Net neutrality

Who the fuck are these anti net neutrality shills anyways?
You realize if Sup Forums wasn't protected ISPs would throttle Sup Forums to shit for wrong think until you leave?
Pic related is a MAN from our discord.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/wQtiIazfoQM
youtu.be/B03eByZia5I
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Fuck off commie.

See, what kind of an argument is that?
Do you even realize what net neutrality is?

Both sides of the net neutrality is shit. Either you get fucked by your government or you get fucked by your isps.

Net neutrality has been in place since before you were born.
Nobody is fighting to get rid of Net neutrality even the ISPs.
Title II is what is being fought over.
Title II is not Net neutrality, it's just a bad part of it.
Learn the fucking difference
Sup Forums is older than 2015, 2015 is when they put in place title II

YOU HAVE TO GO BACK

How much is he paying you?

How far has it come if even the internet gets shilled into being against NN.

>throttle Sup Forums
tell me something libtard
if they want to throttle or block Sup Forums why wasn't it done before 2015?
because they don't give a fuck about Sup Forums
go ask the daily stormer, that has been up since 2013, how 2015 NN is working out for them.
fucking idiots.

I fucking wish they would. There is way too much useless noise, and it will prove an effective pleb filter for people like you who posit this scenario as an actual problem. Maybe we could get back to pre-2008 levels when all the phone posters have to go elsewhere.

youtu.be/wQtiIazfoQM

Yes we do, Fuck off you pro NN shill.

It's working out fantastic retard, we're still here.
Also b4 the election Sup Forums wasn't a threat.
Have you even thought about how retarded you sound?

You are literally a paid shill. Die you cocksucking faggot.

>if they want to throttle or block Sup Forums why wasn't it done before 2015?
because NN has been the rule since the internet started and this is the ISPs push to get it rolled back under the republican administration.

It’s obvious shills are pushing NN. Threads are painfully obvious

Why should I care when TDS and SF are already deplatformed?

the daily stormer is gone you idiot, that happened under NN.
go back to your Net neutrality circle jerk on reddit
because you have no idea what you are even talking about
if you think title II is protecting Sup Forums you are one dumbmotherfucker

>shills are pushing NN

NN is currently the rule and has been the rule since the internet started. The only pushing is being done by people who want to see those rules removed.

WRONG
they are getting Title II removed that was put in place in 2015
not net neutrality
NOBODY IS FIGHT TO GET RID OF NET NEUTRALITY
just title II that was put in place in 2015.

It's definitely protecting it from throttling dumb nigger.
As for people dropping websites, that's a different issue.
You're gonna remove a layer of protection dumbass.
Post where NN started in 2015.
The govt has been trying to remove it since 2014 retard.

>the daily stormer is gone you idiot, that happened under NN.

Web site hosting companies aren't ISPs you fucking retard.

you don't even know what the fight is over.
you still thinks it's over removing net neutrality completely.
you are completely brainwashed.

Get your fucking head out your ass.
Holy fuck, it's like an atheist vs christian thread from 2012 where everyone is talking past each other.
Yes
They are attacking NN

FCC voted in 2015 to reclassify ISPs as Title II utilities
The proposal will reverse the Title II classification

fuck off nigger lover

AND NET NEUTRALITY ISN'T FUCKING TITLE II NIGGER.
THEY'RE GOING TO REMOVE NN.
NN WASNT HERE SINCE 2015, ITS BEEN HERE SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE FUCKIN INTERNET
YOU ABSOLUTE MONG

But the Jews are already using domain registrars as a bottleneck to shut down right wing content, what’s the problem with trump retaliating by throttling leftist media and kike porn?

let me break down the timeline for you:

NN was the rule enforced by the FCC since forever

ISPs hated this because they couldn't throttle and block the internet in ways that would make them the most money

ISPs sued the government claiming it lacked the authority to force them to follow NN rules

The courts agreed with the ISPs and ruled that unless the government decided to classify ISPs as common carriers under title 2 then the government cant force ISPs to follow NN rules.

The Obama administration classified ISPs as common carriers under title 2 so that the FCC could resume forcing ISPs to follow NN rules (2015).

Trump gets elected and ISPs are trying, again, to get NN rules removed.

NN is a good thing that forces ISPs to show you all web sites you want to see at the same speed you pay for. You pay for 1gig/sec then no matter what site you choose to see is seen at the speed you paid for.

NN does not stop web site hosting companies from shutting down sites they host on their servers. (stormer shut down) ISPs are not the same thing as web site hosting companies.

>if they want to throttle or block Sup Forums why wasn't it done before 2015?
Because they couldn't since NN was already a thing. And i do think Sup Forums was temporarily blocked by some ISP.

>because they don't give a fuck about Sup Forums

Wait until some libtard newspaper or website starts to make a campaign on Sup Forums. We are easy targets, they would just have to spread screencaps of pedo shit that existed on Sup Forums.

NO THEY ARE NOT YOU FUCKING BRAINWASHED IDIOT

What the fuck is that creature

These image boards were developed when most people had dial up. They were literally made for slow connections.

>being this much of an ignorant retard
kill yourself

Yeah, NN protects free speech,
That’s why Stormfront was protected when net neutrally was still- oh wait

This is straight up cuck talk

BTFO'D by this user.Ty senpai.

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Long hair on men is very manly, but balding kike markets felt inferior. Thus you all look like your hair was cut for boot camp. Why would you want to look government issue when the government hates you?

Hope you don't mind a few extra bills for your social media and shitposting habits. This is what it's like in Portugal without NN.

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Uh...no

Verizon tried to block Sup Forums 2012. Backtracked in days because the ensuing shit storm was not worth it. Why do you fucking mongoloids think ISPs give one shit about what we look at. As long as we pay for internet they dont give a fuck.

>admitting theyre trying to slow it
> we were made to be slow so lets fuck not only this website but every website

>net neutrality repeals
>youtube costs $5.99 extra p/month to use
>people who want to save money stop using youtube
>new video websites pop up
>end of the (((youtube))) monopoly

Love the satire.

I kinda feel the same way. The only people shilling for NN are huge corporations that don't want to pay to deliver content to the end user.

Net neutrality, is at its heart, a socialist policy designed to stifle innovation. Remember, Soros was one of the biggest proponents of NN back in 2015.

Another thing I find pretty interesting is that no one seems to remember that the internet was actually BETTER before 2015! We didn't see NEAR the amount of censorship, fake news, etc that we do today.

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

I fucking wanting you niggers

That is portugal's cell network carriers, cell networks aren't covered by NN. And it's pretty reasonable to pay €5 a month and get infinite data for video streaming on mobile.

REEE THATS NOT FAIR ALL BANDWIDTH IS EQUAL REEEEE

FCC plans to repeal Obama-era regulations
>FCC plans to repeal Obama-era regulations
FCC plans to repeal Obama-era regulations
>FCC plans to repeal Obama-era regulations

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

At one other person gets it.

see

>Who the fuck are these anti net neutrality shills anyways?
Good question. There is clearly a concerted attempt to throw out NN, and either their corporate propaganda has worked on the young and dumb or there are genuine shills in the midst.

Literally the only thing they have to say is, "muh communism". It's ridiculous and immature.

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

getting rid of the title 2 common carrier designation for ISPs would mean that the FCC would lack the authority to enforce NN rules on them.

simple as that.

Trying to obfuscate that by insisting its only about the title 2 roll back is transparently disingenuous.

thank you

See, this is the old Sup Forums I remember

No because Ajit Pai himself said they would instead be classified as an information service and still be under the jurisdiction of the FCC. Do you retards actually research or just parrot shit

You just made my point you fucking libtard

I'm just stating a fact. I miss the BBS days...maybe we would all be happier with slower internet. It'll be just like the 90's again! LSD FOR EVERYONE!

they are brainwashed
all they do is repeat what they see in some stupid youtube video on reeedit

And we are going to have to pay for those new video sites, you absolute mongoloid

>Muh buzzwords
>muh stifle competition
>muh Soros

Same shit yet again

>was actually BETTER before 2015!
NN was rule before 2015, you fucking retard. Jesus Christ, it's amazing how people have so strong opinions about stuff they have absolutely no idea about.

You amerimutts deserve to be exploited.

This fucking bait and switch bullshit again. Weird tacit but it's not going to fucking work. Go fuck yourself with razor wire OP.

>NN was the rule enforced by the FCC since forever

>ISPs sued the government claiming it lacked the authority to force them to follow NN rules

>The courts agreed with the ISPs and ruled that unless the government decided to classify ISPs as common carriers under title 2 then the government cant force ISPs to follow NN rules.

>The Obama administration classified ISPs as common carriers under title 2 so that the FCC could resume forcing ISPs to follow NN rules (2015).

>Trump gets elected and ISPs are trying, again, to get NN rules removed.

make mIRC great again

Why would you have to pay for that new site? The only reason youtube costs more is because its a massive site and using more bandwidth. Your smaller sites would not face this issue

A big part of this movement lies in infrastructure. These telecom giants don't have the gear in place to handle the rising demand of bandwidth. The system isn't ready for everyone to be simultaneously streaming in 4k uhd, youtubing, tweeting, downloading, shopping etc etc etc.
They are praying to rewrite the rules so they can throttle you down, lump you into some shitty subscription package, or block you out completely while maximising profits before they can no longer provide the illusion of "unlimited internet" you signed a contract for.

Maybe it's better that people like you are actually priced out of the internet.

REEEEeee
SHOW ME IN THE CURRENT YEAR 2017 where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

>Why would you have to pay for that new site?
For the same reason you are paying extra for youtube, you retard.

Unless, of course, you are using the ISP favorite video site, which unfortunately has almost no quality content.

What kind of cuck are you that you want your corporate overlords to make your decisions for you?

It's been answered.
Enjoy your spam ban.

My country has NN.

@151026640

Literal shill

>Same shit yet again

The reason it's the "same shit" is because it's the fucking truth. lol

LOL
SPAM BAN
HAHAHAHAHHA

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

you honestly just sound retarded at this point and are clearly not thinking about anything other than your preconceived notions

I KNEW YOU WERE A REEEEEEEDITTT RETARD
YOU HAVE TO GO BACK YOU LIBTARD
GO BACK TO YOUR CIRCLE JERK

Typical leaf.

Yeah, we talking about repealing NN are the shills. You can tell someone's obviously a shill when they are disagreeing with giant billionaire companies like Reddit, Twitter, Fb, Google who are "protecting you from ebil isps" and totally not special interest groups.

Wow, a bill that benefits your social media is the top post on all your social media networks? How surprising. Oh, George Soros is funding a campaign against repealing the NN 2015 order? Really jingles my nuggets.

They aren't repealing NN, they're repealing the 2015 NN order which forces ISPs to maintain vast infrastructure so netflix can milk them for 4k video. It is a negative change for normal people who aren't maxing out their connection.

They are tricking you shilling all this "lol look at portugal" thing. Those are cell networks, they aren't covered by NN and those are reasonable prices for mobile data. Companies up until 2015 from the inception of the internet could have charged you weird data packages, but they didn't because it would be anti consumer and no one would pay. The only thing that order does is overregulate the market so new ISPs have zero chance of establishing themselves, and milking your isp's cash into large video company's accounts. You're being paid to line Zuckerberg's pockets so you can "stick it to comcast" but in reality you're preventing any new good ISPs from ever starting up.

Take a lesson from someone who knows infinitely more about networking than you:
youtu.be/B03eByZia5I

you know full well that the entire point of removing the title 2 designation from ISPs is to revert them to a state where they are not subject to NN rules.

Pretending that there is some other motive is blatantly, laughably disingenuous.

>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

>leftwing millenials now want the fcc to handle the internet

SHOW ME

old pol sounds retarded
how about we turn it over back to the FTC and let them break up the telecom trusts?
why are leftist such easy targets for monopolists' propaganda campaign?
if you aren't a shill than you are an unwitting pawn

>completely
WHY THE FUCK SHOULD THEY BE ALLOWED TO REMOVE -ANY- OF IT, THOSE ROBBING CORRUPT MONOPLISTIC CUNTS
>how does repealing net neutrality benefit consumers?
how does repealing net neutrality benefit consumers?
>how does repealing net neutrality benefit consumers?

Just ask them two questions:

1. Do you like the government?

They will inevitably answer no.

2. They why do you want them to regulate the internet?

>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

Then*

t. brainlet

Net neutrality is pure communism.
Fuck off.

>73% of consumer Internet traffic is video streaming
>27% for everything else
>traffic shaping can forcibly drop that to 60%
>video down 1/7th, everything else up over 1/3rd (at high contention)
Netflix & youtube on suicide watch

>back to the FTC
because the existence of the FC is preventing that - FTC have no jurisdiction, as FCC (nominally) responsible. BUT getting rid of the now corrupt beyond usless FCC entirely? That is a solution, fuck yes.

>2. They why do you want them to regulate the internet?

I want to see every web site I choose to see at the speed I pay my ISP for. I pay for 1gig/sec, so I want to see sites at 1gig/sec. That is Net Neutrality and I want it to stay that way.

AGAIN CUNT - YOU DON'T PICK AND CHOOSE, WHICH PART OF LAWS YOU WANT REMOVED. YOU ADHERE TO THEM. LIKE NON-CRIMINALS DO. I KNOW THIS CONCEPT IS DIFFICULT FOR ISPs.

nope still not answering the question

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

So you'd prefer to leave the fox in charge of the henhouse?

For-profit corporations are not the ones you want making the rules.

Personally, I prefer freedom.
Freedom to watch/stream/download whatever I want at the best speeds available.

ADHERE TO THE FUCKING LAWS. ALL OF THEM. OR, YOUR GOING TO FUCKING JAIL, PAJEET. YOU CORRUPT, CRIMINAL GANGSTER FUCKS.

So we had Sup Forums before net nuetrality... Why wouldnt we have Sup Forums after net nuetrality?

It's not a law, it's an order. It's a bloated regulation.

Fuck off commie.

See, what kind of an argument is that?
Do you even realize what net neutrality is? Both sides of the net neutrality is shit. Either you get fucked by your government or you get fucked by your isps.

Net neutrality has been in place since before you were born.
Nobody is fighting to get rid of Net neutrality even the ISPs.
Title II is what is being fought over.
Title II is not Net neutrality, it's just a bad part of it.
Learn the fucking difference
Sup Forums is older than 2015, 2015 is when they put in place title II

YOU HAVE TO GO BACK

Why can't people read and quickly verify for themselves that net neutrality has nothing to do with the rules that websites apply to user created or third party content?

Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely
>Show me where they are trying to removing net neutrality completely

>So we had Sup Forums before net nuetrality... Why wouldnt we have Sup Forums after net nuetrality?
see for the timeline

>bloated
And you trust, Comcast will be a better provider, without ANY regulation whatsover?