Best US anti-missile system misses 5 times out of 5

Explain this, burgers:
nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/04/world/middleeast/saudi-missile-defense.html

How do you plan to fight against superior NORK missiles if you can't even intercept some 50 year old shit launched by clueless sandniggers?

Other urls found in this thread:

unvis.it/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/04/world/middleeast/saudi-missile-defense.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Archived unvis.it/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/04/world/middleeast/saudi-missile-defense.html

Thanks for prompt service, norway-bot.

American miltary tech has always sub par. Most their defence budget goes directly in the pockets of defence contractors. China is already surpassing them.l

>saudis fail to use our technology as well as we do so that means our tech must suck

Lol I'm glad the Cheeto cuck is being exposed for the true conman he is, the Israelis are also running the same anti missile shield scam

It's an automated system which failed to do its job, how did the Saudis fuck up, meriturd shill?

Skill and training doesn't matter after the missile is launched mutt, 100% automated as long as the radar keeps it illuminated (or maybe they even have their own semi-active radars dunno)

How don't the Saudis fuck up any and all military technology, operations and organization?
>Why Arabs Lose Wars

How did they fail to employ the technology correctly in this case?

It's worked in the past before, and it's being refined every single day. Yes, there will still be failures until we can work out all of the kinks. For now, our best defense against the North Koreans lies in the fact that their missiles can't quite reach us yet, and in the fact that if they attack us, we will literally kill every single North Korean.

>Laura Grego, a missile expert at the Union of Concerned Scientists, expressed alarm that Saudi defense batteries had fired five times at the incoming missile.
>"You shoot five times at this missile and they all miss? That's shocking,” she said. “That's shocking because this system is supposed to work.”
This was advertisement of S-300 and S-400. Buy our AA defence systems.

>It's worked in the past before

Scripted to succeed, there's no guarantees whatsoever since the systems are completely untested in a real scenario.

Tho a nuke hitting a major US city would only be a good thing.

>their missiles can't quite reach us yet
Actually, they can. Their last launch demonstrated missile which can easily each any large city of USA.

>best
We don't give the best to foreign governments.

Old 1990s hardware, sure.

Doesn't mean they have the miniaturization tech necessary to equip the missiles with warheads, however.

You don't have anything better anyway.

O yeah good point. I don't think they showed proof the have nukes for a rocket

Granted, it's only a matter of time; anyone's guess when they'll be ready with a proper functioning ICBM.

There is enough proof for the moment

stop underestimating them, that's what the US have done for decades

north america deserves to be nuked

>implying they didn't WANT them to miss

What proof is that? Sure they've done those underground tests (and not even those without fucking up), but it's a whole different thing to actually make a nuclear warhead that can be carried by a missile.

I fully agree btw., the can's been kicked down the road for far too long, already.

>Patriot operated by Ar*bs
kek, literally monkeys with wrenches

the soviets in Egypt in the 70s lent them human operators for all air defenses and even most aircraft

I don't really think it's Americans fault
Saudis are insanely fucking retarded and if you follow the war in Yemen you know Houthis exploit this as much as they can
SAUDI PILOTS DON'T SEE KHAT CHEWERS IN PLAIN SIGHT AND THEY HAVE LAST GENERATION APACHES FFS
You have to realize that any weapon is only as good as the person wielding it

The system is 100% automated you dumb fuck. How the hell it can be Saudi fault?