What went wrong with this industry, Sup Forums?

What went wrong with this industry, Sup Forums?

Are you implying there's something wrong with making a machine that can draw pictures as humans do?

All the Hardcore Child Pornography and blatantly fulfilling in every way our sexual lust for children.

The Japanese

>the near future
>some mad men finally build a machine that can draw pictures as kyoany and shaft do?
fluffy quality hentai

>our

nope

Nothing, really.

Miyazaki was right, he sounded like a senile old man but he was right.
Why the fuck would you want to industrialize art?

Art? No.

Repeating backgrounds? In-betweens? Fuck yes.

>anime
>art

Anime is not art.

It's called industrial culture for a reason, you delusional faggot.

He said wrong user. What went wrong.

Pandering to nomalfags.

Sunrise and Xebec are the only good active studio

>Why the fuck would you want to industrialize art?
But that's already done, when outsourcing to gooks.
The difference is that machines don't make mistake and are faster, so no QUALITY.

But it objectively is drawn artwork, regardless of quality

Well yeah, it's called autism.
There are no aesthetically visual mediums without artistic sensibility. A century ago there was the same debate about painting vs photography. About how it wasn't an art because it was mechanical and didn't need an artist to operate. We soon realized even photography needed an artist to work, and that it couldn't work on its own, like a machine. Nadar used light, clothes and volume to bring out the character of the people he shot. Just like a painter uses light and magnifies the caracteristics of his models/adds accessories to suit his purpose. Even now the debate stills remains, you can still find people who will tell you an illustrator/animator working on a computer isn't actually making art.
The desire for a machine to do all the work by itself is not only delusional but suicidal. There was always a need and a desire for new techniques, and that should encouraged, but these guys, even though they probably mean well, are perverting that desire. Artists are just men and women using tools. Whether it be a stick of graphite or Maya, the tool can't, and shouldn't become the master. It's baffling to me that these guys seem not to be aware of such a simple truth. Hopefully they're just baiting with buzzwords.

Pure ideology.

Can they draw children 3D models better than we can? It seems the "2.5D" models of sexy children all look like 18+ year old midgets.

Pic not related.

Photography in and of itself is NOT art.

It depends of who's taking it, why, and what's the result. Same as when you scribble something on a blank page.

Nah, more like common sense.

>our sexual lust for children
>projecting this hard
Neck yourself.

Nah, I neck kids. Also their ears. Kids ears are great.

Kid onaholes are either too large on the outside to fit in my CPR baby or too soft and smooth inside to create any sort of stimulation.

The kemonomimi kid onaholes are just like the regular types and same with anime themed ones.

...

People don't understand how to draw the right sex on characters.

Their eyes are too large, their nose is non existent or too small. Mouths are not triangles. Otherworldly colored eyes and hair colors. Not enough emphasis on sexually exploitating minors. Not enough use of fetishes such as nekomimi.

panzer vor!

>Algorythms are not tools
The guys are clearly talking about animating walk cycles.

Sieg Heil! 卐

> he thinks this photoshopped recreation of most obvious idea ever is DEEP

How simple are you?