Your realty is constructed by your unique experience, and thus unique to you

Thus perhaps it's not the world that is
wrong, but your view of it, such as your expectations.

no one is unique, everybody is the same and expendable
2 hands 2 legs 1 head taxpayer
watch tv, attend to latest trends
you think you are better? go to opera or museum, show people how culture you are

>St. Andre Bessette chooses to become a priest and spend his time administering to the sick
>according to the categorical imperative, this is morally wrong since if everyone did it, society would collapse

Ebin "philosophy" there my friend

>when your English is good, but your words mean nothing

>understanding kant through Jewish scholarship
Remember how your professor's teachings of Hitler did not make sense. Now, apply that to Kant.
Take a month to read his works.

But is what I said incorrect?

>But is what I said incorrect?
Yes. You need to read Kant, in the original language.
Or, if you're short of time, read Mises.

Perspective, my dude.

I recognize my unique definition of right and wrong is not objective but I uphold it regardless.

you really don't know much about Kant do you?
He proved just the opposite: that something can be BOTH real and true.
In other words there is an objective reality outside us.

Jews have been twisting his basic insights for more than 100 years.

Do you have any actual good authors to recommend?

Because unless you can tell me how my first post is wrong, I will continue to consider Kant and Mises as being bad philosophers (not to mention terrible writers, at least in the case of Kant)

Are you perchance a solipsist?

just because you do not understand the beatiful, cold and sharp slavic thought process, it does not mean it means nothing, maple syrup man

>I recognize my unique definition of right and wrong is not objective but I uphold it regardless.

As do I.

only if you believe there is an objective reality.

>Mises
My
fuckin
nigga

Everyone has a unique consciousness
No matter how "similar" you are you're still only you and that, at the very least, makes you a unique individual

>Do you have any actual good authors to recommend?
Economic Science, by Hoppe...yes, the same one who write Democracy, the God that Failed. It's a2 hour read. He explains away Kant idealism...explaining that Kant did not say that the mind creates reality...which is a strawman. But rather, that reality is understood in categories of Action.
>Because unless you can tell me how my first post is wrong, I will continue to consider Kant and Mises as being bad philosophers (not to mention terrible writers, at least in the case of Kant)
I suppose you keep licking her Jewish cunt

>Mises shows us what Jewish scholarship tried to hide through ridiculous straw men
Exactly.

education and culture helps unify unique minds into one mishmash of nu-thinking

Or maybe I should tell others to fuck off and make my own

We're talking about different things
People can be influenced by other people, that much is true, but all thought takes place at an individual level.

Being a priest who administers to the sick is not a general maxim; it is a particular instance of the maxim "be charitable." Are you going to tell me that if every single person was charitable society would fall apart?

>all thought takes place at an individual level.
I disagree
think about McDonalds logo
even if it was your thought, it is not unique to you in any way, it was implanted
this is how memes work
I say
>comfy pepe
or
>happy merchant
and you see the images even when I do not post them

But again that's just influencing. Many people have similar thoughts, and psychology helps us know what's behind certain thought patterns and how to induce them.
BUT that isn't to say there's a collective consciousness. The fact still remains that no one can literally see through your eyes, directly control your limbs as you can; nor can anyone definitely know what you're thinking at any moment, and you can never convey your thoughts as vividly as you feel them yourself.
You are, at the most basic level, only you. Individualistic philosophy is a simple fact when you take that into consideration.

that is true, yet everything said stands true
/r9k/ have collective conciousness, so does Sup Forums
Sup Forums and Sup Forums are too chaotic
EVA fans have collective bipolar disorder

It's not collective in origin, only in destination.

I agree but I don't really see your point in saying so
That fact is nonetheless subordinate to individualism

>only if you believe there is an objective reality.

Objective reality = the information contained in the universe

Subjective cognition = our feeble attempts to process this information

Is there a flaw in my reasoning?

>I think, therefore I am.
Get lost, faggot.

and therefore more important than origin because it directly influences future actions

You've been retarded this whole thread.

this thread is retarded, see? collective retardedness

>Is there a flaw in my reasoning?

Dreams, hallucinations. Not all experiences are the result of sensory input.

Wtf i love hillary now how do i change my vote also death to palestine

Sorry slippery hands from masturbating accidentally clicked you too

>Dreams, hallucinations. Not all experiences are the result of sensory input.

Your brain, and therefore its cognitive processes, are part of the universe

That assumes materialism.

You would need a cast iron refutation of dualism to jump to such a conclusion.

What's wrong with that?
Isn't it fairly evident that we can never grasp the object-in-itself?

>That assumes materialism

Does it? How so? It's a serious question... I haven't studied philosophy in depth so I'm not being facetious here.

I defined objective reality as just the information contained in the universe.This is actually pretty consistent with modern physics.