Atheist hate thread

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=61knwOj8uvs
anyforums.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

how does a sandcastle compare to evolution for fucks sake

It compares to the big bang, retard

>comparing erosion to evolution
...just

it's a parable. it represents the sand in religious people's vaginas.

I'm guessing that the sandcastle represents an abstract idea that: The complex structure before you was created by sentient intelligent being
This is later than applied to mankind and the world as we discover just how complex we really are. We come to the realization that perhaps the Atheist viewpoint Evolution through randomness is in fact irreconcilable...

kek you absolutely obliterated yourself with this embarrassing shit christcuck.

kys
sage
>mfw I still cant decide who is worse, atheists or christians

Don't you have flat earth shilling to do on /x/?

...

/thread

Atheism is a mental illness.

This is why fedoras are fucking retarded. A Creator and intelligent isn't magic, you absolute buffoon.

And why is abstaining from sex a bad thing? A man and woman have to devote themselves to one another without being sexually degenerate vs being sexually degenerate till 30 riding the cock carousel, then to settle down with mr beta Male. I prefer the former, you may think differently.

Abstaining from sex =/= bad genital hygiene

>doesn't believe in magic. how sad

It is not a sand castle. It's merely a pile of sand in a configuration that is not bound to stay that way long in the short term.

Inb4 somebody posts a bunch of fedora pics they found on reddit

>admitting that you don't know how certain things started
or
>assuming it's a powerful being that just is and started it all, and you can't dispute it because there's no evidence to either disprove or prove it's existence
i mean why do you all care in the first place. as long as religion based around these believes doesn't make apes out of people we shouldn't throw shit at each other. yet you do you absolute fucking morons

>JEW LOGIC

youtube.com/watch?v=61knwOj8uvs

Lulz XD. So great picture. Can I save it?

The existence of god cannot be proven nor disproven therefore it is reason enough for me to shit on everyone the doesn’t believe that god does exist. You people are something else.

>Atheist Logic
>Always plays the mage in D&D
>doesn't believe in magic

...

no need to hate atheists. just guide them. they throw hate at me so much though

Hail the old gods.

I love this. Magic is real, magic is change and effect of will.

...

Athiesm is a satanic lie, look it up it's true

If christcucks get to claim evolution is a tornado creating a boeing I think I am allowed to call God Harry Potter

>The self-evident system of evolution

>Chance

Pick one.

With that said, there are no gods but there are creators.

>a creator isn't magic
it literally is.
the only difference between "God" making things and "nature" making things is an implied magic whereby God is an external force that doesn't conform to nature.
Otherwise you can just say that God IS nature and the whole argument is moot.

...

...

I can understand Christians, they at least have a reason to believe that God exists, Bible is historically proved document

But other religions like Islam are completely delusional

...

this is retarded because it applies to both atheists and theists
only the buddhists are right, the universe has no beginning and no end

...

Is there a legible version?

...

The black button up shirt with the flames is what really makes the meme realistic
Why do atheists all dress and look exactly the same, like they came out of an assembly line?

While some religions promote chastity, it isn't a trait unique to religion.

...

...

...

I also see that look as the stereotypical Sup Forums style aswell. Are gamers more prone to becoming atheists?

...

>make a thread
>abandon it
Checkmate atheists

...

God is nature, with slightly more capabilities.

>nazis are bad now

Both things are caused by autism.

Nazis were heathens.

How can you show others the wonders faith can do if all you do is spout hate.
Guide these people they're just lost souls.

To be fair, Jesus would probably want to welcome "asylum seekers", too

...

Atheists are obnoxious queers.
They are worse than niggers and Jews.

No.

>Poisoning the well by equating atheism with known scientific truths about the universe.

You idiots need to understand that science is not a threat to your damn god.

You fundamentalists are as dumb as pure atheists. You're missing the reality of the world.
IF God exists in the way you yourselves describe (an omnipresent and omnipotent force intrinsic in every fibre of the universes makeup), then discovering FACTS about the universe and its mechanisms, be they anarchy-founded phenomenon like evolution, right down to quantum physics and the nature of spacetime; it doesn't take away from god.

Looking at my damn cells and describing how they function does not undo me as a whole person, nor does analysing my components on any depth tell you anything about my personality; at best you could, in the future, gleam a rudamentary silhouette of what i might be like from my genetics, but to know me, you must interact with me as a person-to-person; apply empathy, come at me with your own humanity.

That is how God and gods are developed in all religions - you approach an inarguably real force or phenomenon in the world as though it were humanoid in personality, and in doing so your capacity to understand it past, present and future reaches the same level as you would a friend, or a sketchy neighbour, or a dangerous person you've been told to keep an eye on.

Atheists can't see the woods for the trees, and the fundies refuse to accept there are trees in these woods, just because the woods have a name...

What's the difference between a militant atheist and a regular atheist?

The first is queen of all fags.
The latter is just a regular ole' queer.

>originated on Reddit
Technically, those fedora pics started as a single pixel. They progressed through years of selection to become the pics they have become today. No one created them.

Science

What's the difference between a "democratic" socialist and a communist?

Sandcastles aren't naturally self-assembling. Biochemistry is. The molecules naturally bond into more complex structures. Sand doesn't.

>with slightly more capabilities
which from the perspective of everyone else who lacks those extra capabilities would be indistinguishable from magic

where did the first cells come from atheists hmm?

Chkd

...

...

Hawking's infamous and asshole answer to "what was there before the big bang?" is 'what.is.north.of.the.north.pole?'
/atheists asswipes who worship other men

Now skip the parts between the blank canvas and the squirrel to get what theists believe.

...

It explains that nothing orderly ever comes from disorder. You could set off a trillion bombs in a lumber yard, but a housr will never form by chance.

...

itt
>physics and chemistry are hard

no because it's artificially made. culture vs nature

Am I missing something? Isn't the answer 'outer space'?

"IF GOD EXIST WHY BAD THING HAPPEN?"

Could god create an image so blurry, even he couldn’t read its text?

...

Well said. Agree with everything you laid out.

...

I'm not an atheist, but i can answer nevertheless.

Protein replicators; it's been well observed that applying electricity to salt water (oceans) even on short scales produces proteins.

In earth's lifeless past, it was a bit of a hellscape of thunderstorms, and because of the size of the ocean, it was consistently being electrified and these proteins being produced, which would have slowly but surely over time turned the surface of earth's oceans into a scum-soup of these proteins.

Which would then have been bombarded by radiation from the sun, day after day, year after year, century after century, over and over again for a billion years.

Now, the great thing about proteins, is they're a molecule capable of machine-like behaviour; they can fold and move components, chuck other different proteins around and trigger them. And as a result, in chains can essentially be compared to programmable code; only it's physical and material.
AND they're also not very stable unless protected by something; so a constant bombardment of radiation would have meant these proteins were frequently being busted and rearranged by the ionising radiation from the sun, over and over until finally one formed that was a replicator - so essentially it, in a very very basic sense grabbed any other proteins it came across and reassembled them to look like it.

Of course, this isn't a hypothesis, we know this is possible - the entire pharmaceutical industry is predicated on studying, playing around with and creating these proteins to make all sorts of interesting shit...

As soon as that replicator first appeared on the scene, it would have metaphorically set the (aforementioned protein soup of an) ocean on fire in a frenzy of consumption of the non-replicator proteins into replicator proteins (let's call it R-01 for now).

And as R-01 was crashing into the other proteins, changing them into copies of itself, converting the entire ocean's proteins, sometimes as it... (cont...)

Free Will:
>if i have free will, then could i do something to surprise god?
>if i can suprise god, then he isnt all knowing
>if god knows everything i will do, then free will doesn’t exist

Stupid atheists actually think this way

...

Just goes to show that jews think they're god and this "the universe is all about ME!" shit has rubbed of on their useful idiot krischun underlings.

when you read about all this crazy science stuff around animal hybrids/chimeras, mice with humans brains, goats producing spider silk, human organ harvesting from pigs; you kind of wonder how we have not yet upgraded or downgraded evolution from 'theory' and why do we not take competing theories more seriously.

i dunno, i don't like going down the whole creator route, because you start spiraling down the whole, who created the creator hole

like, if evolution is such a solid theory, where are the experiments about turning fruit flies in to fruit bugs, or something. not the minor stuff like breeding fruit flies with bent wings and stuff; big evolution stuff

>Retarded high school atheist semantics argument to make non atheists sound dumb

Why does nature exist? Why did the supposed "big bang" happen? Where does reality itself come from? If you say believing in a creator of nature is magic then Atheists have the exact same dilemma.

Many atheists even think nature popped into existence from nothingness which clearly would have to be a supernatural process. Nature itself didn't exist and then create itself, that's totally illogical. There would have to be a process above nature to create nature, which is the exact definition of magic. Theists claim that process is an intelligent being while atheists claim that process is randomness. If one is "magic" then both are magic.

>religiuos books is nonsense
> so that means god doesent egsist...

Theory does not mean “unproven”. Did you not learn this in school?

Why do idiots still think the Big Bang means ex nihilo?

(...cont)
Sometimes as it was converting something, it would make a mistake, or, as i said previously, the radiation from the sun would break the replicator whilst it isn't even doing anything.

Now, most of the time this would have just resulted in a broken protein that is quickly consumed and rebuilt by the not-broken replicators around it, but sometimes, very, very rarely, it would result in a slightly different replicator; it's still a replicator, but maybe it's a little quicker at replicating than the others, or maybe it has some capacity to resist being disassembled by the other replicators itself, and all of a sudden we have the first steps of evolutionary competition in play.
Now, imagine this happening hundreds of millions, even billions of times - protein is mutated, most of the time it's shit and dies, but when it's better, it IS better and therefore takes over.
Now we've likely got millions of different types of competing protein floating about, doing what they do, R-01 is long dead and now there have been so many mutations the demand for advanced solutions to stay on top has increased to the level that some proteins are, in addition to consuming and replicating themselves, are putting up hard to break walls of less-palatable molecules around themselves, to protect them from being eaten whilst they go about replicating. It's not necessarily a cell yet, but it's the founding stages of one.
And that starts to take over, and this is where we get a big important split - the ones that went down this cell route, well you already know where they ended up, but some replicators managed to stay extremely basic, without walls, they evolved specifically to fire themselves into walls like a dart, spit stored strings of their replicator RNA into the cell they've attacked, and replicate it from the inside out; these are viruses.

So now cells are not only in evolutionary competition with each other, but are also fighting viruses.

RTFT dipshit. I'm not arguing for or against God. I'm correcting the false statement that a creator isn't magic. If the acts of a creator aren't magic by the standards of the world it created, then there's no difference between God and nature and you're literally having an argument about nothing.

>you kind of wonder how we have not yet upgraded or downgraded evolution from 'theory'
That's because it can't be upgraded. Becoming a scientific theory is the end goal when figuring out natural phenomenon. There is no higher level to go

its pretty great atheism is an evolutionary dead end because they don't have children

So atheists believe in magic then? Oh wait I bet you don't apply that "magic" definition consistently. Only to theists so you can claim they "believe in magic" and tip your fedora.

I feel a need to commemorate this

Atheists believe that magic still happened. They just don't want to call that magic 'God'.

That's literally the most christian thing I can think of.