...
Argue against pot legalization
Other urls found in this thread:
sfn.org
en.wikipedia.org
telegraph.co.uk
netce.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
westernspring.co.uk
pnas.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
alcoholism.about.com
theroadout.org
huffingtonpost.com
archive.org
en.metapedia.org
uk.news.yahoo.com
news.harvard.edu
reuters.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
pnas.org
ajp.psychiatryonline.org
newswise.com
latimes.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
futurity.org
washingtonpost.com
dailymail.co.uk
archive.is
latimes.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
aturnbean.wordpress.com
twitter.com
protip:
>you literally can't
please dont des criminilize, it will take millions away from little cartel members hands and they will go hungry, please ameriburgers
Brain Changes Are Associated with Casual Marijuana Use in Young Adults
sfn.org
Cannabis Dependence
en.wikipedia.org
Cannabis Smoking 'Permanently Lowers IQ'
telegraph.co.uk
Cannabis Use, Abuse, and Dependence
netce.com
Cannabis Use and Risk of Lung Cancer
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Cannabis Use Steals 8 IQ Points from the Teenage Mind
westernspring.co.uk
Decreased dopamine brain reactivity in marijuana abusers is associated with negative emotionality and addiction severity
pnas.org
Effects of Marijuana Smoking on Pulmonary Function and Respiratory Complications
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The Health Effects of Marijuana
alcoholism.about.com
Long and Short Term Effects of Marijuana Use
theroadout.org
Longtime Marijuana Use Linked With Decreased Motivation, Study Finds
huffingtonpost.com
Marijuana
en.metapedia.org
Marijuana May Cause Heart Problems in Young Adults
uk.news.yahoo.com
Marijuana Said to Trigger Heart Attacks
news.harvard.edu
Marijuana Smoking Tied to Testicular Cancer
reuters.com
Marijuana Use and Risk of Lung Cancer
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Persistent Cannabis Users Show Neuropsychological Decline from Childhood to Midlife
pnas.org
Review of the Validity and Significance of Cannabis Withdrawal Syndrome
ajp.psychiatryonline.org
Regular Marijuana Use Bad for Teensf Brains
newswise.com
Regular Pot Smokers Have Shrunken Brains, Study Says
latimes.com
Respiratory Effects of Marijuana and Tobacco Use in a U.S. Sample
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Teen Marijuana Use Linked with Schizophrenia
futurity.org
Teens Who Smoke Weed Daily are 60% Less Likely to Complete High School Than Those Who Never Use
washingtonpost.com
The Terrible Truth About Cannabis
dailymail.co.uk
>Marijuana Use Linked with Schizophrenia
>inb4 it's just a plant
Peyote too and Cocaine
provide tips to help me stop this shit
DUDE SCROMITING
it impairs normal responses and leads to stupid lapses in conduct; it's also inhaling burning materials which isn't generally good for health
but don't tell stoner potheads that -- they gots to haves their smokes
If it's stacked weed, they usually add ammonia in order to hook you, do a cold turkey for 4 weeks and you're most likely free, same as cigs, still has chance of drawback.
>Kids shouldn't smoke pot
>People who abuse pot probably abuse food and video games too
>People who find themselves unmotivated due to pot should probably stop smoking it.
all comes down to self control, my man.
What if I also want to ban smoking?
>citing only propaganda sources
I quit months ago but lying about it doesn't help, just legalize/decriminalize and move on
vape or edibles
Both I guess. AFAIK safest way to get high is
through vape/edibles.
What if I want to ban addictive substances in general because I believe the goyim need to be saved from their own stupid whims?
Soros is for it so I'm against it
>I quit months ago
>just legalize it already
Sources look pretty varied to me. All over the place on the political spectrum too.
What is not a propaganda source for you, 420news.pot?
It's degenerate.
>wikipedia
references wikipedia as "proof".
Those are just reasons why you shouldn't smoke it, which is about as dangerous as water itself. A ton of more dangerous things in the world than "inhaling burning chemicals"
Oh really? Gee, thanks for telling me inhaling shit that's burning is bad for you.
Fpbp
I can't until you're not an indoctrinated idiot
Remider that kikes hate wikipedia for the redpills that can found there like the cultural marxism information on the original version of the page for the frankfurt school.
>these quints are going ignored
This thread is a honeypot for newfags isn't it?
Weed makes you a weak, goofy space cadet who focuses soley on sensual pleasure (degenerate music, food, vidya). I wasted my early 20s as a burned out stoner who thought weed made me more contemplative and spuritual. All it did was lock me inside my own mind as a slave to degenerate sensory experiences, rather than being someone who acts in the world. Society cannot function with any significant number of citizens in such a state of mind.
>Argue against pot legalization.
No.
That would imply there are valid arguments to be had against the right of free citizens to pursue happiness.
Which there are not.
nice
I can't. I dont really like pot but I think it should be legal.
Are any states legalizing still?
On one hand I am against pot legalization because Im against societal decline in general.
On the other I'm cool with it cause it will remove alot of competition for work and other economic opportunities.
Perhaps not smoke it? That's the only solution I see. One must remember that such an effect is only temporary. Also, shakespeare smoked. latimes.com
>Argue against pot legalization
Shill thread
Documentaries exposing zionism
CBS 60 Minutes Exposing Israeli Apartheid
youtube.com
Israeli settlements, explained
youtube.com
The Zionist Story. (Full Documentary)
youtube.com
Israel Lobby
youtube.com
The Israel Lobby's Impact on America
youtube.com
Documentary on Israel / Palestine - Occupation
youtube.com
The Pain Doesn't Go Away - Rachel Corrie's Parents on RAI (1/3)
youtube.com
JIDF
youtube.com
youtube.com
>Happiness
I think you meant debauched hedonism.
You're not wrong as to illegalization of pot and other things being an impediment of individual agency, but calling sensory pleasure happiness is retarded.
schizophrenia in all people is the same as pot smokers you fucking autist so there is litterally no correlation. faggot
moderation is key
Oh yeah and it makes males sterile, causes gynecomastia and many psychotic breaks resulting in multiple multiple homicides. Entire countries have been addicted to the marijuana resulting in years of war and bloodshed. Single handidly the most socially, medically and legally costly drug in the entire history of mankind, bar none. I'm willing to bet it would probably kill you with one use if you're not careful.
1 Peter 5:8
Be SOBER, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour.
It's the leading cause of homosexuality.
Its for complete fuckwitts who think they're clever. Smells like shit an makes people psycho. Other than that yeah, go for it. We don't like you. You are a nigger.
what a waste of a get. kys mutt
Downsides of legalisation
> worth mentioning that many people have never tried it because it is illegal, and might never try it after legalisation just because. But some who have never tried it might, which opens a whole new door
> might be available to kids
> people sensitive to its psychoactive effects might go psycho
> people might get high and drive
Weed doesn't make you do those things, it just makes it so you don't realize you are wasting your time. If you can train yourself to get high and still live your life, you'll be fine.
...
>I think you meant debauched hedonism.
No, I mean happiness.
Your moral view on the matter is as irrelevant as the argument you just put forth.
Happiness is a term used to describe an emotion that can be elicited by various stimuli.
As demonstrated that by you in fact, as for some reason you apparently draw entertainment from misrepresenting reality.
>Society cannot function with any significant number of citizens in such a state of mind.
The effects of a stoned population affect all of us. Society is coming apart at the seams, and weed is a major cause of the progressive moral degeneration we've seen since the 60s. The libertarian argument "I don't care what someone does in the privacy of their home if it doesn't affect me" makes the false assumption that individuals in aggregegate don't affect society as a whole profoundly.
Explain this further, you might be right
LiterallShakingspeare was also into cuckoldry and against race realism.
www.123helpme.com/preview.asp?id=14516
aturnbean.wordpress.com
AKA a huge faggot
>Kids are gonna get pot the same way they do liquor. The solution to that problem lies with the parents.
>Same thing happens with liquor
>People already do get high and drive same as they do drunk and drive. No matter how well you think you can drive when high, you shouldn't do it period.
Being high all day is the only way I can work for my criminal boss and not want to kill myself.
Sucks that the big ass paycheck controls me.
>The effects of a stoned population affect all of us.
Then buy stock in fucking Frito-Lay.
>Society is coming apart at the seams
So why are we still the richest nation on earth?
Why is our stock market at an all time high?
Why in the US at the forefront of almost every new tech being developed?
Face it, for all your fear mongering, your tired old argument that society is collapsing due to immorality is as evidenced as it ever has been. That is to say not at all.
>Why are we still the richest nation on earth?
Trump
>Why is our stock market at an all time high?
Trump
>Why is the US at the forefront of almost every new tech being developed?
Ehhhh, here's where it gets iffy. South Korea has the fastest internet, China makes all our shit and has the best vapes, England developed the Nuclear bomb etc.
you must be from winnipeg
It's self evident.
smoked pot for 20 years ended up with mental issues quit and eventually the anxiety dissipated. The shit fucks up your perception of the world around you. Basically you end up delusional so in the governments eyes its a win win for them. People are retarded and by no means will it free up pot smoking it will only impose new laws and rules on something you were already doing. Any asshole who claims to be put in prison for a couple joints always forgets the stolen car they were riding in or the break and enters or armed robberies they have also committed to get the cops to start watching their dumb asses. I don't have a hate for drugs or weed it just doesn't need to be legal. They should make spanking the shit outta your kids legal again and make it illegal for shit head kids to skip school. Or nation is completely fucked were going to be depending on a bunch of stoned outta their mind buttfucks to run and defend our country. I think the present day stock of fucktards wouldnt even join to fight if we had a wwiii.
Kids don't get liquier dumbass. They card you.
Manhatten invented the nuke
>le ebin alcohol comparison
Drinking can be done responsibly without getting drunk, weed will get you high in any meaningful amount.
Is that all you have?
KEK
Of course they don't fucking buy it, they get it from somebody who buys it for them. Same shit will happen with weed.
The more fun we have the weaker soldiers we'll make.
That's literally it.
>course with drones and nukes we don't need to scare anyone with barbarism anymore
A bunch of DEA agents would lose their jobs. Also in the longer term crime would go down so police funding might go down.
It seems to me that your implied entailments of the prototypical sense of happiness is to expansive to have any real semantic sense here.
>happiness is an emotion elicited by various stimuli
Pleasure is a better descriptor for what you were writing in your first post in regards to pot. I've never done this, but I feel that it would be plausible that asking many people on the street if pot causes "happiness" would result in a majority of 'no' answers.
You can definitely get more or less high. I know police officer who have has both potheads and alcoholics in jail for the night. The drunks are always loud, obnoxious, and looking for a fight. The stoners are always mellow, calm, and minding their own business.
No they don't dingus. They don't drink at all actually because then they'd get in shit.
I don't care either way desu, culture was better when most normies were scared to do it often though.
>might be available to kids
Its available to kids now. And has been for a long time, as have alcohol, cigarettes, and any other other drugs. In fact there is plenty of evidence that kids will do drugs more often if they are illegal due to it being a rebellious thing to do.
>people sensitive to its psychoactive effects might go psycho
Ok, so don't give mental patients pot. Got it.
>people might get high and drive
What like people might get drunk and drive?
THC causes sperm immobility, dramatically increasing risk of autism and down syndrome, and a number of birth defects.
Smoking pot can give you lung cancer, smoke never suddenly become healthy.
Causes problems for pregnant women's children.
It's addictive. No shit, but we finally have studies on it.
Pot also effects brain development, so using it as a teen could cause you to be an idiot or have poor attention, memory, and learning capabilities.
During highs short term memory is shit.
It causes high heart rate and blood pressure.
Listen buddy. I don’t like that weed crap. I’ll vote for anti weed politicians and not argue.
>Everything causes autism these days. My university instructor had a guest speaker that told us that gatorade causes autism. Really?
>Of course it does. It's burning shit being inhaled into your lungs. Do edibles.
>Again, this is a common sense thing. Do not smoke anything when you're pregnant.
>Addictive like really good food.
>Don't let teens use it.
>Water is wet
>I'll have to get back to you on that
citations needed kiddo
those studies are propaganda tier bullshit
until cannabis is decriminalized, you can't expect anyone to tell the truth about it
try harder redd*tor
The infamous "they" are doing a survey on poltards.. XD
It's not even propaganda, it's common sense. Weed can be 100% compared to alcohol any day of the week.
> uses the word kiddo
> writes 'back to plebbit'
Please be more aware of your own faggotry
>It seems to me that your implied entailments of the prototypical sense of happiness is to expansive to have any real semantic sense here.
And it seems to me you are phrasing things in the longest form you possibly can to sound like you have anything to say.
>Pleasure is a better descriptor for what you were writing in your first post in regards to pot.
No, it isn't.
The term happiness was chosen specifically because it is such an open ended descriptor of freedom.
So long as that pursuit does not infringe upon the rights fellow citizens, then it is permissible by default.
You are arguing against something you fundamentally misunderstand the intent of.
FFS five of the founding father grew Marijuana, albeit for a different purpose than to imbibe it, but I doubt they would have a problem with free citizens executing their god given right to do so.
Smells bad, stoners should be killed and the high isn't even that great
>Step 1
Stop buying weed
>Step 2
Don't visit people who offer you weed
>Step 3
Since you don't have weed and other people aren't giving you weed, you won't smoke it.
>Knows it smells bad
>Knows high isnt even that great
You know what to do.
No, i wasnt being wordy for the sake of. Its called semantics and using specific words for specific purposes, for styslism or simple emphathis is important.
I originally disputed your usage of the term happiness because it is axiomatically misused there.
Since you've decided to invoke the founding fathers you should know that they likely did not equate growing and consuming pot with 'happiness' since a great many of them were admirers of Roman Stoicism which rejects the pursuit of pleasure in order to reachachieve happiness.
Dam Im such a linguisticsfag. Its pot ffs, later user.
Genius.... so you googled "marijuana the devil's weed" . Muh sources..
Porn is more likely to do that.... esp the trappys and shedongs
Argue for tobacco. Same thing.
>Dam Im such a linguisticsfag.
No, you are a twat who took a few language courses in college and now thinks that he is an authority on the proper usage of the word happiness in the context of the founders use of it.
>Since you've decided to invoke the founding fathers you should know that they likely did not equate growing and consuming pot with 'happiness' since a great many of them were admirers of Roman Stoicism
Wow your fucking retarded.
You can believe in a certain philosophy, and still be a proponent of the right of the people to do the opposite of that philosophy, should they decide that is what they wish to do.
You need to learn how to argue in the context of the subject. Like most of this board.
Hey now, I know a few 18 year old pot heads who lift 4 times a week and eat healthy
it causes injury and death due to impaired judgment just the same as alcohol
Society needs victimless crimes so that people who can't get their shit together enough to live within the bounds of the law can live as criminals without hurting anybody. Legalize pot and your supplier will be back later to steal your water pipes and sell your daughters to the local kebab factory.