How does a jury watch the video of this sadist murdering a drunk man and decide that he did nothing wrong?

How does a jury watch the video of this sadist murdering a drunk man and decide that he did nothing wrong?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/LKaVwhYhM0Q
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

youtu.be/LKaVwhYhM0Q

What if the drunk guy had gotten into his car and ran over some little girl?

Do we know that they were allowed to view the whole video?

He was a coward, but not guilty of manslaughter.

From the very beginning, Sgt. Langley escalated tensions beyond a reasonable level. His commands were confusing and he created a stressful environment that compounded the difficulty of following said commands. MISTAKE #2. He can repeatedly be heard belittling Shaver's intelligence, telling him to "Shut the fuck up!" and telling him that he was "Going to fucking kill [him]!" When Shaver was told to cross his legs, he crossed his right leg over his left leg, prompting another outburst from Sgt. Langley, "Left leg over your RIGHT leg!" It was this stress that lead Shaver to fail Sgt. Langley's game of life-and-death hokey-pokey, costing him his life.

While Sgt. Langley may not be responsible for the tone of his voice, he can certainly be said to be responsible for his confusing commands. Lana Sweet complied with Sgt. Langley's commands but Shaver, who was at this point sobbing (after being told he was going to die multiple times), was not out of the woods yet. First he was ordered to cross his fingers behind his head, then he was ordered to put his hands in the air, then he was ordered to crawl (while kneeling). He had not seen how his girlfriend "crawled" and thus did not know he was supposed to inch forward on his knees instead of on his hands and knees. Sgt. Shaver let him slide for this, until he went to pull his pants up, which is when Philip Brailsford opened fire on Shaver, shooting him 5 times center-mass with his AR-15.

Had Sgt. Langley not breached procedure by making Shaver play SAW-Twister, he might still be alive. And that's the most egregious mistake of all. Cuffing him when he had his hands behind his head would have ended the situation almost immediately, provided Brailsford and others covered room #502. As for room #502, after the officers callously murdered Shaver, they attempted to breach room #501. Mistake #4. The funniest mistake, if it wasn't so poetically tragic

The jury did not view the video.

The jury only saw the very small segment where is reaches to grab his pants. JUSTice

If a citizen commanded a person to engage in a game of life and death simon says they would not only be charged with 1st degree murder but also torture

>have a guy facedown with his arms out
>still cannot control the situation from there

Cops are fucking retarded

they were not. knowledge of the 'You're Fucked' dust cover was also not allowed

Take out the trash just another day

Idiots on a power trip like most cops.

the jury wasn't allowed to see the video

>Sadist!!!
>Murderer!!!!
>I'm not a spastic libfaggot, I just sound like one.

>The jury did not view the video.
That is a lie! Stop repeating that bullshit. They saw the video.

Thatd be funny

It's the only relevant part, they're only on trial for killing him, not making him cry.

Because we love our cops, don't we folks?

Lying faggot.

Jew lawyer trickery

Daniel Shaver did nothing wrong
>not illegal to own a gun
>not illegal to get drunk at hotel
>followed all directions
>scratches ass
>get shot

OK if this is true why did the Def attorney not say something surly he saw the whole video.

How is this allowed?

REMINDER THAT PHILIP BRAILSFORD WASN'T THE ONE YELLING ORDERS IN THE VIDEO!!!

You're absolutely correct. I take back what I said now that I've researched it.

because if we don't allow our own police to behave like this Israel might look bad.

Both the cop and the guy that got shot were idiots. This is what happens when two morons meet and one has a gun. But in the end the dead guy moved his hands out of sight... this will get you killed every time.

That guy on the floor was the next hitler/stalin.

Thank god for incoherent and jittery cops.

It's been reported somewhere that they didn't see the whole video, but some events leading up to the shooting

i dont see a case for murder
the officer had a reasonable justification with all the reaching
now he should be fired couldnt handle the situation at all

>You're absolutely correct. I take back what I said now that I've researched it.
Thank you! Sorry I attacked so harshly.

Police unions

Hitler took the guns.
Hitler was a socialist, just Like Stalin.
Antifa are the real Nazis.

I get my news from AJ, Coernovich and Laura Loomer. Only reputable sources. I wish pol listened to more Steven Crowder, he's funny and he's based.

No worries, I'm not sure why people are spreading the rumor that the jurors didn't see the video (or why I believed it blindly) even NBC is reporting that they saw the full version.

Now bootlickers are hooking up in these threads!

Madness!

Defence did not show the shooting. I don't know if the prosecution did

This is basically the judge screwing the with mechanisms of justice to engineer the outcome.

>Defence did not show the shooting.

You'd hope not.

>"muh cops can't do no wrong DOG BLESS AMERICA WOOOOOOO USA USA USA USA!!"

you fucks have had too many VB's this morning all ready go back to bed.

Carlton, mate.

OMFG YES POST THIS THREAD AGAIN OMFG IM CUMMING. THE 30 TIMES THIS HAS BEEN POSTED TODAY IS NOT ENOUGH. OMFG MAKE ME CUM MORE FUCK.

PLEASE LEFTIST SHILLS DOWN ANOTHER REDBULL AND SPLASH SOME ON YOUR NECKBEARD FIRE UP SOME MORE OF THE SAME FUCKING THREADS OMFG IM CUMMING

>VB

Yuck

Shaver wasn't really an idiot, he was just drunk and scared. The one truly wrong move he made was not admitting that he was drunk and admitting that he would not be able to comply with their demands. Although I don't think he expected them to have such weirdly specific commands for him. And that was also before they started screaming and threatening to kill him.

bazinga, I took a mans life today!

my bad.

Real question here.
If he'd said he was drunk, what would the cops SOP be that is different?

Reminds me of the Sam Jack scene from Pulp Fiction. Except, his demands weren't as absurd as this real situation's.

he shot a prone man on the floor like 7 times. you got to be some kind of pud.

if langley shot it would be manslaughter in my book
the fact that it was another officer that killed him makes this difficult to prosecute as manslaughter
if this was not procedure at all you could argue criminal negligence

Just-us system. Most judges low-mid level mason. Cops very low level mason basic dumb muscle.

WHAT IF THE LITTLE GIRL WAS A RACIST NAZI????????????????????????????

Most people of legal driving age understand not to wave guns around a window and then keep reaching where you'd place a pistol after being told not to. Coincidentally, the jury has no children on it.

Therefore, they found him not guilty. Fucking crazy court stuff that we'll never understand, ya know?

And it's 3:50 p.m. here now 12/12/17

OMFG IM CUMMING YES THIS TUREAD FOR TYE 100TH TIME TODAY OHHHHHH FUCKKKKKKKKK O....OHHHH OMFG

He should have never had to even had to readjust his pants. He only fumbled after they continued barking orders while he was face down.

I assume they would have gone to him instead of making him come to them, but I don't know.

Yeah the fact that the voice on the video was not Brailsford does change my perception of it as well. The whole situation was engineered by Langley, he's the most culpable. He's the one who said loud and clear that Shaver would be shot if he messed up. Brailsford is a trigger happy CoD LARPing little faggot but at the end of the day he was just going along with his retard boss's orders.

1. he lied about not being drunk
2. judge withheld the part where the guy inscribed "you're fucked" on his weapon.
3. he's not the guy barking the dumbass orders.

It's not whether he did something wrong or not. It's whether he, under the laws of his state and country, committed second degree murder or not. Which he didn't.

Well said, user. This guy deserves at least as much recognition as Braidsford. Yet, nobody seems to want to talk about him.

Well I agree that it was unfair the guy died BUT ti the society that you republirat FUCKS WANTED! So be careful what you any authority worshippers wish for. stupid fucks!

I wouldn't be talking since you have the second highest murder rate in the world.

WHY WAS THIS GUY SUCH A JITTERY SPASTIC

LOOKS OLD AS FUCK, WHERES HIS EXPERIENCE

That's why I WOULD be talking. What he committed, by law, wasn't murder.

He would be considered innocent until proven guilty and still be alive.

Most people think Brailsford is the shouter and the shooter

YOUNG MAN!


SHUT UP.

>innocent until proven guilty
WHAT IF HE WAS ACCUSED WITHOUT EVIDENCE OF CONSOLING A WOMAN BY RUBBING HER BACK

You're probably going to shoot up a school at some point but cops haven't shot you yet.

I know, drives me crazy. Seem to be a couple of anons itt that are aware at least.

pew pew pew

Faggot

Old Sup Forums would have been outright praising this guy; thus the board's name, but no it seems. Looks like the Election really did make this place into Reddit.

>dumb reddit-tier cum bubbler that wasn't even allowed on the internet when Dorner wasn't cornered
Sup Forums hates pigs. It's you reddit faggots shitting up the place.

>tinkerbell

Well that descalated quickly.
But whos right?

They both are, the Jury was bored and slept through the video while the light were off
Court's boring as fuck

t. cuck

US has failed it's citizens. I say we sanction them until they decide to get rid of the corruption within their law system and accept more democratic ways to go about "justice".

>Revisionistic nigger confusing Sup Forums for Sup Forums

Completely false. Hating cops is the status quo and is seen as politically correct. Authoritarianism is Sup Forums as it gets. Kill all the innocent, or does that not follow your cherrypicking agenda, queer?

>Jury of his peers

>it’s politically correct to oppose law enforcement officers

The absolute state of the right wing.

it seems to me that the (((alt right))) are actually the biggest cucks.

Welcome to communism 101, where the police are the devil. They're fine hanging out with Stalinism though, albeit in secrecy.

Well, yeah. Name one true winner that the alt-right supports.

>communism
>anti police
are you retarded? communist societies were police states idiot.

Hi plebbit. Remember, the guy that died was a nu-male retard who had been pointing a realistic looking AR out the window to the extent the police were called.

Once they came, rather than comply with the demands of thee police too keep his hands visible, he went for his waistband THREE FUCKING TIMES.

We can only hope this happens more often. Soyboy Apocalypse now.

The Jury Did not watch the video - it was ommitted from evidence for being to damnning

>ordered to keep hands visible
>goes for waistband three fucking times

It was a good kill reddit.

Good. Its just a shame the cop had to lose his job. We need more dead bugmen.

People don't like drunks.

he was drunk and made a few mistakes so that warrant's a death sentence in merica? no wonder the shithole is universally despised. land of the cucks!

That's why I explicitly said Stalinism, you fucking retard. What are you, Chinese? Can you read? Phoneposters these days.

Real communism has never happened because it literally cannot exist without someone leading the sheep or policing them. It's lie.

why are you so triggered, retard? HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY! move on! How does an illegal felon that enters USA illegally 5 times kills a young lady and gets acquitted?

> all Soyboy jury lets another Soyboy walk free
They can't keep getting away with it

No one is mentioning the area. I live in Arizona, its full of old boomer boot licker types

Yes. Sticking a realistic rifle out the window and going for your waistband three fucking times when police are called is enough to warrent a death sentence.

He wasn't the first person to die because he's a retard, he won't be the last.

Three reasons

1) Jurys are instructed to rule on actions only within the split second timeframe of deadly force. If you freeze frame that moment, he's reaching for his waist band, fear for my life, and that's all that matters. Everything that happened before that is disregarded, even if the officer created the environment for the mistake to happen in the first place

2) That actually doesn't matter anyway because the sergeant did all the fucking up before the shooting. All brailsford did was kneel in a hallway before he shot shaver.

3) Brailsford is on shaver's opposite left side unlike the other officers. He couldn't see where he was reaching and that he was just pulling his pants up.

4) Police are trained to shoot when they see a move like shaver performed, whether that's a good enough reason to shoot someone or not

If I was the jury I would be fuming that I wasn't deliberating on sergeant langley's trial instead. He's actually responsible for what happened. But I don't even think there is an offense on the books to charge him with. Never heard of a law about shitty orders.

Fuck I can't count, guess I'm shot

Probably the best summary of the even I've read so far. In the end every tax payer in the United States will be responsible for this officer's inability. Somone is going to get paid a lot of money for this.

EZ. Feelings aren't facts.