Which political ideology is the best for a population in terms of it's average IQ?

Which political ideology is the best for a population in terms of it's average IQ?

IQ
40 -->
60 -->
80 -->
100 -->
120 -->
140 -->
160 -->

I don't have the time to write out every bracket, but I'd assume the higher the intelligence average, the more individualist and less collectivist the ideology should be.

>40
Dealing with literal chimpanzees
>60
See above
>80
Will quickly degenerate to an anarchy regardless
>100
Capitalism
>120
Capitalism
>140
Capitalism
>160
Capitalism

IQ
40 --> anarcho primitivism
60 --> tribal communism
80 --> absolute monarchy by devine law
100 --> representative democracy, regulated markets
120 --> direct democracy
140 --> libertarianism
160 --> no government but common interests

>40
Communism
>60
Democratic Socialism
>80
Neo-Lioberalism
>100
identitarianism
>120
>140
>160
Fascism

Maybe, maybe not. It's hard to tell because something that doesn't work at the end one end might work on the other.

I would flick that think in the balls so hard.

>40
subhuman, are incompatible with political constitutions
>60
basically the same
>80
anarchy, isolationism, individualism
>100
Capitalism, liberalism
>120
National Capitalism, conservatism
>140
Fascism
>160
National Futurism, Perennialism, Ethnonationalism, Neotraditionalism

>40
Keep them in large reservations until they become homo sapiens sapiens first.
Basically cly tribal order.
>Below 100
Monarchy, Divine or Absolutist
>Over 100
Direct Democracy/Technocracy

Individualist countries turn into pure shit because all anyone is interested in is what benefits them. The IQ of them is irrelevant. If they're low IQ individualists they die off quicker, if they're high IQ then they die off slightly slower.
Individualists are exactly why (((democracy))) is so important. Come election day people vote in their best interests and never in the interests of the country or its people on the whole. Even if a decent amount voted for the latter they'll always be outnumbered by voters of the former.
You need a mixture of both which meets in the middle. You could have a nation of 50m super high IQ people, all capable of designing and planning some super advanced skyscraper, but the problem is you have no one to build it because, no matter how advanced it is it's still only one skyscraper that makes no difference to their life at all. It could hold life saving equipment, but what does that matter? As an individualist you don't need a skyscraper full of life saving equipment, as long as the building is big enough for your life to be saved why would you, as an individualist, give a fuck about anyone else?
I'm not saying centrism is the only option for everything because that would be moronic. But a nation comprised of individualists has just as many problems as a nation comprised of collectivists, high IQ or low IQ.

>40
Islam
>above 40
anything else

??? --> Transhumanism

Don't know if it works like that. A highly intelligent on average might see the individual benefit to be gained by sharing a stable environment with others. The problem are the less or slightly above individualists who can't see the connection between the others and themselves.

Those balls are neat

...

40--> National socialism
60--> Communism

Individualism does work, but only within a social framework. Respect for one's fellow man, loyalty to one's nation, etc need to be commonplace in society. Otherwise it will degenerate into what you've explained. Individualism and collectivism at their extremes are cancer, a blend needs to be found.

>40 --> none
>60 --> none
>80 --> none
>100 --> none
>120 --> none
>140 --> none
>160 --> none

Ideologies are for cucks

This. Smart people need to be individualist to be enriched

>160 --> no government but common interests

All it would take is one psychopath to fuck everyone over and take over the nation.

Pol doesn't understand smart people are more likely to be psychos out for power and domination, and better at oppressing others too.

>40
Dealing with literal chimpanzees
>60
See above
>80
Will quickly degenerate to an anarchy regardless
>100
Capitalism
>120
Capitalism
>140+
Anarcho Capitalism

Not if everybody has guns.

Both ends of the bell curve need some form of strict system. The low end probably something like Communism/Monarchy where the right to rule comes from an ideologie, the high end needs a form of fascism or elective monarchy, where the right to rule comes from the implicit consent of the people to be unified by a leader.

Because elective monarchy and fascism allows smart people to rise and can make use of intelligent people, while not overly micromanaging daily life of the general population. Communism because religion or that ideologie aims to micromanage daily life.

The middle IQs need a form that allows intelligent people to rise, but deals with idiots to either put them to work or at least keep them from ruining the state. Some form of republic or Venice styled city state.

gutted yourself as sub 120 with this one, bucko

>40
Colonialism
>60
Colonialism
>80
Constitutional Republic with barriers to suffrage (an example of this is Rhodesia)
>100
Constitutional Federal Republic
>120
Constitutional Federal Republic
>140
Jeffersonian Constitutional Republic
>160
Ideally this would be ANCAP, but an extremely minimal Constitutional Federal Republic should do

We moroccans are the smartest people on the planet

40 and 160 are the same thing

160=» empirisme organisateur, nationalisme intégral, Roy.

>40 -->
Black Nationalism
>60 -->
Black Nationalism
>80 -->
Neo-Nazism
>100 -->
Liberal/Concervative
>120 -->
Peetersonism
>140 -->
White Nationalism
>160 -->
Zionism

*Petersonism

>0-80
Malevolent dictatorship ("do X or get whipped").

>80-100
Benevolent dictatorship ("do X or face problems with the law").

>100-140
Representative democracy with safeguards against subversion.

>140-
Anything.

Goyim
>0-100 --> (((USSR)))
>100+ --> (((Democracy)))

Chosen people
>0-100 --> Caliphate
>100+ --> Mamlekhet ha-Khuzarim

40 -->
ethnonationalism

60 -->
nationalism

80 -->
libertarianism

100 -->
representative democracy

120 -->
direct democracy

140 -->
Marxism

160 -->
anarchism

how to spot a troll
marxism is pure antithesis to human progress you filthy unethical piece of a shit.

I like

Ha yes, we all remember how the Soviet Union hanged all those nuclear and rocket scientists on day 1.

>160 -->
>anarchism
Yes, because anarchism ensures advanced education....

40: Slavery
60: Slavery
80: Slavery
100 : Fascism
120: Fascism
140: Fascism
160: Fascism

Not sure why it wouldn't but ok.

still ZSRR lost Space Race, Life Quality Race, I can be free race, you piece of a shit.
t. someone who remembers breadlines

Shit i forget to change my meme flag

40 --> nazis
60 --> nazis
80 -->capitalists
100 -->ancoms
120 -->socialists
140 -->communism
160 -->global communism

>180
British Israelism/Anglo-Zionism

first man in space, first man in orbit, first functioning spaceship etc etc. But somehow America decided the moon was the REAL goal all along. Way to snatch victory out of the jaws of defeat.

>40 -->
Not agreeing with me at all. Rope-tier.
>60 -->
Agreeing with me on one or two minor, tertiary issues. Rope with weights tier for a quick death.
>80 -->
Rarely agreeing with me. "Broken clock" tier. Maybe worthy of being a slave.
>100 -->
Agreeing with me on one or two major issues. Untouchable caste tier.
>120 -->
Agreeing with me most of the time, but disagreeing with me on some other, tertiary issues. Prole tier.
>140 -->
Disagreeing with me only on one or two minor issues that I could get over. Outer Party tier.
>160 -->
Agreeing with me one hundred percent. Inner Party tier.

40 --> pol
60 --> reddit
80 --> breitbart
100 --> inforwars
120 --> varg
140 --> CNN
160 --> huffington post

what are you going to do about it? Cry? Write more lies on internet? You can go on but truth always wins in the end redditor.

this is the true spice russian

>freshman in college tier list

150 up is hardcore Hoppean autonomic free cities and neighborhoods with their own rules and traditional views, where leftists don't exist anymore.

Basically millions of small voluntary fascist states.

>says something idiotic
>is immediately refuted
>out of arguments so resorts to insults and ad hom
wow hey man didn't mean to trigger you like that. You should be warned Sup Forums isn't a safe space.

>40
not real communism
>60
not real communism
>80
not real communism
>100
not real communism
>120
not real communism
>140
not real communism
>160
not real communism

>160 --> no government but common interests

lol

being smart doesn't mean being a good person

quite the opposite actually

>40 -->
Tribalism
>60 -->
Monarchism
>80 -->
Fascism
>100 -->
Liberalism
>120 -->
Social democracy
>140 -->
Socialism
>160 -->
Communism

there is nothing i can do better than insult you because i just can't kill you with the internet connection, and facts dont work on leftist utopian scum.
t.breadlines are still in my memory

...

The one withou Jews.

This.

>40
Tribalism
>60
Feudalism
>80
Republicanism (limited suffrage)
>100
Democratic Republicanism
>120
Socialism
>140
Communism
>160
Anarcho-Communism

...

IQ
40 --> communism
60 --> anarchism (and all its variations)
80 -->democracy
100 -->liberalism, natsoc
120 -->conservatism
140 -->libertarianism
160 -->fascism

>there is nothing i can do better than insult you
untrue, you could have posted arguments, had you had some to back up your inane statement. But you hadn't, so you didn't.

>Basically millions of small voluntary fascist states.
you forgot "locked in a perpetual state of war with each other".

this

shekel for a good goy

I don't see individual vs collective as an IQ thing. It's more of a population density thing. In close quarters (e.g. cities), people need to diligently manage their interactions; hence collectivism rules.

Out in the sticks, people don't need to worry so much about managing their relatively infrequent interactions with others; hence individualism.

That's why cities vote left and the country votes right.

If there was a community of 160+ iq. anarchism, communism, pragmatism or libertarianism are the best for them.

Capitalism isn't an ideology dofus

The only assignment that can really be made is that the lower eschelon might benefit from a monarchy / dictatorship, etc.

/thread

>40 -->Diehard Trump supporters
>60 -->Alex Jones fans/Far right white nationalists
>80 -->Basic Bitch Liberals/Limousine Liberals
>100 -->SJWs/Alt Right
>120 -->Ancaps/Libertarians/Communists/Laissez Faire Capitalists
>140-160 -->Moderate Liberal Sensible Socialists/Moderate Conservative Civic Nationalists

Just a general trend. It's not always the case, but in my opinion those are general trends for relative intelligence and political opinions. Basically more moderate people have argued more often and have tempered out the weaknesses of their stances where the more extreme facets are no longer defensible, so they tend to have more nuanced and intelligent opinions. The more extreme left wing and right wing opinions tend to be narrow, simplistic, and aggressive in an effort to get what they want rather than requiring any critical thinking.

>160 --> no government but common interests
This civilization would destroy itself in about 150 years.

Or you could say that stupid people should be governed by smarter ones. The benevolent kind ideally.

I mean maybe the upper end would just create some AI or hivemind to make the best decisions for them, considering they might have realized their own limitations and want the optimal outcome, rather than the outcome possible with their limited level of understanding.

How so?

> no government but common interests

>120
Anarachy
>140
Dictator/Monarch
>160
corruptfree, traitor free communism

>free of corruption
>communism

Pck1

corruption is everywhere nigger

>corruption is everywhere
That does not invalidate what I said.
>nigger
Uhh, you're tough

Yes but communism is instantly corrupted. By default, because its very nature is impossible with human beings and the nature of humans when grouped together.

While all systems are open to corruption, capitalist corruption is generally a slower process because it takes time to conquer a system that promotes competition.

40 --> not even a functioning society, anarcho primitivism
60 --> barely a functioning society, and only with a heavily authoritarian government (either fascism or communism)
80 --> communism, people aren't retarded enough to behave like monkey but they aren't smart enough to live by themselves either
100 --> social democracy, most people will adapt to it
120 --> capitalism with little state intervention
140 --> like above but with even less state
160 --> anarchotranshumanism , regular transhumanism, futurism , space imperialism

First you need to make the Islamic Republic of Gerry into The Fourth Reich then we talk.

I'm not a goy, I'm Jewish

40 --> Ooga Booga
60 --> Tribalism
80 --> Nomadic Tribalism
100 --> Feudalism
120 --> Mixed democracy
140 --> Democracy
160 --> Capitalist Technocracy

TL;DR Democracy and capitalism would work a lot better if we genetically engineer our next generation to be geniuses.

pic related is high iq only.

Do not click if IQ sub 111

Should also note that the feudalism and Nomadic Tribalism is mixed with Theocracy. Fear of a God is very good at getting people in the 70~100 range to cooperate.

Go figure

I know your leftist mind is too idiotic to comprehend this, but a race is won when you cross the finish line.

>pirates
>peaceful

>ideology
>high IQ
pick one

>Come election day people vote in their best interests and never in the interests of the country or its people on the whole
A highly intelligent person will know this and act in the interest of the country as a whole and the future that lies ahead.