I thought you said reddit was wrong about net neutrality?

I thought you said reddit was wrong about net neutrality?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=3I-pJuDvwCE
cox.com/residential/pricing.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

yup. we tried to warn them

Literally every single poster that's for this type of shit is a paid shill. No exceptions.

Awesome, fast lanes.

awesome news, since I'm not a poorfag redditor and make a nice 6 figure income I'm happy with paying for a premium service that gives me better service than some basement dwelling NEET

oh look sage

>pay more for faster speeds
>the horror

i plan on getting a hobby once the internet is kill.

Net Neutrality = shared mediocrity = communism

I'm against anything Reddit supports. Fuck off.

Can someone explain what’s wrong with a business providing a service and charging people for it? And it’s not like this is fucking water or food it’s internet. You won’t die if you have to jerk off to magazines instead of hardcore midget anal

YOU FUCKING RETARD
YOU ALREADY HAVE THAT SERVICE
THIS ONLY MEANS YOU GOTTA PAY MORE
FUCK

>tfw the internet is your hobby

They already do this. They're releasing this "news" because they don't want competition.

I live in a million dollar house, why do I care about an extra $5 a month on my cable bill?

LMAO at you plebs getting upset over this

Step one is to kill Net Neutrality. Step Two should be a few swings of the anti-trust hammer. The reason you see Comcast hinting at this is because they've bought out practically all of their competition.

You're gonna get upset when Sup Forums is blocked. Yes, that has happened before.

>have to pay more for internet now
>can’t afford it
>forced to go outside, improve fitness, read books, meet people, get a job, get a gf
It’s basically the cure for soy boy syndrome. No wonder leftists are for net neutrality.

Fuck the Jews, we're ready to roll the dice. I'll gladly pay an extra $5 and buy some popcorn.

Besides, if Comcast gets too ridiculous then half of us will just have our neighbor's WiFi.

Reddit wasn't in support of giving these guys control over what you can or can't view on the internet. But since you say it's a good thing, I'm sure the companies that own NBC and CNN won't censor Breitbart or even Sup Forums, right?

>Sup Forums is blocked by some provider
>switch providers
>if there’s only one provider and it’s blocking a legal website then that’s evidence of monopoly abuse which is illegal
Redditors will never not be retarded

I only measure policy by the amount of liberals tears it creates - I don't really give fuck what you're saying
get killed

>implying the service doesn't increase in value when it's cost limited even further
Basic supply side economics

>America
>enforcing anti-trust laws

Blocking the AT&T/Time Warner merger is the first time in decades it's been enforced and they have a very good case to make that it's politically motivated.

Ever since the advent of bribery-- sorry, "lobbying," anti-trust laws have been de facto repealed.

Get in here shills

youtube.com/watch?v=3I-pJuDvwCE

making something faster =/= making everything else slower.

This is what you retards don't seem to understand.

>pay more for something you already have
>desirable at all

? Its not even a censorship matter, only a difference in speeds in the type of shit that takes alot of data. Have one plan for your phone, another for your kids, another for your desktop. Sup Forums is pretty bare minimum on data usage to not be affected. Only jewtube and Netflix or a file sharing site would suck on a lesser, cheaper plan. 'My jewtube video loaded a bit slow on my cheaper plan that I picked! Censorship!'

Isn't this what they already do with internet plans anyways or am I missing something here?

>evidence of monopoly abuse which is illegal
HAAAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
>surely the crooks will save me!
fucking. stupid.

On the client side, yes.

Not when it comes to the actual data flowing through their networks.

how’s this different from paying a few extra shekels for faster speeds which i did a couple months ago?

>>if there’s only one provider and it’s blocking a legal website then that’s evidence of monopoly abuse which is illegal
Only being able to choose between Comcrap and AT&T DSL is pretty much the same as zero options.

>am I missing something here?
Yes

Sorry, amerifat. All the moon landings in the world won't give you faster speed. On this one, you missed the boat because of your stupid state/sami-state duopoly on ISPs and now NN.

t. A Europoor who can decide between 1 Mbit/s for 10 bucks a month, up to 1 Gbit/s for 250 and many other options in between.

Eveything else would then become the slower if there was a fast lane. The fact that a fast lane would exist automatically makes everything "slower." Are you "slow" ?

Anybody against NN is either a Shill or a Trump cultist. There are no exceptions.

I'm prescribed 3 doses of midget anal per day. Yuck off asshole

This is already happening.

This is why there are different speeds for different prices.

But will this only happen to companies or sites that pay for that "fast lane"? What if I don't use any of those sites like the pic in ?

It's called a daily dose for a reason.

The fact that you don't understand that everything else being slower is implicit shows that you're either retarded or literally hanging on ideology in the face of facts.

>jewgle, faceberg, leddit, twatter all for NN
Tells me all I need to know about the issue desu.

No, we said that we don't care if they're right.
>muh Netflix
>muh pornhub
>muh YouTube e-celebrities
The nu-internet is shit, I don't care if it dies, and we'll all be better off after your toys are taken away.

>fast lanes
Nice. I have the money, I don't need poor people speeds just because of "equality" or some made up commie bullshit.

>people I don't like support it so I must be bad

Careful, I heard they recently endorsed 'breathing,' too. Stop inhaling the oxygen Jew, degenerate.

>regulations on laying down infrastructure and competing in the ISP market are so corrupt that Giants like Google can barely scratch the market
YOU RETARDS ARE PICKING THE WRONG TARGET. We need to attack the regulations that attack competition. Regulations are always used as exploitable tools for larger corporations to attack smaller businesses. If you really give a fuck about the internet you will do whatever it takes to prevent internet service from becoming a utility. Supporting NN practically admits that internet service is a utility. You shouldn't be fighting against or for it, put the pressure where it counts.

The only way you can fuck over ISPs is if you make what ISPs fear most come into existence. And that's competition. Regulation is their ultimate exploit.

Building a new fast lane doesn't necessarily make the existing lanes any slower. Removing NN incentives the creation of fast lanes.

I still think removing NN is a bad idea, and most ISPs won't even bother building new fast lanes (just changing up their existing lanes), but it's not an entirely worthless argument.

...

>all these extremely anti-white corporations are for something
They only support something if it's in their own financial interests/ is anti-white.

With their track record if they said the sky was blue, I'd have to go check.

Did ATT bought Time Warner or still waiting?

>be american
>get shot
>have third world internet with 1gb datacap for $90 per month
>vote kike puppet into office
>tell myself I'm redpilled for payig an additional $20 to access youtube

maga
inb4 le 2scoopz it was her turn shill responses

If you pay for 50Mbps then you still get that, but if you pay for extra speed for Netflix then you would get faster speeds for that site.

A fast lane doesn't slow down the already existing lanes. How is this hard to understand?

>surely the government will do the honorable thing
You fucking retard. Companies have an incentive (profit) to make sure customers are happy with their service. Government has no such incentive since they’re getting paid no matter what.
That’s the fault of lobbyists/regulators who try to inhibit competition.

This is why NN will be repealed, because of fucking retard faggots like this asshole. Like a petulant fucking child.
"I DONT CARE WHAT HAPPENS TO EVERYONE ONE BECAUSE ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME FUCK ALL OF YOU MEEEEEEEEEEEE!"

Pledges and promises not backed up by an enforcement regime are not worth the shit beneath your boots.

>Regulations are always used as exploitable tools for larger corporations to attack smaller businesses.
Netflix supported NN when it was a small company, and after it became fuckhuge, it changed sides. Antitrust regulations are regulations too. Not all regulations are anticompetitive even if the government often fucks it up.

you are not getting anything better, you'll be paying extra to keep what you have and other people will get fucked in the ass

>Hurr durr why can't we regulate the markets so they don't do whatever the fuck they want
>Hurr

Fuck poorfags

These free market arguments fall apart when you take into consideration that ISPs hold government enforced monopolies/duopolies over internet service in many parts of the country. Pass some sweeping federal legislation invalidating ALL state/local restrictions against starting a new ISP, and then you can eliminate NN.

>NO ONE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO PAY FOR SUPERIOR SERVICE BECUASE THE SERVICE THAT IS GIVEN TO ME IS GOOD ENOUGH MEMEMEMMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEME FUCK SLL OF YOU MEMEMEMEMEMEMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Get fucked, commie bedwetter

Those aren't 'sites.' Those are other companies the ISPs own.

The same people who own the internet's infrastructure also own NBC, CNN, Huffpost, Buzzfeed, etc. Let that sink in a moment.

They are literally asking for the right to decide what you can or can't view on the internet. NN was the one thing stopping them. What do you think are the first websites to go when they do get that right?

>hurr durr Reddit pornhub YouTube Netflix--

Wake up. It will be Stormfront, Breitbart, maybe even Sup Forums. They already did it to us once, and they recently did it to the Daily Stormer. All it will take is one #BanBreitbart campaign on Twitter and you better fucking believe it will be gone.

No ISP will want to be seen as the company that "gives hate speech a platform" or whatever the fuck it is SJWs claim.

>Implying that ISPs don't have price tiers under NN.

cox.com/residential/pricing.html

>breathing the oxygen jew
>absorbing the solar jew
>drinking the watery jew
lmaoing@urlife

>Reddit spacing
Kys

But its not superior you fucktard. Its the exact same service you have now, I seriously don't get how you morons don't understand this.

That's why other lanes will be slower, they won't build new lanes they will just reconfigure the server to prioritize certain websites. This makes everything else slower since the server won't deal with it before the prioritized sites.

>They are literally asking for the right to decide what you can or can't view on the internet
They already do this with NN in place. Right now I have to use Tor to read the DS.

Can't wait to blast past you slow mofo's.

Currently ISPs can only tier by volume of data (and they always have). NN is a requirement that they ONLY tier by volume of data, and not anything else.

>that's not how it's gonna happen
>here's what I vaguely think is gonna happen
>so yea that's what's gonna happen

No, but they want to. Trump dusted off the anti-trust laws for the first time in decades to try to stop it.

Don't expect it to actually work, though. AT&T and Time-Warner have a really strong argument that it's politically motivated.

That wasn't the ISPs, that was GoDaddy and Google claiming they violated their terms of service for DNS hosting.

>be europoor
>can't even afford a car
Sad!

Riddle me this, why would they be whining about Netflix etc "hogging the bandwidth" if they were going to build new lanes to handle increased traffic anyway?

If you don't like it, why don't you start your own ISP?

great. I don't have to share my internet with niggers anymore.

>They are literally asking for the right to decide what you can or can't view on the internet. NN was the one thing stopping them
Give me a fucking break. Companies want to maximize profit. Everything else is secondary. You think blocking legal websites will increase or decrease profit? Reddit spacing faggot

Because they don't want competition.

Why do you think Xfinity On Demand and whatever the fuck the Uverse equivalent is exist?

I thought you were implying the ISPs owned registrars and all the msm news sites.

The point is that you dumb cucks are focusing on the wrong target. Regulations on laying down infrastructure always been retarded and anti consumer, but they've been around for almost 100 years and no one has done anything to attack those regulations. The whole reason the government wanted to limit who builds infrastructure was because they thought that by limiting it, they could make it grow faster, which makes no fucking sense.

By keeping everyone's attention on NN instead of taking this opportunity to show them the bigger and more important problems, you fucktards are throwing away a prime opportunity to majorly fuck over ISP giants and Tech giants both at the same time.

>American
>Datacaps

>he doesn't know what a monopoly is

And it's not like they haven't done it before. To this site, even. But it's okay, we were all newfags once.

why is this not what he meant?
in my experience the very wealthy will gladly pay more if it means it will fuck over the poor

I'm neither. I just hate Jew faggot censors and they're wasting a lot of money shilling for NN.

In case any of you are too stupid to understand what this really says, Fast Lanes means paying more for the speed you have now while they throttle everyone else

...

>riddle me this
No thanks rumpleshitskin

We don't have the power to convince regulators to chance anti-competition laws, but we do have the power to convince them NOT to get rid of the only thing preventing the largest anti-consumer behavior in the last 40 years.

Of course they are going to do that, they are a corporation they want to make more money. The only people against NN were paid shills

>That’s the fault of lobbyists/regulators who try to inhibit competition.
Agreed. However, the idea that "the free market will save us" is bullshit as it pertains to ISPs.

As a hardcore libertarian, it sucks to admit it. But, the monopoly enjoyed by the major telcoms isn't going anywhere any time soon. Companies like AT&T and Comcast are effectively government departments at this point.

Until the telcom monopolies are destroyed, which probably won't happen until some new technology massively disrupts the market (most likely a decentralized network system), we are at the mercy of the ISPs.

Idk why you faggots all hate reddit so much. Because you can't be the volatile piece of shit you really are deep down without people noticing and then telling you you are a shit person? This must be it. Hide here on Sup Forums user, where you can call everyone faggots and cucks and then high five yourself with your cheeto dust ridden hands.

I’m fine with this. We don’t need daddy government to protect us from the evil capitalists. Let’s figure out a market solution.

Faggot

Upvoted

This. Get your neighbours in on it and you can have your own ISP for cheap Free market solves everything

Exactly. Fuck you Jew.

Open up any book and look how text is intended to be organized and formatted.

> calls us faggots
> accusing us of using Sup Forums to call people faggots
fix your mother's mistake and kys

Municipal ISPs are now illegal in the US.

Guess why.