lib. It's truly distributed, redundant, etc etc.
Connor Adams
>Decentralizing the internet as much as possible and creating a distributed system seems to be the best way forward to save freedom of speech and information >Decentralizing god damn you are a retard
Brody Flores
Bumping for a decentralized radio repeater internet. This is a possibility woth hardware that is available. Im tired of paying the jew for access when we could build our own. We just need to adopt it widely, thats the tricky part. Mass adoptaion.
Distributed internet seems like it would be easier to track individual users. Someone redpill me on how it would work, im not that into tech.
Jeremiah Adams
It is distributed you retarded leaf. The word you are looking for os decenttalized as in no central authority. You are as dumb as the wop above ypu
Jack Butler
I said distributed twice and I said decentralizing as in the verb, not decentralized. Maximum decentralization = distributed. Why are burgers so dumb?
Evan Foster
>Distributed internet seems like it would be easier to track individual users.
No, is going to be like tor or i2p but from link layer.
John Baker
Wifi repeaters have good throughput. Problem is distance not so much bitrate. And yes we would need a sat to connect over oceans.
Easton Brooks
Leaf if youre going to start a thread at least know what youre talking about. Youre arguing about apples and oranges
Xavier James
It would be unkillable, then, you'd just layer encryption over the whole thing. You (a) would connect to (b), but what does that prove? (b) has any amount of stuff. Everybody connects to (b). Ooops, halfway through you connect to (c). I'm not sure with IPFS anyone even knows what they're hosting. Maybe, maybe not. Of course, no-one wants to help paedos, but it might be that if you want real privacy, you have to accept that you might.
I looked into IPFS once, but I don't remember how it does things. Intro video: