if it is 99% real and 1% fake...it is all fake and forged
Nobody said she forged his signature anyone who's seen the picture can see she just added a bunch of shit on the end herself, which she admits.
She did forge part of the signature, though. The "Moore D.A." is the same ink as the date and location she admits to adding.
For all we know it's just some random Roy (or Ray) she knew.
defend calling someone a child molester purely based on accusations
conveniently ignore that the accuser has a personal vendetta against Moor due to a verdict in the past
pretend that it's completely normal to forge additional notices and add them to a yearbook with an already existing signature, just because the alleged "victim" obviously thought that a signature alone wouldn't suffice as proof
*enter full panic mode*
divert attention away from the cheating party by getting hung up on the obvious, but ultimately unimportant failure of Fox news to differentiate between the authentic signature and the forged, additional content.
What a truly wonderful being the modern day Liberal is.
how is it not forged? She literally said Roy Moore wrote the entire thing at her press conference. She even read the shit she added and attributed it to him
part of the passage was forged, like fox said. PART OF.
I just found out today she added "Moore" to it, this is something CNN and every news outlet forgot to mention.
I thought it was pretty damning that he wrote "Roy Moore", but if it's JUST Roy/Ray...they need to verify that it's actually him, considering it can be ANY Roy.
Now I seriously don't know which parts he allegedly wrote, and what SHE wrote, since Roy/Ray appears to be a lighter blue.
For all we know it's just some random Roy (or Ray) she knew.
For all we know, Roy Moore is a martian invader here for our women.
Let me ask you a very simple question. Who is more likely to be a pedophile, Jones or Moore?
Jones. This year has been a testament that Democrats are primarily pedophiles and rapists.
Without question Jones. He has that proven child molester cannibal satanist look
Circumstantial evidence = conviction
Go fuck yourself faggot. Its a signature, not proof he molested her
according to gloria allred
Oh wow, she shopped a handwriting "expert" until she found one with confirmation bias.
Do people ever charge their phones?
according to Gloria Allred
I didn't forge it all.
I only forged a little bit.
She's admitted she wrote in the yearbook when she at first claimed that she did not. That is forgery and destroys her credibility.
Semantics. She didn't forge the signature but the extra words.
How about that drawing of the girl she showed in the press conference ? isnt that proof ?
She didn't forge the signature
she doesn't admit to forging the signature
if it had been legit she wouldn't have had to forge anything.
She admitted to adding additional date/location and the independent examiner said it's ALL consistent with a single author. Allred, also, still will not release it for further examination.
It's a hoax, everyone knows it even democrats, they just won't admit it.
The independent examiner looked at picture on the Internet. He never had the actual document and said he only gave the picture a once over.
according to Gloria Allred
She did forge part of the signature, though.
If the books not legit you must acquit
according to the lying attorney
Moore will win
Post more than once.
alright retards, if this is a conspiracy then why was Moore banned from the Mall decades ago?
You fucking hypocrites went apeshit over far less with Pizzagate, but as soon as soon as the truth is inconvenient to your world view you bury your heads in the sand. pathetic
then why was Moore banned from the Mall decades ago?
There is no evidence that he was ever banned from a mall. Only hearsay.
learn what forgery means you fucking brainlets.
Furthermore, if this was a conspiracy, then why the hell would they only take the time to forge half of it convincingly, then write in the (non-essential to the claim) dates in a different handwriting (which is a perfectly plausible thing to do)? Come on.
yeah, testimony from over a dozen people, including five members of the local legal community, a major political figure, two police, officers, and some random mall-goers. So your argument is that the conspirators have the resources and influence to keep all these people quiet and complicit, yet can't forge a proper document (or more like a paragraph) without slipping into another handwriting for the dates?
learn what forgery means you fucking brainlets
signing someone's signature other than your own is forgery
Turining "Roy" (or Ray) into Roy Moore DA is forgery
Roy Moore never signs with DA after his name. DA is was his clerk's initials which she added each time she 'stamped' his signature.
The nice lady got a signature to copy into the yearbook from divorce/custody papers when she appeared in his court later.
*he ruled against her
**she said in her first presser she had never seen moore since the 'rape attempt'
yeah, testimony from over a dozen people,
Testimony outside of a trial?
your argument is that the conspirators have the resources and influence to keep all these people quiet and complicit, yet can't forge a proper document (or more like a paragraph) without slipping into another handwriting for the dates?
The man is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
No charges have been filed.
Therefore he is completely innocent of anything you accuse him and he does not have to bow to your demands to resign or drop out of any political race.
Either charge him with a crime and wait for the results of the trial or stop trying to ruin him for political gain.
Of course it's his handwriting, she literally copied it off of his signature from her divorce filing. No one is questioning if it's a real signature - we're questioning that he himself wrote it. Now that she has admitted to forging at least part of it, there is no way to be certain that it is in any way real at all.
and some random mall goers
local legal community
also, what major political figure? I swear to god if you say Doug Jones.. furthermore, testimony about something from 40 years ago is fucking worthless. Three individuals came forward against the mall accusation. So who's right and who's wrong? To take one person's testimony over another is inherently biased, and that is precisely why testimony is fucking bullshit. It proves nothing either way. And on top of all that, you can't even get your fucking accusations straight on the mall story. CNN reported he was on 'watch' while other sources claim he was banned. So which fucking is it?
it's huffpo, no one reads, no need to defend.
The left knows only projection.
this level of fear mongering
Even if moore raped, murdered, and ate a nine year old, he is still more morally acceptable than an advocate of mass infanticide
Didn't the guy who managed that mall during the time Moore was allegedly banned say it was false?
yes, I posted the source from AL.com where he was one of the people that came forward in defense of Moore
forgery doesn't exist
everyone has a completely unique signature that couldn't possibly be copied or similar to anothers
Who gives a shit. Moore is going to win. Fuck democrats. Fuck alred. Fuck Clinton. Fuck op. All of you can kys.
We were lying about part of the signature
We are totally telling the truth that a handwriting expert looked at it AND verified its authenticity
HUFFPOST thinking they have the moral high ground on this when their source is a liar
You gotta dumb it down for these people, make it into something relatable.
If I made you a grilled cheese that was 99% cheese and 1% shit would you eat it?
media organizations are tripping over themselves to prove everyone else is fake news
media is actually learning to conduct research
Trump is saving the media from itself. Is there anything he can't do?
Proven false, it's bullshit... so fuck off... next?
Who is more likely to be a pedophile
I would bet on the party of Wienstien, Fraken, Conyers, Podesta, Lena Dunham, George Takei, and the next five to go down
according to *our* >one< handwriting expert its real
oh no lol we wont let anyone else look at it or a third party handwriting analysis to take place woopsie
Fuck you huffpost you fake shit calling other fake news
fox was never good for news -- the only reasons to watch are the cleavage and crotch shots
You forgot that part were liberals believe that a woman should be listened and believed. The fact that a woman is accusing a man of proof enough.
a handwriting expert said
Ahh yes trusting the lawyer that won't even have the "expert" come out and say it.
Defend them correcting their error? Which part of that needs correcting?
I mean a casual glance reveals that this is a rich jew funded rape accusation.
Fake news. They also asked to have an independent expert look at it rather than one paid for by Allred, and of course she declined.