If nazism is so superior then how come the majority of the people in scientific field are leftists?

if nazism is so superior then how come the majority of the people in scientific field are leftists?

Other urls found in this thread:

tavaana.org/sites/default/files/Ellul_Jacques_-_Propaganda.pdf
nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

If they dare speak up they lose everything, just look at scientists that go against liberalism. Ostracized/excommunicated like Galileo was

bubbled group think and liberal college professors are the main reason.

Couldn't possibly be that they know a few things that you don't. Right Sup Forums?

What could they possibly know?, they go into science expecting a result and then only take what supports their theory, if something contradicts it they hide it or they ignore it. Those are your scientists, it's not about truth regardless of the results as true science should be.

>they go into science expecting a result and then only take what supports their theory, if something contradicts it they hide it or they ignore it
Disregarding the fact that there's been hundreds of years of exactly the opposite happening?

>retard that doesn't know anything about science
If we strictly talking hard sciences, like chemistry, biology, or physics, you can't lie your way through it. You need to produce repeatable experiments for your findings. If you don't, you will be found out for being a bullshitter very quickly. People can make careers from proving you wrong.
T. Chemistry Phd student working with Carbon isotopes.

Most scientists are apolitical. Some are conservative, some are progressive. Most likely more left wing economically, but that is due to capitalism and scientific progress not going hand in hand very well.

What is Genetics and it's relationship to the continuation of Lysenkoist theory's

Genetics has nothing to do with lysenkoism, what the fuck are you smoking?

>biology,
Do you mean like when they found that different races had different skull sizes and then proceeded to lie about it and ostracize anyone who pointed out the research? Like that?

Of course nobody is pressuring you about fucking carbon isotopes, unless it somehow relates to global warming, it has no political value.

The Nazi's were socialists.

Really?

The only "scientists" who get funding and recognition are the ones that stay in line.

There are studies that prove niggers are less evolved and studies that show climate change isn't that big a deal but you aren't allowed to see those.

Look at what happened to nutrition. All the scientists said one thing was great for you and then a fuck load of people made a fuckload of money and then all of a sudden something else is great for you and that other thing was actually bad for you the whole time.

They're not.

Stop equating faggot cuck professors of black studies with scientists.
I hang out with people who work for MIT and several labs. Some of them are raging Nazi's.

because it is the ONLY criteria in becoming an expert LOL

race REALISTS

>implying "scientists" actually know shit
hahahaha ok then

Lysenkoism was based purely on propaganda, and not science. I fail to see how genetics would contribute to lysenkoism. If anything, it completely disproved it.

> be an acknowledged scientist
> bro required to go to college
College being infiltrated with communist subversion and indoctrination
> be good in your field but not hip enough to mass social engineering schemes to thwart it's effort
This is assuming your premise is true, which it probably isn't

I think you misunderstood me, Lysenkoist thought has replaced fact based genetics in the modern field of genetics.

Right, because people don't conveniently muddle lines to obfuscate points being raised like Fst distances in humans, etc.

>chemistry
>biology
>hard science
wew

nazis aren't "right" you fucking imbecile

also this

Not genetics, social sciences.

Upton Sinclair — 'It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.'

This is it.

Schools and universities are rife with radical left wing ideology... and people wonder why educated people (publicly) tend to be left wing.

Meanwhile the uneducated dregs of society avoid this, and the image of the typical right-winger is a redneck/skinhead etc. These people simply haven't been subject to years of brainwashing and peer-pressure.

logical fallacy

>implying most of us here aren't disaffected liberals

Because most of them are Jews or mixed Jewish/White blood. I'm 1/8 Jew and studying chemistry. Also a lot of scientists don't care about anything other than science. They have too because it is such a mentally demanding field. Research is at least.

Ochem is pretty tough.

If Nazis are so dumb why did we need their scientists too go to the moon?

Have you ever been to college?

I feel like right wing scientists would get ignored far more than leftist ones coz liberals are so popular,

Plus most right wingers are religious who aren't big on the science

Scientists have to (((be))) who they need to (((be))) to get the funding they require. (((Coincidentally))) those with the most funding and mass appeal are leftists, so the scientific community has to suck-up to them. Stay in line.

That automatically makes them slaves as well. Don't bite the hand that feeds you, my people say. Just see how the scientists that linked circumcision with permanent brain damage were treated.

>Muh PhD.
Cuckold angloo.

>if nazism is so superior then how come the majority of the people in scientific field are leftists?

They're not leftists. There are very few of those left in America. The real American leftists of the mid-20th century didn't go to graduate school. They went to the working class communities to try and advance the interests of the proletariat.

Most people with graduate degrees are members of the capitalist bourgeoisie. They have liberal views on things like gay marriage and abortion, but that doesn't distinguish them meaningfully from the libertarian right.

Hypothesis: what you do academically has no correlation to political belief

Or maybe it's difficult to buy into internet pseudo-science memes when there's a vietnamese Fields, the best geometrician is cantonese and tons of indians are making a killing in medical research
Now if you aren't coward bitches, tell us how much science you've actually done in your lives, just for fun

Ok, BUT WHERE IS THE FUCKING SOURCE?

Yet we constantly hear stories of professors refusing to debate their students or colleagues on "Right" wing issues. My country is a case study in this. You can pretend that knowledge requires a gate keeper, but that says more about you than society.

>A related point, central in Ellul's thesis, is that modem propaganda cannot work without "education"; he thus reverses the widespread notion that education is the best prophylactic against propaganda. On the contrary. he says, education, or what usually goes by that word in the modem world, is the absolute prerequisite for propaganda. In fact, education is largely identical with what Ellul calls "pre-propaganda ”the conditioning of minds with vast amounts of incoherent information, already dispensed for ulterior purposes and posing as "facts" and as "education." Ellul follows through by designating intellectuals as virtually the most vulnerable of all to modem propaganda, for three reasons: (1) they absorb the largest amount of secondhand, unverifiable information; they feel a compelling need to have an opinion on every important question of our time, and thus easily succumb to opinions offered to them by propaganda on all such indigestible pieces of information; (3) they consider themselves capable of "judging for themselves." They literally need propaganda.
tavaana.org/sites/default/files/Ellul_Jacques_-_Propaganda.pdf

Science and politics are completley separate fields of study and as such it is completley unreasonable to expect someone who is an expert in the former to be an expert in the later and vice versa.

The explanation as to how they came to be majority politically left in this context is therefor irrelevant because their scientific acumen has no impact on their veracity and competence as political thinkers.

>tfw no betty gf

giv betty gf

if leftist scientists are so superior, how come the Nazis were more technologically advanced than the Allies?

Liberals want more social freedom and more money taken from the goyim.
Now go post about how anytime Donald Trump will get impeached anyday now.
/thread

Back off leaf she’s mine

deduction: only scientists are smart. only smart people can into politic. only politician rule over pleb.

Her lips gross me out, I want a thin lipped Jew.

some body needs a field trip to nasa

my professor directly used lysenko as an example of genetics being misused

his work is completely irrelevant to current genetics

>hurr why are so many actors Jewish?
Kys Stephanie

When nazis controlled science, they put men on the moon.

Now that marxists control science, all you can do is "invent" global warming and 49 new genders.

>Nigger on welfare that also has done low paying research studies that feels the bern

She doesn’t even have very thick lips tho...

People in college are Larping. They can't stand SJW pussies, they know they'll crush you on the competitive job market so they just play along with you sheltered bubblefags.

She is average at best, just makeup and lack of sex is what makes her so popular on Sup Forums.

The right applies it and goes to buisness

>She is average at best
I’m not even memeing when I say delete this and kys.

This is the only logical conclusion.
>mfw registered democrat for jobs because demographics

>blocks your path

If you limit that only to actual STEM fields, ie ones with measurable bounds, not just circlejerking, then it skews left. To the oven with you OP for incessant faggotry

are you triggerprofiling me?

I don't understand the question. The National Socialist German Workers Party was a leftist organization.

Literally the entire space program was former Nazi scientists. What does that tell you?

Skews strongly right*... "humanities", "arts" and other bullshit sciences skew left, STEM skews right.

>moooom someone on Sup Forums said my tabloid tier waifu isn't a 10.

I mixed food coloring as a kid

>Now if you aren't coward bitches, tell us how much science you've actually done in your lives, just for fun
Nice fallacy there, shitskin. How's life in the caliphate of Frenchukistan?

Did you know there's rampant crime, degeneracy and inbreeding in the shitholes you mentioned? Have you a clue of how arse-backwards Poo-in-loos are, or about their fucked-up caste system?
Next time you bait, make something autistic enough to rile us up; this was just plain awful...

Its because you guys hate scientists. You don’t respect or understand their work, you assume they are pushing conspiracies and ignore them.

Scientists will become republicans when you accept evolution, climate change, and vaccines, while suggesting policy in response to new data.

You guys can’t pretend like the last 100 years never happened.
Europe has conservative scientists, but they also admitted lead was bad for you 30 years before the US did.

You guys only want scientists to make products, you don’t want them to inform public policy. Smoking creates jobs, smoking is good for you

John Liebowitz has the answer

>social ((scientific)) leans left
most actual stem scientist either don't care about politics or lean right

haha hard science you stupid fuck

In chemistry, 85% report failing to replicate another’s results. 65% in physics/engineering & Earth Science; 75% in biology (Baker, 2016)

nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970

>comparing conservatives to galileo

/po/ is one scientist

>Correlation does not imply causation
It's a product of educational indoctrination. If our schools pushed national socialism to the world's brightest scientist and doctors, they would be Nazis. If our schools pushed communism, they would be communist. Just because scientists are leftist, doesn't mean leftist are smart. In fact, this proves further how indoctrinating our educational system is.

are you that fucking stupid? The fact that you just wrote that sentence tells me that you are not even in the conversation. You need to sit back and do some critical thinking. Remarkable!

The Nazis are dead. WHITE AMERICAN MEN killed em.

We're all STEMlords here ausbro.

If science is so leftist then why is there not enough diversity in science?

leftists are soooooooooooo intelligent. Harhar.

First, being smart doesn't mean you are less likely to be swayed by logic and sound reasoning; in fact, it just makes you better at defending your positions.

Second, most people in the "scientific field" work at universities as professors or researchers, or as grad students. Life college/university life bares little resemblance to the real world. Academics often form their own little bubbles and forget what the real world is like.

t. B.S. in Math & Physics

Most scientists and research labs I know would be politically neutral if the right wasn't so viciously anti-science and anti-education. Like socially speaking most people, myself included, are neutral. If the right would up funding for research and education I think you'd see far more diversity in political affiliation in academia.

And . Like don't get me wrong there are anti-science idiots on both sides, but even though I'm not particularly left I don't know how I fit into a party that dumps funding into trying to hinder research that is producing results that are inconvenient for it. At least democrats fucking leave science alone.

That's coming from someone whose lab gets military funding. Unless your policies are absolutely heinous I vote for whoever funds research the most and hinders it the least.

You forgot that most of our modern world is based off of advances made by nazi scientists.

> voting to get government to spend money on what you want it to spend money
Thanks for stealing my tax money and using it to spend on yourself doing with it whatever you want. At least you get to vote for what you want to do with MY money.

I'm working on a masters in a very specialized engineering field

smart people aren't magic, they watch CNN and go on reddit to form their political opinions

just because you know a lot about biochemistry for example doesn't mean you have wise takes on geo-politics and macroeconomics

in fact good students are usually very obedient and conformist by nature, they aren't stupid of bad, they just tend to do what good normal people are "supposed" to do

I'm not surprised that university educated normies tend to memorize and signal the correct narratives, they have the brainpower to process cultural marxism and have no reason to alienate themselves from ZOG culture

>if we controlled the culture, the upper class white people would be unflinching nationalists (just like almost all of american history)

the government doesn't hire leftists for anything except the progression of the retardation of the public

according to my hypothesis, i have no charisma so in order to get laid i must appeal the females sense of empathy by letting mexicans rape our working class. too bad you didn't get an overpriced degree and compromise your values silly rednecks

>what is corporate R&D

I mean realistically I'd even be open to a completely free market but I think realistically that will never happen. We can talk ideal governments all day but when you vote you're choosing between realities, not ideals. Truthfully I'm for a dynamic system and I don't think ANY political system can overcome the human nature to twist that system to their benefit. Not always maliciously so, but it's inevitable. But that also means whatever your views are, I'd probably agree in some circumstance or another they would work, at least for awhile.

The only difference between getting government/military funding is that the projects funded by government/military are specifically scoped to benefit the government/military and its people.

because men outnumber women like 20:1 in these fields and when 150 greasy weird physicists constantly weirdly hit on the only fit girl in your lecture they're gonna turn blue hair and the majority of guys become orbiters

>comparing quacks to Galileo

>""""""socialists""""""

>Schools and universities are rife with radical left wing ideology
*tips tinfoil*

>1 post by this ID
Sage

because the people that sponsor and fund their research tell them what to believe, and if they don't then they lose their funding

scientists are a bad reference point for proving superiority to begin with

>1920s/1930s Romania
>Iron Guard
>Most members are university students and professors

If you ever visited a research lab you'd know it's because they want funds.

Because high taxes disincentivize hard work. Because it is wrong to steal. Because all socialist countries are/have been shitholes.