/LRG/ - Pangolin Edition

This thread is for discussion of property rights, self-determination, natural order, right-libertarianism and the PHYSICAL REMOVAL of COMMUNIST FAGS from our board of peace. Reminder that this is the Libertarian RIGHT General. Left-Libertarians, Cosmopolitan freaks, Open borders cucks and other assorted libertine degenerates need to fuck off.

>LIBERTARIANISM DOES NOT MEAN OPEN BORDERS, MORAL DEGRADATION, HYPER-INDIVIDUALISM OR LAWLESS CHAOS. /lrg/ IS THE A STAND AGAINST THE LEFT-LIBERTARIAN AND ANTI-MORAL LIBERTARIAN MENACE, DON'T COME HERE PREACHING THAT GARBAGE AND DONT ASSUME WE SUPPORT THOSE LOSERS.

Questions are welcome, however many are repeated often. We advise you research the basics before asking.

THREAD RESOURCES:
>Pastebin: pastebin.com/7K1EJYb8
>Discord & Book Club: sXwfD5K

RECOMMENDED MATERIAL:
>Anatomy of the State (Murray Rothbard)
mises.org/library/anatomy-state
>For a New Liberty (Murray Rothbard)
mises.org/library/new-liberty-libertarian-manifesto
>Democracy: The God that Failed (Hans Hermann-Hoppe) - riosmauricio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Hoppe_Democracy_The_God_That_Failed.pdf

>Bump for Life, Liberty, and Private Death Squads

Other urls found in this thread:

wariscrime.com/new/the-state-is-a-gang-of-protection-racketeers/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

...

...

...

No, the state is anything but the result of a contract! No one with even just an ounce of common sense would agree to such a contract. I have a lot of contracts in my files, but nowhere is there one like this. The state is the result of aggressive force and subjugation. It has evolved without contractual foundation, just like a gang of protection racketeers. And concerning the struggle of all against all: that is a myth.

...

Bump

How will libertarians solve this

...

Bumping.

>No

Whatchu sayin no to, buddy? We agree with you

This is Destroy Dick December material for me right here. Thanks, senpai.

>people shouldn't be allowed to marry those of a different religion or ethnicity because of 'muh white genocide'

NeetSocs get the helicopter too

I quotepost every thread, in case you haven't noticed. Unless I get the chance to put one in the OP.

Daily reminder: Killing Commies isn't a violation of the NAP

...

Where is this quote from? Democrussy?
In any case, daily reminder to read Hoppe, faggots.

...

Free association and private property

>live with white people who agree with you that niggers suck
>everyone rejects niggers from their society and rejects nigger lovers
>society promotes large (white) families

Who gives a shit about the degenerate race-mixers? We don't want them anyway.

How would you guys plan to fix the social security bubble?

...

...

...

...

wariscrime.com/new/the-state-is-a-gang-of-protection-racketeers/
Some interview I guess

...

our numbers are getting lower and lower each year, the fact that you wouldn't want to save your own people disgusts me, and don't assume I require the violation of property rights to do that

never forgetti, hoppe's spagetti

What do you guys think about ethical ethnic cleansing? Pay undesirables a lump sum to become sterilized. If we price it right, then we can get enough of the undesirable population to sterilize itself that they can't manage replacement rates. Because it's a voluntary thing, it would fall well within our ethical system. I would imagine it would operate something like a mutual aid society, where interested parties would pay in a subscription for the 'service' of sterilizing undesirable populations. Could this be profitable?

Racemixing used to be very rare even in cosmopolitan areas such as Vienna or Paris, in times of lesser gov't interference. It's a relatively recent phenomenon, easily explained by the deteriorating quality of the White population due to its overly present-oriented policy and subsequent mindset.
Don't use our platform to push the Kalergi plan, /lrg/ is a white nationalist group.

And you'll have your eyes scratched out and your limbs cut off.

You think that libertarians and anarchists are interested in saving the white race? HA! Think again.
They are degenerate materialists who care only about money, and nothing else.

Fuck that guy, churches have the right to discriminate against interracial marriages, the state shouldn't exist so fuck state-marriages.

You can definitely promote your own people without violating property ethics.

>voluntary transactions
>voluntary transactions that result in less undesirables
Please stop, Im already so turned on

>The Cuckolds general.

>our numbers are getting lower and lower each year

>social security
By not taxing the skin off the citizenry, leaving them enough money to pay for their own retirement, tended to by their family.
There's a reason we're solving very recent problems here - they had usually arised around 40 to 60 years ago, during the communist infiltration era.
Tear it down, and in time the natural order will restore itself, and we can go on living in a healthy society.

Not an argument NeetSoc

>They are degenerate materialists who care only about money
and it just so happens to be a coincidence that white people can generate money better than all thee other races?

exactly what I was thinking of, private property includes self ownership from what I know, so I'm wondering how would libertarians solve the racial problems of Europe

Modern 'capitalism' isn't capitalism. Remember that our "(((capitalism)))" is the kind where discrimination is illegal, minorities can steal from whites, whites are forced to hire more minorities, etc.

We live in an authoritarian socialist world, just because the USA is more capitalist doesn't mean it is capitalist.

Most of us here care deeply about the future of European people. The state will only ever be a poison to us, and support of it is against your own.

I'm not interested in discussion with a sub-50 IQ favela monkey. You can't have an immigration policy without a state - indeed, one might prefer to shoot the wetbacks (like yourself) as soon as they lay their dirty feet on his lawn.
The state imports the spics because it doesn't pay the real cost of the bargain.

My country is still majority white and birth rates are decent enough to keep up with immigrant birth rates

why do you think I linked a map of Europe and not the United States?

>lolbertarian
>has the gall to talk about NEETs

>implying Im civic nationalist
>implying I would ever accept or associate with negros

Do you even fucking read the threads you post in or do you just shit up everything?

>I'm wondering how would libertarians solve the racial problems of Europe
make it legal to discriminate and stop taxing whites

56% and dropping

What do you tell all the people that have been paying in for 40 years? Sorry, but fuck you? I'm being 100% serious here. I mean we all know the government run ponzi scheme is fucked as people live longer, and have less kids. What do you tell the people that have been paying in for so long?

Funny how a communist kike was the one to pass the Hart-(((Celler))) Act and the (((Civil Rights Act))), some of the least libertarian bills in the history of the United States.
But don't let the truth sway you, go on living your pipe dream until you're 90 and being laughed at by niggers on your deathbed, with nobody to mourn you.

because you dont know the definition of numbers and think percents is just as good

>everyone rejects niggers from their society

Everyone does not. Even in highly conservative societes there are several % of people who are either nigger lovers and/or want to profit from human trafficking business. Also, since when has everyone rejecting niggers stopped them? Being a reject in a wealthy country is better than being accepted in a nigger shithole. They will come uninvited and when they create a diaspora inside your ancapistan it will quickly go downhill.

You need organized state power to supress such undesirable elements, and you will likely have to violate some property/association rights in the process.

I sympathise a lot with many libertarian views but ultimately, they are suspectible to be a victim of paradox of tolerance, and it is an utopian system that would sooner or later fail in practice.

>impying I'm from the US

>lolbertarian

No Jeffery Tucker and Gary Johnson are lolbertarians. I am not. Get your terms right

>lp
>libertarian
thats a funny way to spell libertine

talk shit when European birthrate goes back up, not the Amerimutt birthrate

>Libertarian
>Party
that's the second biggest contradiction in terms I've seen, right after "an expropriating property protector".

People like you and me would choose to not associate with niggers, how hard is this to comprehend?

This extends to race mixers.

Why do you care about or assign any value to the blue haired degenerates (the race mixers)? I don't even consider them fucking white anymore. Reject them, associate with people like yourself, have ten white kids. I plan to.

Do you know how to read?

Attempt to give everyone their money back, and tell them to NEVER trust ANY government again, once we've shot the (((people in charge))) of these swindlings.
>but inflation, you're giving them less than they had paid in!
Yes, I know. One more reason to hate the state to the core of your bones.
Daily reminder to not only end the FED, but to end the feds, too.

May liberty come in our or our children's lifetime!
Hail Cantwell, Hail Hoppe, Hail Korwin!

Private society.

Hard to create a diaspora on another's private property, especially if the nigs lack weapons.
Squatters get the bullet, too.

>he saved my meme
Good taste, sir.

*everyone within the nigger hating societies that would inevitably form without a state jailing people for hate speech/discrimination

You do not need organized state power to save the white race, dumbfuck. Why would you value attacking degenerates over the necessary upholding of individual rights for your own people? Why do you feel a need to put so much effort and energy into dealing with cucks and tumblrites, rather than ignoring them and letting them fail in a socially darwinist society.

Remove welfare, bring back discrimination. Don't give power to an entity that will always be necessarily against your people and is incentivized to grow through their harm.

That sure is a long paragraph friend!
you coulda just said democracy

Ethical ethnic genocide
mixed with the right to not associate with undesirables. I'd only live in a community that excluded undesirable populations, like I assume most others would. Also, with no welfare system, there wouldn't be much of an impetus for those populations to remain here when they'd have to work just as hard here as they would elsewhere to survive. I'd like to see them turn to crime, where it would then be justified to plant the seed of a lead tree in their skulls

...

Daily reminder that Libertarianism is a short-sighted fantasy adhered to by man-children.

Great opinion Timmy, now go back and play with the others.

>he doesn't know the prinicbles of the founding fathers

could you possible suck the states fat cock more

>short-sighted
Someone hasn't read Democracy - The God that Failed, it seems.
Until you do, you're literally a farm animal - or worse.

Calling me a cocksucker while you fail over yourself to abolish all protections afforded to the proletariat - aka, begging the bourgeoisie to please let you suck their cocks.

The great irony of Libertarianism is, of course, that all of its adherents are such incompetent ubermensch that they would all either starve or become slaves in the society they so ardently demand.

>using marxist terminology
someone post the helicopter basketball meme please

Quick question for stormcucks.

Do you guys have any plans whatsoever for allocating scarce resources and any economic theories, or do you just rant about 'muh Joos' and 'muh heritage' to distract from the fact that you guys want white exclusive socialism?

>Hard to create a diaspora on another's private property,

Then it wont be on private property. It will begin in largely unoccupied territory. Think gypsy settlements which used to be located next to white cities, Calais migrant camp etc.

Again, you can remove all welfare, have conservative people that largely refuse to associate with niggers, and it is STILL preferable for niggers to live in this society than to live in war torn famine ravaged shitholes that they themselves create.

To safeguard white peoples you need to enforce white sovereignty over whole countries, thousands of kilometers of land, most of which is not really a property of anyone in particular, and some of which is owned by people apathetic or openly hostile to a white ethnostate. You basically need a state at least in some limited form. Cant do that under strictly propertarian principles.

I'd be scared if there was any chance one of you faggots would ever be successful enough to afford a helicopter.

Needless to say, I'm not discomforted in the slightest.

>cigáni
>ľudia
*confused_Kotleba_face.png*
In all seriousness, AnCapistan prioritises tribal-like communities, with a high degree of autonomy. If a community has fallen to the darkies, it's the responsibility of everybody else to learn from their example - whether that means isolation, shunning, or other market action against them - and if they fail to do so, they deserve what happens next.

Kowin Mikke is my hero

*says the socialist, wiping his sweaty fingers against a napkin to stop them from slipping on his keyboard*
It's okay, the impact is painless and the fall is the most scenic 20 seconds of your life, or so I'm told.
Remember - Pinochet is much like Hitler. We might not like some of his policies, but he did away with folks with style and the main issue is that he didn't finish the job.

Nomad testing phoneposting, please ignore

>b-b-but I thought lolbergtardians were supposed to be degenerate???

>Namefagging
dumb nigger

y'all niggas better boost this feggit's message
WE
WUZ
PHONEPOSTANGZ
AN
SHIEEEET

How will ancaps defend a land from foreign invasion?

Everyone ignore him

>Britbong doesn't know what a gun is.

PSA IGNORE THIS POST

I'd imagine with weapons and professional armies made up of trained locals, duh.

How does anything defend itself from foreign invasion?

You are asking a question which all societies must ask themselves. The answer is, by defending ourselves through whatever arms necessary and through organization.

There is much less opportunity for a foreign state to desire invading us if we are not ourselves a state anyway, and we sure as hell wouldn't make it a very profitable or easy invasion.

>libertarian
>right

I specifically requested the opposite of this!

Let me rephrase: how will you get many people with wildly differing views to organise and fend off a well trained army of invaders? Continuing on this: what stops millitias taking over and forming small governing bodies ruling by force?
There is plenty of opportunity for a foreign government to take over a wildly prospering land without cohesion other than the free market.

>without cohesion other than the free market

Lolwut, do you think all cohesion between people ceases to exist without a state?
Do you think that there wouldn't be an incredibly high demand for there to exist defense against invasion?

can you define left and right?

>militias taking over and forming small governing bodies ruling by force
Preferable to centralised states, but hard to achieve in a highly armed society.
>no cohesion
Seeing as people who don't see eye to eye would prefer to disassociate, the cohesion in an AnCap society would easily surpass that of any democracy and most ethnocentric states.
Other than that, warfare against people who refuse reason is just pest control, and fuck anyone who thinks otherwise.

libertarian is the antithesis of totalitarianism aka right-wing

Right wing Blork squads

revolutionary vs reactionary

Totalitarianism is a Jewish, communist system of population control. To fight it is the duty of humanity.

We're solving recent problems by reverting to the past, while you are a proud futurist and fascism is a recent phenomenon. What's going on, big guy?