The wealth dilemma

As power consolidates around a few human beings in the form of ultra wealth the average person sees fewer and fewer opportunities for advancement in class and status. Working an unfulfilling job to keep your head above water while paying out 50% of your income in the form of rent has become the norm.

What are some solutions for income inequality, and how can the average person compete against those who are born into positions of family wealth?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/DVg2EJvvlF8
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>EAT THE RICH

this is so anti-semitic

Abolish income tax

Wow, look at that, the worker ants income has been increased their by 30% or more.

One weird solution I found to the wealth gap below:

>* Bring rice and water to a boil in a saucepan over high heat. Reduce heat to medium-low, cover, and simmer until rice is tender, and liquid has been absorbed, 20 to 25 minutes.

>* Combine soy sauce, brown sugar, and corn starch in a small bowl; stir until smooth. Mix ginger, garlic, and red pepper into sauce; coat meat with marinade and refrigerate for at least 15 minutes.

>* Heat 1 tablespoon sesame oil in a large skillet over medium-high heat. Cook and stir bell pepper, water chestnuts, broccoli, carrots, and onion until just tender, about 5 minutes. Remove vegetables from skillet and keep warm.

>* Remove meat from marinade, reserving liquid. Heat 1 tablespoon sesame oil in skillet over medium-high heat. Cook and stir meat until slightly pink on the inside, about 2 minutes per side; return vegetables and reserved marinade to skillet. Bring to a boil; cook and stir until meat is no longer pink in the middle and vegetables are tender, 5 to 7 minutes. Serve over rice.

try it pleb,

Bump for more solutions

This.

...

DON'T DO THIS. IT MAKES CHLORINE GAS

There's a clear precedent. In Victorian times rail, telegraph, mining and factories created vast wealth inequality. Communism was born from this. Today its the internet and computers. Either its Communism 2.0 & revolutions or the West reforms and becomes better at giving gibs to people that want it

US also needs a third party

John Lennon

Imagine a Jew World Order

youtu.be/DVg2EJvvlF8

No heaven.
No countries.
No possessions.
No religion.
The world will be as one.

One jewish, communist, world government where you have no rights - not even the right to breathe. We've already seen jewish communism murder 100 million-plus people in the last century.

Who would have thought that saving the species would turn out to be so delicious?

>*Place meat in slow cooker. In a small bowl mix together the flour, salt, and pepper; pour over meat, and stir to coat meat with flour mixture. Stir in the garlic, bay leaf, paprika, Worcestershire sauce, onion, broth, potatoes, carrots, and celery.

>*Cover, and cook on Low setting for 10 to 12 hours, or on High setting for 4 to 6 hours.

Well considering wealth is zero sum and thus there's only a limited amount of wealth to go around we really are doomed when competing with the evil rich ppl cuz they have it all. And they don't wanna give us none. That shit ain't fair.

The Federal Reserve, the IRS, and the Anti-Defamation League were all set up by Jews in the year 1913.

gonna tell you a secret so listen up: if you were to take everybody on the planet and take all their stuff, in a few years it would be mostly the same folks would have all the nice stuff. that's just life.

This is only true if you forget the most important step.

We can’t eat jews! Imagine the indegestion.

Really. Jewish commies wanna eat the rich. You can’t make this shit up.

The first step would be to hang every leftist that devalued the value of labor and destroyed any chance for class mobility with their progressive horseshit.

testing

>find a smaller apartment? Live within your means? everyone is a retard?

Capital and the Debt Trap reports that "cooperatives tend to have a longer life than other types of enterprise, and thus a higher level of entrepreneurial sustainability". This resilience has been attributed to how cooperatives share risks and rewards between members, how they harness the ideas of many and how members have a tangible ownership stake in the business. Additionally, "cooperative banks build up counter-cyclical buffers that function well in case of a crisis," and are less likely to lead members and clients towards a debt trap (p. 216). This is explained by their more democratic governance that reduces perverse incentives and subsequent contributions to economic bubbles.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative

Yes, but it would be pretty fun at this point to take all those rich assholes stuff and maybe put that stuff in a meat grinder.

>the average person sees fewer and fewer opportunities for advancement in class and status.
Not true. The economy is not zero-sum. One person's productive activities does not hinder mine.
>how can the average person compete against those who are born into positions of family wealth?
You don't, in fact, need to "compete against them" to make personal advancements.
>What are some solutions for income inequality
The abolition of private property is the only way to completely eliminate it, but that comes with drawbacks such as poverty, famine, state oppression, and no opportunity for personal advancement.
Most efforts made to alleviate income inequality have the side effect of increasing the cost of living, making the poor worse off on net. For that reason, it's not the moral high ground position.

Quit bitching and do something then.

Instead of having a sook that rich people exist, go invest in cryptocurrencies and maybe in a few years you will be rich too.

No, I think people should just burn down your house now.

This reads like wishful thinking. If cooperatives were really better in every way, we'd see them dominate the modern capitalist economy due to its Darwinian nature. But that hasn't happened.

...

checked

posting memes about cannibalizing the rich *is* doing something

It's doing nothing. You are just having a sook. No one that matters even cared or noticed your thread.

No matter what changes we make to the system, the super wealthy don't want to lose power and are wealthy powerful enough to move above the system. Humans are corrupt like that.
Hence, it would be most beneficial for us to just kill the most powerful in any way we can. They're not gonna give up their power voluntarily.

It is not money that people hate, it's the continuous flow of wealth transfer schemes by unpunished corporations. It is fine to earn money and accumulate wealth, it is not right to steal it through land grabs or failed mortgage-backed securities.

It is the corruption and the financial and political cabal that people are fed up with, not hosetly earned wealth.
What do Ivanka Trump and Chelsea Clinton have in common?

Both of their fathers were/are US Presidents.
They both went to the finest schools. They were both raised as social elite.
They were both endlessly groomed, rich and protected with bodyguards as they were raised.

All of this effort to raise these girls as exceptional, but they were both readily married into criminal families with convicted felons:

Chelsea Clinton married Marc Mezvinsky, whose father (Ed Mezvinsky, a former US Representative) who was convicted federally of a Ponzi scheme, for stealing $10M.

Ivanka Trump married Jared Kushner, whose father (Charles Kushner) was federally convicted of tax evasion, witness tampering and illegal campaign contributions to the democratic party.

Why would both of these girls be so meticulously groomed and sheltered as they grew up, only to be married into criminal families? Democrats and republicans are really not that different.

All a part of the great cabal of criminals running the show today.


pic related

*honestly

>the modern capitalist economy due to its Darwinian nature
That's the wishful thinking.

>People actually believe this

Fair is foul and foul is fair.

If wealth is zero sum how do you explain the difference in the amount of wealth between the world 300 years ago and the world now? how do you explain the difference between the value of a blank canvas and some paint as opposed to the value of a painting that sells for millions of dollars? wealth is created and transactions are beneficial to both parties... otherwise you wouldnt buy the product/service. this of course all goes out the window when the government is pointing a gun at you to force you into using their services... but that's another discussion.

Lets start with stop wasting my money on unemployed communist retards, unemployed niggers and holocaust remembrance?