PROJECT VERITAS NEW WAPO VIDEO

LET'S GET IT TRENDING LADS!!
BEZOS "DEMOCRACY DIES IN DARKNESS"
youtube.com/watch?v=Tf_Wcnyaak8

Bump.

dont feel like watching give me a quick run down

...

same

...

Quads, I guess I'll watch the whole thing.

>tards at Project Failitas

>VERITAS
leterally a nuthing burger

Qrd for us lazy folks please

Biggest takeaway is Bezos fears the Trump.

Rest is what we already know about this libtarded reporters.

!Jeb here how can I help?

cool

>The people at Washington post don't like trump, and sensationalize the news.
Thanks?

I don't feel like watching this.

kys Jeb

This didn't do anything for NYT (when veritas exposed that editor being Comey's godson)
Why should WaPo be afraid. Bezos is richest man in the world. :J

FUCK YES. all these stories about veritas and moore i knew something was up! ahahahahahahahahahaha

bump

You really have to be a sub-iq, low info retard if you think this "exposes" anything.

I fucking hate watching these things

I already know that the media is bought off by and controlled by weirdos, commies, and lizard people.

Watching it actually happen on tape just depresses me.

reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Jesus christ THE MOORE STORY FROM EARLIER WAS A HOAX

THEY FUCKING PANICKED AND MADE UP A CRAZY ASS BULLSHIT STORY

kek, fagot sage garbage.

Man, she's a pure breed 56%'ter

checked

Hmm I guess it's WaPo's turn now. Not so juicy as with cnn or nyt, yet at least.

To be honest, I don't really feel like anything too negative about wapo was brought to light in that video. The dudes essentially said that they have a bias towards what they emphasize, and that their business depends on Trump, but they also defended that they are truthful throughout the video. I know msm is shit, but this wouldn't be any different for Fox either. But hey, good on Veritas for getting some unfiltered truth.

Washpo is biased from the top down

>Project Veritas plot to poison the well is an EPIC FAIL.
>WaPo BTFOs LARPer
We're on to you now

Bump

It's not WaPo's turn at all. Veritas tried to do a sting on WaPo and so they released their proof of the sting and now they put up this vid as a knee-jerk reaction

bampo

so this is why wapo shat the bed earlier tonight lol

indeed
>more to come
so I assume they have made or will be making 3-4 of these as they tend to do

You mad?

I see those digits and I wonder if O'queefe has never read this quote.

>them quads
aight you got me

quads

bump

bump

QRD on fake Moore story?

>pv releases video
>shortly after, wapo posts fake story about how they "caught" pv attempting to do an undercover sting involving a fake roy moore accuser

Toasting in epic bread. Digits for WAPO getting Gawker'd

Bump

bump

>democracy dies in darkness
not surprised wapo actually believes in that motto

It's a reference to Obama.

I can't believe the video showed uncensored penis!

How is this on youtube?

Digitz WAPO gets crushed.

Watched every video so far, it's just one person saying the editorial board is biased and another person saying Jeff Bezos has an influence in some things

I hope he releases more because there's nothing that important that was released.

But if you want to see shills in real time, head over to the /r/conspiracy thread, jesus

is bezos /ourguy/?

Its for the retarded boomers who can never stop spouting it as if the 9000 and 1st time they state it THEN everyone realizes it. No, the fuckers who don’t already realize this are beyond saving.

>SEE I TOLD YOU CNN IS BIASED

he's not really wrong though, a free press is critical to the maintenance of whatever democracy we have left. Trump merely represents the newest assault on the press, but he's done no where near the damage that the Iraq War 2 media blitz did to the credibility of the press lel.

>critical to the maintenance of democracy
>maintenance of democracy
>maintaining democracy
>democracy

You should know by now that all democracy inevitably leads to rule of the mob and sooner or later marxism and then communism.

>0000
Reminder that you're literally in a Hot information Jihad against the entire establishment

...

whoa there cowboy nice dubbies over then quadies
shes real folks

This is awful. All he's done is ousted someone who's clearly secretly pro trump from the editorial staff. That dude will get fired now and nothing will change.

I hate when dullards from the right wing eat their own moles.

can Sup Forums bring down a 100 billion dollar man? I think not. If Bezos wanted he could just buy us with his pocket change.

So here's my offer to you Bezos. Pay us all 1 million dollars and we'll never come back to Sup Forums and you will be guaranteed not to hear from us again or shitpost about amazon or expose any of your con artistic endeavors. kek

you realize our democratic republic is governed far more by large corporate interests than anything resembling communism/marxism, right? The left gets to virtue signal in gender womens studies on campuses and hollywood is full of bleeding hearts who say the right things and never give up their huge wealth, only fucktards see these as concerns. The main sectors of the economy, and bipartisan cross sections of our representatives as a result of their lobbying efforts, are dominated by oligopolies such as Facebook and Google in tech or Exxon Mobile and subsidiaries of Koch in energy. You know them as "da joos" but honestly it's just distillates of capital given to self serving corporate bodies.

If anything, our form of democracy paired with the free market is a road to plutocracy. Just keep meming while the adults talk lel

I will, however, grant if you leave the virtue signaling around in universities and media enough to roil enough without opposition they may end up being a problem. The point is for the moment those large multinational conglomerates are by and far the ones wearing the pants of our democracy and largely responsible for why it no longer functions for many of us, not some ethereal communist/marxist threat lel.

I can see you hinting toward class struggle and muh workers revolution through your snake-oil salesman speech you fucking commie scum. While what you said is true no doubt, that means that we should unite as a race and fight for our idea of self governance and most importantly the self preservation of our race and culture.

>inb4 but you’re a burger
This is precisely why ALL races should unite with their own and seek to preserve their people as well. In a utopian view of the world anyways. In reality, whites must once again dominate and subjugate the lesser races in order to advance humanity as a whole.

none of these are actual arguments though, they're talking points (sprinkled with a lil ad hom too, just like the soy boy we all can see you to be). A plurality of the wealth in this nation is owned by a gilded few, as is the majority of the political power and influence. The fact you can only sperg out with some ethnostatist bullshit is a testament to the failure of your ideologies and the interference you've been conditioned to run for the powerful corporate interests that dominate our society. Of course, you're just an out of luck billionaire though, right? One day you'll be just like them lel, so say it loud and say it proud "take that LIBRULS" as you sell away even more of your personal agency.

how exactly Bezos reaches 100 B while Gates stagnated for 30 years and so did Buffet?!

>none of these are actual arguments though, they're talking points
You should genuinely look in the mirror. Your fear mongering isn't working.

>DAE Washington Post is bias!??
cool

also race is pretty hard to actually pin down into a population, especially if you try looking at everyone's genetics. Nation states, or maybe trading blocks of them working for their own interest, are probably as good as you'll good.

It's not fear mongering to say a plurality of wealth in this country is concentrated in the hands of a very select few m80, it simply is. Much the same way as saying the sun will rise tomorrow and you're gonna need to check these killer digits isn't fear mongering either.

good as you'll get*

>It's not fear mongering to say a plurality of wealth in this country is concentrated in the hands of a very select few m80, it simply is.
But to put a negative spin on it is. We have clear examples from the 20th century about what happens when the wealth is redistributed. Fucking look at venezuela today if you wanna see what happens. Your points lack any foresight or depth. You are a recycling the same vapid talking points we've heard 1000x and doing the it in the exact say manner, by fear mongering.

I didn't need the devil to tell me this. I already knew

Checked but I feel like he's exposing some of the only half decent people at the post. Why is he getting these guys fired? They seem on the fence about the company agenda and probably browse /pol unironically.

t. WaPo staffer

>American Pravda

First, Venezuela has been a shit hole since the Spanish tried to make something of it and Bolivar used it as the staging ground for his South American independence movement. Throw in a couple decades, going on centuries, of American dominance in the Hemisphere, one charismatic-ish and whiny fat boi who later died of cancer after spreading it in the form of socialism and voila you have a fucking catastrophe that continues to reveal it can and will get worse.

All I've said is a select few control a plurality of wealth and political influence in our country to point out that our democracy is far from the communist/marxist shit hole was implying we are heading towards. Your casting it as fear mongering, as opposed to understanding that it is merely the current state of our society, is both hilarious and sad. It's the former particularly since I've offered no actual ideas for how to "redistribute wealth" as you assumed.

I merely reveal the state of things and yet you see a threat in it. How strange lel.

Also you didn't check'em cuck

>First, Venezuela has been a shit hole since the Spanish tried
Nice attempt at deflection. It's a logical fallacy
>All I've said is a select few control a plurality of wealth and political influence in our country
And totally forget about the voters influence? Really?
>I merely reveal the state of things and yet you see a threat in it.
You reveal nothing. We know these things and have known for a while. That's why Sup Forums meme Trump into office, to drain the swamp. He still has 3 years to get it done too.
>check'em
You are such an unbelievable faggot, user.

Now recycle more talking points we've already heard and act like youre saying something intelligent again. It's comical.

>0000
oooo

Checked.

lol washington compost

EVERY time it is nothing.
Also checked.

i need some guac...STAT!

>151161747
>WaPo finds out they got snooped by PV and a video was about to hit soon
>They try to preempt the video's release by claiming the PV moles were trying to plant a fake Moore accusation to discredit them
>Cue tons of retards screaming "THIS LOOKS BAD FOR MOORE FELLOW TRUMP SUPPORTERS I NOW RATTLE ME BONES FOR DOUG JONES"

>Nice attempt at deflection. It's a logical fallacy

Saying it's a logical fallacy doesn't make it so, contextualization of Venezuela's shit tier status prior to becoming a malignant and failed socialist state was quite topical. I'm unsurprised you can only throw a "l-l-logical f-fallacy" back in response.

>And totally forget about the voters influence? Really?

I said a plurality of wealth and political influence, not the totality. You also seem to think the rich and influential are not only a monolithic entity, but somehow majorly losing out by having Trump as president. The massive rounds of tax cuts being negotiated right now, particularly the corporate tax rate, reveal your complete lack of understanding.

>You reveal nothing. We know these things and have known for a while. That's why Sup Forums meme Trump into office, to drain the swamp. He still has 3 years to get it done too.

no, about 80k workers in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania switched from voting for Obama in 2012 to voting for Trump in 2016, annihilating Shillary and winning him the EC. Sup Forums made some funny pictures with impact font and circulated them on twitter, if anything Sup Forums overshadowed the ruskies influence ops but that's about it.

>You are such an unbelievable faggot, user.

save the salt for someone who cares soyboy

>Now recycle more talking points we've already heard and act like youre saying something intelligent again. It's comical.

I'd say you're doing a pretty good job for us m80, please continue to defend your corporate overlords you out of luck billionaire. I'm sure you'll be able to join them one day. :^)

I'm also willing to let the fact you missed my point (that being to disprove the notion of our democracy somehow degenerating into some sort of marxist shitstain by just pointing out the current state of things, something 'you knew' at least lel) slide because you're my favorite soyboy corporate bootlicker in the thread.

check'em

fug

>democracy dies in darkness
what if we get the public to think darkness means black people? you anons thinking what i'm thinking?

that washpo is trying to run a disinfo/false flag on Sup Forums to make it look worse (somehow)? No thx bezos

AMZN goes up. MSFT share price was stagnant at 25-30 for almost 15 years.

Gates has also donated close to 100 million shares of Microsoft in the last 20 years.

O Keefe got his ass handed to him by WaPo

>Saying it's a logical fallacy doesn't make it so, contextualization of Venezuela's shit tier status prior to becoming a malignant and failed socialist state was quite topical
You admit it's a failed socialist state. Are there any other current examples of failed states in SA that aren't socialist?
>The massive rounds of tax cuts being negotiated right now, particularly the corporate tax rate, reveal your complete lack of understanding.
> if anything Sup Forums overshadowed the ruskies influence ops but that's about it.
More recycled talking point that has been debunked countless times. You are a walking cliche at this point.
>save the salt for someone who cares soyboy
You care enough to keep giving me those sweet you, with your total lack of self awareness.
>I'm sure you'll be able to join them one day. :^)
We both know you won't and that's why youre so butthurt over thier existence.

>Trump merely represents the newest assault on the press

Trump has literally done nothing against them except call them names

> the neo-Jew Bezos is behind the push
Go fucking figure. He wants Trump gone and a fuzzy, friendly Democrat to never, ever punish him for anti-trust violations.

>You admit it's a failed socialist state. Are there any other current examples of failed states in SA that aren't socialist?

It was never in question that Venezuela was a failing* state (Libya and Somalia are failed states, for reference) although there continues to be this disconnect that I'm somehow advocating for a socialist uprising lel. Anyways, Columbia remains a nominally failing state (stemming from our Drug War) and Brazil continues to sort of limp about although I'd hardly say they're socialist the same way Venezuela is.

>More recycled talking point that has been debunked countless times. You are a walking cliche at this point.

You'll have to go beyond just saying they've been debunked m80. Google, Twitter and Facebook all testified before Congress that the Russians thoroughly waded into social media to influence voters, and perjury is a pretty big crime. I merely suspect Sup Forums had more sway given it's largely made up of Americans who actually understand American culture. Of course, I also contend the influence from both was minimal. Additionally, will the tax cuts hurt those massive corporations and their leaders/shareholders? Like I said, you'll have to say more than "IT'S BEEN DEBUNKED REE"

pls?

>You care enough to keep giving me those sweet you, with your total lack of self awareness.

I consider it charity work to make sure you don't run off and sperg on someone else. No need to get salty about me trying to get tax deductions tho

>We both know you won't and that's why youre so butthurt over thier existence.

Hardly, I recognize their celestial position in our "meritocracy", gained through skill and luck in varying measures. I merely think it's funny people get so butthurt (see: you) and think you're plotting some sort of mass purge by simply mentioning their status as holders of tremendous wealth and influence.

>Libya and Somalia are failed states, for reference
Irrelevant and I'm done reading. You went on a rant about the Spanish influence on venezuela, and how it was somehow relevant to the failure of the state, remember? You have no logical consistency to what you are saying. Therefore continuing this conversation is pointless. You shift the goalposts whenever it suits you, because it's easier than admitting you don't know what you are talking about.

not to mention the point of bringing up the status quo (which you seemingly are aware of) was to say, as I've reiterated multiple times, that our democracy is quite far from being in any danger of falling into some sort of marxist madness.

Please continue trying to elaborate on...whatever it is you're trying to prove lol. The Russians verifiably did try to influence voters on Social Media (unless you're saying those companies committed perjury in which case meh), Sup Forums threw around some funny memes I harvested that probably were more effective (but neither Sup Forums or the ruskies did much imo), and the rich and powerful remain rich and powerful.

also fug should've asked for a check

>Are there any other current examples of failed states in SA that aren't socialist?

Argentina, it collapsed very badly around the 2000.

Once again, the context of their shitty beginnings is critical to understanding the poor foundations for their failing socialist state m80. Do I have to spell out how the influences of causality work to you?

Let me also remind you once again the point I was making was that our democracy is in no danger of falling to marxism or w/e the meme flag posted earlier, as evidenced by our status quo of plutocratic influence and wealth. I can't help but kek a bit as you accuse me of ignorance with regard to the topic. Don't run away tho, I need these tax deductions friendo

>The Russians verifiably did try to influence voters on Social Media
For which side though? You still haven't proved which party they shilled for. There is a tactic in Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, the book Hillary lives her life by, that say blame the other side for you crimes in order to shift focus off yourself. You and no one else has proved who the ruskies shilled for.

Stop using Amazon faggots.

Your girl looks like an amphibious goblin, Jeb.

>Do I have to spell out how the influences of causality work to you?
Explian how Spanish influence is responsible for faliure of Lybia and Somilia. I'll wait. That's the premise of your argument. That external influence from Spain played a role in the failure of states.

>Let me also remind you once again the point I was making was that our democracy is in no danger of falling to marxism or w/e the meme flag posted earlier, as evidenced by our status quo of plutocratic influence and wealth. I can't help but kek a bit as you accuse me of ignorance with regard to the topic. Don't run away tho, I need these tax deductions friendo
Because by proving you don't have a clue what you are talking about regarding Venezuela, I can prove that more than likely you don't have clue about this greentexted statement as well.

The point I was making was that their influence was limited in whatever form, more limited than Sup Forums's. Who they were shilling "for" seems to have been for themselves, according to the Congressional testimony, which highlighted Russian attempts to spread divisiveness where ever possible. Although based on the examples of them trying to show ads of a fake Black Lives Matter and Muslim Group on FB to people who liked Confederate flags and Guns, it seems kinda clear who they thought were more gullible.

This also includes things like trying to organize an anti-muslim and pro-diversity march to try and start fights. Again, my suspicion remains Sup Forumss memes were more influential and that the overall influence of both was quite minimal. The Russians didn't exactly tell Clinton to not campaign in Wisconsin lel

Hereditary systemic racism it's a thing.

>The Russians didn't exactly tell Clinton to not campaign in Wisconsin lel
Because Clinton, thru Uranium One, was assured the Russian govt would shill for her on social media? The tactic worked so well with the CIA and the ArabSpring, it seemed fool proof. You should look up the article where the NATO General yells at Sup Forums for using NATO psychological warfare tactics. It's really cute.