c-span.org
SHARE AND SPREAD THIS TO EVERY NORMIE YOU CAN
>THE STORM RISES
GRASSLEY MURDERED CLINTON AND OBAMA ON THE FLOOR OF THE SENATE
Lincoln Myers
Parker Parker
bump
Sebastian Hall
What am I watching here? It's just noise and no one talking...
Brayden Wright
1st thread about to be slid:
boards.Sup Forums.org/pol/thread/152300579#bottom
Grayson Miller
Nolan Nelson
Look under the video and click play next to Senator Grassley
Too bad its not on Youtube
James Jackson
Note that if the Benghazi investigation is reopened, so does the coffin for the CIA
Bentley Perez
I wish every American could watch and listen to Grassley here
It is the most sensible, rational explanation of the crucial shit in play here
Robert Johnson
Part of me worries that all this DNC and FBI and Mueller bashing is just another distraction from a real swamp drain.
Like that whole sex harassment story about the FBI just seems like something ripped straight from the deepstate playbook.
If Mueller is actually /ourguy/ then what better way to neuter him than to cry sexism and discredit the "Russia" probe? I seriously don't know who's jewing who anymore, so i'll leave it up to kek:
If numbers, Mueller is /ourguy/ and these new revelations are a deepstate ploy. If singles, the storm rises.
Josiah Myers
Chuck Grassley
>I HAVE BEEN DOING OVERSIGHT OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH FOR A VERY LONG TIME. I'VE DONE IT AS RANKING MEMBER, I'VE DONE IT AS CHAIRMAN, I'VE DONE IT WHEN MY PARTY HELD THE WHITE HOUSE, AND I'VE DONE IT WHEN THE OTHER PARTY HELD THE WHITE HOUSE. EARLIER THIS YEAR I STOOD UP FOR THE RIGHTS OF MY DEMOCRATIC COLLEAGUES TO DO OVERSIGHT OF THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION EVEN WHILE THEY ARE IN THE MINORITY. I DID IT BECAUSE IT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO. LOTS OF PEOPLE GIVE LIP SERVICE TO THE NOTION OF BIPARTISAN OVERSIGHT, BUT VERY FEW ACTUALLY PRACTICE IT. IT'S TOUGH. YOU HAVE TO BE WILLING TO WORK WITH COLLEAGUES IN THE OTHER PARTY TO ASK TOUGH QUESTIONS OF YOUR OWN POLITICAL ALLIES, AND YOU CAN'T JUST ASK. IF YOU ACTUALLY WANT ANSWERS, YOU HAVE TO FOLLOW THROUGH. TRUE BIPARTISAN OVERSIGHT IS IMPOSSIBLE UNLESS IT'S A TWO-WAY STREET. IF DEMOCRATS ARE UNWILLING TO ASK HARD QUESTIONS AND FORCE ANSWERS FROM THEIR OWN POLITICAL ALLIES, THEN THERE SIMPLY IS NO WAY TO MOVE FORWARD TOGETHER IN GOOD FAITH. BOTH SIDES NEED TO BE COMMITTED TO GETTING THE WHOLE STORY, NOT JUST THE HALF THAT THEY THINK HELPS THEIR SIDE. REGARDLESS OF WHETHER MY DEMOCRATIC COLLEAGUES JOIN ME OR NOT, I'M INTERESTED IN THAT WHOLE STORY. THERE ARE TWO MAJOR CONTROVERSIES PLAGUING THE CREDIBILITY OF THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT AND THE F.B.I. RIGHT NOW. ON THE ONE HAND THE TRUMP RUSSIA INVESTIGATION, AND THEN ON THE OTHER HAND THE HANDLING OF THE CLINTON INVESTIGATION. ANY CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT RELATED TO EITHER ONE OF THESE TOPICS IS NOT CREDIBLE WITHOUT ALSO EXAMINING THE OTHER. BOTH CASES WERE ACTIVE DURING LAST YEAR'S CAMPAIGN. BOTH CASES HAVE BEEN LINKED TO THE FIRING OF THE F.B.I. DIRECTOR. I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO EXPLAIN THIS TO MY DEMOCRATIC COLLEAGUES FOR MONTHS. THE POLITICAL REALITY IS THAT HALF OF THE COUNTRY THINKS THAT OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT ESTABLISHMENT GAVE HILLARY CLINTON AND HER AIDES A PASS.
Camden Nelson
>THESE QUESTIONS GO TO THE HEART OF THE INTEGRITY OF OUR FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND JUSTICE SYSTEM. THEY ARE NOT GOING TO GO AWAY JUST BECAUSE CLINTON LOST THE ELECTION. THE INDEPENDENT INSPECTOR GENERAL AT THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT CERTAINLY ISN'T IGNORING THAT ISSUE. DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS HAVE ASKED THE INSPECTOR GENERAL TO LOOK INTO A HOST OF ISSUES INVOLVING THE HANDLING OF THE CLINTON INVESTIGATION DURING THE CAMPAIGN. HIS HARD WORK HAS ALREADY UNCOVERED SOME PRETTY DISTURBING INFORMATION. OVER THE PAST WEEK THE PRESS HAS REPORTED THAT AN F.B.I. AGENT WAS REMOVED FROM THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S TEAM AND DEMOTED AT THE F.B.I. DUE TO WHAT DO YOU THINK? POLITICAL BIAS. THE AGENT WAS AT THE VERY CENTER OF BOTH OF THESE HIGH-PROFILE INVESTIGATIONS. HIGH-RANKING F.B.I. AGENT PETER STRUCK REPORTEDLY USED HIS WORK PHONE TO SEND ANTI-TRUMP AND PRO-CLINTON TEXT IMLEADGES TO ANOTHER F.B.I. AGENT -- MESSAGES TO ANOTHER F.B.I. AGENT WITH WHOM HE WAS HAVING AN ILL ILLICIT AND IMMORAL RELATIONSHIP. THIS MAN WAS THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR THE F.B.I.'S COUNTERINTELLIGENCE DECISION. HE WORKED ON THE INVESTIGATION OF FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE HIFERL CLINTON'S USE -- HILLARY CLINTON'S USE OF A PRIVATE SECTOR TO CONDUCT, WHAT DO YOU THINK? OFFICIAL BUSINESS. ACCORDING TO NEWS REPORTS, AND ACCORDING TO DOCUMENTS, IT LOOKS LIKE HE ALSO HELPED DRAFT COMEY'S CONTROVERSIAL PUBLIC STATEMENT ENDING THAT CASE OF HILLARY CLINTON AND THE E-MAILS. SPECIFICALLY, HE APPARENTLY EDITED OUT LANGUAGE THAT SUGGESTED LEGAL JEOPARDY FOR LYNN. -- FOR CLINTON. PRESS REPORTS STATE THAT HE OPENED THE F.B.I.'S INVESTIGATION OF ALLEGATIONS OF COLLUSION BETWEEN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND THE -- AND RUSSIA. AND IT'S BEEN REPORTED THAT HE WAS ONE OF THE TWO F.B.I. AGENTS WHO INTERVIEWED FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR MICHAEL FLYNN. CAN YOU IMAGINE IF THE SHOE WERE ON THE OTHER FOOT?
Brayden Bell
> WHAT IF A HIGH-RANKING F.B.I. OFFICIAL GOT CAUGHT EXPRESSING PRO-TRUMP POLITICAL BIAS ON HIS WORK -- ON HIS WORK PHONE WHILE LEADING WHAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE A PROFESSIONAL OBJECTIVE AND NONPARTISAN SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH. WHY, OF COURSE. IF THAT WERE HAPPENING, DEMOCRATS WOULD GO BALLISTIC, AND THEY WOULD HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO GO BALLISTIC. THIS MAN HELD A CRUCIAL POSITION OF PUBLIC TRUST, CHARGED WITH PROTECTING THIS COUNTRY FROM COUNTERINTELLIGENCE THREATS. HE WAS A KEY PART OF DIRECTOR COMEY'S CLINTON INVESTIGATION AND HIS RUSSIAN INVESTIGATION. I HAVE BEEN SAYING FOR MONTHS THAT THESE TWO CASES ARE FOREVER LINKED. YOU CANNOT SEPARATE THEM. THE SAME PEOPLE IN THE SAME AGENCY HANDLED BOTH CASES AT THE SAME TIME, AND NOW A HUGE SEGMENT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE NO FAITH THAT THESE CASES WERE TREATED AS THEY SHOULD BE IMPARTIALLY. AND I DON'T BLAME THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. IT IS INTERESTING THAT BEFORE HE WAS FIRED, F.B.I. DIRECTOR COMEY LECTURED OUR JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AND LECTURED THE PUBLIC ABOUT HOW THE MEN AND WOMEN OF THE F.B.I., QUOTE, DON'T GIVE A RELATIONSHIP ABOUT POLITICS, END OF QUOTE. I BELIEVE THAT FOR MOST OF THE HARDWORKING RANK-AND-FILE F.B.I. AGENTS, THAT IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE. THEIR JOBS NORMALLY DON'T INVOLVE CONTROVERSIAL POLITICAL QUESTIONS, AND THEIR OWN POLITICAL VIEWS AREN'T RELEVANT. BECAUSE THEY ARE PROFESSIONALS. BUT NO HUMAN IS PERFECT, AND NO ORGANIZATION IS IMMUNE FROM ERROR. IT DOES NOT GOOD FOR THE LEADERS OF THE F.B.I. TO PRETEND THAT ITS SENIOR MANAGEMENT IS ABOVE ALL REPROACH, THAT THEY WOULD NEVER SHOW ANY IMPROPER POLITICAL BIAS AND WOULD NEVER MAKE MISS TAKES. THE ONLY WAY TO PROTECT AGAINST BIAS OR MISCONDUCT IS TO RECOGNIZE IT EXISTS AND TO CONFRONT IT, NOT TO HIDE IT FROM CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. THE LAW AND THE FACTS, WHATEVER THEY ARE, SHOULD GUIDE THE WORK OF THE F.B.I. AND THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT.
Hudson King
>IF POLITICS INFECTED THE DEPARTMENT'S DECISIONS DURING A HOTLY CONTESTED NATIONAL POLITICAL CAMPAIGN, WE WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT IT. THAT IS TRUE WHETHER IT OCCURRED IN THE CLINTON CASE OR IN THE TRUMP-RUSSIA CASE OR IF IT INCLUDED BOTH. ANYONE CLAIMING TO DO BIPARTISAN OVERSIGHT OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH HAS TO EXAMINE BOTH. IGNORING EITHER HALF OF THIS STORY SIMPLY WON'T BE CREDIBLE WITH THE OTHER HALF OF THE COUNTRY. EVERYONE THOUGHT HILLARY CLINTON WAS GOING TO BE PRESIDENT, EVERYONE. AND THE PERCEPTION OF A HUGE SEGMENT OF THE PUBLIC IS THAT THE WHOLE WASHINGTON ESTABLISHMENT WORKED OVERTIME TO GET HER NAME CLEARED BEFORE THE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION LAST SUMMER. THE F.B.I. EVEN CALLED ITS CASE, QUOTE-UNQUOTE, MIDYEAR EXAM. DIRECTOR COMEY TESTIFIED THAT THE FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL REFUSED TO EVEN NAME THE F.B.I.'S WORK AND INVESTIGATION. THAT'S HOW POLITICAL IT BECAME. IT WAS REALLY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AT THAT TIME INSISTING ON CALLING IT NOT AN INVESTIGATION BUT, QUOTE-UNQUOTE, A MATTER, M-A-T-T-E-R, WHATEVER THAT MEANS. WE HAVE LEARNED THAT DIRECTOR COMEY STARTED DRAFTING HIS EXONERATION STATEMENT LONG BEFORE THE INVESTIGATION WAS DONE. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE WAS A RUSH TO CLEAR HER. IT LOOKS LIKE THE FIX WAS IN. I KNOW DEMOCRATS DON'T WANT TO HEAR THAT. THEY ONLY WANT TO TALK ABOUT TRUMP. THERE IS A DOUBLE STANDARD HERE IN THE WAY THAT THEY DESPERATELY WANT TO GO AFTER THE PRESIDENT BUT IGNORE ALL OTHER POTENTIAL WRONGDOING IN THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION. IT STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN, BUT DEMOCRATS HAVE VISIONS OF IMPEACHMENT DANCING IN THEIR HEADS. RATHER THAN RESERVE JUDGMENT AND CAREFULLY EXAMINE THE FACTS, ALL OF THE FACTS, THEY ARE JUMPING TO ALL SORTS OF CONCLUSIONS. THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HAS AN OBLIGATION TO DO BOTH A DEEP DIVE INTO THE FIRING OF JAMES COMEY AND BOTH OF THE TWO CONTROVERSIAL POLITICAL INVESTIGATIONS THAT PRECEDED IT. UNFORTUNATELY, THE DEMOCRATS ARE BE PREVENTING ANY TRULY BIPARTISAN PATH FORWARD.
Nathan Martin
>THEY APPEAR TO BE ASSUMING THE CONCLUSION AT THE OUTSET. THEY COMPLAIN PUBLICLY AND THEY COMPLAIN PRIVATELY THAT I'M NOT DOING ENOUGH TO INVESTIGATE OBSTRUCTION.BUT OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IS IS A -- IS A LEGAL TERM OF ART. IT IS A CONCLUSION NOT EVIDENCE. THAT IS NOT HOW I CONDUCT MY INVESTIGATIONS. I DO NOT MAKE MY CONCLUSIONS FIRST AND TRY TO SHOEHORN THE FACTS TO FIT MY CONCLUSIONS. I TRIED TO GET THE FACTS AND THEN GO WHERE THOSE FACTS LEAD. LET'S CONSIDER EXAMPLES OF WHERE INVESTIGATIONS HAVE UNCOVERED FACTS THAT POINT TO, QUOTE-UNQUOTE, OBSTRUCTION. BILL CLINTON AND RICHARD NIXON BOTH LIED TO INVESTIGATORS. THAT IS OBSTRUCTION, AND THAT BEHAVIOR GOT ONE OF THEM IMPEACHED AND FORCED THE OTHER TO RESIGN. WE ALSO RECENTLY LEARNED THAT HILLARY CLINTON'S LAWYERS USED A PROGRAM CALLED BLEACH BIT TO DELETE 33,000 EMAILS UNDER SUBPOENA BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. NOW, THOSE GOVERNMENT RECORDS -- AND THEY ARE GOVERNMENT RECORDS -- CAN NEVER BE RECOVERED. THOSE FACTS CERTAINLY LOOK LIKE OBSTRUCTION, BUT WE DON'T HAVE ALL THE FACTS HERE YET. SO FAR, I HAVE SEEN NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS TOLD ANYONE TO LIE. I ALSO HAVE SEEN NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE THAT HE OR HIS AIDES HAVE DESTROYED RECORDS BEING SOUGHT BY INVESTIGATORS. MANY PEOPLE FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT THE PRESIDENT FIRED THE F.B.I. DIRECTOR IN ORDER TO IMPROPERLY HALT THE INVESTIGATION OF LIEUTENANT GENERAL FLYNN. NOW, I'M NOT ONLY WILLING, BUT I'M EAGER TO DELVE DEEPLY INTO ALL THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING DIRECTOR COMEY'S REMOVAL. BUT TO CLAIM AT THE OUTSET THAT HIS REMOVAL WAS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE PUTS THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE. I'D LIKE TO PLACE AN ARTICLE IN THE RECORD AT THIS POINT BY THE WELL-KNOWN LIBERAL LAW PROFESSOR ALAN DERSHOWITZ, MR. PRESIDENT.
Jeremiah Taylor
What time
Matthew Smith
this is a bump
may not be the best bump
but it's mine
Hunter Johnson
When are Republicans going to understand that Hillary and Obama no longer matter? Trump is a threat to humanity. It's time to impeach.
Jason Roberts
At what time do I start the video?
Tyler Edwards
Hello Mordecai
Oliver Taylor
some bitch talking and then orinn hatch got a better link
Noah Walker
>NOW, PROFESSOR DERSHOWITZ IS NOT A FAN OF DONALD TRUMP, AND HE AND I PROBABLY WOULDN'T AGREE ON VERY MANY ISSUES, GENERALLY SPEAKING. THE TITLE OF HIS ARTICLE IS, QUOTE, SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN MAY BE PROVOKING A CONSTITUTIONAL CONFLICT, END OF QUOTE. PROFESSOR DERSHOWITZ STRONGLY DISAGREES WITH THE RANKING MEMBER'S STATEMENTS ON "MEET THE PRESS" THIS WEEKEND THAT COMEY WAS FIRED. QUOTE, DIRECTLY BECAUSE HE DID NOT AGREE TO LIFT THE CLOUD OF RUSSIAN INVESTIGATION, THAT'S OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, END OF QUOTE. THIS IS HOW PROFESSOR DERSHOWITZ REPLIED, QUOTE, NO IT ISN'T. UNDER OUR CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM OF SEPARATION OF POWERS, THE PRESIDENT CANNOT BE CHARGED WITH A CRIME FOR MERELY EXERCISING HIS AUTHORITY UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONSTITUTION. THIS AUTHORITY INCLUDES FIRING THE DIRECTOR OF THE F.B.I. FOR WHATEVER REASON OR NO REASON, END OF QUOTE. THAT'S NOT TO PAY THAT THE PRESIDENT CAN ENGAGE IN ILLEGAL CONDUCT, BUT THE PROFESSOR'S POINT, AS I UNDERSTAND IT, IS THAT WHEN A PRESIDENT TAKES AN ACTION THAT'S WITHIN THE SCOPE OF CLEAR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY AND DISCRETION, IT SHOULD BE A POLITICAL QUESTION NOT A CRIMINAL ONE. THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE STILL NEEDS TO INVESTIGATE THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING COMEY'S FIRING AND THE FLYNN INVESTIGATION. THOSE FACTS COULD HAVE -- MAY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE OBSTRUCTION BUT COULD STILL PROVIDE IMPORTANT INSIGHT ABOUT THE POTENTIAL REFORMS TO HOW THE F.B.I. AND THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OPERATE. FOR EXAMPLE, HE EXPLAINS HOW PRESIDENT TRUMP COULD HAVE HALTED ANY INVESTIGATION ON FLYNN IF HE REALLY WANTED TO, AND THIS IS WHAT THE PROFESSOR SAYS. TRUMP WOULD HAVE BEEN WITHIN HIS CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO PARDON FLYNN AS FLYNN HOPED HE WOULD DO THAT WOULD HAVE KEPT HIM FROM COOPERATING WITH THE SPECIAL COUNSEL AND BECOMING A GOVERNMENT WITNESS.
Christian Clark
>HAD THE PRESIDENT DONE THAT, HE WOULD HAVE ACTED ENTIRELY LAWFUL AS PRESIDENT H.W. BUSH -- GEORGE H.W. BUSH DID WHEN HE PARDONED CASPAR WEINBERGER IN ORDER TO STOP THE IRAN-CONTRA INVESTIGATION. ALTHOUGH SPECIAL PROSECUTOR LAWRENCE WALSH COMPLAINED BITTERLY THAT THE BUSH PRESENTATION PARDON HAD THE INTENT AND EFFECT OF COMPLETELY CLOSING DOWN HIS INVESTIGATION, NO ONE SUGGESTED THAT BUSH HAD COMMITTED THE CRIME OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. THEN FINALLY, PROFESSOR DERSHOWITZ EXPLAINS WHAT REAL OBSTRUCTION LOOKS LIKE, HOW IT IS DIFFERENT THAN A PRESIDENT MERELY EXERCISING HIS CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY, SO I ONCE AGAIN QUOTE THE PROFESSOR. BOTH PRESIDENTS RICHARD NIXON AND BILL CLINTON WERE ACCUSED OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, BUT IN BOTH CASES, THEY WERE ACCUSED OF GOING WELL BEYOND THE MERE EXERCISE OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY. NIXON WAS ACCUSED OF TELLING SUBORDINATES TO LIE TO THE F.B.I., PAYING HUSH MONEY TO POTENTIAL WITNESSES AND DESTROYING EVIDENCE. CLINTON WAS ACCUSED OF TRYING TO GET WITNESSES SUCH AS MONICA LEWINSKY TO LIE. THESE CHARGES CONSTITUTED ACTS, INDEPENDENT CRIMES THAT GO WELL BEYOND A PRESENTATION AUTHORITY. PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS NOT ACCUSED -- BEEN ACCUSED OF ANY FACTS THAT WOULD INDEPENDENTLY CONSTITUTE CRIMES. THE ENTIRE CASE AGAINST HIM IS OUT-- AS OUTLINED BY FEINSTEIN CONSISTS OF CONSTITUTIONALLY AUTHORIZED ACTS THAT WERE WELL WITHIN THE PRESIDENT'S AUTHORITY UNDER ARTICLE 2. THAT IS AN ENORMOUS AND CONSEQUENTIAL DIFFERENCE UNDER OUR SYSTEM OF SEPARATION OF POWERS, END OF QUOTE. BUT OUR CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM OF CHECKS AND BALANCES IS TOO IMPORTANT TO THROW IT ASIDE WHEN IT IS -- WHEN IT ISN'T POLITICALLY CONVENIENT. YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE A TRUMP FAN TO WORRY ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES OF TAKING SHORT CUTS AND GETTING AFTER YOUR POLITICAL OPPONENTS. THAT'S WHY BIPARTISAN INVESTIGATIONS ARE SO VERY VALUABLE. WHEN IT WORKS, A BIPARTISAN INQUIRY CAN PROVIDE COMFORT THAT ALL ANGLES HAVE BEEN EXPLORED AND EXPLORED THOROUGHLY.
Sebastian Hughes
1:00:06
Exactly 1 hour into the video
Tyler Morales
you're legit retarded.
Andrew White
BUT IT TAKES TWO TO TANGLE, AS THEY SAY. EARLIER THIS YEAR, RANKING MEMBER FEINSTEIN EXPRESSED CONCERNS ABOUT REPORTS THAT FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL FLYNN ASKED DIRECTOR COMEY TO DOWN PLAY THE F.B.I.'S INVESTIGATIONS AS MERELY A MATTER INSTEAD OF USING THE TERM INVESTIGATION DURING THE CAMPAIGN. YET SINCE THEN, THE RANKING MEMBER HAS TOLD ME PLAINLY SHE WON'T JOIN ANY INVESTIGATION OF THE OVERSIGHT OF THE CLINTON E-MAIL INVESTIGATIONS. EVEN ON TRUMP-RUSSIA OVERSIGHT WHERE WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO COOPERATE A GREAT DEAL, THERE HAVE BEEN SIMILAR PROBLEMS. FIRST, ALL YEAR I HAVE WANTED TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE ORIGINS OF THE DOSSIER THAT LARGELY KICK STARTED THE F.B.I.'S INVESTIGATION OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. IN JULY, THE RANKING MEMBER JOINED ME IN A BIPARTISAN LETTER SEEKING VOLUNTARY COOPERATION FROM THE FIRM THAT PRODUCED THE DOSSIER. THE DOSSIER WAS BASED LARGELY ON RUSSIAN SOURCES WITHIN RUSSIA AND WAS PUT TOGETHER BY A FORMER BRITISH SPY. IT MADE SALACIOUS AND UNVERIFIED CLAIMS ABOUT TRUMP. THE COMPANY RESPONSIBLE FOR PRODUCING IT, FUSION G.P.S., WAS UNCORPORATIVE. IN REAL ESTATE SPONSE TO OUR BIPARTISAN -- IN RESPONSE TO OUR BIPARTISAN REQUEST, IT DUTCHED ON THE COMMITTEE -- IT DUMPED ON THE COMMITTEE ABOUT 32,000 PAGES OF PRESS CLIPPINGS AND 8,000 PAGES THAT WERE ENTIRELY BLANK. SINCE THEN, IT HAS PROVIDED ZERO ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. THE FOUNDER OF FUSION G.P.S. INITIALLY INDICATED HE WOULD RELY ON HIS FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION RATHER THAN TESTIFY AT THE COMMITTEE HEARING IN JULY. HE LATER AGREED TO A PRIVATE STAFF INTERVIEW BUT REFUSED TO ANSWER DOZENS OF KEY QUESTIONS. I WOULD LIKE TO COMPEL HIM TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AND COMPEL HIM TO PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS THAT SENATOR FEINSTEIN AND I BOTH ASKED HIM HAD JULY TO PROVIDE VOLUNTARILY, BUT UNDER OUR COMMITTEE RULES, I DON'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DO THAT ON MY OWN.
Joseph Robinson
exactly 1 hour into video
somebody get this up onto youtube idk how tf to do it
Carter White
Shut the fuck up you goddamn retarded nigger. I don’t even care if you said anything substantial because you literally typed all caps and green texted for like 4 or 5 full posts. Fucking neck yourself you utter fucking faggot bitch.
David Hall
She damn near said 90 Gorilion!
Adrian Adams
>NOW, WHY WOULD DEMOCRATS NOT WANT TO FOLLOW UP AND GET THE DOCUMENTS FROM FUSION G.P.S. THAT WE ALREADY ASKED FOR TOGETHER; IN OTHER WORDS, IN A BY THE WAY? -- IN A BIPARTISAN WAY? SO DO THEY NOT WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT HOW THIS COMPANY PUT TOGETHER ITS ANTI-TRUMP DOSSIER FROM RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT SOURCES? WELL, IN LIGHT OF RECENT NEWS, THE RESISTANCE FROM DEMOCRATS TO THIS LINE OF TRUMP-RUSSIA INQUIRY IS NOW A LITTLE MORE UNDERSTANDABLE. IT TURNS OUT THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN AND THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE ARE THE ONES WHO PAID FUSION G.P.S. FOR THE INFORMATION IT GATHERED FROM RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT SOURCES. I DON'T KNOW WHETHER THE RANKING MEMBER OR HER STAFF KNEW THE FACTS EARLIER THIS YEAR WHEN I WAS TRYING TO PERSUADE HER TO DO BIPARTISAN FOLLOW-UP WORK WITH FUSION G.P.S. BUT I DO KNOW THAT UNLESS BOTH SIDES ARE WILLING TO ASK TOUGH QUESTIONS, NO MATTER WHERE THE FACTS LEAD, THERE CAN BE NO BIPARTISAN OVERSIGHT. SO WE HAVE LEARNED THAT THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE PAID FOR AN ANTI-TRUMP DOSSIER BASED ON INFORMATION FROM RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT SOURCES. SECOND, WE HAVE LEARNED THAT THE INSPECTOR GENERAL UNCOVERED EVIDENCE OF PARTISAN BIAS BY A SENIOR F.B.I. OFFICIAL AT THE CENTER OF BOTH CLINTON AND THE TRUMP RUSSIA INVESTIGATIONS WHICH LED TO HIS DISMISSAL FROM THE MUELLER TEAM. BEFORE THAT NEWS BROKE BACK IN OCTOBER THIS YEAR, I WROTE TO THE F.B.I. OFFICIAL REQUESTING VOLUNTARY COOPERATION AND PRIVATE TRANSCRIBED INTERVIEWS WITH THE COMMITTEE. THE RANKING MEMBER DID NOT SIGN THAT LETTER. THE COMMITTEE HAS RECEIVED NO LETTER IN REAL ESTATE PLY. WE'RE -- IN REPLY. WE'RE STILL WAITING FOR DOCUMENTS FROM THE F.B.I. ABOUT HIS AND OTHER OFFICIALS' PARTICIPATION IN THE DRAFT COMEY STATEMENT. THE F.B.I. SHOULD COMPLY VOLUNTARILY, BUT IF THEY DON'T, I WOULD ISSUE A SUBPOENA TO REQUIRE THAT THE DOCUMENTS BE PROVIDED AND THAT THE WITNESS SIT FOR A DEPOSITION.
Parker Gomez
A Republican Senator called for investigation into Hillary Clinton? How shocking and exciting! This has literally never happened before!
Robert Flores
could you re-type this without it being in all caps?
Kayden Campbell
Its word for word what this thread is about, read it or watch it I dont care.
Grayson Martin
You continue to get stomped on until you take your fucking fingers out of your ears idiot. LISTEN
Mason Cruz
DUDE SHUT THE FUCK UP AND TALK LIKE A NORMAL INDIVIDUAL JESUS CHRIST YOU FUCKING USELESS NIGGER.
I would bet $100 you are nonwhite, m8.
Aaron Phillips
that nigger also voted to nix the social security number requirement for claimed dependents
Caleb Lewis
Chill, he's just copy pasting the text from the c-span site, not his fault c-span uses retarded all caps
Jonathan Anderson
can I get a quick rundown?
Brody Evans
Is the impeachment vote the delineation between swamp and not swamp?
Jeremiah Diaz
bump, start at 1hour exactly
Oliver Brown
ty, user
Evan Foster
The deepstate is pretty good at hiding their power level whenever it's not a sure bet, so I'd say no.
Samuel Bailey
Grassley went off on all the wild double standards and head in sand behaviors of Democrats regarding their jobs in conducting oversight. Eviscerates Dems, Clintons, FBI, DOJ, everyone for all the coverups and obfuscation of facts.
Or just click the c-span link in OP. Starts 1 hour into the video
Joshua Thomas
fuck me, should have just done this.
>no caps site
pastebin.com
Kayden Anderson
bump for interest
Zachary Nguyen
All caps is easier to read when there's that many words and no spacing
Jordan Foster
Nice. Bump for anyone who wants to read instead of watch
Levi Campbell
Bump. Grassley is a very important guy.
>not a Trumpeter, but not a Never Trumper
>highly respectable position
>Establishment, but not a sell-his-own-mother traitor like Flake or McCain
>connected to voter realities
Xavier Stewart
Jesus, the catalog is a mess.
SHILLCON 1
Keep this bumped.
Evan Bell
fawk! Grassley just fired both barrels.
Elijah Rivera
when clinton and/or obama gets jail trump has my support even when starting WW3. it shall be worth it
Carson Williams
bump
Henry Nelson
>It's time to impeach.
364-58
Daniel Fisher
Holy shit
James Carter
Bump
Asher Foster
I'm guessing you don't like books.
Sebastian Martinez
Roger, roger.
Brayden Wilson
Have another...
Levi Rogers
...
Jackson Kelly
I love the fact that this older fella has younger folks sourcing his speech that is basically Sup Forums on the fucking house floor. God damned brilliant.
Hunter Nguyen
why are you such a sperglord
Lucas Thomas
Read user's post and edumicate yourselves.
Jack Carter
...
Jaxson Baker
...
Luis Clark
It's a discredit tactic.
Austin Powell
Literally still angry that HRC hit 'delete' on emails because shes a boomer and computers are hard.
The absolute state of America.
Colton Young
His speech keeps getting better.
Julian Morales
cause we use to hang people for doing less
Lucas Taylor
bump
Asher Anderson
At least our pm is crying about the trials and tribulations of faggots
Ayden Wood
You know when ya have a corrupt system and there is always someone that takes it too far and gets the whole gang busted
Thats the Clintons.
Matthew Smith
It stinks to high heaven.
Colton Allen
I suggest you OPEN EYES then.
Sebastian Johnson
Obama too. In hindsight grassley wasnt hitting Obama himself but so much of this falls into "under his watch" territory. What a weird dynamic that Clinton-Obama relationship must have always been and still be today. It almost seems like Obama was talked into following the "Clinton model" as far as getting out of office but continuing to be a political money machine and general nuisance. Be nice to throw a cog into all those plans. He's still a relatively young guy. I want him alive long enough to see his own name turned into a universal joke and embarrassment for our country
Jason Hernandez
Bump
Jace Cook
>Time to impeach
Not even a republican. But you can't impeach somebody just because you don't like them. Plus your nigger tried to earlier today, and it fell flat on it's face.
Hudson Richardson
All caps user..
It's borderline useless.
Angel Gutierrez
>probe
>Clinton
Have you seen the body count? Just hang these traitors.
Lincoln Reyes
I allready is user.
0bombacare
Carson Campbell
Huff some petrol and learn to read
Leo Peterson
Good to see we've had an impact on you.
Camden Garcia
holy shit he straight roasted all of their asses. bump
Carter Robinson
Damn that was lit
Carter Morgan
A fucking leaf.
She used a program to wipe the email servers. She didn't just "hit delete".
Jackson Allen
One one cares.
Camden Campbell
Grassley starts exactly 1 hour into video
1:00:06
Gabriel Robinson
>tch an
the GOP is panicked and going all out to discredit Mueller
Hannity and Limbaugh are nonstop on this script from Murdoch, so Grassley is just following along with the script of the party of treason and lies and corruption and closeted gay pedophiles
Eli Parker
...
Isaac Moore
>Trump is a threat to humanity. It's time to impeach.
most GOP admit this in private, but getting their precious giveaway to their corporate masters passed is their true priority not patriotism
Oliver Green
Dude, Chuck Grassley has own my respect. He hit everything spot fucking on.
Liam Ward
>)
bump
Dominic Ross
More then half of the GOP dont even support Trump you retarded nigger
Aaron Roberts
>I want him alive long enough to see his own name turned into a universal joke and embarrassment for our country
Assuming the deep state doesn't MKULTRA the evidence, the shit that Obama did to consciously and explicitly undermine whites will be chilling. Our ethnocide is the explicit and conscious policy of the Democrats.
Carter Bell
uh huh
Gavin Roberts
yeah but Trump pisses off liberals, so he gets my vote
Christopher Perry
i'll get it upon youtube as soon as it finishes playing through--its quite a long speech really
Nathan Johnson
I would really just like to convey my experience just now of having to read your post like 3 times before I realized you were arguing that it's over for Drumpf. The disconnect from reality, the surreally ineffective shilling, it made quite an impression on me
Jackson Thompson
>getting triggered this hard by caps and greentext
Thomas Carter
thanks i'll watch it once it hites the tubes. interesting digits btw
Owen Thompson
...
Benjamin Green
You have the choice to watch, read, or gtfo. Did the truths hurt your little fee fees?