Was slavery the main cause of the Civil War?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pcy7qV-BGF4
youtube.com/watch?v=RPOnL-PZeCc
civil-war.net/pages/ordinances_secession.asp
youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
youtube.com/watch?v=-iU9kf2EHJw
youtube.com/watch?v=bOgkGzMdieI
youtube.com/watch?v=xnqIj8C2Aek
youtube.com/watch?v=VggFao85vTs
youtube.com/watch?v=IfCOO7Z39j0
liveleak.com/view?i=aec_1508296335
youtube.com/watch?v=bX3EZCVj2XA
youtube.com/watch?v=b5tci36bNjg
youtube.com/watch?v=hvNNtBmA3SQ
youtube.com/watch?v=gwd_Iofr6ZQ
youtu.be/kPdxhLUKZYM?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe&t=412
youtube.com/watch?v=tPc899uUb-A
youtube.com/watch?v=Ae_WSV4n-u8
youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk
youtube.com/watch?v=PE56dcgGVMs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Nope, union troops refusing to leave southern territory caused the war.

no it was the Jews.

...

There is no one reason. In the end it doesn't matter. Only what we do now does.

No
lol even random polack from europe knows better then burger
You are retarted

...

lol way back when people thought hot countries couldn't be civilised

...

It had more to do with state rights within the government in general, slavery being one of those

union aggression caused the civil war

Overall it was certainly one of the biggest reasons for secession. However, it's not the way it's taught. Whitewashed history makes it out to be freedom-fighting northerners fighting evil slave-owning nazis in the south. In reality, the issue 99% of northerners had was that they didn't like the idea of the western territories becoming slave states, because being slave states would mean that those territories would be filled with niggers too.

Yeah, that's right. People were against slavery not because they cared about blacks, but because THEY DIDN'T WANT THEM IN THEIR SOCIETY. Think about it. The south is still very black, but back then like 50% of the population was slave niggers. Imagine living in that society. Would YOU want all this hyper-aggressive farm equipment prowling around? FUCK NO. That's the main issue northerners had.

Hell, look at the underground railroad. You want to know why the final destination was canada rather than just the northern states? BECAUSE NOBODY IN THE NORTH WANTED THEM AROUND. So they told them to take a fucking hike and passed the buck to canada or get deported back to the south. And Canadians were fucking pissed about the niggers being ferried into their country too, not unlike what happens with jewish NGO rescue boats bringing niggers from libya into europe today

It was the ONLY reason! Tear down those racist statues now!

>THEY DIDN'T WANT THEM IN THEIR SOCIETY

Complain about white washed history and proceed to make up some bullshit to fit your agenda

you can do better

>PRESERVE THE UNION, GOY!

youtube.com/watch?v=pcy7qV-BGF4

here you go senpai i know they dont teach this in the south but some good info here

He's mostly right. The abolitionist evangelicals of the north loved the darkies but they were always a obnoxious minority. Most northerners if they cared at all didn't want to compete with slave labor in the new territories.

Can't wait for the day of the rope where we remove you seditious niggers

yes but the south had a constitutional right to own slaves

>Most northerners if they cared at all didn't want to compete with slave labor in the new territories.

so the war WAS about slavery! Congrats Johnny

also the north was already more productive than the South even without slave labor

A states right to own a slave is a states right.

Productive in what way? Certainly not in cotton exports.

Food crops

I'm against slavery happening in the first place, because that's why niggers are here now. Very sad. Fucking Jews.

>implying Jews FORCED southern whites to buy slaves
White greed brought Jewish slavers to American shores. If land-owning whites had hired poor, honest whites a living wage to work their farms, we wouldn't have ANY niggers living here today. Stop shifting blame, it's pathetic

The South attacked a Union-held fortress. They attacked this fortress because they wanted new states to have slavery. Stop pretending the South's motivations weren't based upon Slavery.

>"African slavery as it exists among us—the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution." - Alexander Stevens, Confederate Vice President

Even the VP of the Confederacy says the civil war was about slavery. Fuck off.

Why did the south need new slave states in congress?

>blames it on whites AGAIN
That's a nice narrative, Rabbi. Be a shame if the goyim knew..

I never said anything about the civil war in my post, friend.

I just wrote an eight page paper on that! NO!

Yup. The egalitarian abolitionists were a tiny minority, and the reasoning the vast majority in the north had to be ant-nigger was because they didn't want niggers shitting up the west. Which is a totally valid worldview to have, and I agree with them.

IMO, abolition wasn't a mistake. Not sending them all back to africa was.

>The South attacked a Union-held fortress.
after a near unanimous decision to leave the union

>They attacked this fortress because they wanted new states to have slavery.
a right that was held up by the dred scott case in the supreme court.

>Stop pretending the South's motivations weren't based upon Slavery.
stop pretending that the south didn't have a reason to secede

Perhaps this will enlighten you

The american civil war was a war against the jewish libertarian capitalist southern traitors that fired on us at fort sumter and secceeded because like jewish libertarians they hate big governments and they saw abraham lincoln as a dictator.

Interesting...

>The South attacked a Union-held fortress. They attacked this fortress because they wanted new states to have slavery.
FALSE. *South Carolina* attacked a fedcuck fort to which Lincoln sent troops after a declaration of secession that cited the declaration of independence.

Literally ALL other fedcuck forts and holdings in SC were abandoned without ANY shots fired.

Yes. Jewish Slaveowners imported Africans and whites fought to keep them in chains because they didn't want to be treated as equals to their livestock.

The northerners didn't care since they were not going to have to live amongst them anyway ( for a while )

>being this retarded
Are you happy being a (((fedcuck))) faggot? How about that (((16th amendment))) of yours? You like getting fucked by jews?

Fucking serves you yankikes right that your society is so decadent and full of malaise and degeneracy.

Ooga booga go get shot in a concert polmutt

if so - it is indisputable that the Jews were the cause
if not - it is still indisputable if Jews were the cause, perhaps more indisputable

(wasted)
stop replying to bait, you drooling newfags

Federal Tyranny vs States Rights

>stop pretending that the south didn't have a reason to secede
I'm not. The South had a reason to secede. That reason was: to spread slavery to more states.

>DA SOUF NEVA ATTAKED FEDRUL FORTS IT WAS SOUF CAROLINA
>implying South Carolina isn't a part of the south
K

Freedom vs. Slavery

See? I can use gay buzzwords too, faggot

Nope the union jews wouldn't leave DIXIE alone.
And, still don't.

You're probably just baiting for a thread full of people flaming each other. But yes, slavery was by far the largest cause of the civil war.

WE do know

We have studied ur history jewboi

All from government approved ....BULLSHIT

It was a war of imperialist aggression by New England, especially Massachusetts.

Nope. It was Jewspapers, and Lincoln new it.

"“Gentlemen, after Boston, Chicago has been the chief instrument in bringing this war on the country. It is you who are largely responsible for making blood flow as it has. You called for war until we had it. You called for emancipation, and I have given it to you. Whatever you have asked, you have had. The Northwest has opposed the South as New England has opposed the South. Now you come here begging to be let off from the call for men which I have made to carry out the war you have demanded. You ought to be ashamed of yourself. I have a right to expect better things of you. Go home, and raise your 6,000 extra men. And you, [Joseph] Medill, are acting like a coward. You and your Tribune have had more influence any paper in the Northwest in making this war. You can influence great masses, and yet you cry to be spared at a moment when the cause is suffering. Go home and send us those men.”

BASED Reality there.
The force amendments are not only illegal but the blow-back on the jew union was not seen until it was too late.
Some day maybe the house will be declared in session...Again!

>implying South Carolina isn't a part of the south
Not implying. My state (NC) ONLY seceded after fedcucks attempted to conscript us into invading SC.
We didn't secede over slavery. Our secession was ENTIRELY States' Rights related (SC's right to secede).
TN, VA, and Arkansas agreed.

The following transcript is from Bill Still's documentary "Money Masters"
17.ABELINCOLNandtheCIVILWARUnfortunately,evenJacksonfailedtograsptheentirepictureanditsrootcause.AlthoughJacksonhadkilledtheprivatelyownedcentralbank,themostinsidiousweaponoftheMoneyChangersfractionalreservebankingremainedinusebythenumerousstate-charteredbanks.Forexample,LnMassachusettsby1862thestatebankshadloanedouteight{p.34}timesasmuchastheyhadgoldandsilverondeposit.Onestatebankhadissued$50,000backedbyatotalof$86.48.ThisfueledeconomicinstabilityintheyearsbeforetheCivilWar,particularlyasnoreserveratiosweremandatedformostofthestatebanks.

Yes and no. Although technically it was over states' rights, the issue of slavery was the single largest factor in what began the argument in the first place. You could say that the war over slavery had already begun years before 1861 what with all the shit in Kansas, Missouri, Harpers Ferry, and Pennsylvania.

yes because the southern states fought to enforce laws requiring states to prop up the slave trade all the way up until the war broke out.

the south loss due to a lack of trains and a supply routes

cool comic book when does superboy die??

Why was the south having to fight to enforce the law? Sounds to me like a broken system.

they had laws and legal arguments for years trying to get the states that boycotted slavery to let the slave trade back into every state, remember slavery was a business and one with influence back then too so they did everything up until the war to keep the southern slave trade propped up because they didnt mechanize as fast as the south due to them having the slave trade in the first place

as fast as the north*

If you read the "Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union," it essentially explains how the North had been violating the rights of the South for over a decade, with the election of Lincoln being the breaking point. The South believed that the North, by harboring and giving citizenship to fugitive slaves, were stuffing the ballot box, not unlike what the left does today with illegal aliens and prison convicts.

the south lost the war due to slavery because it hindered their tech advancement in lue of cheap labor

boy you live in a dream world where that happens right?

kinda, the south was outraged by lincolns moderate position of letting slave states keep slavery, but not allowing slavery to expand into the union states. So they threw a tism and got btfo by the north and lost slavery as punishment.

>ebil nazi confederates wanted to spread slavery to all states because they hated mighty capitalist industry.

Is this what Professor Shekelberg teaches in high school these days?

Only as an incidental setpiece. The true nature of the conflict was that democrats insisted they had the right to control the lives of other people.

She's only hot because of white features. Prove me wrong.

Fuck no. Anyone actually believing that are retarded and uneducated.

I will colonize all the black wombs.

Daily reminder that Sherman shouldn't have stopped at Savannah

are you a fucking tard they did it to protect their money. they didnt have trains like the north did and they didnt have mechanical factories until after the civil war but they did have a thriving agriculture/slave trade until states started boycotting slavery in general. thennnnnn they started trying to legislate laws in place that forced their trade in the states that boycotting and everything came to an impasse there and then the civil war sparked off. dont play dumb

>1 post by this ID
Nope.
youtube.com/watch?v=RPOnL-PZeCc

Yeah, interesting. "Slave Ship Owners" in google tells a little something about facts in the past.

The North waged an economic war on the south. Illegally, I might add.

Yes, anybody that says otherwise is playing "dindu nuffin" apologetics.

sounds like white flag flyer shilling for the actuality that the south threw a temper tantrum because they couldnt get their greedy hands in every state with their biggest industry

The South didn't want to spread slavery to Massachusetts. What a bizarre set of lies you have been told.

good fuck niggers
they will be enslaved and shackled once more
god willing

well...uhhh...hmmm..dammit i cant prove you wrong

No the main cause was black people wanting to be free, and then white society gets into a shitflinging contest. Southern states wanted control over slavery in theirs, and the protection to a court-approved slavery as property right when it escaped north. North didnt want to deal with it, and slave catchers potentially seizing free blacks from the north.

Should have sent them back to Africa.

...retard. Muh secession documents vs. objective reality.

yes they did, they wanted it in every state that they could get their hands on and when automation started off in the north the industry leaders in the south started panicking big time just before the war at the thought of losing a big part of their economy due to not being relevant anymore.

you're goofy if you think the south didnt do nuffin. stop feeding yourself pol facts and try a real school or book

the real reason is always a financial interests you dumbfucks.
southern states income was based on farming. there is only one way to increase an agriculture capital - to expand. thats the reason

You may read the ordinances of secession here:
civil-war.net/pages/ordinances_secession.asp

Here's the Arkansas one:
>AN ORDINANCE to dissolve the union now existing between the State of Arkansas and the other States united with her under the compact entitled "The Constitution of the United States of America."
>Whereas, in addition to the well-founded causes of complaint set forth by this convention, in resolutions adopted on the 11th of March, A.D. 1861, against the sectional party now in power in Washington City, headed by Abraham Lincoln, he has, in the face of resolutions passed by this convention pledging the State of Arkansas to resist to the last extremity any attempt on the part of such power to coerce any State that had seceded from the old Union, proclaimed to the world that war should be waged against such States until they should be compelled to submit to their rule, and large forces to accomplish this have by this same power been called out, and are now being marshaled to carry out this inhuman design; and to longer submit to such rule, or remain in the old Union of the United States, would be disgraceful and ruinous to the State of Arkansas
TRANSLATION: Arkansas ONLY seceded because Lincoln conscripted them and pledged to invade and terrorize the states that seceded. If you don't understand that, then reread it over and over again until a brain cell emerges in your void yankee skull

>t. brainwashed fedcuck degenerate
Stay in your lands. Your society is crumbling, as it deserves to. No compassion for fedcucks. They deserve leftism.

Alright you nigger cock slurping yeankees listen here for the truth the South seceded over slavery, but the war wasn't about slavery. Most people confuse the secession and war for being the same cause.

The south was afraid that lincoln would prohibit new slave territories and with more anti slave votes in the senate the Gov. would free the slaves. The south worried what would happen the next day what rights would they have the right to vote, marry whites, serve in the military/police. So the South cut the yankees off by seceding which the government at the time was ok with they thought it succession was better than war. Then the tyrant Lincoln got in power and forced the South into attacking by sending men back into South Carolina and rearming the fort. While telling the public that is was unarmed. The south seeing an armed Union fort over a major port moved in and began a siege to starve the soldiers out. Lincoln sent a ship to resupply the fort and the confederate navy had to fire warning shots against the Union ship. The confederate leaders knowing that the war began on the sea moved in on Fort Sumter and took it over bloodlessly hoping for a small chance that it wouldn't result in war. But alas Lincoln used this as justification to start the war claiming to be victims of Southern Aggression.

Most people don't understand how easy it is to make a country declare war on you. The US faked actions or forced other countries into declaring see the Mexican War, The Civil War, WW1, The Vietnam War, and the Iraq Invasion.

Lincoln himself said that "if I could end the war without freeing the slaves I would and If I could end the war and free the slaves I would." Ending slavery was never Lincoln goal keeping the country together was Lincoln's goal he mistakenly thought that the war was going to be easy. So he kept dragging himself deeper into war and got over 600,000 killed due to his arrogance.

It's about (((their))) globalist agenda. They want to run a prison planet of border-less, race-less, culture-less, identity-less, subdued sheep. They make up less than 1% of the world's population, yet look at all they control from the world's finances to the media that brainwashes us.

In short, they use the entertainment and news media to encourage globalism and to discourage nationalism and traditional western values. They distort and lie about the past and present in that effort.

The truth about immigration, by the numbers:
>youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE

Why people are afraid of the facts about the Jews:
>youtube.com/watch?v=-iU9kf2EHJw

Cultural Marxist Jews Admit Organizing White Genocide

The plan to eliminate the white race:
>youtube.com/watch?v=bOgkGzMdieI

Cultural Marxism & Social Justice explained:
>youtube.com/watch?v=xnqIj8C2Aek

Why are we in decline - Cultural Marxism:
>youtube.com/watch?v=VggFao85vTs

The Jewish role in the refugee crisis:
>youtube.com/watch?v=IfCOO7Z39j0

White Genocide is real - In their own words
>liveleak.com/view?i=aec_1508296335

Leftist subversion explained by former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov:
>youtube.com/watch?v=bX3EZCVj2XA

also see

The facts about slavery in North America:
>youtube.com/watch?v=b5tci36bNjg

Cultural Marxist Jews fund media propaganda against whites on an enormous scale:
>youtube.com/watch?v=hvNNtBmA3SQ

The Jewish role in the porn industry:
>youtube.com/watch?v=gwd_Iofr6ZQ

Does this sound familiar at all? (starting at 6:52)
>youtu.be/kPdxhLUKZYM?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe&t=412

The Holocaust:
>youtube.com/watch?v=tPc899uUb-A
>youtube.com/watch?v=Ae_WSV4n-u8
>youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk
>youtube.com/watch?v=PE56dcgGVMs

It was about the economic implications of slavery rather than because "dey wuz ebul wacists." Everybody was still racist, but everybody always knew the ethical implications of slavery, the North didn't need a bunch of low IQ niggers in a new industrialized America and it probably profited them more than having slaves because they were unemployable.

The south's economy was still completely dependent upon farming, and the north was a big enough hit to their economy that it caused them to try and leave the union.

Which, I mean, isn't really wrong is it? If states agree to a union should they not be able to leave it?

>Nice sources
>Not an argument
Did you even watch the vid?

>hey didnt have trains like the north did
>What is Atlanta
Where'd you go to school, boy? I need to meet your "teacher".

>prove my opinion wrong