Christopher Langan

>has an IQ of 200
>hobbies include working on the farm with his wife and lifting weights
>works blue collar jobs
>proved the existence of god using mathematics
>150 IQ mid-wits and IYI's constantly attacking him for not being atheist and refusing to adopt an elitist urban lifestyle

Is he /our guy/?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=dEaecUuEqfc
youtube.com/watch?v=TttHkDRuyZw
youtube.com/watch?v=wRsGPq77X0Q
youtube.com/watch?v=gNodh9OlTrQ
youtube.com/watch?v=flnhdhxVR6g
youtube.com/watch?v=aoYXihwcp8c
youtube.com/watch?v=j-7bxI_XOoQ
youtube.com/watch?v=Gh-DNNIUjKU
youtube.com/watch?v=ExgKJpJyDXQ
youtube.com/watch?v=tbAgl7w_Vws
takeourworldback.com/zionistcrimes.htm
ctmu.org/
goodmath.scientopia.org/2011/02/11/another-crank-comes-to-visit-the-cognitive-theoretic-model-of-the-universe/
youtube.com/watch?v=a7hHMOpyJKc&feature=youtu.be&t=58
youtube.com/watch?v=QyN0v4aRF3Y
youtu.be/cjBvRYIMvJ8
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>IQ of 200
>150 IQ mid-wits
that isn't how IQ works
but yeah probably

His information based universe theory it's gold.

But he lives to far apart from the academic world, perfect for memes tough.

He did not prove the existence of God using math.

>Christopher Langan
I saw a youtube video about this guy.
Can't shake the feeling that he is full of shit to a large degree.

>proved the existence of god using mathematics

>IQ of 200
No proof

>proved existence of God using mathematics
No he didn't

That guy is a great example of why IQ isn’t everything. He’s a prime time bullshitter. Like everyone’s annoying unemployed uncle. He just happens to be good at pattern recognition but is still too ducking stupid to do anything useful or profitable with it.

>mad autistic atheist desperately trying to disprove

Keking loudly at you ;^)

Post the cap of him going Sup Forums lite

Or maybe he sees the futility of vain ambitions and chooses to laugh at the world instead.

They say every wrinkle on his brain has taken all the online IQ tests and scored above 200 everytime.

"The relationship between physical and informational reductionism is a telling one, for it directly mirrors Cartesian mind-matter dualism, the source of several centuries of philosophical and scientific controversy regarding the nature of deep reality. As long as matter and information remain separate, with specialists treating one as primary while tacitly relegating the other to secondary status, dualism remains in effect. To this extent, history is merely repeating itself; where mind and matter once vied with each other for primary status, concrete matter now vies with abstract information abstractly representing matter and its extended relationships. But while the formal abstractness and concrete descriptiveness of information seem to make it a worthy compromise between mind and matter, Berlinski’s comment demonstrates its inadequacy as a conceptual substitute. What is now required is thus what has been required all along: a conceptual framework in which the relationship between mind and matter, cognition and information, is made explicit. This framework must not only permit the completion of the gradual ongoing dissolution of the Cartesian mind-matter divider, but the construction of a footworthy logical bridge across the resulting explanatory gap."

Let's make this thread more interesting.

How tall is he?

>there is no proof to these claims
>oh yeah? prove those non-existent proofs then hurr!
>but user, that's not how it wor..
>LOL KEK BTFO HURR GOTCHA KEKEKEK
>user I..
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>never mind

Didn't completly understand that but it seems coherent rather than just obtuse mumbo jumbo to make him look smart.

He got unabomber tier intelligence. When you're so smart you lose interest in material gain, learn life is bullshit, and then become a hermit.

Langan probably lacked trauma in life, low ambition. Charmed life as a kid. Got the pussy. Coasted on easy mode.

Unabomber saw the "anti-life" equation and went nuts... became a super villain terrorist.

.. sounds more like some edgy, enlightened fedora teenager but yeah sure, whatever.

I have 200 IQ but I'm not langhan.

Shut up, I want to believe.

It's not complex really, we live in a cartesian dualistic world, where information and matter work separately, therefore people like Hawkings believe that information can't be destructed and would survive even the event horizon of a black hole.

This makes sense in a cartesian reducted universe, but not for Lagan.

No you both aren't thinking right. Life is about knowing people and having the right connections to achieve even more success. IQ is only one form of intelligence that is measurable.

You guys constantly hate on the nigger but black gang members that sell drugs have their own form of intelligence that goes completely unaware by most people. For example they speak in code aka slang to keep their drug dealing hidden from cops. That right there is a form of intelligence.

The way I see intelligence is can you have influence in the world and the people in the world? Can you control your life in such a way that you always get the more favorable outcomes for yourself? Then I would say you have all the intelligence you can need. A stupid IQ test is meaningless at that point.

I think this guy realizes how meaningless life ultimately is unless you are born into successful families already. So he decided to just live an average middle class life and live with little worries. Smart choice if you ask me.

I agree with Langan, the problem is that this gap is the essence of our consciousness, we would be merely animals without it, we would however be as one, seeing information and matter as one.

intelligence is umeasurable over 150 or so because the people capable of making problems for the test are so rare (they'd need to be above 150 to do so) and bc the pool of people is so small the statistical margins lose meaning

he is not 200. the smartest people in history like von neumann are around 160

>slang is a form of intelligence

>Shut up, I want to believe.
Kek has spoken

Yeah, I see what you're saying, but niggers making up words while they sell drugs doesn't impress me.

Tard

This.

I'm more impressed with Orcas and the like, they have a brain capacity to see things in their mind with sound, more advanced than our minds in many respects.

Using code words to try and keep their drug dealing hidden from cops is a form of intelligence you stupid nigger. Why do you think cops always try to learn the street terms for drugs? Not saying niggers are absolutely smart here but they do have some intelligence otherwise they wouldn't be functional at all.

This guy lives in Missourah....

Btw, he knows the current status quo is bullshit.

QM bs

youtube.com/watch?v=dEaecUuEqfc

Electricity Eric Dollard

youtube.com/watch?v=TttHkDRuyZw

Gravity & Black Holes

youtube.com/watch?v=wRsGPq77X0Q

TRUMP knew Truth on 911

youtube.com/watch?v=gNodh9OlTrQ

youtube.com/watch?v=flnhdhxVR6g

youtube.com/watch?v=aoYXihwcp8c

youtube.com/watch?v=j-7bxI_XOoQ

GLOBAL HOAXING

youtube.com/watch?v=Gh-DNNIUjKU

youtube.com/watch?v=ExgKJpJyDXQ

youtube.com/watch?v=tbAgl7w_Vws

takeourworldback.com/zionistcrimes.htm

Http://www.ae911truth.org/

>For example they speak in code aka slang to keep their drug dealing hidden from cops. That right there is a form of intelligence.

Being incapable of correctly using English and rapidly cycling through linguistic fads is not laudable.

how do I get a 200 IQ?

You see this is what I'm getting at. You people can give credit to animals like Orcas. So often you here people go on about smart dogs. Yet you don't give certain black people the same credit? Why not? Because they are black? Quit being such stormfags. What I said makes complete sense. Some of the shitposters who replied to me just trying to fish for (You)'s but I'm not giving them shit.

intelligence over 150 is exactly as measurable as it is below that, it's just more difficult to find a sample population in that range to normalize against

t. IQ 148

>200 IQ
>farmboy
He better have found out how to dejew the food industry or else it's all been for naught.

And worked as a stripclub bouncer.

"How is this to be done? In a word, with language. This does not mean merely that language should be used as a tool to analyze reality, for this has already been done countless times with varying degrees of success. Nor does it mean that reality should be regarded as a machine language running in some kind of vast computer. It means using language as a mathematical paradigm unto itself. Of all mathematical structures, language is the most general, powerful and necessary. Not only is every formal or working theory of science and mathematics by definition a language, but science and mathematics in whole and in sum are languages. Everything that can be described or conceived, including every structure or process or law, is isomorphic to a description or definition and therefore qualifies as a language, and every sentient creature constantly affirms the linguistic structure of nature by exploiting syntactic isomorphism to perceive, conceptualize and refer to it. Even cognition and perception are languages based on what Kant might have called “phenomenal syntax”. With logic and mathematics counted among its most fundamental syntactic ingredients, language defines the very structure of information. This is more than an empirical truth; it is a rational and scientific necessity."

You are so wrong it's sad. Are you an abbo?

Language based intellegence is dominated by the kikes. Spacial intellegence by the whites, mathematics by the chinks. Niggers are bad at all three. One isolated example doesn't describe a trend you fucking brainlet.

r vs. K theory describes them perfectly. They cannot think long term.

Yep. That's what makes me wonder about this guy a bit.

t. Tested 146

i like him, he agrees with me on the thermodynamics thing.
t. 140 nigger
Garry Kasparov (IQ – 194)
Christopher Michael Langan (IQ – 190 – 210)
Edith Stern (IQ – 200+)
Kim Ung-Yong (IQ – 210)
Christopher Hirata (IQ – 225)
Marilyn Vos Savant (IQ – 228)
Terence Tao (IQ – 225 – 230)
William James Sidis (IQ – 250-300)
140 is nice
160 is amazing i know 2, one works on brains.
met 1 180, hes a freak.

>His IQ has never been officially measured by a third-party. It's all self-reported based off the results from a magazine IQ test he took in the 90's
>He's never written a mathematical paper despite claiming to have mathematical proof of god
>He got banned from editing his own wikipedia page because he kept adding false credentials and getting into fight with wiki editors

Here's what Dave Miller wrote about langan in 2008:

>Let me see if I can clarify why no intelligent, educated people can think of Chris Langan as anything except a fool, a charlatan, or, possibly, a prankster with a somewhat eccentric sense of humor. His CTMU masterpiece consists largely of undefined jargon, not known to real experts and not explained by Langan himself. That is the sure sign of a crackpot. The other problem is that those of us who have some real expertise in some of the fields about which he pontificates find his musings to be nonsense.

>I have a Ph.D. from Stanford in elementary particle theory: I know a great deal about quantum mechanics. I also am co-patentholder on several patents that apply information theory to various problems in computer and communication systems.

>Quantum physics and information theory are two of the subjects Langan appeals to in his CTMU work. Part of the point is to make it sound as if you would recognize the profundity of his writing if only you understood all of the technical background as he does. Well, in those two fields, I do understand the technical background, and his use of those subjects is a sham: it only seems impressive to people who are as ignorant of those subjects as Langan is.

>Personally, my guess is that it is all a big joke, like Mencken’s bathtub hoax: Langan is running an experiment to see how many gullible fools there really are in the country (answer: hundreds of millions – just watch the election!)

Nice, where is this goys work?

...

>intelligence is umeasurable over 150
>the smartest people in history like von neumann are around 160

ctmu.org/

No one is denying blacks the agency of being human beings.
Truth be told there are many species in our environment that are smarter than blacks in mental puzzles, in fact some of them would outperform even whites in some tasks.
Would I consider blacks to be of interesting intellect if we classified them as something other than human? Probably, but since they fall under our species they are just the worst of them, we don't call pitbulls particularly intelligent either mind you.

I wish I could talk so fluidly like this dude

Wonder what Tesla was. He could simulate machines in his mind and figure out wear on components.

I never implied a trend or anything dumb fuck. Go ahead and tell me you are smarter than pic related though. Go ahead and make me laugh.

Simple, by not being a fucktard.

Why would you even use that as an example of black intelligence though? I literally did the same thing with my sister when I was 6 years old when we made up code-names for things to confuse our parents.

It's measurable but not quite reliable for iq. Since it is based on distribution.

What line of work are you in? and do you guys just sit around and circle-jerk all day about your IQ's?

check'd

probably enough they would have a hard time testing him, like those top 2.

Yes.

dude can't communicate his ideas clearly. would rather "sound smart" than make a substantive point.

he should kill himself.

>implying academia is reliable
You have no idea how bad it is.

I be iq of 170
I find hard to out bed,
I still stick finger up bum.
Test me ask a question

Mark Chu-Carroll on Langan (2011):

>To recap: this "theory" of his has three problems, each of which is individually enough to discard it; with the three of them together, it's a virtual masterpiece of crap.

>1. The "theory" consists mostly of word-games - arguing about the meanings of words like "universe" and "inclusion", without actually explaining anything about how the universe works. It's a theory with no predictive or descriptive value.

>2. The "theory" is defined by creating a new version of set theory, whose axioms are never stated, and whose specific goal guarantees that it will be an unsound theory. Unsound mathematical theories are useless: every possible statement is provable in an unsound theory.

>3. The author doesn't understand the difference between syntax and semantics, between objects and models, or between statements and facts - and because of that, the basic statements in his theory are utterly meaningless.

goodmath.scientopia.org/2011/02/11/another-crank-comes-to-visit-the-cognitive-theoretic-model-of-the-universe/

TL;DR

Langan is a con-artist who is known to shill himself online in order to sell his shitty e-books. If past behavior is any indication, Langan is likely in this thread right now.

>I literally did the same thing with my sister when I was 6 years old when we made up code-names for things to confuse our parents.

Which shows intelligence. Remember these black gang members are dumb as shit. But even in being dumb as shit they still have moments or times where they can be intelligent. Even as dumb as they can be. Just like how no animal is truly smarter than man but we can still recognize whenever we see signs of intelligence in animals. Just like with these ghetto blacks. They can have moments of brilliance.

carpenter, lots of freedom. work when i want, neet when i dont. all i do is math and labor, dont have to talk to anyone or deal with any kind of corporate faggotry. i could have been anything, i chose to stay out of it. was offered to skip multiple grades, quit at 16 and picked up a saw.

Kind of do, I'm still the best researcher to come up of my university cause it got closed down after a few years.

I think I may actually be retarded myself. I was in the special school district from k-12 (resource) and forced to sit in class with literal retarded children at times.
It was only for one period of the day.

I was also not cut out for public school and was put in Montessori class in my early years.
I was always so pissed off at this, I struggled so hard in public education.

and now, I am applying for PhD programs in philosophy. For me, philosophy is like swimming its so easy.

Tho many folks that I tell, kinda laugh at me, I guess they think philosophy sucks and only losers study it.

There's little difference between the unabomber and a lot of non-terrorists who see life is pointless. I just enjoy playing video games and masturbating on my wife. He enjoyed blowing shit up. It's all pointless in the end.

>For example they speak in code aka slang to keep their drug dealing hidden from cops.
lmao what. If you hear some nignog speaking in tongues you can fucking bet that boy does drugs.

I have noticed that the very smartest of the smart tend to be theists.

Lmao he is just a faggot who failed out of Texas and now pushes the establishment theory. I graduatedfrom Texas with a Civil engineering degree, now im a PE doing architectural engineering. I've read his books, pure fiction and entertaining too.

Black holes are total bullshit, thus his book about what it feels like in a black hole is bullshit. Cool theory, but unproven. All theoretical kike bullshit that will never help mankind. It is a mindfuck. Tesla knew.
"Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off throughequationafterequation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality."

Black holes "proof" BTFO
youtube.com/watch?v=wRsGPq77X0Q

>implying the unabomber was a villain
He fucked up with the bombs, he would've done better by having a white family and spreading the knowledge, but he's no villain. Plus he might've been a victim of MK while in Harvard, so I feel for the dude

Bing!

Tesla

>>His IQ has never been officially measured by a third-party. It's all self-reported based off the results from a magazine IQ test he took in the 90's

youtube.com/watch?v=a7hHMOpyJKc&feature=youtu.be&t=58

>where mind and matter once vied with each other for primary status, concrete matter now vies with abstract information abstractly representing matter and its extended relationships.

So before we saw physical phenomena and created theoretical frameworks to explain them. Now we develop more and more theoretical phenomena first and then seek to validate them through observations in the physical reality.

That's what I understood from that line. Which kinda makes sense considering things like black holes that have yet to be proven through direct observation and existed first only theoretically.

I've seen Chris go to forums where they call him out, and he actually argues with them

You can tell Chris is in a league entirely of his own. His problem is that he's so fucking intelligent, he doesn't understand that people just don't understand a lot of what he's saying, but he just kind of assumes that they know, because those things are so obvious to him. It's literally like me, a person with an average IQ, explaining something that I find simple, to someone with a significantly lower IQ. They just won't understand the concepts, whereas they just seem like "common sense" to me. Then I'll try to explain what I mean by using more "common sense" things, and they still don't fucking understand.

That's Chris. Like I said, he's just on another level of intelligence. Also, read up his history of schooling. He left in college because he got to a point where he was teaching the teachers. Any attempt to smear his intelligence is just that, a smear.

Theoretical physics is slowing converging on an information based conception of the universe at this point.

Cool, still...

"People who Brag about their IQ are losers."
- Stephen Hawking

I would like you to watch this video through to completion please.

youtube.com/watch?v=QyN0v4aRF3Y

Information only has meaning when there's something to process it. Cognition is nothing but a form of information processing.

Damn he's really chad here. Why did the fucker get fat, he had chad potential. Imagine him with a beard like Mel's

He was setup. First false flag to cover up Clintons drug cartel in arkansas.
Kikes wanted to ban militia patriots.

youtu.be/cjBvRYIMvJ8

Exactly, it was cool to shit on Lagan back then but here we are, cognitive theoretical bits of data making the world go round.

No, that entire paragraph made perfect sense. You're just stupid.

hi chris. you faggot. kys.

you know who else are losers? people who make singular contributions to their field in their 20s and then remain irrelevant for 55+ years, riding on their early success which has since been overwritten and is basically useless failed theory.

and also being famous because you randomly didn't die. have some random gene that halts progression of a terrible disorder before it kills you. bravo here's your medal

just in case you needed that one more time: stephen hawking last contributed to science in his mid 20s

There's a lot of political bullshit throughout, but that's always been the case. Most of the hard STEM subjects still have reasonable standards.

I noticed this too. Which is why I find it funny when my atheist friends, who consider me a fairly smart guy, believes in God, a concept so utterly ridiculous to them. Hell they even have said they lost respect for me when I told them I consider myself a christian.

Philosophy requires a certain level of verbal IQ just to understand the syntax, but by no means does it make you smart. Perhaps you're like me in that you hate numbers but love discussing concepts and why people do things. Start a business. You'll be good at it.

Instead he became famous by bombing people ensuring that people would know who he was and would be curious as to what lead to him doing it therefore stumbling upon his manifesto.

whats funny is this 140 is aryan.
the 160's i know are jews.
the 180 is a mutt.
aside from the flukes i find the demographics to be pretty accurate. also support barron trump for next fuhrer, i think hes gonna get redpilled faster than anyone in history.

a sign of intelligence is the ability to communicate any concept or idea clearly. langan ain't got that ability.

Bullshit, and doesn't even refute my claim. He has never taken an IQ test administered by a third party and shown the results, why is this?
>too high to measure
>Very smart man

>tfw to smart too take IQ tests because my brain power keeps breaking the scores

Where are his scientific papers? Where are the IQ test results? Where are the patents? Where is ANYTHING of use or value to the scientific community he has contributed?

You fell for a conjob.
You fell for the conjob too. Literally all his bullshit is self-reported and promotion for himself to sell pseudo-intellectual ramblings to gullible morons like yourself.

There seems to be an edgy athiest sweet spot around 115-125 IQ, which is right where most people in pleb subjects in university are sitting.

No, actually, this guy is saying exactly what he means to say.

The problem is that your average plebian doesn't have a PhD in philosophy or have studied philosophy for years. While philosophers can assign semantics to his words, it's practically a foreign language to everyone else.

He works as a bouncer dude, why does he need to do that?

Or you think being smart means he's forced to pander to your vision of what a smart men should be?

Wait, what? Even with him? DUDE, I CAN'T STAND THE CLINTONS ANY FUCKING LONGER FOR FUCKS SAKE, WHAT DID THESE FUCKERS NOT DO? REEEEE

It was clearly communicated. But one can only distill complexity so far without losing key information that you're trying to convey. It's a bit like image compression, the more you compress it, the more detail you lose, and at a certain you can't tell WTF you're looking at anymore.

>Implying you can brag when being anonymous.
If your implication is me being a loser, then you would be correct.
My people are being wiped out and I can't do anything to stop it even with excess brainpower, it really doesn't help at the end of day, collectivism does however and I don't have the necessary vocabulary skills to convince people to drop their lives and start fighting for their future, very few people do.
OH I guess that makes him a loser too.

It's like you trying to communicate simple physics to a literal retard. You can spell it out as simply as you want, they just won't get it.

It's not like his sister is a converted jewess or anything right?