Has anyone else noticed the recent surgence of so-called "radical centrists"...

Has anyone else noticed the recent surgence of so-called "radical centrists"? How do we deal with these kind of people in the political spectrum?

Other urls found in this thread:

lowes.com/pl/Gas-wall-ovens-Wall-ovens-Appliances/2967758990
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Radical centerist is a derogatory term. We are trying to get a third position party here.

you mean reasonable people?

>recent "surgence" (not a word)
I've noticed the opposite, actually. The skepticTM community is currently in self-destruct mode while the civic nationalists are, one by one, giving up and embracing ethno-nationalism.

Make them look stupid

>lets kill half the jews

what do you call yourselves, then? Hypocritical cucks?

You deal with them by holding conversation with them.

I think they are the latest incarnation of the "rationalist" fedoras, and we should deal with them like last time: ruthless mockery and belittling.

Centrist go out and make order from chaos. Lefty and righty circle jerk each other.

they're not centrists, they're 90's liberals who want all the same poz and diversity but within the context of Windows 95 and Nintendo 64 escapism

You have that backwards though. The "skeptic(TM)" community has been imploding because all its members are either
1) shifting to/toward white nationalism (or "alt right", whatever)
2) shitting the bed by going after white nationalists and completely failing at every turn

The skeptic(TM) community reached their peak in the wake of gamergate, when "fighting le SJWs" was still seen as bleeding-edge. They're on the decline now.

>Brings up radical centrism as if that’s a thing.
>posts a picture of a self described liberal

You are so enlightened.

It's the exact opposite my guy. Centrists are following the center, set by others. They are obsessed with seeming neutral and understanding in a social sense, and are confused about their principles.

Wrong fag we walk the strait line, we don't lean either way because muh Jews or niggers.

That doesn't even make any sense. I sometimes see centrists make statements like this and it's always utterly baffling. Like that pic of 2 people saying completely different things the centrist popping in with "can't you see you two are exactly the same!?".

O shit the larp is back guys give him you's so he feels better.

these fags preach the horseshoe theory as if it was their religion

This. What counts as "center" is complete based on the context of the setting. All it really means is upholding the status quo, with the heavy assertion that because THIS is the current acceptable position in the current zeitgeist, that it must be inherently be a superior position to take.

Go back to 1860 America, and the centrist position is that niggers are inferior subhumans, but that we shouldn't own them as slaves, and that they should be shipped back to Africa.

In Sargon's case, you cut him off from the gibs flow

Other than that, you debate 'em like civilized Westerners

you're mentally retarded

But they do that on there own

>Other than that, you debate 'em like civilized Westerners

Which has been the strategy so far, and It's worked very well, because they have no real arguments. When trying to argue against ethno-nationalism, all they can do is employ tactical nihilism and go with a "I don't care whatever about any groups at all and I don't care what happens to the country in 50 years because I'll be dead by then anyway!"

Set the fence they love to sit on so much on fire, there is no reason debating with someone who wants to be on the winning side rather than be correct.

This. The skepticsTM could only be an attractive movement back when most Western world leaders were spouting SJW nonsense. Now that right-wing populism is on the rise, the skepticsTM are divided on what to do about it, with Thunderf00t dragging out the "just as bad" meme while Sargon is so positive about Orban that his Hungarian fans demand a retraction.

A centrist position makes no sense. For example we have abortion. How the fuck are you supposed to be centrist on that? It's pretty much a yes or no question. It's pretty much just moving goalposts when you try to be a centrist.

Do they even debate ethno-nationalists? I only ever see them debating brazen SJWs. They avoid intelligent right-wingers like the plague.

AKA everyone jumping on SJW obvious wagon, only to say "but hey, hey, let's not be snowflakes, but let's also open up our borders"
FUCKING COMMIES

...

Libertarians and Ancaps ARE centrists, just an uncommon type.

Sargon interviewed Jared Taylor and got wrecked.

Yeah, Sargon debated Jared Taylor recently

Let's start with a more fundamental question:
What do "radical centrists" believe?

ignore them and let them complain

Ignore them.

And Kraut and Tea debated Naked Ape about race realism recently and Ape argued circles around him to the point where Kraut just left the stream without saying anything. It was pretty sad

Most people anti abortion are so because of religion, centrists are generally non-religious so it's irrelevant

Does anyone know why Braving Ruin protected his tweets? He made a good video calling out Sargon and then locked his account down

>What do "radical centrists" believe?
That's easy: whatever is currently normal and acceptable to the general population. So civic nationalism, unlimited lawful immigration, and mild socialism.

...

I’d consider Sargon a leftist with a hard on for individual rights.

Most of America are sensible but apathetic moderates who just dont vote.

>Anyone who isn't a full blown collectivist or individualist is called a cuck by Sup Forums
>People don't actually want authoritarian governments or no government at all
color me surprised

lowes.com/pl/Gas-wall-ovens-Wall-ovens-Appliances/2967758990

moderatism = "let's kill half the jews"
radical centrism = "let's kill all the central bankers"

Who cares, they've been BTFO by reality over and over, all they have is arrogance and SJW stupidity videos

>bright green font on a blue background

Legal for the first trimester could be considered a "centrist" position in the US, taking into account the "extremes" of either permitting it the entire 9 months or banning it entirely.

Of course, "centrist" is a meaningless label from the outset unless your goal is to split the baby on all issues. Each position on abortion, wherever you think the legal cutoff should be, is to be undergirded by principles and reason which lead to those conclusions.

Think it had to do with the Sargon fanboy brigade going after his Twitter after he made that video

There are significant numbers of agnostics who oppose abortion entirely as murder and religious people who support legal abortion for the entire 9 months in the US. Perhaps your experience is different in the UK.

Perhaps the most powerful woman in our country, Nancy Pelosi, is rabidly pro-abortion and Catholic.

>What makes a man turn neutral?

So they're conservatives with respect to yesterday. "Yesterday seemed good. Let's do that again!"

'OLD ON THERE A SECOND
*leans into the mic*
YOU FUCKING IDEE-OT
*spends an hour and a half practicing a two minute skit with some random*
VE HAVE ZE GENES, KRAUT
*practices his recorder*
ZE MICE ARE RETARDED
*shills his book*
HWUT ARE YOU GOING TO DO NAU, KRAUT

Braving doesn’t seem like the kind of guy who would run away and hide like that

There are different stances on abortion than just yes/no depending on what viewpoint you're coming from. For instance, my response is "what race is the baby?"

But regardless, self-proclaimed "centrists" have their epistemology completely backwards. They don't actually come to any conclusions naturally on their own. They just look at what the left wing and right wing stances are, and then they choose to pick something in the middle, because their opinions are entirely dictated by the Golden Mean Fallacy.

Just watched it, and damn, it's basically an hour of Taylor lecturing a toddler. Sargon is completely out of his league there.

Didn't he run away back when he called himself Edgy Sphinx because Kraut "exposed" him as le ebil nazi racist?

Have any of you guys heard of Aerocratic Atheist?

I'll give you a quick run-down on him..
>He's a tripfag
>He posts on /lit/, Sup Forums and /sci/
>He absolutely destroys Muslims, Catholics and Jews in online debates
>He's absolutely rapes Feminists, Blacks, SJW's and Commies too
>He's a centrist
>He thinks that 9/11 and Sandy Hook were inside jobs
>He likes some aspects of Shari'ah law
>He supported Anjem Choudary in the 2005 general election, as well as supporting Islam4UK in 2003, in London
>He flocked to Ron Paul in 2012, and then Flocked to Farage and Trump in 2014
>He destroyed Dawkins and le black science man on a sub reddit
>He thinks London's current Muslim mayor is an idiot
>He collaborated on writing Primus's last album

He's also writing a book, apparently. Redpilled as fuck. And it's working.

I haven't seen that debate, but I've seen other ones where Sargon tried debating white nationalists, and it was always extremely cringey.

His only argument is "You can't judge people based on groups! You need to look at each and every instance as an isolated individual instance!" As if just because outliers exist, that means you can't make accurate predictions based on demographic shifts. I don't even know what to call this sort of fallacious leap of logic that he always use. It's like he'll acknowledge that differences between groups exist, but then act like you can't make any judgement calls based on them.

Historically, fascism was called the "third way". Centrism is in no way a distinct political ideology because it's backings are entirely arbitrary and decided upon what's popular at the time. There is no central idea that drives their policies, like the right or left.

user I dont wanna sound like the "I'm smarter or illuminated because I'm informed" person, but I really suggest for you to read at least the wikipedia page of political "third position" or even the "fourth position". Stop imagining the 4 coloured quadrant and some normie trapped in the middle, that is just a meme. Now, Sarggon is some cucked e-celeb in the end, you can find some other sources for centralized politics, which I repeat is a concept that has been sounding for about 20 years is fresh and still a new ground. Far leaned politics have proven to cause division and paranoia, best example the typical far wing leftie is literally hated by everyone, and the far right winger is feared. Liberal =/= Third position. The Third position is not a meme.

From your description he sounds nothing like a centrist.

Okay, that's great and all, but you haven't specified his stance on the most important issue, which is race.
Without addressing race, it doesn't mater how otherwise "woke" you are, because then you're just a civnat r/the_donald cuck.

Aren’t you ancap or are you just a larp

Remember it is centrism from the classical perspective, to imagine a modern fascist ideology some would suggest to have a 3-d quadrant. The urgency for a new position is to give people an answer based on their background, instead to adapt to the current, to defy the establishment and make the normie normie dare to visualize a new world, without globalist fuckery, false or failed democracies, no welfare leaching, no private grabbling. Its cool because there are literally not that many thinkers or promoters in this field, being part of it is becoming part of a movement in a calling.

>
holy crap....TOP KEK

Where does this idea that centralist are some kind of neutral party? All it means is you take each issue individually. We are t supposed to have a two party system in the first place. It’s ineffective because they can’t work together at all anymore. We need a third position that takes each issue individually.

>radical centrist

Aren’t*

MUH
HORSE
SHOE
THEORY

Yea I agree, we need a third-position party

He claimed there are superate races within humans, and they ar Mongollid, Negroid, Caucasioid, Capoid, and Australoid

No u. If you can’t see that both sides do fucked up shit but also have some good ideas then you are a moron.

Radical centrism would necessarily have to take the opposite of the long trend, not just the current movement. They'd be to the right now. Any that aren't are just full of shit.

I looked at everything on a case by case basis and determined that white nationalism is the only way forward. wtf I love radical centrism now.

Radical centralism is a derogatory term someone came up with to make fun of the idiots and to discredit the movement. Same exact thing as alt-right

Please explain who these "Radical centrists" are or whatever you prefer to be called, because if your talking about libertarians/liberals you can look to the west to see a society of these people who already exist.

He always rename the debate into an "interview" when he gets his ass handed to him.Which means nearly all the time.

There should be a new buzzword to refer to third positionism so even normies have to look it up and get into the trip pill. Trips, drittes, trip pos, dritters...I dunno

He'll just say centrism just means picking each idea on its own stance, as if to imply that everyone but them just decides to randomly defend their stances on issues without knowing anything about them or having any real reason to support their view.

It's akin to saying my political viewpoint is "smartism" because my ideas are smart and everyone else is a dumb-dumb

this.
also he a manlet barely taller than boogie land whale 2988 on a mobility scooter

Link?

sargon isn't a centrist retard

t. horseshoe theorist

radically reasonable. When both left and right goes bonkers, it is time for radical centrists!

That'll happen when you're both being retarded. Like daddy putting the foot down.

>The winning side
>correct
pick one