Why do libertarians believe that regulations are bad? Aren't they putting a lot of trust in mega-corporations?

Why do libertarians believe that regulations are bad? Aren't they putting a lot of trust in mega-corporations?

I'd rather put my trust in corporate jews than government jews

in jews we trust

The problem you are naive about is many of these regulations are proposed by companies and corporations trying to kill off competitors through political bribes.

That doesn't mean all regulation is bad. Why do people pretend that it is?

>"Im a libertarian because I'm skeptical of putting more power in big gov't"
>big gov't has to answer to the will of the people through votes
>not skeptical of putting more power in big industry
>industry does not answer to will of the people in anyway directly except sort of through purchasing power which they can limit through shit wages
>can form pseudo-socialist bonds with the gov't to become even less bound to the will of the people cause money = free speech in libertarian world

Not sure why theyre like this, OP. They're just as dogmatic as catholics under holy roman empire rule with their fucked up unscientific ideology.

>I'd rather put my trust in corporate jews than government jews

>Implying there's any diffrence

YEP! That is the whole point of the ideology, which is spread mainstream. Examples: Republicans believe largely in morally sound ideals, while insisting on letting children and the elderly starve and fighting wars for multinational corporations. Democrats claim to believe in science and intelligent thought, yet want you to believe that transexuality is normal thing and that to believe that the people, who have been screwing us over for thousands of years cannot possibly be involved in a coordinated effort to harm the masses.
The truth is confused and obscured.

>Being this stupid to economics.
Kill yourself, commie.

>implying they're not the same
Which one was Lucky Larry and others?

Yeah, but Government has very different incentives to corporations. Corporations just want to make money and extract value for shareholders. Government on the other hand wants to preserve its position as the holder of the monopoly of force. This means it has to placate the people to a certain extent and prevent corporations from getting too powerful.

>the will of the people through votes
this is where you got confused, lurk for 2 more years and try again

>Republicans believe largely in morally sound ideals, while insisting on letting children and the elderly starve
Christians are vastly more charitable than every shitlib college socialist combined. They operate hundreds of thousands of food banks and churches, all of which clothe and feed anyone who walks into their doors. Every day of the year. They are the boots on the ground in literally every aid operation in the fucking world, while shitlibs and their kike professors cry about how stealing more money from the rich and giving it all to worthless niggers is the solution.

And they are the only ones that even care for the elderly. Shitlibs put them in homes and hire niggers to care for them. They expect the government to pay for that too.

Even Jesus turned down healing a city when he had shit to do, and knew that if people knew he was there he would be mobbed by the waste of society. People need to be able to care for themselves otherwise the dependant population remains and endless drain upon those that produce.

Have fun dying in the lead mines™. American democracy is fake but at least its less fake than the myth that completely unhindered capitalism gives every pleb more freedom and not just the few that are most rich, exploitive, and unhindered by any sort of moral code.

The shitlibs also can't understand charity =/= gunpoint collected, enforced taxation, government laundered, welfare.
Choice has no meaning.

because they don't understand economics

The uninhibited capitalism that right libertarians blindly promote is damaging to any attempt at bettering society through civic nationalism. An example of a libertarian mindset gone awry is the difference between how America approached the creation of a healthcare system once the science was available vs. how most northern European countries approached it:

Europe: "How do I game the system to give the most help to my fellow countrymen in need?"

America: "How do I game the system to make the most money off my fellow countrymen in need?"

The big corporations lobby for regulations to put their smaller competitors out of business, not because they love you. This is a historical fact.

>Why doesn't the US want to die in line for healthcare treatment like the rest of Europe?
>Why does the US have the greatest healthcare system in the world?
>Why does the US make all the innovations in modern medicine?

How exactly are those two any different? Corporations have to satisfy their customers to remain profitable. Unless they lobby for some kind of monopoly-creating regulation, of course.

The mega corporations are the only ones not regulated you massive delusional faggotry obsessed cuck