Let's get a feminism thread going anons

Let's get a feminism thread going anons.
Thread question: feminists are moving towards hating white women. Can we accelerate that?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/O894bXmqqGU?t=4s
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>feminists are moving towards hating white women

You mean SJWs. Don't get your terms confused in the OP. All SJWs are feminists (or pretend to be to virtue signal) but not all feminists are SJWs. Just most of them.

...

Support pro choice anons, and start demanding that no abortion can proceed legally without the mans choice on the matter.

The man has right to the property in her womb, as courts have established which can force men to pay for a child under alimony if the woman doesnt terminate the pregnancy. Also any man who says no but the woman says yes frees the man from all alimony and indemnification under the law.

Why you fuckers havent gone that route to the supreme court I have no idea, Im graduating law school soon and its always boggled my mind.

I mean feminism as a political movement, which is a branch of the left. For at least a year now white feminists have been heavily criticized by "feminist outlets" such as Gawker, Jezebel and Vice

Since you're a law fag, how feasible would you say it is to pressure authorities to change misandric laws? Isn't the feminist lobby much stronger? After all there's people like Hillary on their side, and I guess someone like Trump wouldn't meddle in that, at least for now.

all they need is a bucket of water to toss in the niglets.

...

Can we D&C feminists?

>Can online pressure help change mysandric laws?

>not all feminists are SJWs

You completely failed to name one.

>Since you're a law fag, how feasible would you say it is to pressure authorities to change misandric laws?
You go to court, not polticians for legal disputes in reference to the definition of law. Instead of asking politicians to alter the legal framework in place say forcing a man to pay alimony while the same man has no choice in keeping a child is antithetical to that same existing case law.

> Isn't the feminist lobby much stronger?
In court this shouldnt matter, were talking legal terms and filing a pro life case based on pro choice values meaning that it isnt pro choice until we give the man a choice. Without 2 party consent its murder, plain and simple.

> After all there's people like Hillary on their side, and I guess someone like Trump wouldn't meddle in that, at least for now.
Any normal person could file these cases, challenging any states law since its the law of the land to get to the supreme court unlike all the abortion crazies who just want it banned. Their too blind too see what a monkey wrench it would be forcing 2 party consent for pro choice, using the case law that that the man is responsible for the pregnancy hence palimony, alimony etc, thus forcing the courts to act and rule that the male must have a choice in the abortion since the relationship legally is already proven to exist.

If they start post birth abortion the right wing should become Isis tier.

>Since you're a law fag, how feasible would you say it is to pressure authorities to change misandric laws?
tldr, you dont ask politicians to alter the law, you go to courts who invalidate laws thus forcing politicians to write laws that fit into the legal system.

Established case law shows a man is held accountable for a pregnancy through alimony and palimony. Using that as any basis, it shows the mans link to the child as a form of ownership, in that way it demonstrates also that no woman should legally be allowed an abortion without the mans consent.

What this may take to open is a man and or men suing women for having abortions with no consent agreement in existence or documented and notarized. Verbal agreements dont mean shit so the same guy could agree verbally, drive her to get the abortion, then sue the fuck out of her for having the abortion and destroying what was his property. Same way you can sue an airline for wrongful death, its all the same thing using wrongful death as the filing motion.

Only when white women do it.
The shitskins can kill their offspring all they like. Less welfare babies.

>Without 2 party consent its murder, plain and simple.
But you're talking as if they use logic user. Isn't lawyer mental gymnastics commonplace? What stops some feminist organization helping the woman fund a big shot lawyer to use rhetoric to dismiss the case of the man? After all, if we're talking about a change in law feminists wouldn't take it easily, and there are sure a lot of feminist groups with deep pockets.

You know these anti-white sjw/feminists are a bunch of insecure niggers, kikes, dikes and ugly shitskins from India, right? They show their envy for lighter skin all the time.

Yeah thats completely fair. If the shitskins are dumb enough to murder their babies it isn't really our problem. That said, the moment the non whites start getting post birth abortions I'm going to take that as a huge red flag.

>But you're talking as if they use logic user. Isn't lawyer mental gymnastics commonplace?
The law has never been challenged in the manner relating to a man having a choice in the matter of abortion. Case law shows only that a woman has a choice, no court or case has said that a man does NOT have a choice, it simply hasnt been brought up.

>What stops some feminist organization helping the woman fund a big shot lawyer to use rhetoric to dismiss the case of the man?
That wont happen unless legal procedure determines that to be the rightful result for dismissing a case. Rhetoric has nothing to do with that, but improper filing does, and honestly most lawyers fuck up their filing you need a hot shot to pull this off to even file it correctly.

> After all, if we're talking about a change in law feminists wouldn't take it easily, and there are sure a lot of feminist groups with deep pockets.
There is literally no change to existing law, women retain their right to choice. The law is added upon granting the man involved the choice of her having an abortion. Much the same way men have no choice but can be sued for alimony and palimony suits even if they didnt know the woman was pregnant because that case law exists it shows the man must have a choice.

Any man who did not get the choice should file a civil lawsuit for wrongful death against the woman, this is something not done yet and must be approached.

Murder is a sin.

Enjoy roasting in hell feminists

Is that real. Who can take that seriously. Description is literally, fat lady tries to blend in with other round objects.

>Be against infanticide
>Celebrate Spartan culture as a cornerstone of whiteness

The absolute state of Sup Forums

JUST A CLUMP OF CELLS

So I suppose what we can do is spread this enough to encourage any men facing court out there to do such a thing?

Sign me up. Not one child.

I have never praised Spartan culture in my life. People just admire their war capabilities.

jesus fucking christ my blood is boiling

I have a thick skin but yes this triggers me too

Can we after birth abort the liberals?

I like how they intentionally put a white child on that

It would be cool if some user had that infographic showing how every single article about not having kids has white children in the cover, while articles about the joy of motherhood all portray miscigenation

Just FYI, if you actually look this article up, it's the author arguing against some idiotic proposal that a couple of extreme leftist philosophers made about justifying infanticide. He's not in support of it at all, and uses it as a chance to challenge pro-choicers to define the line on where abortion becomes "ok".

Can we post-birth abort all lefties?

Pic related: This entire fucking thread.

...

So because I'm posting these pics I'm automatically a "muh god emperor" magapede? Who even brought him up? You're better than this user.

Read the shirt, assuming you can read.

You should probably leave.
You've lost whatever credibility you've had.

can you give me any good left-wing arguments then?

So we shouldn't criticize this until slaughtering babies is popular with the left? Spoiler alert it's already popular with the left.

The right is literally destroying everything: the environment, the economy, the species. But oh I found this one article about a cannibal transblack otherkin!

>the environment
Implying this shit didn't happen with Obama-kun. Trump made it worse, but if Obama cared, he would have invested in Windpower (which we have enough of in Northern Alaska to fuel the entire US powergrid). I did the math, and by using only Vestas V164, it would be a down payment of 750 billion USD. Note that we spend 50 Billion USD every year in coal and gas for electricity(aka profit is made back in just 3 years).

But he didn't do shit, did he?

>the economy
Take a look at the debt between the years of 2008 to 2016 (years of King Nigger's presidency). Then proceed to Stfu.

And of course, I haven't mentioned that disgusting failure's (king nigger) attempts at (((World Peace))) in Libya and Syria, both of which he tried to destroyed (succeeded in Libya, failed in Syria thanks to based Putin).

You mock Bush because of his Iraq war nonsense and so do we. But then you do the same thing, twice. And what's worse, you were trying to elect a candidate (Hillary Clinton) that was gonna do it again, this time in Iran.
>youtu.be/O894bXmqqGU?t=4s
Gas yourself you fucking degenerate.

>Note that we spend 50 Billion USD every year in coal and gas for electricity(aka profit is made back in just 3 years).
250 billion USD ***

>The economy
The modern left pushes harder and harder into socialist territory, any credibility the left had in terms of economics was lost when they started supporting mass immigration and gibsmedat programs..
>The species
You have to be deluded to not see that the decline of educated westerners is the great threat to the species. We are entering a dangerous time and we need as many educated and intelligent people as we can get however birth and marriage rates in the countries with the resources to provide adequate education are dropping drastically. Not only are they dropping but the decrease is felt mostly among the middle and upper classes, who are the ones with the intellectual capacity and resources to provide the children our species needs to solve the problems that face us. If you think these problems aren't solely the result of feminism then you are deluded.
>The environment
The left exclusively focuses on climate change, a debate they will never win thanks to their own arrogance. If addressing it was as important to the left as scoring political points is they would have had an impartial person bring up the issue in public forums, instead the first person to bring the issue truly center stage was Al Gore, a former democratic presidential candidate and VP. The second they did that conservatives around the globe were put on the defensive, unable to accept it without conceding a point to a prominent left wing politician. More recently the person who has put themselves front and center as the moderate level headed scientist on the issue (Bill Nye) demonstrated that he is nothing more than a shill pushing ideology as science thereby discrediting everything he might have accomplished on the issue. Meanwhile the earth air and most importantly ocean are all becoming increasingly toxic, pollution produced by developing countries is basically destroying the planet but the left is too preoccupied dealing with climate change to debate these issues.

lets see how people would react if we changed the picture