In a non-racist way, explain to me why Africa never advanced technologically like the Europeans

Is it the climate? Is it because of European colonialism? Genuinely curious.
And again, no racist answers please, I want answers based on scientific/historical reasoning.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0jFGNQScRNY&t=194s
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory
reuters.com/article/us-usa-college-cheating/act-cancels-entrance-exam-in-south-korea-hong-kong-after-test-leak-idUSKCN0YX008
unz.com/jman/more-on-farming-and-inheritance-systems-part-i-iq/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

The people there are niggers

Just look up the average IQ in those regions, you'll have your answer.

>no racist answers please
>I want answers based on scientific reasoning.
Pick one.

Racism, Colonialism, Bad Climate, Lizards which chew away at wooden infrastructure

>Answer what 2+2 is and show your work, but without using math, please.

niggers are stupid because they didn't have evolutionary pressures to select for intelligence and other higher order thinking traits. Also they are from a completely different ancestor, essentially a different species that walks talks and thinks differently

Honestly, it's because the people have an average IQ which would be considered legally retarded in the US.

Terrible climate, poor trade routes to the Cradles of Civilisation in the Middle East. Europeans constantly needed technological advance, to ensure their neighbours would never be able to soundly beat them in war. It wasn't really the same in Africa.

No great empire to unite their peoples under a benevolent dictatorship.

What is there to explain? If you begin with the hypothesis that it takes a critical mass of higher-IQ people to develop and maintain advanced civilization, then Africa's condition not only makes sense, but it would be utterly bizarre if it were any other way. In other words, observed reality is exactly what we would expect it to be, given that initial assumption.

youtube.com/watch?v=0jFGNQScRNY&t=194s

I think climate. You can easily survive just chilling and eating fruit all day, year round in a tropical climate. (source: check my flag) If you have a winter to face, you better work your ass off and come up with solutions to impending problems or you're ded.
Multiply by 1000 generations.

That crab monster has a higher IQ than all Africans.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory

But why didn't they evolve? Maybe because it's hot and they had food and water so they didn't even bother unlike Europeans who suffered through snow and winter

oh press on and my soggy knees.

There are many factors but consider only two - climate and geography. Hot and humid climate makes epidemics more likely because cold kills viruses and some bacteria. Geography adds another challenge. The continent is huge and distances are very difficult to travel. That makes cultural exchange of knowledge less likely and with it progress becomes less likely. There is a reason wealth in Europe is concentrated in the north.

IQ is not an accurate representation of one's intelligence, it is highly misleading. Then explain why the Chinese were behind the West in the 19th century (Qing Dynasty times) despite their IQ superiority?
I said without racism mate, can't read?

i've seen many parts of Africa described as literally being "gardens of Eden" in the sense that edible food just grows, year round. they never had to organize or plan on a societal level to maintain their civilization. they never had to learn to trust one another and cooperate in an economic sense to survive, so their culture never developed these sorts of concepts. they just harvest what they need from their environment and spend their free time murdering each other over females

I’m glad someone’s finally gotten to the bottom of this.

>There is a reason wealth in Europe is concentrated in the north.
Yes, intelligence. The norther you go, the harder it is to survive. That's why all old empires came to be in the south. The only empires in the north are relatively recent, whereas southern Europe had empires two millenia ago, and middle-east had them thousands upon thousands of years ago.

It's the geography. Their land is bad for farming and they can't grow good crops. Without an abundance of extra food, they can't really ever get past the stage they're in. Simple history.

>I said without racism mate
What is 2 + 2? And don't tell me it's 4.

Africans are, on average, less intelligent than Whites or Asians. Our ancestors knew this, our grandparents and parents knew this. Anyone that has listened to African American vernacular would know that their language is not as complex because they're unable to learn the finer points of the English language. This is why minorities struggle academically, become discouraged and drop out of school. In Baltimore there are 13 schools that, between all of them, there are exactly ZERO students that are proficient at math. While we may never have to use algebra or calculus in our adulthood, I believe our ability to learn these concepts demonstrates our capacity to learn complex concepts and retain knowledge. Whites have a higher level of creativity and are able to build on what we already know.

This is why unrestricted third world immigration is so dangerous. I truly believe a civilization's level of advancement depends on the level of intelligence of the people within it and how the civilization delegates its labor. If we're promoting Blacks into positions that benefit from an intelligent individual, like engineering or medicine, based on affirmative action policies then these roles will not be fulfilled to their full potential and society as a whole will suffer from this.

Why is it so hard for you to look at every population of niggers and observe their failure?

>But muh Chinese
Ain’t no Chinese niggers bud.

>Rhodesia
>breadbasket of the world
rly maeks u think

Northern Africans are the only ones that became somewhat advanced compared to the Southern Africans is because North was influenced by Islam.

>Europeans constantly needed technological advance, to ensure their neighbours would never be able to soundly beat them in war.
There are literally thousands of tribes in Africa that have long fought together for land and wealth too. It's not just Europe.

Islam was big in Carthage.

The abundance of food prevented the nigger from having to evolve a brain capable of planning for the future. Elephants also fucked up any opportunity for agriculture since niggers are to dumb to realize they should have just killed them all like the Europids did to all the large fauna in the north.

Sure, maybe. The point is they aren't on the level of Whites. So what do we do now? Throw money and food at them because we feel sorry for them even though we know they'll never be on our level? Allow them to reach a population of 10 billion on their continent and cut down the entire rain forest and poach every endangered species into extinction before we realize that genocide is preferable to a collapse of the biosphere?

They couldnt domesticate livestock because they would attract flies

They never got writing, agriculture, or domesticated animals, not settled, nomads

Don't bother most people here will just go

>hurrhurr muh IQ test

The IQ tests you know are designed for westerners. How do you expect someone who lived in a hut (black or white) never had access to education of any form to suddenly have a solid grasp on geometry and spacial abstraction? IQ doesn't measure "Intelligence" it just measures those two things.

Let me guess who I would rather have on my team, a Sup Forums nerd who knows triangle patterns or whatever or habu bibi who hunted hundreds of crocodiles in his life.

This is all not to defend niggers but just to say that if you go on about muh IQ you're as retarded as a nigger.

Crabs in a bucket mentality on a continental scale

No it doesn't dingus. IQ measures your pattern recognition ability. Education means nothing.

Look at the average IQ's of the countries involved. Seriously, it's about brains and not color

>The abundance of food prevented the nigger from having to evolve a brain capable of planning for the future.
This, but also the heat. Most creatures in the south have small heads, since large brains produce tons of heat, and that can be lethal in hot and dry climates.

Yeah you seriously fucked up by trying to integrate them into society

The east-west theory. Basically the geography of northern sub Sahara-Africa isn't all that fertile and condusive to primitive farming. Much of the south is similar. There are certain cash crop plants that can be grown there with ease, but not the staples of the fertile crescent agriculture. So farming did spread out of the middle-east into middle Africa, but it wasn't a game changer. It didn't advance beyond that because of the lack of contact with advanced trading partners. The east-west theory says that farming of ready food spread quickly because the climate was similar and the crops the same. Africa wasn't able to farm these same crops and trade like the people who were on the that latitude. Also, niggers.

The best IQ test there is: The success of your people. Blacks fail. Every time.

The Chinese cheat on there national IQ tests/fake statistics.

How? They didn't know anyone else had it better. In fact they did have it better than anyone else

The climate doesnt change. In Europe you have to work hard in preparation for winter. You have to have the ability to plan ahead, anticipate the future. This requires injenuity and intelligence. Blacks grew up where there's always resources just laying around. This requires no planning, no concept of time.

You don't want a racist answer? so you don't want the true reason? its because of race.

>Look at thousands of years of nigger failure
>Wypipo is testin is wrong n sheeit.

I wish IQ was just a test on how to create western culture because then we could at least improve their scores.

If it were about farming, we'd expect Norwegians, Scotts, Swedes etc. to be brainlets. They are, of course, but not on the level of Africans.

Africans are closer to Bonobo than Human
its not racism its fact.

Well, it's in North Africa, point?

Of course. I blame Christianity for that one. It was the "we're all God's children" nonsense that silenced Darwinism.

Because they never really needed to. They had plenty of food so there wss no massive need to develop storng metals. So no problems were to be sloved, and they didn't have equipment and material to exepriment with. I havent seen anyone talk about them using horses, so ill assume that they didnt have any and that contributed negatively to transfer rates of knowledge between peoples, retarding them further.

I could believe south Korea/japan, china lies about everything though.

I don't see people being mystified as to why a wolf can't herd sheep. Why you don't see mastiffs in dog races. Why grey hounds are not used as guide dogs. Why golden retrievers are not used as guard dogs etc. But for some reason, when you look at all the human races, people seem confused when you get different results with different races.
As for the specific reason why things are the way they are, could just be a random mutation that happened in the caucasus or some other place many many thousands of years ago. Or it could be selective pressure because of climate.

>Carthage came into prominence due to Islam

The trade hypothesis is silly. There were plenty of people to trad with in Africa -- Africa is huge. The problem is that the only people to trade with are Africans.

Hence, nothing happens. Because Africans are barely human.

>The IQ tests you know are designed for westerners.
Why do Asians score higher than whites?

Why does the IQ test consistently predict life outcomes like income, lifespan and improvement in social grade?

lots of space
easy access to food
no winter

No, it also measures basic geometry knowledge and spacial abstraction. If you think that's all there is to "intelligence" then you should go back to Africa you little cunt.

>I could believe south Korea

reuters.com/article/us-usa-college-cheating/act-cancels-entrance-exam-in-south-korea-hong-kong-after-test-leak-idUSKCN0YX008

>Their land is bad for farming
No it's not.

How come India or South East Asia developed writing systems and complex civilizations and Africa didn’t? Those places are tropical with abundant food and hot weather too.

Basically this. Whites have, since the beginning, to think creatively to survive. Lived in colder and harsher climates where survival was dependent upon their ability to innovate.

Blacks never had to do any of this. Hence, their brains never progressing as far as whites.

well thanks lmao haha.

Also Red Sea would have been a perfect place for trading. Also agriculture. The areas did develop a bit better than most of sub Saharan Africa, but nowehere near the Mediterranean levels.

Trading partners would be the theory's answer. The Vikings were trading in Baghdad for heavens sake.

Still living in the Golden Age.

Epicycles and retrograde motion explains everything! They are both tried and tested means of navigation.

Asking us to be politically correct on Sup Forums. Wheres that faggot that saged my thread?

>no racist answers
>scientific reasoning

Make up your mind.

The idea that all human beings are equally capable of civilization is contrary to all evidence. Racism is scientific. Liberalism is a cult benefitting only its priesthood.

They adapted to their environment.

What stopped blacks from trading in Baghdad?

Then I, someone who went to expensive private schools my whole life and got one of the most expensive NYC tutors to tutor me since i was 6 wouldn't get 89 on an IQ test.

genetic pressure

Trade did happen on the Red Sea, but that area is observably a wasteland.

>Wheres that faggot that saged my thread?
If your thread dies due to saging, it wasn't a good thread to begin with.

Can someone post that pic which shows what nigs pretty much don't have frontal lobes?

My sides
>I want the truth but not if it's explained in a way that reveals the truth.

Google it then you fucking moron.

>easy access to food
Sure thing, they had as much difficulty as the Europeans.

It is really just sub Saharan Africa. Places like Carthage and Egypt were able to create functioning societies.

>IQ is not an accurate representation of one's intelligence
Its the most accurate representation that exists

Nature is "racist". That is the answer. Now you can either accept reality or continue living in confusion and frustration.

that's basically impossible.

Lack of agriculture/resources along with not being connected to the rest of the world while other civilizations at the time grew through trade and agriculture.

I just hate how zero of our history classes from elementary to high school acknowledged how African rulers sold slaves, the story is always spun like Europeans just trapped slaves and shipped them across the Atlantic. It wasn't until this World History course in college I'm taking that I found out the truth. Taking a course on African history next semester to get the bigger picture hopefully.

Academic answer here. The reason is because they produce children faster than jobs.

>without telling me why, tell me why
Niggers are inferior, simple as that.

Afrixa is larger than eurasia

...

Jobs can be created out of thin air though.

unz.com/jman/more-on-farming-and-inheritance-systems-part-i-iq/

That's why I think it could be a random mutation. I honestly suspect horseback riding could have something to do with it. Just keep in mind, civilization is on the y-chromosome. Iq IS important, but not enough to create civilization, or else women could do it.
A single random mutation in a single man could be what gave spark to civilization.

Hot Weather Selection Theory. The evolutionary pressures in climates that face a Rany/Dry season shift select for quick aggression and short term thinking and planning. Climates that have winter to deal with select for long term planning and cooperation/blind trust.

Africans are differently evolved due to the different selections pressures they faced. This led to an average intelligence that is way below the Nordic, Khazar (an Eastern European ethnicity that many people call Jewish,) East Asian and Middle Eastern populations (I bet you don't know that many deserts get freezing cold during the night.)

A quick 'splaining. Pic related.

>I want answers based on scientific/historical reasoning.

whats your fucking problem you fucking burger piece of shit? off course they are niggers, but it´s a logical fallacy to invoke their nigger status to explain a complex thing like economical and technological development, beign nigger it´s not per se an explanation for IQ nor other kind of intelligence according to Howard Gardner. It´s fun to talk about how nigger are dumb, but it explain nothing, so please, if you in your brain full of lard and guns cannot provide something remotely reasonable, please, go fuck off yourself, go watch fucking nascar, or porn or a Trump speech and let the intelligent people argue with some more deep and elaborate than "muh nigga".
Fucking burger, the fucking first reply and is a piece of shit like this.
im triggered, i`ve been baited hard, but for fuck´s sake you really are an ignorant piece of shit, like a fucking nigger but probably slightly wither

another fucking amerilard with cheese and bacon in his fucking brain, go fuck yourself. Scum like you are a fucking a shame to the human race.

Westerners was the wrong word, I meant anyone who have a degree of education that is pretty much at the same level as we have on the West. But instead of writing all this shit I wrote "westerners".

>Why does the IQ test consistently predict life outcomes like income, lifespan and improvement in social grade?

In general it does but not always. There are plenty of cases of people with high IQ offing themselves or living nihilistic lives.

My point here is that if all you have to say is go on about IQ then you're a moron who will lose to any non-brainlet leftie. The most important thing is culture. To answer the OP what we had here in the West that they didn't have is a Christian culture (maybe you can mention romans as well). The notion of sacrificing yourself for the greater good and so on.

Obviously IQ is still a factor but that doesn't answer the OP question. Why niggers didn't develop? They never had a Caesar or a Jesus.

...

>no racist answers pleas
why is africa so shit?
don't mind the people living there

>but that area is observably a wasteland.
More fertile than 100 % of my country. Parts of it just as fertile as the best farmlands of Europe.

rly maeks u think