Questions about the belief of white supremacists

(I don't want to trigger anyone here. It's just that I live in Vietnam and has almost no experience of what I'm about to ask.)

1. What are some of the historical and achaelogical details (frabricated or not) that are usually quoted by white supremacists to prove that whites has a superior biology and/or an origin in very old and "advanced" civilizations.

2. From what I've read and watched, a good number of white supremacists also believe in a global Jewish/black/Muslim conspiracy. How do they explain why Jews/blacks/Muslims, while inferior to whites in their words, could fool and dominate over whites?

There is something off about this guy. He looks really weird.

its the eyes

White supremacists are retards OP.
Northern europeans over which these people wank were way more primitive than southern europeans and especially more primitive than mesopotamians. Instead of accepting that each people had their low and high points they act as if every moment was ahigh point for their history.

There are like 3 retarded "nordicist" threads currently on /his/. It seems like they try to find artifacts that resemble Indo-European artifacts which supposed to prove that IE people were the ruling class everywhere and conquered everything. For example a lot of white supremacists seem to push the Tocharian meme now.

Not a white supremacist but from what I gather:
>1. What are some of the historical and achaelogical details (frabricated or not) that are usually quoted by white supremacists to prove that whites has a superior biology and/or an origin in very old and "advanced" civilizations.
It's not about archeological evidence as much as contemporary evidence of differences in ability (through IQ tests).

>2. From what I've read and watched, a good number of white supremacists also believe in a global Jewish/black/Muslim conspiracy. How do they explain why Jews/blacks/Muslims, while inferior to whites in their words, could fool and dominate over whites?
They don't view jews as inferior, and they don't view blacks and muslims as dominating them. They view blacks and muslims as tools used by jews to undermine them.

>3 retarded "nordicist" threads currently on /his/.

You mean bait threads made by shitposters of the opposite side.
"Nordicism" is a strawman used by retards who need some imaginary enemy to fight against. Almost nobody actually claims those things anymore.

Multiple separate lines of thought run in parallel. The conclusions drawn from them create the supremacist belief, not the initial reasoning.

1) jews/blacks/muslims are evil
therefore Whites are the better race
2) jews/muslims/blacks are cunning
therefore Whites are the better race
3) jews/muslims/blacks are stupid
therefore Whites are the better race

Therefore, Whites are superior.

The same IQ tests show the Asians are smarter, though.

>Jewish conspiracy
They just mindlessly repeat Nazi propaganda. There is virtually nothing new about it. Even this "white genocide" meme is of Nazi origin. Hitler blamed the Jews for French African soldiers in the Rhineland.

Which is true, considering the Proto-Indo-European steppe people mixed with the neolithic farmers in Eastern Europe who would thus become the Corded-Ware peoples from whom Indo-Aryans came to be. Of course over time and space they interbred with locals but they were certainly "white" looking at the start.

You should actually go to Sup Forums and ask them. They're just waiting for someone to tell their white supremacy bullshit to.

>white
Why can't we have a single thread without americans shitting it up with their retarded terminology?

>The same IQ tests show the Asians are smarter, though.
But thats just cause they're memorizing/culture/family values/not-white.

Hmm... I'm pretty sure the heart of Indo-Aryan civilisations was in the middle of Iran and Northern India, duh, while they did with Europe pretty much the same thing Europe did with its colonialism

Are you fucking retarded? They originated in Ukraine.

Ultimately, the Indo-Aryans come from the Corded Ware People who lived in Eastern Europe.

>What are some of the historical and achaelogical details (frabricated or not) that are usually quoted by white supremacists to prove that whites has a superior biology and/or an origin in very old and "advanced" civilizations.
As said, they usually point to things like IQ test. And while, as pointed out, Asians (and Jews) do have higher IQs, they will often point to Asians being less creative and independent. Western culture is a lot more individualistic. A lot of white supremacists will argue that ancient Egyptians/Romans/Mesopotamians/Indians were actually white nordics like the Germans at the time or that they were ruled by an aryan nobility. This certainly is not all white supremacists though.

>From what I've read and watched, a good number of white supremacists also believe in a global Jewish/black/Muslim conspiracy. How do they explain why Jews/blacks/Muslims, while inferior to whites in their words, could fool and dominate over whites?
They generally believe that Muslims and Blacks are not part of a conspiracy, but rather are pushed by in Muslims' case their religious beliefs or in black peoples' case their genetics to act maliciously. Whites are superior to them because Muslims and blacks are backwards, to them. Jews, rather than being intellectually inferior, are considered morally inferior as they are trying to destroy the moral integrity of society through spreading things like degeneracy (which is a very vague term) and hordes of third world migrants to destroy the white population. This is also why a lot of them deny the Holocaust, as their hatred of Jews relies on white people being morally superior rather than intellectually superior.

Your delusions aren't true.

>What are some of the historical and achaelogical details (frabricated or not) that are usually quoted by white supremacists to prove that whites has a superior biology and/or an origin in very old and "advanced" civilizations.
Darwin, Alfred Rosenberg, Voltaire, Carl Linnaeus ...

This

Let me ask you. Would you mind if Vietnamese people became a minority in Vietnam?

Didnt they come from the caucasus?

Nice meme Luigi

>people that want to preserve their own nation and heritage are automatically the "Eviil Supremacists"
Epic thread

America belongs to Amerindians the same as europe belongs to europeans. Do you agree?

Certainly. What the Europeans did in the Americas was horrible and Native American culture should be preserved. That doesn't mean Europeans from the US should be punished for that.

I personally don't care about the United States of 56% but I want Europe to be European.

>punished
It has nothing to do with it. It's pretty simple. America belongs to Amerindians the same as europe belongs to europeans. If a condition isn't fulfilled, why should the other be complied?

So why are so many nationalists in the Western World lumped together as "White supremacists" despite this?

no he actually looks weird, plastic. like a tv evangelist.

See

>Vietnam

>complains about poisoning the well
>goyim
>da joos
Nice false flag, my friend. I guess I should bring out my leftist strawmen now.

So you agree with european replacement? Great for you.

Of course he looks weird he's a synth

Simple. As history demonstrates, Amerindians are superior to europeans. If you agree with a race's superiority, then you agree with europeans getting replaced then extinct'd. How is this even a question?

So you agree with european replacement?

>non-scientific supported babble
As I said before, Amerindians are superior to europeans. If you believe that superiority implies replacement of the other lesser races, then you agree with european replacement. How is this hard to get?

If europeans get extinct'd, it will be better for humanity, though. It's all for the greater good, and your whining without reason has no weight in this choice. How can you go against humanity?

>Why are whites considered superior
>Posts fucking David Duke
David Duke is a white nationalist, not s white supremacists. Next you'll post Jared Taylor as a white supremacists as well lmao. But, to answer your question, white "supreemists" will mostly cite scientific acheivement and per capita differences between whites and non-whites that work in their favor
>Nazis believe that Jews control the world
Not quite, they think that Jews benefit greatly from the system in place that does control the world - free market capitalism. It's a lot more complicated than
>Da joos rule the world :DDD

>real humans
As Amerindians have demonstrated better civilization potential through all history, that means that Amerindians are more humans than europeans. So you agree with european replacement. Good for you.

This is based on my limited understanding on the subject so I might not be completely or even mostly accurate.
1. White supremacists tend to associate 'whites' (which is a meaningless meme term btw) with the aryans that conquered India and then spread throughout the western parts of the world as indo-europeans. The reasoning is something a kin to that the germanic sub-group of these people is the most pure of them in terms of resembling the aryans of legend and thus is also the best of people.
2. You can be inferior and still be crafty and cunning. The jews are typically seen as a race of people who use their innate cunningness and tendency for schemes to dupe the white people into following their agenda. This agenda may include, depending on which supremacists you talk to, the use of multiculturalism as a tool to weaken the white man by draining their resources (both statewise by genetically) by black and muslim immigrants. A crucial part of this conspiracy theory is to brainwash white women into finding swarthy men attractive which weakens the power of the white race by miscegenation untill there are no whites left.

>wh*Tes are afraid of KARA BOGA
>invent a juice boogeyman
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I don't know who he is but he looks like reptiloid.
Or "Smiler" from Transmetropolitan.

>i don't care about humanity
Irrelevant. European extinction is for the greater good.
>put words in mouth
You seem to agree with a race being submitted/replaced to other, so the logical conclusion would be following the greater good: european extinction.

>white supremacy bullshit
Its not bullshit. It's reality.

>doesn't deny it
After europeans getting extinct'd. There is no need for your unscientific opinions anymore. So, goodbye.

>denying science
>reality
Hmm...?

All Europeans are white.

>They just mindlessly repeat Nazi propaganda
It's not propaganda and there is a white genocide.

>retarded burger terminology

Science proves white supremacy.

According to archeological history, Amerindians had a higher development rate compared to europeans. In other words, they had more civilization potential than europeans.

According to science, europeans are inferior to Amerindians.

>not propaganda
>denies science
Yeah...
>white genocide
>not having kids is genocide
Hmm...?

No they didnt. No science shows those savages had anything higher.

>planned killing of a group of people
Tell me who is killing who then?

Why did you make this thread here?
Sup Forums will give better answers to your question
How is this related to /his/?

You are just shitting this board, GET THE FUCK OUT, RETARD

Niggers are subhumans.
In the US the richest njggers still commit more crime than the poorest whites.

>eurangutans:
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to solutrean:10000 years (30000BC-20000BC)
>from aurignacian-antelian to neolithic: 15000 years(30000BC-15000BC)
>from neolithic proto-agriculture societies to neolithic revolution: 6000 years (15000BC-9000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to copper and arsenical bronze: 4000 years (9000BC-5000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to bronze age and tin bronze: 5200 years (9000BC-3800BC)

>Amerindians:
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to clovis: 4000 years (15000BC-11000BC)
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to the start of crop development: 7000 years (15000BC-8000BC)
>from neolithic proto-agriculture societies to neolithic revolution: 5000 years (8000BC-3000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to copper and arsenical bronze independently: 2000 years (3000BC-1000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to bronze age and tin bronze: 4000 years (3000BC-1000 AD)
Amerindians had a higher development rate compared to europeans. In other words, Amerindians had more civilization potential than europeans. Amerindians are superior to europeans. Deal with it.

Genocide doesn't mean actual murder.

That's the most retarded thing I've ever seen.

>Eurangutans

Oh it's you again.

How is anyone killing europeans? Is there a planned massacre? How aren't the immigrants new europeans? You are the problem, if you don't even accept the immigrants.

>archeological facts
>retarded
Hmm...

I don't see europeans getting thrown away to unfertile lands nor dying by other causes. Some europeans just choose to not have kids the immigrant new europeans have no problem with it though.

>the pinacle of eurangutan superiority are being disease spread pigs
Hmm...?

Amerindian superiority is based on their higher development rate compared to europeans. In other words they had more civilization potential. How is this even a question?

>they don't have choice
Except they have and they don't want to. They aren't being destroyed either.
>()()
hahahahahaha

Not having kids is not being destroyed. The influx of new europeans will help them.
>having choice
Being free of doing anything simply rejects all your conspiracy brainwashig ()() bullshit completely.

You posted no facts

>keeps denying consensus
Try again.

Amerindians reached bronze age 5000 years after European.
That somehow makes them superior.

>not having kids
Again, not choosing to have kids is not being genocided, nor destroyed nor anything.
>you are blind
Because I simply see that it's not genocide? You are just making up new words to fit your narrative. And how are immigrant bad for europe? All the bullshit you spout makes no sense.

>chimp having a gun 1 year before a child genius is born
Amerindians accomplished what europeans did until 3000BC in almost half the time spent. In other words Amerindians had more civilization potential. Deal with it.

>It's because you know who he is
I don't. He still looks like a fucking raptor.

>gets completely btfo'd
>you are liying
Dumb kid, come back when you have something worth to be read.

Totally not weird at all.

>genocide is happening!
>actually it's not genocide becau-
>antiwhite opinion discarded
? Are you american?

Nah, it just looks like the average old "white" american. That's why he looks like a muttant.

...

No it's not genocide because no-one is being obligued to do anything. I already explained you this.

Dumb american.

He is just a muttant american. It's normal for them.

Yes, he still does. I don't know where the fuck you're getting at, but I'm not a shitskin or a leftie.This guy simply looks very verid and unnatural to me, like he's ill.

>you want them to mean
Didn't you want to morph the original meaning of genocide and call it what this thing ()()() means?
hahaha

I don't fucking care.

>not choosing to have kids=destruction
Whatever is happening over here is nothing but free will to do anything you want. If you think europeans want to destroy themselves, you can put your opinions on the trash can if you want.

Let me ask you. Would you mind if Amerindian people became a minority in Americas?

If you've ever listened to his podcasts you'll realize he quite clearly does believe in white superiority. Same with fucking jared taylor actually.
I definitely do believe that jared doesn't actually hate anyone though, he's pretty classy.

Kill all white people they have been the cause of most of the planets problems

Whiteness is a social construct. Prove me wrong.

>media affects people
That's obvious. Nobody is being obligued to not have kids. Nobody is being lied to. Why do you keep pushing for this?

You keep trying to force the genocide word for this, it's pathetic.

the entire media doesn't do that at all though.
In fact society at large still looks at you as a fucking weirdo if you don't have kids.

Kill all eurangutans.

Even when i was going through my Sup Forums phase i thought he looked creepy as fuck.
You fags need to get his face out of the public eye desu.

There are no amerindians left to give """their""" clay back to. Most tribes will accept you with 25% native blood, and most of them are majority white that just larp as injuns.

>Yes we get it, you use words to mean whatever you want them to mean
>the (((dictionary)))
unreal

Wrong. There are millions of Amerindians with less than 1% european blood in Peru, Bolivia and Guatemala. And I'm not counting the millions of mestizos with more than 60% native blood all over mexico and south-america which are the majority on most zones.

America belongs to Amerindians the same as europe belongs to europeans. Time to deal with it.

>my race was so thoroughly btfo by europeans that my ass still hurts from it today

It's more that Amerindians being superior to europeans, getting all eurangutans extinct'd, would be better for humanity. Don't you agree?

>south american mudbloods
Literally who gives a fuck, they can have that shithole if they want. North America best America.

Irrelevant. Amerindians are a more homogeneous ethnic group compared to europe. America belongs to Amerindians. Get over it.

>superior
>lost to germs and a handful of Spaniards with svurvy