Anarchism

What does Sup Forums think of Anarchism?

Is it also a Jewish Satanist conspiracy?

(I am NOT talking about Anarcho-Capitalism because it is a dumb fucking oxymoron that will never happen and is not even worth thinking about.)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0vVCSUafFVI
youtube.com/watch?v=gPeqKzv1q6c
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

nonsense for edgelord teenage faggots

christian anarchy is the only righteous form of governance for mankind. everything else is heresy.

Shut up Steve Ceru...

Unemployed edgy middle-class that envy the upper class so they want to bring down the system to beat the rich. tl;dr edgy stupid normies

anarchism is the most retarded ideology i can think of after anarcho-communism, the real oxymoron

Anarchism is about removing hierarchies, not social order. Anarcho-Communism seeks to do that through workers councils and direct democracy.

Anarcho-capitalism is just private tyranny.

All of your Anarcho-(X) ideologies are oxymorons.

Uhh
Swinging by to let you know anarcho communism is also oxymoronic
What organization is gonna distribute the wealth? That calls for a Gov't, Uh oh, anarchy calls for no government.
Really anything with "anarcho," is practically automatically retarded and has a complete disregard for the callousness of human behavior.

Kysf

Wow. You are a real genius.

You should right a book about how in depth your knowledge of political ideologies goes.

anarchy is without a central power, communism is total central power, “anarcho-communism” makes no fucking sense

Uh oh soyboy is also completely describing anarchy by his own terms.
Uh oh soyboy doesn't even understand the basis of anarchy
Uh oh soyboy doesn't realize that for the collective wealth to be re distributed, an organization is neccesary, and and organization that is responsible for distributing the wealth would inherently have a lot of power as they would control all the wealth. Oh and that would also be a hierarchy (You wouldn't want that as an anarchy guy now would you)
Uh oh soyboy doesn't realize that a direct democracy is incredibly impractical in a population any greater than approx. 400 people.
Uh oh soyboy doesn't understand human nature and greed

Write*
If you're going to be sarcastic (sarcasm isn't wit) about my level of intellect, you could at least have some accountability on your part.

as says anarcho-communism, as the name itself doesn't make any sense is the most retarded one
standard anarchism falls second because you could probably at least program robots to leave in a functional anarchist society
>Anarcho-capitalism is just private tyranny.
it's not the government so it's still technically anarchism, so it's not an oxymoron

Uh oh virgin wage-cuck doesn't know the first thing about Anarchism.
Uh oh virgin wage-cuck doesn't realize that anarcho-communism still has social order and laws
Uh oh virgin wage-cuck doesn't believe in democracy and freedom and would rather be cucked by politicians and buerocrats and billionaires.
Uh oh virgin wage-cuck claims to be an expert on human nature without referring back to any of the hundreds of philosophical works on human nature from the past 3000 years.

Like I said, Anarchism is about removing hierarchies. Capitalism is inherently hierarchical.

>still has social order and laws
>anarchy

Soy vey you're fucking retarded aren't you?

Actually, the burger clearly and simply BTFO your argument and you responded with non-sequiturs. And, yes, I’m a fucking leaf. But, as a leaf, I think burgers are generally dumb as shit; so for a leaf to defend a burger means you’re just beyond help. ProTip: lurk more, post after graduating middle school.

Who the fuck maintains and oversees the social order? The collective? If you're so convinced of this political ideology, move to Slab City, where the chances of you getting shot/stabbed/robbed/ or your fucking house burnt to the ground is insanely high (Because no fucking authority XD XD)
youtube.com/watch?v=0vVCSUafFVI

Are you retarded? Re-read that sentence you fucking imbecile.

it is a dumb fucking oxymoron that will never happen and is not even worth thinking about

>Who the fuck maintains and oversees the social order?
Unions and workers councils.

Worked well in Spain for over a million people.

You must have a hard time reading and comprehending.
>no social organization
"Uh oh virgin-wage cuck doesn't realize that anarcho-communism ((((still has social order))))
>no social organization
>abolition of ALL government
>laws
k u b l a k e k

you are a bunch of cucks i will enjoy watching you soy boys slapping each other on the ground crying and yelling who is hiding food from afar while your women are suckin on my big fat mcdick >: )

Psychedelic anarchism is the rainbow pill of enlightenment. It's too bad that most of the online anarchy resources and forums are actually socialist/communist honeypots.

>Capitalism is inherently hierarchical
it's not really the same thing as states and their hierarchies are social constructs, someone giving food to someone else to do stuff for him is not

You are so stupid it's not even funny.

The picture of the definition you posted is not talking about the abolition of the social organization. It says "Belief in the abolition of all government *stop implied* AND the organization of society on a voluntary, cooperative basis..."
It is talking about two different principles of anarchism. Did that sink into your thick skull yet?

Also if you want to talk about schools of philosophy, let's talk Hegelian dialectics.

In the past, communism has failed TREMENDOUSLY
Let's try it again :^))))))))))))))))))))))))
Uh oh! It failed again!
Let's try it again :^)))))))))))))))))))))))))
Uh oh! It failed again!
Let's try it again :^)))))))))))))))))))))))))Uh oh! It failed again!
Let's try it again :^)))))))))))))))))))))))))Uh oh! It failed again!
Let's try it again :^)))))))))))))))))))))))))

The absolute state of anarcho communists

Every time it has failed was because it was a Vanguardist version of Marxism. Every time it has succeed it was because it was a more libertarian model of Marxism.

You cant just point your finger at one model of socialism (a model that I and many others are against).

You really think in an environment where there is no authority, that everyone will happily work together and effectively+decisively apply mob justice against the right people? That everyone will share their wealth?
Do you have any fraction of an understanding that humans are inherently greedy? And will go to any length to pursue personal advancement?
You zealously believe that humans would be accountable and fair in an anarcho-communist society.
You don't think people would do questionable and inhumane things with no authority?
If you want a prime example of how a society with no authority turned out, observe Somalia

LITERALLY 14 hours ago "512 Dead in attack."

Damn that absence of Government really allowed for an atmosphere of voluntary social organization and order!

You're a fucking fool and stop embarrassing yourself
Just fucking /thread already holy shit.

>communism
>succeeded
North Korea is the only state that strictly adheres to the true tenants of Communism, and it's a fucking shit show.
China had to let a little Capitalism in, otherwise it was bound to fail (again)

youtube.com/watch?v=gPeqKzv1q6c

Despite what a lot of people will try to tell you, not all anarchists are commies. Some of us advocate a path to anarchism that begins with freeing the mind from all rigid ideologies, of which communism is a prime unfortunate example. Deconstructing all authoritarian structures may not be possible in practice given the current evolutionary state of humanity, but it is possible our far-future cyborg metahuman descendants will figure it out. I'm an optimist.

Rather than asking me what examples I believe succeeded you continue to point at failed examples to fuel your circular logic.

I am wasting my time with you. Good night.

Ok, what states following the tenants of Communism actually succeeded?

...

All anarchism is completely retarded. Hierarchy is an inevitable consequence of human relations and necessary to organize and form large scale societies. Yes, your pseudo anarcho-communism can work in small hunter-gatherer tribes, but you will never build a real civilization out of it. The more individualist anarchist ideologies are slightly less retarded (ex. anarcho-capitalism), but they would just devolve into fedualism given enough time.

Well, we're waiting!

>When you claim property is theft but fail to realize the only rights that exist in a free society free of government are property rights which includes the natural right to self-ownership but since you're a retarded commie you dont believe in self ownership but then again not owning yourself would mean someone else owns you but since you're an anarchist you dont believe in rulers so you have no idea what your ideology actually means and fail to realize therefore that Anarcho communism is an oxymoron

Anarchism is the transitional vacuum state towards brutality or fascism. it is the friend of the dictator. Communism is fascism facilitated by the state.
Basically, in anarchy, disputes are settled by the guy with the cruelest methods, weapons, thug-buddies. I appreciate the notion that an external force governing me at all is insulting; be grown ups follow the good. A free-market protected by the republic is good, when the government isnt a contagious welfare cyst making up rules for tax and murder. Problem with Anarchy is that it makes the vacuum that leads to more brutality and more government. When HUMINT grows it gets better. Remember in life, you are your own boss and you make your path,consequences,choices. To what extent does the govt really own you? so degrees of anarchy or govt can be a semantic game ... again with the Jews FFS

>I am NOT talking about Anarcho-Capitalism because it is a dumb fucking oxymoron that will never happen and is not even worth thinking about
>posting with an ancom flag which actually IS AN OXYMORON
You're retarded

>What does Sup Forums think of Anarchism?

It's retarded.

sage