ITT: describe your political beliefs with one image

I'll start

I like guns, nature, technology, and egalitarianism.

I dislike organized religion, oppression, and racial supremacy (any race).

...

...

...

...

...

>likes technology
>doesnt think that anarchy would make the society back to it's primitive state as technology would be useless when everything is burning and destroyed

...

...

...

...

...

Minarchist.

Not a Minecraft Anarchist. I’ve genuinely have had people think thats what a fucking Minarchist is.

Nasjonal Samling.

...

...

Free Market White Nationalist Minarchist.

Literally the best political ideology.

there is no cute image to illustrate how sad i am for this country

Gay.

...

"Anarcho"-capitalism. Never has there been a more blatant oxymoron. Call yourself what you are. Unregulated, raw capitalist.

...

Nat cap just added hat cuz tis the season.

Damn straight

>I wish my parent would just let me play angry birds on my iPhone X all day, fucking fascists

She won, get over it.

...

flag checks out

...

Earl Grey tea and post-scarcity

...

>capitalism requires a state
>what is Somalia
>what was Kowloon Walled City

...

>DUDE I WANT TO BE A SLAVE
>DUDE MUH WERKERZ COMMUNES

Enjoy being poor lmao

...

...

...

...

...

I will take you seriously and assume you are an anarchist, but I want you to consider some of the flaws.

Anarchism will never be true because leaders always emerge whether formally or informally. Leaders will be decided by:
>Physical strength or intimidation
>Manipulation
>success/mimicry

Additionally, anarchy by definition would last a structure and therefore does not have a way to deal with every day problems.
>How would anarchy deal with the criminal justice system
How would the community deal with an unpopular verdict? What laws would be in place to prevent mob justice and necklacing like in rural africa?
>Tragedy of the commons
What if farmers refuse to rotate crops? What if a statue or park is damaged someone.
>Military
This is the main reason why anarchy has not lasted. Any Anarchist society has not lasted more than about 50 years, either the land they occupy is devoid of any natural resources or the land is sought after by a more powerful nation. With no army they are easily taken over.

My political ideology in a nutshell.

...

...

...

...

Self defense doesn't violate the NAP.
Communists want to take your property, which does violate the NAP
> Killing communists preemptively is self defense, hence not against the NAP

You're right that they don't tend to last long. Typically they're ironically highly militarised since they arise in the gaps during a conflict (e.g. Revolutionary Catalonia, Makhnovian Ukraine, Rojava, Zapatistas etc.).

The former two situations they were basically slaughtered by authoritarian communists. The latter two are still around because they're too well-armed for a nearby government to have the wherewithal/ be bothered enough to annex them

...

I honestly like that there are multiple threads with the same pattern:

>1 post by this ID
>294 replies

and everyone is arguing about basically nothing.

Most anons on Sup Forums are proverbally Ricks thinking they're immune to stupidity etc. - but throw them a thread like

>"how can/do we fix xy?"
>"xy hate thread"
>"what did he/she mean by this?"
>"dare I say he/she is /our xy/ ?"
>"what's his/her problem?"
>"why do you hate xy?”
>”is xy finished?”
>”really makes you think”
>”he/she is right you know"

(bonus points for “Lauren Southern / Jordan Peterson / random ‘e-celeb’ defamation threads)

and you'll get even worse than Jerry. You don't even realize that those threads are posted EVERY DAY almost EVERY HOUR and you still reply like the goldfish brains that you honestly are.

Most of you are just arrogant idiots that only like to put other people down solely for their flag. You just want to derail threads of anons only because some shill posted one of those threads listed above before, ripping on your flag, so you feel obligated to vindicate yourself or give back to a flag that ripped on (you), and of course because you don't have anything substantial to say.

Burgers are the worst: they dish out at anyone, but since shills made the "56% face" meme they get something of their own medicine and every other asshole is quick to jump on the bandwagon, to “show them burgers”...

all the while the shariablue and university of southern california shills are rubbing their hands laughing at you, because they got what they wanted -> a distraught/distracted userbase

>inb4 Sup Forums was always shit

...

...

...

...

kekkered

hello newfriend. its called slide threads.

Post your guns, fellow gun enthusiast.

...

What's with all the fucking anarchist here? Cheesus Cucking Christ, I need to stop going on this site.

>Against All Authority

>thinks 100,000 years of lobster dominance hierarchies are a joke

>unsorted, dirty room soyboy

TrippleTripsSaysSo

They are very well armed but that is only a deterrent for so long, wait 50 years and those old military boys are too weak to fight. Having guns doesn't matter if you are unorganized.
>No leader means no military structure
>No way to secure ammo or supplies
The fact is that they could be taken over, not unlike Sealand or micronations like it, they are tolerated by larger nations if they so choose.
Again, this is why they never last.

...

That image combined with that flag is perfect.

My theory on that is that there's a shit ton of new members who fail to see that these threads are bait threads and they just fall into the trap. They haven't built up the filter to sift through all of the bullshit on this forum. Most of them think that almost every post is genuine.

...

Tell me about Bane, why does he wear the mask?

*bait/slide threads*

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

>pizza delivery guy some kind of hero for doing a regular delivery when everyone else is busy saving lives

...

...

>I don't know how your elections work.
Retard.

...

...

...

White Nationalism is for faggots. Why not be a National Socialist?

...

Kek

...

...

>thinks that anarchy is everything burning and in chaos

...

>thinks that anarchy isn't everything burning and in chaos

...

>"Anarchism will never be true because leaders always emerge whether formally or informally."
not all hierarchy is bad. it's the structurally and violently enforces hierarchy that's bad because it stifles the meritocracy that should be inherent to human interaction.Justice would be done in a way that satisfies the needs of the particular community. Direct democracy would likely be involved to the greatest extent feasible so an unpopular verdict would be an oxy-moron. Most anarchists reject a rigid adherence to "rule of law" anyways so a problematic verdict would likely be revoked somehow. There will always be retards and antisocial fucks in any given population or society. The idea that the state serves as an effective deterrent to this shit is probably false, and certainly doesn't make up for all of the bullshit the state does.
>not the original anarchist poster btw

...

...

>Gott erhalte!

...

>thinks that antifa/"""an"""comm faggots are anarchists

That's awesome!

...

...