Pol generally believes that Jews are naturally evil/sneaky/subversive etc. If it is natural, something genetic or inborn, then it isn't much of a stretch to say that the people who we call Jews today existed pre-Judaism.
What were they like? Did they corrupt religion, or did the religion corrupt them?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Khazars
They aren't even decedent from the Jews in the bible. All the bible Jews converted to Christianity and Islam.
Learn some fucking history you dumb pommy cunt.
Ask your parents
...
No one said we think they're genetically anything. The Talmud, which is a holy book, teaches them to be that way you half-wit. Also even the ones that are atheist or another religion still benefit from a "Jews are the choosen people mentality" that most modern Jews have.
Also, THIS!
Did the Khazar ancestors of Jews (assuming that is correct, it is disputed) act like modern Jews?
Or is modern Jew behaviour a result of interaction with and subsequent hatred of Europeans and other races?
Why did they come up with and accept the Talmud in the first place if they weren't evil?
Pharisees, are worth reading up on. Sanhedrin as well.
Not all Jews follow the Talmud.. Most should follow the Torah (since it's basically a compilation of all the books minus the nasty bits. It's basically a new testament for the Jews.). But the Jews who came up with it are evil and the ones who follow it are too by extension. The fact people will ignore the Torah and instead follow the Talmud confuses me beyond belief.
Long long time ago, the Russian leader Svyatoslav destroyed the Khazar Jewish Khaganate.
...
Since then, Jews do not like Russia very much. and always shit her into porridge.
Research the ancient hibiru tribe.
They were genocidal maniacs that were rightly enslaved by anyone who came across them.
Judaism is pretty damn old m8
>Habiru or Apiru (Egyptian: ˁpr.w) was the name given by various Sumerian, Egyptian, Akkadian, Hittite, Mitanni, and Ugaritic sources (dated, roughly, between 1800 BC and 1100 BC) to a group of people living as nomadic invaders in areas of the Fertile Crescent from Northeastern Mesopotamia and Iran to the borders of Egypt in Canaan.[1] Depending on the source and epoch, these Habiru are variously described as nomadic or semi-nomadic, rebels, outlaws, raiders, mercenaries, and bowmen, servants, slaves, migrant laborers, etc. Some scholars identify them with the early Hebrews although this is disputed.
>Anson Rainey has argued that "the plethora of attempts to relate apiru (Habiru) to the gentilic ibri are all nothing but wishful thinking."[14] The Zondervan Illustrated Bible Dictionary states that Habiru is not an ethnic identification and is used to refer to both Semites and non-Semites, adding that "the connection, if there is any, remains obscure."[15]
The same.
Gee that was hard.
This is the real jews
en.wikipedia.org
Also they wern't mentioned in the bible, that was change to mean jew when it meant something else altogether (the chosen people)
The stories of exodus and esther both predate the talmud. Do you honestly think they are telling you a truthful version of their massacres of the egyptians or the persians? Did they do the exact samething in the kitanos revolt?
Bullshit. Actually the most anti zionist ultra orthodox Jews are the biggest followers of the Talmud. But also the biggest zionists in israel.
The Jews who are in control of everything in america and the world are typically atheists.
>Torah is the new testaments for the jews
IMO pre-Judaism Jews were basically just a few tribes of Nomadic Phoenicians(Canaanites), I know Hebrews claim they were a separate ethnic group to Canaanites but IMO that's bullshit, they were a breakaway cult that rejected Phoenician polytheism and practised monotheism