Sup Forums BTFO yet again
White nations are not happier than multicultural nations
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
liveleak.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Fuck off, kike.
It's about (((their))) globalist agenda. They want to run a prison planet of border-less, race-less, culture-less, identity-less, subdued sheep. They make up less than 1% of the world's population, yet look at all they control from the world's finances to the media that brainwashes us.
In short, they use the entertainment and news media to encourage globalism and to discourage nationalism and traditional western values. They distort and lie about the past and present in that effort.
The truth about immigration, by the numbers:
>youtube.com
Why people are afraid of the facts about the Jews:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxist Jews Admit Organizing White Genocide
The plan to eliminate the white race:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxism & Social Justice explained:
>youtube.com
Why are we in decline - Cultural Marxism:
>youtube.com
The Jewish role in the refugee crisis:
>youtube.com
White Genocide is real - In their own words
>liveleak.com
Leftist subversion explained by former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov:
>youtube.com
also see
The facts about slavery in North America:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxist Jews fund media propaganda against whites on an enormous scale:
>youtube.com
The Jewish role in the porn industry:
>youtube.com
Does this sound familiar at all? (starting at 6:52)
>youtu.be
The Holocaust:
>youtube.com
>youtube.com
>youtube.com
>youtube.com
>dk
>not white
sage
richer countries, you mean, surely mehmed
13% foreigners. Same as Sweden
Being surrounded by your own people who you share the same culture with is the leading cause of suicide. It’s much better to have many Muslims there, so you can have cultural conflicts and accidentally microinsult blacks.
Sweden...
That's right. White ethnostates will never be as successful as multicultural nations
I'm sure all the Somali's raping your women are really happy Sven :^)
ex-communist countries*
I was 5 when the USSR fell.
Depression is more common in rich/middle class people than poors/third worlders.
America...
Nvious, is that you?
the more intelligence the more self awareness and awareness about whats going on in the world. That can cause depression
>4% unhappy
this is utter bullshit, almost every 2nd gen nonwhite hates it here and so do loads of young people + old people saged
What's your sample size?
If you're unhappy it's likely that you socialize with unhappy people, so that will likely cause a bias.
we are based as fuck.
t. dutch citizen
>inb4 amerimutts
The alt-right doesn't care about happiness, they care about racial purity.
Why have a fulfilled life when you can be depressed, and grit your teeth every time you see an interracial couple?
On the flipside of that coin, Syria, Myanmar, Nigeria, Yemen, Afghanistan are such wonderful exemplars of multiculturalism and diversity.
Right... Interventionism, and religion, has nothing to do with the conditions in Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen... It's purely due to a lack of racial purity.
Kek if a country is infested by niggers and sand niggers of course they are gonna say they are happy, its better than the shithole they came from
>It's purely due to a lack of racial purity.
Yep. Has nothing to do with their apocalyptic death cult led by a pedophile
My point is that diverse societies are far more prone to conflict. Syria, Afghanistan, Myanmar, Nigeria, Yemen are all diverse yet the various ethnicities are more likely to murder each other.
For a larger scale comparison, look at China and India. The former is far more homogenous and stable, while the latter is diverse and dysfunctional.
Tell that to India and Brazil
This is inconvenient to the Sup Forums narrative...
Qatar #1 GDP per capita country according to the world bank and IMF
"The number of people in Qatar fluctuates considerably depending on the season, since the country relies heavily on migrant labour. In early 2017, Qatar's total population was 2.6 million, of which 313,000 were Qatari citizens (12%) and 2.3 million were expatriates.[21] Non-Arab foreigners make up the vast majority of Qatar's population; Indians are the largest community, numbering 650,000 in 2017,[21] followed by 350,000 Nepalis, 280,000 Bangladeshis, 260,000 Filipinos, 200,000 Egyptians, 145,000 Sri Lankans and 125,000 Pakistanis among many other nationalities.[21]"
Singapore #3 GDP per capita...
According to the country's most recent census in 2010, nearly 23% of Singaporean residents (i.e. citizens and permanent residents) were foreign born (which means about 10% of Singapore citizens were foreign-born naturalised citizens); if non-residents were counted, nearly 43% of the total population were foreign born.[255][256]
The same census also reports that about 74.1% of residents were of Chinese descent, 13.4% of Malay descent, 9.2% of Indian descent, and 3.3% of other (including Eurasian) descent.[255] Prior to 2010, each person could register as a member of only one race, by default that of his or her father, therefore mixed-race persons were solely grouped under their father's race in government censuses. From 2010 onward, people may register using a multi-racial classification, in which they may choose one primary race and one secondary race, but no more than two.
Brunei #4...
n 2014, 65.7% of the population were Malay, 10.3% are Chinese, 3.4% are indigenous, with 20.6% smaller groups making up the rest.
Kuwait # 5...
Kuwait's 2014 population was 4.1 million people, of which 1.2 million were Kuwaitis, 1.1 million are Arab, 1.4 million Asian expatriates, and 76,698 Africans
(CONT)
Kuwait #8...
There are 1.4 million Emirati citizens.[7] The United Arab Emirates' population is ethnically diverse. According to the CIA, 19% of residents were Emirati; 23% were other Arab (Egyptians; Jordanians); and Iranian; 50% were South Asian; and 8% were other expatriates, including Westerners and East Asians (1982 est.).[2]
In 2009, Emirati citizens accounted for 16.5% of the total population; South Asian (Bangladeshi, Pakistani, Sri Lankans and Indians) constituted the largest group, making up 58.4% of the total; other Asians (Filipinos, Iranians)[331] made up 16.7%, while Western expatriates were 8.4% of the total population
###
That shows that there is more to 'stability' than the minimization of diversity.
Sup Forums ignores things like that.
Whoops...
I meant UAE #8 above.
Qatar is a slavocracy on the brink of a spartacist revolt
Singapore requires draconian measures that most europeans would balk at.
Brunei, I don't know much about
Kuwait, again, is sitting on a powder keg like Qatar
Speculation, about the Gulf state possible mass revolt.
People say the same about China. If you don't believe me, just google.
Regarding Singapore... Again, that goes to my point that there is more to stability than just minimizing diversity.
Except if you want more diversity in a society you must have greater willingness to accept more authoritarian controls to keep said society from fracturing.
And even then, Singapore isn't that diverse with a hypermajority chinese population.
As for comparing the gulf states to China, the CCP enjoys FAR more legitimacy than the Emirs.
What am I looking at?
>Except if you want more diversity in a society you must have greater willingness to accept more authoritarian controls to keep said society from fracturing
What specific draconian measures are you talking about exactly, which have helped stop the society from fracturing?
You obviously don't mean economic, because Singapore rates higher on the economic freedom index than any European nation.
Again though,... That shows that diversity isn't a problem in and of itself. The problem is how the society is managed.
>And even then, Singapore isn't that diverse with a hypermajority chinese population.
So you would be OK with these percentage in white nations (replacing Chinese with European)?...
"74.1% of residents were of Chinese descent, 13.4% of Malay descent, 9.2% of Indian descent, and 3.3% of other (including Eurasian) descent.[255]"
>>As for comparing the gulf states to China, the CCP enjoys FAR more legitimacy than the Emirs
Again, that doesn't negate what I said that diversity in and of itself is a problem.
this is literally the stupidest argument I've ever heard
they are multicultural because their wealth attracts immigrants.
This is stupid.
This was never a competition, there's places in south america where people just dances all day I shit you not.
Of course if you get that people inside your scandinavian country they will say they are happy, they are always happy.
Singapore is a draconian state with media almost completely controlled by the state
Sure business might have lots of freedom, but personal freedom is really low
I actually watched some youtube videos from a singapore and in one of them the guy actually said the government contacted him to produce videos "to promote racial harmony"
I don't know what is going on over there, but if that is something that is necessary, its obviously shows that there is some straining going on
>would you be okay with these percentages in white countries
those percentages are more or less where the United States is right now, and its already beginning to cleave at its seams. If the percentages remained at the 75% white level I guess it wouldn't be a problem, but nothing is static so making a cut off point from which you say "okay you are diverse enough so you are now allowed to stop immigration" is bullshit
Its obviously always better to be as homogeneous as possible
Dutch people actually complained about this because "when life hits you" you can't be happy for some reason anymore.
I guess complaining about literally everything makes you happier