Let’s have a pol Sup Forums

Let’s have a pol Sup Forums

1. Country
2. Do you support net neutrality in the USA?

1. Finland
2. Of course not

1. Finland
2. Don't care

USA
No

USA
still on the fence, I'd like to see the companies to get assblasted

1. Canada
2. No, because it will mean less Americans on this site which is a postiive, also Sup Forums is owned by a Jap who can easily move servers

1. USA
2. No, but having a Pajeet have his way bothers me

Sweden
No because it would be funny if USA gets even less democratic

I'm against capitalism, so yes I support net neutrality.

1. secret
2. no, they have the right to be cucked by ISPs it's called FREEDOM you fucking COMMIE

1. AwooSA
2. No
NN wasn't a thing until 2015 for shit's sake. It's quite literally internet socialism. The internet and speeds have been stagnant for years in the United States. It is following the same exact path of socialism as an economic solution.

1. USA

2. As long as I can still order dominos online, I’m good

There is literally no one who support NN ban.
The whole "NN = Communism" is an attack.
they are using bots, we figured it out on this thread >The solution of the problem is weaponized IGNORANCE .

Come join us.

>believing that communist shit

Are you 10?

1. 180 IQ

2. No because ISPs are businesses and they have the business right to throttle whoever the fuck they want just like the so called pro-neutrality businesses that get throttled (Google, Twitter, YT, Netflix etc.) can censor whoever the fuck they want and as a consumer you can just choose another ISP if they fuck over your beloved jew sites. Oh you only have one ISP in your made-up back alley jungle area? Too bad maybe you can jack off to real life monkeys instead of watching other monkeys fuck each other on poor throttled Pornhub.

>meme flag
>support NN goyim
>0.12 Yen has been deposited in your shillbucks account

1. American
2. No

USA
No

>1. 180 IQ

Jews want an end to NN, though. They want a way to make money and simultaneously control what people can and can't access.

Fuck no. I get literally 12 GB per month. Why the fuck should USA get unlimited internet? They are fucking obese.

That isn't net neutrality. That's bandwidth.

>Jews want an end to NN, though

Google, Youtube, Netflix, Twitter, Facebook don't want an end to NN???

Rare spotted.

>Google, Youtube, Netflix, Twitter, Facebook don't want an end to NN???

Because those Jews will have to start paying bigger Jews more money. They're already happily controlling the population and saving money. The other side isn't.

>Freedom
>By restricting people

UK
Yes, fuck the greedy Capitlist Jews
>where is the Strasserist flag

>Jews will be able to jew Jews when Net Jewtrality is repealed

This just solidifies my No vote then

>wanting bigger Jews to control what you can and can't see on the internet, so that lesser Jews will have to pay some money
>cutting off your nose to spite your face

It's all about bandwidth in the end. If Netflix wasn't being a literal bandwitdth jew, this wouldn't even be an issue.

fuck off pajeet

Norbong
Yes.

oh no I will have to pay an extra $10 a month to buy a video game and a pathfinding package
how will I ever feed myself?

Why are there so many corporate shills shilling against net neutrality?
Or all of you are just retards?

Usa
no

i dont understand how people can say "the corporations all support it, but repealing it will be sucking off the corporations!"

America has proven every time that corporations know best what's good for the people, you filthy commie fuck

USA
no

Yes lets give some cucks the right to choose what other people can see. GG you fucking commie

we created it we'll do as we see fit

Pro OIO = Pro Google Facebook Twitter censoring the internet as they see fit, and in the future any american goverment also censoring it as they see fit

Anti OIO - Free market will bring down internet prices and promote a new age of innovation with in the internet. Google, facebook youtube and kin lose their powers of censorship over the internet and are dead within a few years.

THE ANSWER IS FUCKING OBVIOUS

Data mining
Sage

You have a point

USA
Yes

The internet as we know it today, aka the World Wide Web was created at CERN in Switzerland.

nope. Its a Grade-1 Gold-plated Shill op.
the Jews are posting 'Sup Forums is against NN!' on other boards, till it comes true. We stand, shoulder-to-shoulder, with the owners of Buzzfeed in their quest to Jew yet more shekels from their monopolist squatting upon American Taxpayer paid infrastructure. Gonna be a long month of this dross. Oh and btw, 'youre a filthy commie fuck', etc. Or they done that bit already?

nah bro. al gore invented the internet. also the military. and a bunch of fax machines at universities.

No

1. Merica
2. No, but it'll be just fine with or without it

I do support the elimination of Net Neutrality because it is in name alone. It puts Title 2 onto ISPs and that means regulation that could eventually become content censorship. Here is the proof. It is enacted now and we see censorship en masse. Going back to how it was allows filing antitrust lawsuits for bad companies. Pic related, Soros is backing keeping it and other pic related is the astroturf on plebbit the other day to push for it, thanks Soros.

other pic i noted

those have almost nothing to do with the internet we know today

1. Clappistani
2. Yes. The whole "Big ISPs want to open up the market to more competition" is a crock of shit

DO NOT FALL FOR THE ISP SHILLS.

We need NN to ensure the free flow of redpills.

>But Soros gave $200 million to NN groups!
Wrong. Soros gave $200 million to liberal free-expression groups that happen to have a pro-NN stance. These articles are coming from sources owned by the ISPs. They know people hate Soros, so they put out fake news trying to spin NN as his personal operation.

>But liberals want NN!
Conservatives also want NN. The overwhelming majority of the population wants NN.

>But it's like communism! We aren't entitled to regulate a private business!
Internet infrastructure was largely funded by the US government, paid for by your taxes. You, the American people, are partial owners of the internet lines. You are entitled to decide how these lines are used.

>But blocking and throttling is bad for business!
Read the above statement. The internet is NOT a free market. Half the country only has 1 ISP and will never have another because that would require us to fund additional, redundant infrastructure. Wireless is not an alternative either, it is very heavily loaded with just the current traffic. More importantly, blocking and throttling HAS happened many times in the past, Sup Forums being one of the sites that was blocked.

>But Google and Netflix use too much traffic! They should pay for it!
These large traffic consumers are already paying for additional lines to handle their massive bandwidth requirements.

>But NN gives government control over the internet!
NN does no such thing. It is an individual regulation that governs how ISPs can run the cable lines. It does not give the government any special privileges. If the government wanted to "control the internet" they would need to pass a separate law, which they can do at any time, regardless of whether NN is repealed.

>But Trump wants NN repealed!
Trump never said that. His FCC chairman, Ajit Pai (who happens to be a Verizon lawyer) wants NN repealed. Trump does not micromanage the entire US government.

I'm tired of this fucking copy pasta. Please consult with the book in pic related.

Estonia
On fence but if i have to make decision on the spot with current info I have, its solid no.

>'youre a filthy commie fuck
Literally couple posts above yours

Net Neutrality debate is this

Government control

OR

Free Market Control

>flag
No. It's a scam.
I would support some sort of regulations for internet related stuff, if it were designed intelligently and specifically to limit ALL powers on the net. From governments to ISPs to content providers to content aggregates to hardware manufacturers...

Why can Intel build a hardware backdoor into their processors and when people start figuring out how to hijack it, they release firmware to obfuscate it a little more and then lie to everyone and call it a bug?

You can't build in a hardware backdoor and then pretend it's a bug when people outside of the CIA start figuring out how to get access...

And like Cisco and juniper don't have the same "bug" somewhere... How about a regulation that says governments can't work with these giant hardware manufacturers to build a secret internet of devices compromised by design?

Fuck everyone who is crying about net neutrality. Ignorant fucking pissants

>flag
>I don't give a fuck

1. Portugal
2. No - alas I want to watch USA as a non-Net Neutrality experiment. 2nd If it made John Oliver and HBO butthurt, it is good.

1.canada
2.no

Comcast etc doesn't want to pay to upgrade their infrastructure to support what they're actually selling and instead want to auction off their bandwidth to the highest bidder. You know how airlines overbook their flights and hope not everyone shows up? Well mainstream Netflix use means a lot more people are making full use of the bandwidth they are paying for, or showing up to the flight in the analogy. The ISPs don't want to upgrade their infrastructure and are trying to pass the bill to Netflix and co even though they buy their bandwidth like anyone else.

USA
no

I can see past the fearmongering targeted at regular goys.