If sexual liberation is so bad, how come all developed countries are sexually liberal?

And how come all sexually restrictive countries like the Islamic world are terrible places to live? Doesn't this prove sexual freedom is good?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singapore
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

t. literal retard
sage this thread

I hate Muslims but the citizens of Saudi Arabia Qatar Kuwait and the UAE live far better than your borderline third world shithole

women's rights are a joke. they should not be in places of high public authority, should not teach our youth. sexual liberation has lead to an all out degenerate world where the edge get a pushed further and further, while we wait for "What's next/how far can they take us to keep us thrilled"?
It lead to the fall of Rome and will lead to the fall of the West. Germany ww2 had it right by burning transgender science studies books, that's where sexual liberation is taking us to.

also sage

Dammi il suo nome, zoccolo.

Dubai is the greatest city in the world and sex outside of wedlock is literally illegal. Japan, the second, is also pretty straight-laced.

would run my tongue up and down pic related's asscrack and chew her cheeks for days, niggaw!

Because “developed” is a meaningless word and you’re using it to mean “sexually liberal”.
Also sexual liberalness came out of wealth, as people got complacent and hedonistic. It’s causing a lot of harm.
That’s like saying “if fast food is so bad and fresh fruit and vegetables are so good, then why is every developed country addicted to fast food?”

BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAP

Sweden is the most "sexually liberated" (you mean women became glorified prostitutes) country and look how that worked out for them

"1 post by this ID."
Soft porn used as clickbait.
Neck yourself, shill.
Sage in all fields.
Hi, alphabet niggers!

Developed Countries beget sexual liberalism, not the other way around, Luigi. And it's just the first sign of stagnation.

Also sage.

>sex outside of wedlock is literally illegal
Except to children and camels right Achmed?

It is a country with very high standards of living (higher than USA) and the population reports high level of satisfaction with their lives.

What's the problem?

Same applies to prevalence of obesity.

Doesn't this prove obesity is good?

they've became developed before sexual liberation.

and they won't be developed for long...

many asian countries are already better developed and with every year they get more advantage.

that girl is like 150 cm lol

precisely tgis.
sage

>Prefering the arab desert to beautiful Italy

Fucking leaf

>Dubai is the greatest city in the world
wtf? why?

Kike degeneracy is a plague on society

S _ _ _

>Because “developed” is a meaningless word

> thinks economic development is a meaningless word and not something objectively studied by economists
> t. Canadian intellectual

BRAAAAAAAAAP

It's not because of the desert you literally get hundreds of thousands of dollars by the state in free money/

Too much sexual liberation in the west.

>Dubai is the greatest city in the world
lmfao what. because of muh shiny skyscrapers?

/thread

>if mental illness is so bad, how come all developed countries have a higher rate of mentally ill people?

What a fucking retard

FPBP sage
P
B
P

s
a
g
e

Conservatives built it.
Liberals n other parasites destroy it.

Nut very hard to understand.
( for a liberal tho ....hmm )

Except... the capitalism that allows countries to develop requires also individual freedom that includes sexual freedom.

Sexual liberation is a good thing, women are the natural arbiters of who gets to breed and who doesnt so only the best males will produce offspring

When i go on tinder i only see maybe 1-2 guys i find attractive but if i lower my bar i get hundreds of matches. Women need to exercise some form of quality control because even shit men want to fuck

> t. Amerimutt who has never been outside the USA

If you ever go to the Middle East, they have high levels of obesity.

>only reason a place in the world is good to live is because muh thots.
Kys

except tinder is used for meaningless hookups,not a breeding partner

just (((how))) can this be?

>Women need to exercise some form of quality control because even shit men want to fuck

Don't say this you'll crush the hopes of the neckbeards on pol

you have shit taste that thot has disgusting fake hair and an out of proportion mongrel face.

t. 47% effectively illiterate population

>And how come all sexually restrictive countries like the Islamic world are terrible places to live?
Because they literally terrible places to live, like a fucking desert?

Brrrrrrraaaaaaaaaaaaappppppppppffffffftttftfftftftftftftttrftpppppffffff

You mix cause and effect, nigger.

Development makes people too easy going and leads to sexual liberation, not the other way around.

...

>Except... the capitalism that allows countries to develop requires also individual freedom that includes sexual freedom.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singapore

>Singapore ranks 5th on the UN Human Development Index and the 3rd highest GDP per capita. It is ranked highly in education, healthcare, life expectancy, quality of life, personal safety and housing.

>Singapore is a global commerce, finance and transport hub. Its standings include: the most "technology-ready" nation (WEF), top International-meetings city (UIA), city with "best investment potential" (BERI), third-most competitive country, third-largest foreign exchange market, third-largest financial centre, third-largest oil refining and trading centre and the second-busiest container port.

which part of the middle east exactly? far as I'm aware most obese people live in the west, east and asia

>cause and effect =/= effect is cause
t. dumb cunt

capitalism started in early XIX century while sexual liberation started in th 60s of XX century

so you are obviously wrong

law=/=manners or culture

Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Emirates all have high levels of obesity.

> A "country" the size of a city is the best example to prove the point
> t. retard

It's possible that a lot of the stuff this board complains about could actually end up being good in the end.
Yes, things seem bleak right now, but imagine this
Imagine you are a cave man, and have no idea of childbirth. What it is, what its purpose is absolutely nothing. Now you stumble across a woman in labor. You would immediately think something terrible is going on. There's bleeding, screaming, the woman is obviously in a lot of pain. To an unknowing bystander it would seem like something horribly wrong is happening, and it is a serious state of urgency.
Little do you know that the miracle of child birth is happening though.

I like to compare our society to this. Yes, it's very nasty. Change almost always is. The thing about it is there's the chance for some miraculous to happen at the same time. To come out on the other side better than before.
Our society is currently in the birth canal.

All developed countries were drastically more sexually restricted 50 years ago, and what has happened in that time?

>divorce rates around 50% depending on which western country
>white birth rates below replacement in every country
>less people getting married and getting married later in life
>infidelity rates increasing

Also

>how come all sexually restrictive countries like the Islamic world are terrible places to live?

They're not

>n-nuh uh! your example doesn't count, because reasons!

wow gr8 argument

>offer the old pensions so they have less incentives to have children and if they do to make them be both productive and grateful enough to take care of them in old age
>offer the single-mothers child support, free public childcare and education
>etc.
Sexual liberation in the sense of not violently oppressing people is fine, but forbidding people from holding women to standards while also forcing the productive members of society to subsidize irresponsible people is incredibly retarded.

/thread
Sage

If sexual liberation is good why are all "developed" countries in decline?

>women are the natural arbiters of who gets to breed and who doesnt

that's only true in a society where certain enforced rules protect certain types of citizens.
The absolute natural arbiters are men because they possess the necessary strenght to beat and rape any woman against her consent

Although you're using a falso analogy, you're right. Sexual liberation IS good, not for the reason you mentioned, though. Why the FUCK would you even wonder whether it's good or not? You're listening to too many of these fucking virginal man children, retard.

>commie tripfag
Never reply to this.

Just because a succesfull person does something, doesnt mean its automattically a good thing.

They were already developed before the sexual liberation.

Sup Forums sucks, every day I fall in love on here with my dreams, then I go back to reality of.......?

Dubai is just a flashy balloon . It will just pop after they run low on oil to pump .

When EVERY successful person does something, it usually is a good thing.

Developed countries aren't great because of sexual degenracy, they're great in spite of it. It's a natural consequence of easy prosperous life. Same way too easy of a childhood spoils a good too much prosperity spoils a society which eventually collapses as their culture degenrates. Same reason a society like Rome collapsed due to cultural reasons.

Sexual subjugation is necessary for the establishment of society. Our ancestors were disgusting apes with an alpha/beta structure that was enforced by female sexual selection. Take a quick look at sexual biology. A female needs to spend months pregnant and years mothering to have a single child. A male can impregnate hundreds of females per year. Sexual strategies developed around this - females seek the most fit male, males seek as many females as possible. For this reason, females prefer to be one of many wives of the most fit male than to be the lone wife of a weak male. Males are expendable resources and they were far less plentiful than women in the pre-human and early human times. The norm in ape societies is a dominant male who breeds with all of the women, and they seek him out for his superior genetics. The submissive males are weak and they adapted the sexual strategy of being loyal to the alpha male but impregnating his harem in secret.

Civilization began when the dominant males became smart and ambitious enough to realize they could manipulate the betas into constructing complex societies through increasing egalitarianism within the male sex. Along comes monogamy and arranged marriage. Females are forced to marry betas, the alpha has fewer wives, and the betas become less resentful. They are no longer simple foragers, they are builders and soldiers and scientists. Christianity enforced strict monogamy in the west, which also went through the most natural selection of cultures and systems through the amount of war and conquest in its history. That is what allowed the west to conquer all others - it knew conquest from its own history. The importance of sexual relations to western dominance cannot be understated.

The greatness pushed so far that the west developed incredible degrees of liberty and comfort. Female sexual selection in the west is new. Now the Muslims and East Asians are superior to us in the sense of natural selection.

Developed countries are able to afford ridiculous luxuries and stupid ideas without collapsing (immediately).

You have to be insanely successful to be in a position to handicap yourself with retarded ideas and still be able to coast without crashing immediately.

And it's not sexual freedom per se that marks the modern West, it's *rights and freedoms for women* generally.

In most of the world and throughout most of history, making rational decisions without the stupid emotional bullshit that women bring to politics especially national defence was a life-and-death matter. In most of history and in less developed countries today letting a fucking woman lead your armies would have led to conquest. Only in places like Europe where you have all kinds of techno-gizmos and the United States lording over everybody is such effeminacy possible.

Actually, right now in South Korea you may be about to see what happens when female voters in an ABSOLUTELY DEGENERATE naive and softened society meet the most ruthless cruel and least effeminate leaderships in the world collide.

Women have always been oppressed for dressing half nak....

correlation is not causation, read a fucking book

So was it sexual "liberation" that enables tue Enlightenment, industrial revolution, scientific revolution etcetera? Or is the sexual."liberation" the result of cultural forces that have been allowed space thanks to the various freedom enablng developments in the west?

Personally I think it's not a liberation but more like a regression and a form of slavery to worldly and carnal desires, not something to strive for at all. Of xourse the middle eastern cultures go too far as well. The west needs a healthy and balanced sexual norm. And healthy family values. The emphasis on sex in the west today is empty, lustful and bad for society.

Simple

>Tough times create hard men
>Hard men create good times
>Good times create weak men and their love of women's rights
>Cucks create hard times


(we're between step 3 and 4)

Only developed countries are sexually liberal since they are the only countries that CAN be sexually liberal.
Remove all form of condoms and pills and shit, and remove things like electricity, then society will naturally become more traditionalist.

fpbp

They're developed in spite of it, not because of it

That's one lumpy ass.

Never have I wanted to see a woman blacked more than her.

The degenerates have built nothing. All they do is destroy what was given to them they have no self respect and that's why the west is dying.

...

I prefer women with two arms

Do you mean the countries that had everything going for them when they Supported Christian/Conservative Values.
How Retarded can you be to not see that within the last 50 years every developed country has been turning in to a 3rd world hell-scape due to degeneracy Promoted by the Left

sexual liberation and development go hand in hand, they are both the outcomes of getting rid of religious maniacs wielding power.
and both of those things are good.

who else only here for the ass?

If heroine is bad, why comes that junkies take it every day.

me.

SAGE!

You must be baiting, a country with high levels of satisfaction has no reason to 1984 and hide shit like crime stats from the populace. The propaganda is so thiccccc in sweden you are not even allowed to get the real stats from the state, they have to be leaked out.You are a literal fucking retard like first post said.

They'd be eating dirt if they weren't sitting on the biggest oil reserves in the world.

It's the same with all policies.
When you become rich you look for problems to solve that aren't there. It's just egoism on a societal scale.
That's why people become vegetarians and feminists and care about the habitat of the blue necked barn swallow.

...

And yet I lived there for 5 years with my girlfriend and we not only had sex but had two children...

She's like a pretty Chloe Moretz...

>Sexually liberal/developed countries in massive decline
>Muslim countries populations bursting at the seams and flooding into the first world

MGTOW/Sandnigger Shill, pls.

...

With sexual licence, pair-bonding, a prerequisite for stable families, becomes impossible.

>capitalism requires also individual freedom

He also requires highly intellectual people who - oops - do not breed due a sexual revolution.

That is why Singapore introduced eugenics and banned all form of sexuality in public life

You have it backwards. In prosperous countries, people have the luxury of picking attractive mates and breeding even sexier people. And all these sexy people means more sex.

Sexual liberation isn't a huge problem in and of itself, it's bad for birthrates but evolution will take care of that.

Sexual liberation + jews is the problem. The existence of sluts is one thing, media and education declaring sluts normal is the big problem.

j-j-j-ews n-n-niggers p-p-raise t-t-rump

>that flag

Is there a more pathetic thing than a Sw*de?