If nazism is so great then how come they lost the war?

if nazism is so great then how come they lost the war?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/channel/UCjAFO7xz5UotUfIzvd_xXDA/videos
renegadetribune.com
youtube.com/watch?v=ClR9tcpKZec
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

i want to ejaculate on her forehead

I honestly like that there are multiple threads with the same pattern:

>1 post by this ID
>294 replies

and everyone is arguing about basically nothing.

This is how slide threads work. There are so many degenerate idiots on here, it's quite unbelievable that someone honestly thinks that Sup Forums could be a threat to anyone

Most anons on Sup Forums are proverbally Ricks thinking they're immune to stupidity etc. - but throw them a thread like

>"how can/do we fix xy?"
>"xy hate thread"
>"what did he/she mean by this?"
>"dare I say he/she is /our xy/ ?"
>"what's his/her problem?"
>"why do you hate xy?”
>”is xy finished?”
>”really makes you think”
>”he/she is right you know"

(bonus points for “Lauren Southern / Jordan Peterson / random ‘e-celeb’ defamation threads)

and you'll get even worse than Jerry. You don't even realize that those threads are posted EVERY DAY almost EVERY HOUR and you still reply like the goldfishbrains that you honestly are.

Most of you are just arrogant idiots that only like to put other people down solely for their flag. You just want to derail threads of anons only because some shill posted one of those threads listed above before, ripping on your flag, so you feel obligated to vindicate yourself or give back to a flag that ripped on (you), and of course because you don't have anything substantial to say.

Burgers are the worst: they dish out at anyone, but since shills made the "le 56% face" meme they get something of their own medicine and every other asshole is quick to jump on the bandwagon, to “show them burgers”...

all the while the shariablue and university of southern california shills are rubbing their hands laughing at you, because they got what they wanted -> a distraught/distracted userbase

inb4 Sup Forums was always shit

open a book is too hard for you?

it's simple, because the US couldn't keep their nose out of Europe's business. Again.
But this is a bait thread, so consider yourself reported to Sup Forums authorities.

Next time keep your honorary Aryans on a tighter leash.

Because the power of kabbalistic Saturn magick is very real, the Jews literally shaped the war in their domination of the media, in portraying Hitler as the villainous murder as he is seen today. These fuckin Jews are the aster of the lie, and by way pf their central banks, were also easily able to mobilize the west against Hitler. ....nationalism is a direct to jewish globalism.

Because the press is mightier than the tanks.

>how come a bag of dicks should satisfy OP, but he won't stop consuming penis
>memeflag
>bait thread
sage

This is like a Tom & Jerry cartoon.

If you try a method ONE time and it didn't really work, then it will never work. Only remaining options are totally different methods from there on.

POLES BROKE ENIGMA AND MURRICA BTFO THEIR ARMY

that's an odd way of spelling soviet

Germany is a German occupied country because ZOG still fears the German.

Resources.

We didn't it never ended

Also, Germany had traitors on the inside pulling for the Allies.

Hitler's biggest mistake was to think he had the war won by June 1940.

if the West is so great why is it set to lose to China?

...

find all the answers here
youtube.com/channel/UCjAFO7xz5UotUfIzvd_xXDA/videos

renegadetribune.com

Because the Clintons are devotees of Mao and his little red book?

implying

They faced a more powerful enemy.

true. true.

War? You mean minor battle.

Did they?

WW2 was a distraction
They wanted to show people proof why the Juden are capable of and why they need extermination and what race really is.
They did.

Now they either come back from the Arctic or reemerge in the cesspit that is modern Austria

>Winner of the loser's bracket
LOL I kind of wish the USSR still existed. Another couple of generations of total misery and they'd have sold us all their nukes for some Burger King.

In a sense both world wars were a major failure for the British. They wanted to destroy Germany as a commercial rival by military force.

history is a major failure for the british. They used to be world sea power with colonies everywhere. Today they are on their rainy islands and get invaded by their former slaves. It would be funny if it wasn't sad.

If tanks are so armoured how come they blow up when you shoot missiles at them?

>if nazism is so great then how come they lost the war?
How did you let this retarded thought get far enough to where it left and went through your fingers? Are you legitimately retarded?

>dur why do murders happen to good people
>why do bad people prosper
>help me daddy. what is this world

you realize they fought off major world powers for along time of the war? eventually they were overpowered.

nice copy paste

How many five yo kids can a MMA-figher fight off before he's overpowered?

what you're essentially saying is that nazism is an inadequate ideology.

hmm. really makes me question reality.

Took the entire world to take it down

>This is how slide threads work
So tell me, what is the oh so important thread they are sliding?

They were hacked by the Russians

no. it worked far better the socialism also. germany had a strong economy under it before the war. you are actually retarded and don't know how too debate or have a basic grasp of what you are yapping on about, so go back too listening too lil wayne on the stereo you stole from the "white devil" down the road you monkey mouthed nigger.

There are numerous things. Lack of a proper navy to take out Britain, failure of the U-Boat campaign, invading the Soviet Union despite it being near impossible, having little vital resources (Such as oil), neglecting logistics, over engineering things like tanks to the point that they are too hard to produce, wasting resources on "Wunderwaffes" and so on. It was a war that was impossible to win.

>germany had a strong economy under it before the war
This is a common myth. Their economy was too shaky and unstable. The future wasn't looking good for them in 1939, and it was one of the main reasons to invade Poland.

Lies. hitler put the economy on its feet and did actually tried too stop the war.

>Tried to stop the war
>Kept demanding land with no sign of stopping
If Hitler wanted to negotiate with Danzig he shouldn't have annexed the interior of Czechoslovakia after getting the Sudetenland

you have an anarchist capitalist, i expected more. anyway, I havent read about world war 2 because i care so little about it. so for this one Im just going too stay on the fence.

>germany's economy was stellar till it wasn't because hitler thought invading other countries was good

so smart
>anarchist capitalist
>I havent read about world war 2
>just going too stay on the fence
literally kill yourself

But this isn't true, the German economy was smoke and mirrors. There was no unemployment, because they put everybody to work. You had doctors digging ditches. Debt exploded, which they tried to cover up, and living conditions were stagnant. They pursued autarky, but didn't produce any consumables. It was all heavy industry and armaments.
>and did actually tried too stop the war.
By backstabbing Chamberlain when he, Hitler, promised not to invade non-Germanic Czechoslovakia?

>anyway, I havent read about world war 2 because i care so little about it.
>But I'm going to claim that Hitler tried to stop the war as though I have any knowledge or authority on the subject
If Hitler wanted to avert WW2 all he had to do was not invade Poland.

I at least know it worked for better then socialism in russia, they were in place at the same time and Germany had far less starvation and death. so fuck off darkey

He met with england and america before the war started trying to prevent it. it was more self defense then anything.

The Poles deserved what they got.

>Going on a rampage through Europe, annexing territories that are not even ethnically German, going back on all of your promises, ignoring British and French guarantees on Poland while simultaneously threatening them, and concealing rearmament is "Self Defense"

Pretty good point. Hey.. hows that communism working out? -oh wait.

hahahaha, proud nigger btfo.

Communism is objectively more successful than Nazism ever was.

By doing what?

Communism outlasted fascism, that's for sure.
>Be communism
>Actually win wars
>Expand your national borders via conquest
>Eventually collapse due to economic instability and ethnic tensions

>Be fascist
>Never win a war
>Lose huge chunks of your country in wars that you start
>Never get the chance to collapse due to economic instability because your regime barely lasted a decade

the germs should have targeted only eastern europe and the assorted wasteland in the region. Clearly nobody cares what happens there.

the reasons it failed was because nazi Germany went down as an evil nation, which i wouldn't really disagree with btw,so of course no one really wanted too do it after while communism became more friendly with the west directly after world war 2. also it took an entire union too expand across eastern Europe and still barely matched the usa.

Ever hear of the Bromberg massacre?

>Because the power of kabbalistic Saturn magick is very real,

please tell me more.

next time enjoy not being white.

One day we're all going to have to band together to try to educate you burgers on history

Britain and France still would have eventually attacked Germany in order to prevent them from gaining hegemony over Europe. Even then it is doubtful that Germany could have defeated the USSR alone. The USSR outnumbered Germany massively especially in terms of tanks and aircraft and could (and did) trade land for time.

Looking out the outset of Operation Barbarossa the German led coalition outnumbered the Soviets by about 35% in terms of personnel but the Soviets had well over 3 times as many tanks and aircraft as the German led coalition, and many of these tanks were far superior to their German counterpart due to either extreme mobility, superior firepower, or being nearly impossible for German tanks or anti-tank guns to kill.

Here is a clip of Hitler talking about the Soviets when he mentions that the Soviets can't be beaten even after destroying 35,000 tanks that they are still so far from history.
youtube.com/watch?v=ClR9tcpKZec
Intro ends at about 0:25

In 1941 the Soviet army was the best equipped military on earth in terms of sheer number of tanks and aircraft by a massive margin. Without the safety of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, combined with no invasion of Finland it is likely that the Soviet army would be even more militarized by the time the Germans invaded.

He's a nig-nog. What do you expect?

nice pasta

we would need too teach them how too read first.

If you was kangs why aren't you anymore?

>Germany invades
>Kill Germans in your country
>Germany invaded you because you would kill Germans after Germany invaded you
What?

good analysis familia

well with that in mind I can see why it went down the way it did

they never even were. dna evidence shows that the "kangz" were euros. oh how the gods fall.