Why is placing restrictions on IQ for immigrants any different from planning your economy in any other sense?

Why is placing restrictions on IQ for immigrants any different from planning your economy in any other sense?

How could you possibly predict demand for low and high IQ services? Are you not just falling for the same bullshit as socialists?

Other urls found in this thread:

demos.org/publication/why-voting-gap-matters
bls.gov/opub/reports/race-and-ethnicity/2015/home.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

the ABSOLUTE STATE of libertarianism

>how is preventing niggers from getting into your country any different than communism
Gee bill, really makes me think.

Under strict communism all industries are planned. Planning single aspects is completely different but overbearing control is still going to be subject to the same failures that always plague planned economies.

Name a failure the market will suffer from not having any niggers.

Higher workers' wages

Oy vey

>How could you possibly predict demand for low and high IQ services?
Low IQ services are all getting automated.

I wish Angela Merkel was a fictional character

Or rather, the demand for higher workers' wages. Then you watch as markets who accept nogs for low wages become more competitive and your "perfect" white ethnostate market falls behind, ergo lower wages

Not enough low skilled workers to meet demand

IQ is correlated to:

-employment
-income
-productivity
-criminal behaviour (or rather, lack thereof)
-skills and education

Not IQ testing all immigrants is absolutely retarded and honestly I'm surprised no nation does it yet.

Literally all that means is wages will go up. Dear god, the horror.

So let businesses and people decide if they want to automate the work, employ someone within the nations borders or employ someone who lives outside the nations borders.

>-employment
>-income
>-productivity
>-skills and education
And number of people is good indicator of how much bread a country needs, try and guess how much bread Canada will need next year. These are all things markets figure out perfectly, why go substitute them with imperfect proxies?

Criminality is an issue, but there are worse problems than slightly more crime.

And as wages go up (particularly for low skilled workers) costs of living increase. Store clerks, janitors and gardeners shouldn't earn a fortune because they don't have to compete with foreign labour.

The market doesn't deal with all issues perfectly.

It doesn't deal with a violent underclass of unemployable 80 IQ niggers.

>Store clerks, janitors and gardeners shouldn't earn a fortune because they don't have to compete with foreign labour.

Shouldn't according to who? To you? Why do you have final say in this?

Keeping a minimum of wealth disparity in society reduces criminality and violent behaviour in the underclass. A uniformity of race, religion and language in your country also increases social cohesion. Low IQ people also vote like retards in a democracy which means an inevitable rise in corruption (voters won't punish corrupt politicians) and a general shift to a poltiical clown fiesta (eg; the US). There's a cost-benefit to this. Cheaper labour from low IQ outsiders means a less stable society for only a mild boost in general quality of life from some cheap labour.

Also

>Niggers
>fulfilling market labour demands

>implying Niggers work

>It doesn't deal with a violent underclass of unemployable 80 IQ niggers.
What participation would they need before they have been properly dealt with?

>Shouldn't according to who? To you? Why do you have final say in this?
People prefer lower costs. There's not much sacrifice of quality in these areas, pretty much anyone can do what a janitor or store clerk does. You're paying a premium for nothing.

>Keeping a minimum of wealth disparity in society reduces criminality and violent behaviour in the underclass
Why not just have a progressive tax? Far less harmful way to reduce inequality.

>A uniformity of race, religion and language in your country also increases social cohesion
Fair

>Low IQ people also vote like retards in a democracy which means an inevitable rise in corruption
Low IQ people don't tend to vote
demos.org/publication/why-voting-gap-matters

>Cheaper labour from low IQ outsiders means a less stable society for only a mild boost in general quality of life from some cheap labour
What can be done cheaper overseas will still be done cheaper overseas. iPhone's, cars and pretty much every product that can be transported will still be made where it currently is. What would change is that things that can't be transported (Haircuts, gardening, cleaning, farmhands, stacking shelves etc.) will become much cheaper as firms can more easily hire foreign labour.

The level of civilization correlates with the average IQ of its population. To import below average people is a malicious crime against the population in that it does damage to their quality of life.

Decrease in purple drank and Dorito sales that extend all the way up the supply chain. 7-11 stores BTFO everywhere

Labour participation can be represented in a variety of ways. The modern way of showing labour participation is to remove people who have been out of work for too long or anybody on disability payments (aka any nigger with a hoaxed depression or ADHD diagnosis). Better stats for that are welfare recipients which are overwhelmingly dominated by niggers. And specifically I said 80 IQ niggers. You'd be hard pressed to find a single 80 nog with a job...

Progressive taxes punish the economically virile and encourage capital flight. It's all about the incentives. Take note how basically all countries with progressive taxes have economies that have ground to a halt. Taxation does not facilitate economic growth, ever. Progressive taxation also hasn't been proven to decrease wealth inequality. It's much more closely tied with multi ethnic societies than taxes.

When it comes to voting, IQ is relative. Look at Mexico and South America. Their low IQ mud people vote left in droves and it destroys their nations. Greedy, lazy, low IQ mudskins will vote your country into a Venezuela.

Cheap good generally come from high IQ, under developed countries like China and Taiwan, but that won't last forever. As their cost of wages increases so will the cost of their goods and services. Nigeria will never be a production hub like China is now because it's full of dumb lazy niggers. Mexico is becoming more industrialized but they still won't ever match China and it's much better to keep Mexicans in Mexico and to just import the goods than to import the Mexicans themselves. You keep them out of your prisons and welfare system that way.

The way I look at it is we have a limited amount of funding to support low IQ retards. I'd rather that goes to giving a moderately ok education and healthcare to some dumbass hick whites than have it dispersed among a much larger number of shitskins and niggers and white hicks so they all suffer in squalor, as happens in America. We treat our poor whites much better here in Canada than they do down in America because we don't have an army of welfare niggers to support.

>labor force participation
I don't think that graphic means what you think it means

Look how various ethnic groups vote in America. They all consider themselves to be social conservatives as they hate gays and want women in the kitchen, yet they still vote consistently left. Why? Because they're single issue voters. They vote for gibs.

>Give me free shit white man! GIMME GIMME GIMME.

Such is the call of the shitskin in a multi-ethnic society.

>Better stats for that are welfare recipients which are overwhelmingly dominated by niggers
No thats a terrible way of counting employment. A good chunk of employed are on benefits.

A greater proportion of blacks aren't in the workforce but its not overall that different from the average

bls.gov/opub/reports/race-and-ethnicity/2015/home.htm

>Progressive taxes punish the economically virile and encourage capital flight
Only if you were taxing capital. Everything that reduces inequality punishes the economically virile. The successful benefit the most from a large pool of low skilled labour.

>Take note how basically all countries with progressive taxes have economies that have ground to a halt. Taxation does not facilitate economic growth, ever
I agree, taxation is opposed to growth, but thats the trade-off. You'll be hard pressed to find anything that reduces both inequality and growth.

Pretty much every country on earth has progressive taxation and all, without exception, have grown over any significant time period.

>Their low IQ mud people vote left in droves and it destroys their nations. Greedy, lazy, low IQ mudskins will vote your country into a Venezuela
I'm not sure about voting rates of the poor in those countries but low IQ citizens in western countries barely vote.

>Cheap good generally come from high IQ, under developed countries like China and Taiwan, but that won't last forever. As their cost of wages increases so will the cost of their goods and services. Nigeria will never be a production hub like China is now because it's full of dumb lazy niggers
Only recently have Asians had high average IQ's. Blacks in the US are tenfold more productive than any given Chinese person and could easily (and do) work in manufacturing. You don't need to be a genius to sit in front of a sowing machine all day doing the same, repetitive action.